HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Bernie Sanders And Elizab...

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 09:39 PM

Bernie Sanders And Elizabeth Warren May Have Just Saved Consumers $14 Billion

Source: Huffington Post

WASHINGTON -- Cable customers who are tired of paying through the nose to rent set-top boxes are about to see some serious savings, thanks to a new proposal from the Federal Communications Commission.

The new regulation would open up the set-top box market to consumer choice so that customers could rent or buy devices from providers other than their cable companies. About 99 percent of cable customers currently rent set-top boxes from their cable company. According to a survey commissioned by Sens. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), cable customers pay an average of $232 a year for those rentals -- a $20 billion market annually, just for set-top box rentals.
...
Cable companies and their lobbyists are furious about the plan, which the commission is set to vote on Feb. 18. But the proposal didn't emerge from a vacuum. Liberal senators have been pressuring the FCC to act on cable "monopolies" for months. In July, current Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) organized a letter calling on the agency to collect a host of consumer pricing information from cable companies -- a move designed to show that in many regions of the country, households pay arbitrarily high prices due to a lack of other cable options. Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Al Franken (D-Minn.), Markey and Blumenthal all signed on to the letter.

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/fcc-proposal-cable-tv-boxes_us_56aa781ae4b05e4e3703b26e



Way to go Bernie and Elizabeth!! (though we have to wait for Feb 18th vote to really celebrate)

82 replies, 8485 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 82 replies Author Time Post
Reply Bernie Sanders And Elizabeth Warren May Have Just Saved Consumers $14 Billion (Original post)
Jarqui Jan 2016 OP
jfern Jan 2016 #1
Divernan Jan 2016 #4
retrowire Jan 2016 #2
elmac Jan 2016 #5
LittleGirl Jan 2016 #43
nxylas Jan 2016 #52
LittleGirl Jan 2016 #53
George II Jan 2016 #21
draa Jan 2016 #26
George II Jan 2016 #29
draa Jan 2016 #32
George II Jan 2016 #33
draa Jan 2016 #35
George II Jan 2016 #36
Jenny_92808 Jan 2016 #59
George II Jan 2016 #64
SunSeeker Jan 2016 #34
rhett o rick Jan 2016 #55
George II Jan 2016 #61
rhett o rick Jan 2016 #67
George II Jan 2016 #68
rhett o rick Jan 2016 #56
George II Jan 2016 #62
rhett o rick Jan 2016 #66
George II Jan 2016 #69
rhett o rick Jan 2016 #70
George II Jan 2016 #71
rhett o rick Jan 2016 #72
George II Jan 2016 #73
rhett o rick Jan 2016 #74
George II Jan 2016 #75
rhett o rick Jan 2016 #76
George II Jan 2016 #79
Jenny_92808 Jan 2016 #60
George II Jan 2016 #63
Unknown Beatle Jan 2016 #45
retrowire Jan 2016 #46
elmac Jan 2016 #3
Jackilope Jan 2016 #6
jfern Jan 2016 #8
christx30 Jan 2016 #12
Unknown Beatle Jan 2016 #47
George II Jan 2016 #7
7962 Jan 2016 #11
George II Jan 2016 #14
Duval Jan 2016 #23
FreedomRain Jan 2016 #57
George II Jan 2016 #65
George II Jan 2016 #81
rhett o rick Jan 2016 #77
George II Jan 2016 #80
rhett o rick Jan 2016 #82
Hoyt Jan 2016 #9
FlatBaroque Jan 2016 #10
George II Jan 2016 #13
blackspade Jan 2016 #15
joshcryer Jan 2016 #16
onehandle Jan 2016 #17
Jarqui Jan 2016 #18
wildbilln864 Jan 2016 #20
George II Jan 2016 #22
Jarqui Jan 2016 #27
George II Jan 2016 #31
napi21 Jan 2016 #28
Duval Jan 2016 #24
pattymcq Jan 2016 #19
Duval Jan 2016 #25
fbc Jan 2016 #30
senz Jan 2016 #38
TexasBushwhacker Jan 2016 #37
mrmpa Jan 2016 #44
Mr. Evil Jan 2016 #39
senz Jan 2016 #40
WillyT Jan 2016 #41
avaistheone1 Jan 2016 #42
mountain grammy Jan 2016 #48
bigbrother05 Jan 2016 #50
mountain grammy Jan 2016 #51
bigbrother05 Jan 2016 #49
ChiciB1 Jan 2016 #54
Dont call me Shirley Jan 2016 #58
Politicub Jan 2016 #78

