Chen Guangcheng, now in U.S., poised to play role in yet another abortion debate
Source: Washington Post
Conservatives are seizing on the high-profile story of Chen Guangcheng, the blind Chinese activist who recently arrived in the United States, hoping that the spotlight on his human rights work will bolster their efforts to curb abortions domestically and in China.
Antiabortion groups, including National Right to Life and the Susan B. Anthony List, are highlighting Chens work exposing forced abortions and sterilizations in China in hopes it will help them with their current priority in the United States, passing legislation banning abortions performed because of a childs gender. Chens plight also has led congressional Republicans to plan hearings this summer on the one-child policy.
Mitt Romneys presidential campaign is citing Chens work in its critique of President Obamas record on human rights. Particularly, Romneys campaign officials argue Obama has been weak on the one-child rule, Chinas much-publicized population control measure, which has been criticized as an under-recognized human rights abuse.
The political posturing highlights the minefield that awaits Chen, who has remained largely out of the public eye since arriving in the United States this month. China agreed to Chens departure after tense, month-long negotiations between the two countries.
Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/chen-guangcheng-now-in-us-poised-to-play-role-in-yet-another-abortion-debate/2012/05/29/gJQARTuJzU_singlePage.html
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)What MORANS
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)Such practices run counter to the whole idea of being pro-choice, that it is the woman's choice, not the government's choice.
They can't help but be stupid it seems.
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)for jumping the gun on diplomatic negotiations when he criticized Obama for failing to secure Chen's release by China?
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)GOP is simply going to encourage firms doing business with China to donate to Dem SuperPacs.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Oh, right. They don't. They're just trying to make it harder for anyone to get one.
Plus, there are a few legitimate reasons for gender-based abortion, specifically in the case of a fatal genetic defect that would affect (usually) males but not females.
joshcryer
(62,265 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)like that. I feel sorry for him because these nut jobs are crazier than crazy.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)the dopes are marching. Chen may well want absolutely nothing to do with these dolts and say so.
magic59
(429 posts)making their fortunes in a country that supports mass abortions. Conservatives are only interested in being rich at any cost, their abortion ploy is just to get religious fanatics to vote for them.