New Poll: Sanders Moves Ahead Of Clinton In Iowa
Source: Talking Points Memo
Sen. Bernie Sanders (D-VT) has moved into the lead in Iowa over former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, according to polling conducted by the American Research Group released Monday.
The polls showed Sanders support at 47 percent to Clintons 44 percent. Sanders held the same 47-44 lead over Clinton in a separate ARG poll of New Hampshire also released Monday.
In Iowa, where Clinton has mostly led in the polls, this is the first recent poll to place Sanders in the lead. This is the first ARG poll of the Iowa Democratic primary this cycle. Most polls taken throughout the fall have put him ahead in New Hampshire by a narrow margin. The last ARG poll of New Hampshire, Dec. 23, showed Clinton leading Sanders 46-43.
Nationwide polls give Clinton a comfortable lead, though closer now than in the summer when Sanders first surged. In Iowa and New Hampshire, however, Sanders has done better than nationally.
The Iowa poll surveyed 400 likely Democratic caucus-goers from January 6-10, with a margin of error of +/- 5%. Both were conducted using live telephone interviews. The New Hampshire ARG poll surveyed 600 likely Democratic voters from January 7-10, with a martin of error of +/- 4%.
Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/polltracker/arg-january-dems-iowa-nh
The second set of recent polls (in addition to the recent NBC/Marist polls) that show momentum is moving in Sanders' favor...can you feel it?
Uponthegears
(1,499 posts)that while Hillary has been beating the bushes for endorsements, Bernie has been out beating the bushes for VOTERS.
Good news.
sarge43
(29,173 posts)was talking with the voters about issues and problems. Funny how that works.
Bernin' it up.
Response to pangaia (Reply #3)
Plucketeer This message was self-deleted by its author.
Americans are deciding we need the CHANGE that BO only ever gave lip service to - a strategy that HRC has been replicating after having felt it's sting in '08. Sorry Hill - dumb bombs are now passe! We've got these new armaments called TRUTH & INTEGRITY. They eclipse desperately lobbed bombs like you won't believe - like you DON'T believe!
earthside
(6,960 posts)This was part of Mrs. Clinton's undoing in 2008, too.
The Clinton campaign uses these endorsements like a club ready to strike: get on board or else!
A lot of average caucus attendees and primary voters who are engaged enough to be involved have a natural reaction against this "you'll be left out and then where will you be?" approach.
Clinton uses endorsements to implant fear in voters; Sanders uses endorsements that come his way as messages of hope.
Endorsements can be helpful, especially if they come from grassroots or populist-type organizations.
Endorsements that smack of insider elites helping each other, like the Planned Parenthood Action Fund, tend to actually hurt, in my estimation.
The Sanders campaign is doing the endorsement thing just about right; Hillary, as usual, is doing it wrong and the polls are now showing it.
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)Even just the appearance of devaluing any part of the process can hurt. Support has to look unforced, organic, imo.
So, yeah, what you wrote about "a natural reaction against this" could be a driving force here. We'll see, and pretty soon.
jonno99
(2,620 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Thanks for that perspective.
elmac
(4,642 posts)No, but it sure makes for a very interesting Primary run. Will support who ever makes it to the end, any Dem is far, far better then a fascist pig republican.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)I would guess the Clinton campaign polling knew this would or was happening for a long time.
Hang in there Bernie. Stick to your guns and keep your cool !
INdemo
(7,024 posts)by Sanders? If the Clinton campaign wants to start throwing dirt(I have different noun to use)
There is plenty out there using Hillary's own words and all those "I was for it before I was against it" speeches to show.
There are those that don't want to remember all those negatives the Clinton(Bill) campaign tried against Obama.How did that work out for Hillary?
pangaia
(24,324 posts)--maybe also I should not have said 'stick to your guns."
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)I took no offense by it!
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)I'd rather wait to see what the Feb 1 polls say.
Hopefully the enthusiasm is real and very deep.
INdemo
(7,024 posts)i think its real though. I would like to see a poll with about 1000(+) samplings
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)They were specifically polling Iowans. Typical questions
Those results should be coming out very shortly. Their methodology seems very sound.
