Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 11:09 PM Dec 2015

Top NYT editor calls San Bernardino social media report 'a really big mistake'

Source: CNNMoney

December 18, 2015: 3:16 PM ET

The executive editor of The New York Times says his paper's erroneous report on the San Bernardino terrorists' social media use was "a really big mistake," and would cause the Times to reconsider its use of anonymous sources.

"More than anything since I've become editor it does make me think we need to do something about how we handle anonymous sources," Dean Baquet told Margaret Sullivan, the Times' public editor, on Friday. "This was a system failure that we have to fix."

The report, which appeared on the front page of the Sunday edition, claimed that Tashfeen Malik had "talked openly on social media about her views on violent jihad," and that these postings had gone "uncovered" by American law enforcement authorities.

The Times was forced to revise its report on Thursday after FBI Director James Comey told reporters that both Malik and her husband, Syed Farook, never posted publicly on social media about their views, but had instead communicated via "direct, private messages." Comey dismissed the Times report as inaccurate "garble."

Read more: http://money.cnn.com/2015/12/18/media/new-york-times-mistake-san-bernardino/index.html?sr=twCNN121915/new-york-times-mistake-san-bernardino/index.html%200257AMStoryLink&linkId=19720366



6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
1. President Obama may have had a hand in this remarkable confession:
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 11:14 PM
Dec 2015
President Obama also appeared to address the report during a press conference on Friday. "The issue of reviewing social media for those who are obtaining visas, I think may have gotten garbled a little bit," Obama said. "It's important to distinguish between posts that are public... versus private communications."


LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
2. Imagine what a Repug would have said - making it up as they go along with no reprisal
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 11:17 PM
Dec 2015

more applause for Pres. Obama

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
3. Here's the baloney front page story
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 11:31 PM
Dec 2015

The article is way above the fold, basically the leading story of the day:

None uncovered what
Ms. Malik had made little effort
to hide — that she talked openly
on social media about her views
on violent jihad.

She said she supported it. And
she said she wanted to be a part
of it.


American law enforcement officials
said they recently discovered
those old — and previously
unreported — postings as they
pieced together the lives of Ms.
Malik and her husband, Syed Rizwan
Farook, trying to understand
how they pulled off the deadliest
terrorist attack on American soil
since Sept. 11, 2001.


http://www.nytimes.com/images/2015/12/13/nytfrontpage/scan.pdf



The miracle is that they got caught.

LuckyLib

(6,817 posts)
4. So much for top notch investigative original reporting. Not!
Sat Dec 19, 2015, 12:28 AM
Dec 2015

The real media in this country is simply gone. Poof!

PSPS

(13,580 posts)
6. It didn't stop the media, including Diane Rehm, from stating it as a fact even after its retraction
Sat Dec 19, 2015, 02:33 AM
Dec 2015
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Top NYT editor calls San ...