Response to Jarqui (Original post)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 09:44 PM

1. Oh sure, but just think if Hillary had sent a tweet telling them to "cut it out"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jfern (Reply #1)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 09:49 PM

4. Yup. That never worked with Bill either!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Original post)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 09:47 PM

2. And if Bernie is elected president,

I think we can look to much more of this!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to retrowire (Reply #2)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 09:52 PM

5. Yep, we need open access to cable

 

like they have in Europe, competition is the only answer.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to elmac (Reply #5)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 03:17 PM

43. I wish

we have two providers at our location in Europe and they may be cheaper than the states but they all suck.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LittleGirl (Reply #43)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 05:22 PM

52. Virgin Media has a virtual monopoly here in the UK

I think they have something like 95% of the cable market.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to nxylas (Reply #52)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 05:28 PM

53. Thought so. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to retrowire (Reply #2)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:28 PM

21. Too bad it wasn't initiated by Sanders or Warren, but by Blumenthal and Markey.

Funny how that always works for Sanders - let others do the work and then take credit for it.

Follower, not a leader.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #21)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:38 PM

26. And yet your example of a leader

got almost 5000 American soldiers killed. Hmmm...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to draa (Reply #26)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:52 PM

29. How do you figure that? I think you should review history again, sir......

...and I don't know what that has to do with cable television. Care to explain?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #29)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:00 AM

32. If you support Clinton then you'd better check history.

You're the one spouting off about leadership. As far as a cable company who gives a shit. It has nothing to do with leadership but even if it did Clinton's not fit to run one of those either.

She supported the Iraq War with Bush and Cheney. There's no running from that. And no, as a veteran myself an apology means shit as far as what she voted for. She will still have to answer for that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to draa (Reply #32)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:15 AM

33. Once again, nothing to do with the subject at hand. But Sanders took the easy way out....

.....as demonstrated by his votes since the start of the Iraq war, he was "against" it, yet he voted consistently with the republicans to fund that war. Yeah, I know the litany is that "well, we had to support the troops over there", but if we didn't fund the war then the troops would have been withdrawn.

So, how do you draw the connection between cable television set top boxes and the war in Iraq? Does Comcast have the Baghdad cable television franchise?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #33)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:45 AM

35. In the discussion we're currently in you had no point.

Even the Blumenthal/Mularkey comment you made was meant to be an insult to Sanders. Then you mentioned leadership, not me.

Your comment below, at 8:54pm would have been a good discussion. Instead you spouted something about Sanders' leadership like Clinton's is somehow better. It's not and Clinton's vote for the Iraq War proves it.

You'll deny and put another up comment trying to tell me why. It doesn't matter so save your time. I didn't read the one I'm replying to because I don't fucking care. I've heard it all and it's still doesn't change my mind or her vote. eom

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to draa (Reply #35)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:57 AM

36. The subject initiative is Blumenthal's and Markey's*. Attributing it to Sanders "had no point"....

....

*By the way, it's MARKEY, no your blatantly offensive "Mularkey"! In a nutshell, that says a lot. Thanks for playing tonight.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #36)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 10:08 PM

59. Leave

 

You are so wrong it makes me wonder if you are trolling.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jenny_92808 (Reply #59)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 11:01 PM

64. Excuse me?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #21)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:39 AM

34. LOL. Thanks for the facts. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #21)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 09:15 PM

55. When HRC had her chance to be a leader she failed terribly. When George Bush ask her to FOLLOW him

 

into Iraq, she said sure George and I will give a speech to get other Democrats to ditch their principles and FOLLOW you Republicons.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #55)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 10:49 PM

61. What does that have to do with cable television boxes?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #61)

Sat Jan 30, 2016, 01:04 AM

67. Maybe if I speak slower you will understand. You disparaged Sen Sanders for not being a leader

 

and I just wanted to point out that your idol didn't lead when the chips were down. She acquiesced to the worst President we've ever had.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #67)

Sat Jan 30, 2016, 01:20 AM

68. Speak (or type) as slowly as you'd like. I didn't "disparage" Sanders, I pointed out the truth.

And I don't have "idols" in politics, I have candidates who I believe will do better jobs than others. Those for whom I feel that way have proven their capabilities over the years.

Now, can we get back to cable boxes?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #21)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 09:16 PM

56. Are you disparaging Elizabeth Warren as well as Sanders? nm

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #56)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 10:51 PM

62. I'm giving credit where credit is due - to the two Senators who really got this started....

....Senators Blumenthal and Markey.