INdemo
(7,024 posts)I just have a very positive feeling about Iowa
closeupready
(29,503 posts)Go Bernie!!!
K&R
ucrdem
(15,720 posts)NBC, 9 pm ET.
INdemo
(7,024 posts)Last edited Tue Jan 12, 2016, 01:04 PM - Edit history (2)
more "shit" that wont stick?
jonno99
(2,620 posts)Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)reveals her blonde locks have been straightened, we'll know she's been pulling at them in frustration.
jonno99
(2,620 posts)joeybee12
(56,177 posts)So tired of Bernie's one-note campaign.
Duval
(4,280 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)According to this ARG poll, Bernie is beating Clinton with Iowa Independents by 14 points.
This is incredibly significant. Independents are the largest voting block in Iowa (42 percent of all Iowa registered voters).
It is routine in Iowa that Independents change their registration on caucus night (easily done in ten minutes, on-site before the caucus).
If Bernie is beating Clinton by 14% with Independents, this is a huge advantage in our state, and in the caucuses.
----------------------------
Likely Democratic Caucus-Goers
--------------------------------------Democrats (88%) No party (12%)
Clinton-------------------------------46%-----------------------30%
Sanders------------------------------46%-----------------------54%
Samantha
(9,314 posts)although the MSM failed to mention that for some reason.
But the numbers you report indicate that indeed is what is happening. The question remaining is by what margin will this happen. I am indeed feeling the Bern. Thanks for the info.
Sam
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)was discussed on Sunday night when Bernie met with the precinct captains. Bernie specifically asked us about Republicans and Indies and how they were responding on the phone and what they're comments were. Many chimed in to say that many Indies and some Rs were supporting Sanders.
There is definite cross-over appeal.
My favorite current challenge is a Republican in my precinct who still has a Fred Thompson bumper sticker on his car. He's always participated in the Iowa Republican caucuses, but this year he is aghast at the clown car his party is offering. He is incredibly traumatized and saddened and he said to me, "At least Bernie is honest. Bernie is a straight shooter. I may, for the first time ever caucus with the Democrats."
I am currently working on him, but treading lightly because he's truly in pain. I'm probably going to invite him and his wife for coffee and do a whole lot of listening. He's in my precinct and lives near me. One vote at a time...
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)That is significant and could translate into larger shift towards Sanders when the votes are actually cast!
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)This day just keeps getting better and better!
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Great news on top of the MoveOn endorsement!
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Great news!
AzDar
(14,023 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)raindaddy
(1,370 posts)dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)This isnt going to help her with people who already doubt her sincerity - -
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hillary-clinton-calls-spirited-debate-bernie-sanders-race/story?id=36223002
raindaddy
(1,370 posts)Thanks of the link!
dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)Im just channeling my inner beatnik
pnwmom
(110,255 posts)There are many pollsters rated A and A-. This one shouldn't be relied on no matter what your point of view.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/interactives/pollster-ratings/
Aside from that issue, the poll doesn't indicate a lead. Because the results are within the reported margin of error, it indicates a tie.
He could be doing better?!
pnwmom
(110,255 posts)anything within the margin of error is a tie -- and nothing done by ARG should be take seriously in the first place.
ejbr
(5,892 posts)then indeed he could be doing better than whatever they are reporting.
pnwmom
(110,255 posts)ARG isn't reliable.
ejbr
(5,892 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)its shows favorability towards Bernie so its not to be taken seriously.
You all make me Laugh,
Pointing finger and rolling in the floor laughing my ass off, LOL
pnwmom
(110,255 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)538 didn't do such a stellar job the last time around either.
I like the you pick and chose who is and who isn't to be taken seriously. To the point I have to laugh, LOL
pnwmom
(110,255 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,568 posts)Since she was ahead in 2008 and lost to Obama. ARG has a reputation of getting things wrong.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Matthew28
(1,859 posts)Sanders would be a far more serious candidate with taking on the super rich and on economic issues. He also beats Trump in the general!
randys1
(16,286 posts)that what ALL of this comes down to?