I like Warren a lot, and I think she'll be a great asset in President Clinton's cabinet.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #62)

Sat Jan 30, 2016, 01:02 AM

66. No you are not. You disparage Sanders for not "leading" but give Warren a pass.

 

I doubt that Senator Warren will be bought by the Wealthy 1% that you worship.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #66)

Sat Jan 30, 2016, 01:22 AM

69. And where do you get the idea that I "worship" the wealthy 1%? Remember, if the candidate that....

....you worship were to win the Presidency, he would be instantly catapulted into the 1% himself. Unless, of course, he does the job without pay.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #69)

Sat Jan 30, 2016, 01:32 AM

70. You need to check your math. Your idol is worth $50,000,000. She accumulated that

 

in less than 15 years. What a slap in the face of honest, hard working Americans struggling to make ends meet. Sanders will never reach that level of wealth.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #70)

Sat Jan 30, 2016, 01:35 AM

71. Again with the "idol" stuff. If nothing else, you are persistent!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #71)

Sat Jan 30, 2016, 11:06 AM

72. It's the only reason I can think of for people to choose to side with her and Goldman-Sachs

 

over the 99%. Clinton is clearly embroiled in the corrupt Big Money controlled government. She has earned (?) 50 million dollars by working the system, playing the game. She is not the one to lead us out of this horrendous wealth hole that she pretends. There is nothing to stop the financial institutions from having another crash. They jointly made 5 trillion dollars the last time and I don't think Clinton wants to reel them in. Why should she. She and Bill have gotten enormous wealth from this culture.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #72)

Sat Jan 30, 2016, 11:09 AM

73. You're the person who claimed my $700 a week bank-teller sister was a "bankster", so....

.....I'm never surprised with anything you say anymore.

If only you worked as hard for your candidate as you do insulting DUers, perhaps Sanders would have a chance in these primaries.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #73)

Sat Jan 30, 2016, 11:21 AM

74. I never claimed such a thing. I was referring to those execs that get huge bonus

 

and are glad to share them with politicians. Does your sister even work for Goldman-Sachs?

I am working very hard for Sanders, handing out flyers, making calls and going door to door. I see this as a do or die campaign. Let the Conservative Wing of our Party continue the status quo will bring more deaths from poverty, unfair incarceration, and killings in the streets. If I insult fellow Democrats it's because I am frustrated that Democrats would choose Goldman-Sachs over helping the poor. Don't you understand if we keep the status quo and let Goldman-Sachs have influence in the WH that things will continue to get worse? H. Clinton is very invested in accumulating massive wealth and that doesn't coincide with helping the poor, working and middle classes. She doesn't want to raise the cap on SS, she doesn't want to help college students in debt, she doesn't want to stop fracking, didn't want same sex marriage until pushed into it, did want the TPP until she didn't.

This is a class war and H. Clinton with her $50,000,000 and close relationship with Goldman-Sachs, isn't on our side.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #74)

Sat Jan 30, 2016, 11:28 AM

75. Yes you did, when I pointed out how many people in New York have "ties" to banks simply because...

...it's such a huge industry in NY, and just about every family has at least one member who at one time worked for a bank.

I mentioned that several family members of mine worked for banks at less than "executive" positions, including my sister who was a teller and myself who worked as a computer operator in a bank data center (that's what they were called back in the 1980s) for a cople of years. You said I must be proud of my "family of banksters".

Insulting DUers that you don't know and never met seems to be something you do often (you even admit it above)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #75)

Sat Jan 30, 2016, 11:39 AM

76. You are clearly thinking of someone else. nm

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #76)

Sat Jan 30, 2016, 11:42 AM

79. No, when someone say something that offensive (and false) about a person's family, I remember.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #21)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 10:21 PM

60. Try again

 

"Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) organized a letter calling on the agency to collect a host of consumer pricing information from cable companies -- a move designed to show that in many regions of the country, households pay arbitrarily high prices due to a lack of other cable options. Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Al Franken (D-Minn.), Markey and Blumenthal all signed on to the letter."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jenny_92808 (Reply #60)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 10:56 PM

63. Selective excerpt....how about the rest of the article? Here:

"According to a survey commissioned by Sens. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), cable customers pay an average of $232 a year for those rentals -- a $20 billion market annually, just for set-top box rentals."

Then your excerpt, where Sanders followed Markey's and Blumenthal's lead, which went nowhere. Resulting in this:

"After Markey and Blumenthal did their own pricing survey in July, they organized another letter to the FCC in November, specifically targeting set-top boxes. Sanders, Warren and Franken all signed on, as did Sens. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), Corey Booker (D-N.J.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.). "

So you see, Markey and Blumenthal got the ball rolling, Sanders ran with the ball but sadly fumbled it, causing Blumenthal and Markey to pick up the ball and continue the effort.

I read the ENTIRE article.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to retrowire (Reply #2)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 04:16 PM

45. Hey, wait a minute,

it's not if Bernie is elected president, it's when Bernie is elected president.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Unknown Beatle (Reply #45)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 04:20 PM

46. You right! nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Original post)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 09:48 PM

3. Good for consumers

 

& good for box makers. Another chip from the cable monopolies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Original post)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 09:52 PM

6. $$ shelled out for cable is outrageous as it is

Where I live there is very little competition. One could drop cable for Direct or Dish, but from what I've heard, they start you out with a low rate for a few years then increase the price.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jackilope (Reply #6)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 09:55 PM

8. There's really basically no competition if you want anything faster than 20 Mbps down

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jackilope (Reply #6)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:07 PM

12. And they lock you into a contract

so it costs like $200 to switch to another provider if you aren't happy. And they charge for trouble calls.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jackilope (Reply #6)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 04:27 PM

47. You're right about what you write.

I have Direct TV, and I had to sign a two year contract. The first year it's very affordable, but the second year, which I'm currently on, is very expensive. They nickle and dime you for everything, plus the rentals for the set top boxes and it ballooned to a little over a hundred bucks a month, and my wife and I only watch about ten channels regularly.

If this passes into law, then by all means, I would continue with one of the dish or the only cable company in town. It would be very affordable then.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Original post)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 09:54 PM

7. Amazing projection!

From the article, it was Senators Markey and Blumenthal who commissioned the survey and got this going.

As usual, coat-tailing someone else's work, Sanders jumped on it and "organized" a letter which was signed by him, Markey, Blumenthal, Franken, and Warren. That letter merely called for the FCC to gather pricing information. Of course he just asked the FCC to gather information, he did nothing substantive.

And, you conveniently failed to post this excerpt from the article, which is what is REALLY prompting the FCC to act further:

"After Markey and Blumenthal did their own pricing survey in July, they organized another letter to the FCC in November, specifically targeting set-top boxes. Sanders, Warren and Franken all signed on, as did Sens. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), Corey Booker (D-N.J.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.)."

So why is it that only Sanders and Warren get credit for this?

Blumenthal is my Senator, and he gets ALL the credit for anything that is accomplished. Sanders, in both cases, is simply following Blumenthal's and Markey's lead and piggy-backing on their work. Once again, Sanders demonstrates that he's a follower, not a leader.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #7)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:06 PM

11. It appears he shouldnt count on your vote

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 7962 (Reply #11)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:09 PM

14. Well, if he had a record of accomplishment I might have considered him, but he doesn't.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 7962 (Reply #11)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:31 PM

23. Ya' think? eom

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #7)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 09:54 PM

57. you cant get mad at someone for signing on to a good idea

what's the point of that?

Give credit to those 2 that started it, give credit to the rest who used their power and influence to get it done.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreedomRain (Reply #57)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 11:02 PM

65. Yes, he signed on to a good idea (which wasn't his in the first place), his effort failed, so....

....the original two Senators had to pursue it further to get any action from the FCC.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreedomRain (Reply #57)

Sat Jan 30, 2016, 11:45 AM

81. That's what I've done - I give credit to Blumenthal and Markey for getting it started....

...and again to Blumenthal and Markey for keeping it going after Sanders' effort stalled.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #7)

Sat Jan 30, 2016, 11:41 AM

77. So I assume you think that Sen Warren is also a follower and not a leader. nm

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #77)

Sat Jan 30, 2016, 11:44 AM

80. Elizabeth Warren isn't running for President by taking credit for the efforts....

....of everyone around here over the decades.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #80)

Sat Jan 30, 2016, 11:46 AM

82. I asked about leadership and you carefully avoided the question. You are quick to disparage

 

Sen Sanders but carefully don't hold Sen Warren to the same standard.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Original post)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 09:56 PM

9. Another Obama appointee does the right thing as he did with net neutrality.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Original post)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:04 PM

10. The thought of E Warren and Bernie working in tandem

sends chills ...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Reply #10)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:08 PM

13. Too bad it was Blumenthal and Markey who did all the work.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Original post)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:23 PM

15. This would potentially result in a tremendous amount of savings.

I have thus far refused to 'upgrade' to a DVR to the tune of $10 extra a month.
$6/mo is plenty for the one I already have.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Original post)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:25 PM

16. No love for Wheeler?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Original post)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:30 PM

17. Hillary has been working with Senator Sanders and Senator Warren for years.

It's going to be great when President Hillary Clinton continues that work with them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onehandle (Reply #17)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:32 PM

18. She has indeed



Do we get to look forward to more of that with President Hillary?

They're going to be knocking heads over Wall Street who have bought Hillary until at least 2020.

No Glass-Steagall for Elizabeth and Bernie. Hillary is against that.

But if Bernie is president, he and Elizabeth are on the same page for bankruptcy, Glass-Steagall, too -big-to-fail and Wall Street reform.

Like the top of this thread, they have proven to work together well. No problems.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Reply #18)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:01 PM

20. thank you! n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Reply #18)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:29 PM

22. What/where was Elizabeth Warren in 2004?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #22)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:39 PM

27. She became a lawyer and professor that

started to get into bankruptcy in the 80s. She did some advisory stuff in the 90s on bankruptcy. In the mid 90s, she wound up at Harvard law school until she became a senator in 2012. She started to get published and well known. She was trying to fight the passage of that bankruptcy bill in 2004 in an activist role (I think - I'm not positive on all of the above - it's the gist).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Reply #27)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:57 PM

31. In 2004 she was only a few years removed from being a republican. Talk about "camp weathervane"!!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #22)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:43 PM

28. Teaching at the College I presume. She wasn't a Senator for sure! nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Reply #18)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:33 PM

24. Thanks Jarqui.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onehandle (Reply #17)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:49 PM

19. 👍

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Original post)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:34 PM

25. Bernie and Elizabeth make a winning pair.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Original post)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:56 PM

30. That explains why Comcast is pouring so much money into Clinton's campaign.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fbc (Reply #30)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 01:44 AM

38. Yep. Clinton represents the oligarchs --

 

everything Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders rail against.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Original post)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 01:42 AM

37. I remember having to rent our PHONE n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TexasBushwhacker (Reply #37)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 04:14 PM

44. I do too.............

we had two phones in the house. One in the kitchen and one in my parents bedroom. Just about the day you didn't have to rent it anymore, my folks bought 2 new phones and installed them. The rented ones were returned to the phone company.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Original post)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 01:45 AM

39. This is so such a good thing!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Original post)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 01:51 AM

40. Bernie got the entire process started. Good show of leadership! Great results!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Original post)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 10:44 AM

41. HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!!

 


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Original post)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 02:21 PM

42. Just another amazing day at the office for Bernie and Elizabeth.

 

They are both awesome. Truly.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Original post)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 05:19 PM

48. I don't care about a VP pick from a different region.

I think a Sanders/Warren ticket is a sure winner.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mountain grammy (Reply #48)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 05:21 PM

50. He's from Brooklyn, she's from OKC, so problem solved

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bigbrother05 (Reply #50)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 05:22 PM

51. Yep, forgot about that.. Problem solved.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Original post)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 05:19 PM

49. Imagine owing a box that worked with any cable/satellite system

that could be upgraded or used apps to improve. Maybe have built in wifi to access Netflix, etc and a DVR function that would let you chose or enhance your storage capacity. Can see Roku making a big move in this area as well as the Google/Amazon/Apple/MS folks. Would be nice to have capability to plug in added hard drives or wireless to a personal cloud server.

Downloading content off cycle for later viewing or local sharing would be great as well and help level internet loads.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Original post)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 08:25 PM

54. Unfortunately This Is A HUGE Reason Why TPTB

are fighting so hard to keep Bernie from becoming POTUS! You try to make people understand this kind of power and WHY we need to fight the STATUS QUO, of which Hillary is entrenched with, and many here just don't understand this. Or, for whatever other reason they have to look the other way about this, it baffles me.

So many things are in the hands of these Corporations and Wall Street, you can list a long list, but POWER is determined to keep POWER. We have an opening to begin to have our voices heard and let them know that running a country that's basically already an Oligarchy that we've had ENOUGH!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Original post)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 09:57 PM

58. Cable, Internet and phone prices need to go down, while quality needs to go up. Let's join the rest

of the developed world, US.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Original post)

Sat Jan 30, 2016, 11:42 AM

78. Good proposal

But the people using this as an opportunity to shit on Hillary take away from the positive aspects of it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread