Thu Jan 28, 2016, 09:39 PM
Jarqui (9,138 posts)
Bernie Sanders And Elizabeth Warren May Have Just Saved Consumers $14 Billion
Source: Huffington Post
WASHINGTON -- Cable customers who are tired of paying through the nose to rent set-top boxes are about to see some serious savings, thanks to a new proposal from the Federal Communications Commission. The new regulation would open up the set-top box market to consumer choice so that customers could rent or buy devices from providers other than their cable companies. About 99 percent of cable customers currently rent set-top boxes from their cable company. According to a survey commissioned by Sens. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), cable customers pay an average of $232 a year for those rentals -- a $20 billion market annually, just for set-top box rentals. ... Cable companies and their lobbyists are furious about the plan, which the commission is set to vote on Feb. 18. But the proposal didn't emerge from a vacuum. Liberal senators have been pressuring the FCC to act on cable "monopolies" for months. In July, current Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) organized a letter calling on the agency to collect a host of consumer pricing information from cable companies -- a move designed to show that in many regions of the country, households pay arbitrarily high prices due to a lack of other cable options. Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Al Franken (D-Minn.), Markey and Blumenthal all signed on to the letter. Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/fcc-proposal-cable-tv-boxes_us_56aa781ae4b05e4e3703b26e Way to go Bernie and Elizabeth!! (though we have to wait for Feb 18th vote to really celebrate)
|
82 replies, 8485 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Jarqui | Jan 2016 | OP |
jfern | Jan 2016 | #1 | |
Divernan | Jan 2016 | #4 | |
retrowire | Jan 2016 | #2 | |
elmac | Jan 2016 | #5 | |
LittleGirl | Jan 2016 | #43 | |
nxylas | Jan 2016 | #52 | |
LittleGirl | Jan 2016 | #53 | |
George II | Jan 2016 | #21 | |
draa | Jan 2016 | #26 | |
George II | Jan 2016 | #29 | |
draa | Jan 2016 | #32 | |
George II | Jan 2016 | #33 | |
draa | Jan 2016 | #35 | |
George II | Jan 2016 | #36 | |
Jenny_92808 | Jan 2016 | #59 | |
George II | Jan 2016 | #64 | |
SunSeeker | Jan 2016 | #34 | |
rhett o rick | Jan 2016 | #55 | |
George II | Jan 2016 | #61 | |
rhett o rick | Jan 2016 | #67 | |
George II | Jan 2016 | #68 | |
rhett o rick | Jan 2016 | #56 | |
George II | Jan 2016 | #62 | |
rhett o rick | Jan 2016 | #66 | |
George II | Jan 2016 | #69 | |
rhett o rick | Jan 2016 | #70 | |
George II | Jan 2016 | #71 | |
rhett o rick | Jan 2016 | #72 | |
George II | Jan 2016 | #73 | |
rhett o rick | Jan 2016 | #74 | |
George II | Jan 2016 | #75 | |
rhett o rick | Jan 2016 | #76 | |
George II | Jan 2016 | #79 | |
Jenny_92808 | Jan 2016 | #60 | |
George II | Jan 2016 | #63 | |
Unknown Beatle | Jan 2016 | #45 | |
retrowire | Jan 2016 | #46 | |
elmac | Jan 2016 | #3 | |
Jackilope | Jan 2016 | #6 | |
jfern | Jan 2016 | #8 | |
christx30 | Jan 2016 | #12 | |
Unknown Beatle | Jan 2016 | #47 | |
George II | Jan 2016 | #7 | |
7962 | Jan 2016 | #11 | |
George II | Jan 2016 | #14 | |
Duval | Jan 2016 | #23 | |
FreedomRain | Jan 2016 | #57 | |
George II | Jan 2016 | #65 | |
George II | Jan 2016 | #81 | |
rhett o rick | Jan 2016 | #77 | |
George II | Jan 2016 | #80 | |
rhett o rick | Jan 2016 | #82 | |
Hoyt | Jan 2016 | #9 | |
FlatBaroque | Jan 2016 | #10 | |
George II | Jan 2016 | #13 | |
blackspade | Jan 2016 | #15 | |
joshcryer | Jan 2016 | #16 | |
onehandle | Jan 2016 | #17 | |
Jarqui | Jan 2016 | #18 | |
wildbilln864 | Jan 2016 | #20 | |
George II | Jan 2016 | #22 | |
Jarqui | Jan 2016 | #27 | |
George II | Jan 2016 | #31 | |
napi21 | Jan 2016 | #28 | |
Duval | Jan 2016 | #24 | |
pattymcq | Jan 2016 | #19 | |
Duval | Jan 2016 | #25 | |
fbc | Jan 2016 | #30 | |
senz | Jan 2016 | #38 | |
TexasBushwhacker | Jan 2016 | #37 | |
mrmpa | Jan 2016 | #44 | |
Mr. Evil | Jan 2016 | #39 | |
senz | Jan 2016 | #40 | |
WillyT | Jan 2016 | #41 | |
avaistheone1 | Jan 2016 | #42 | |
mountain grammy | Jan 2016 | #48 | |
bigbrother05 | Jan 2016 | #50 | |
mountain grammy | Jan 2016 | #51 | |
bigbrother05 | Jan 2016 | #49 | |
ChiciB1 | Jan 2016 | #54 | |
Dont call me Shirley | Jan 2016 | #58 | |
Politicub | Jan 2016 | #78 |
Response to Jarqui (Original post)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 09:44 PM
jfern (5,204 posts)
1. Oh sure, but just think if Hillary had sent a tweet telling them to "cut it out"
Response to jfern (Reply #1)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 09:49 PM
Divernan (15,480 posts)
4. Yup. That never worked with Bill either!
Response to Jarqui (Original post)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 09:47 PM
retrowire (10,345 posts)
2. And if Bernie is elected president,
I think we can look to much more of this!
![]() |
Response to retrowire (Reply #2)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 09:52 PM
elmac (4,642 posts)
5. Yep, we need open access to cable
like they have in Europe, competition is the only answer.
|
Response to elmac (Reply #5)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 03:17 PM
LittleGirl (7,732 posts)
43. I wish
we have two providers at our location in Europe and they may be cheaper than the states but they all suck.
|
Response to LittleGirl (Reply #43)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 05:22 PM
nxylas (6,440 posts)
52. Virgin Media has a virtual monopoly here in the UK
I think they have something like 95% of the cable market.
|
Response to nxylas (Reply #52)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 05:28 PM
LittleGirl (7,732 posts)
53. Thought so. n/t
Response to retrowire (Reply #2)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:28 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
21. Too bad it wasn't initiated by Sanders or Warren, but by Blumenthal and Markey.
Funny how that always works for Sanders - let others do the work and then take credit for it.
Follower, not a leader. |
Response to George II (Reply #21)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:38 PM
draa (975 posts)
26. And yet your example of a leader
got almost 5000 American soldiers killed. Hmmm...
|
Response to draa (Reply #26)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:52 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
29. How do you figure that? I think you should review history again, sir......
...and I don't know what that has to do with cable television. Care to explain?
|
Response to George II (Reply #29)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:00 AM
draa (975 posts)
32. If you support Clinton then you'd better check history.
You're the one spouting off about leadership. As far as a cable company who gives a shit. It has nothing to do with leadership but even if it did Clinton's not fit to run one of those either.
She supported the Iraq War with Bush and Cheney. There's no running from that. And no, as a veteran myself an apology means shit as far as what she voted for. She will still have to answer for that. |
Response to draa (Reply #32)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:15 AM
George II (67,782 posts)
33. Once again, nothing to do with the subject at hand. But Sanders took the easy way out....
.....as demonstrated by his votes since the start of the Iraq war, he was "against" it, yet he voted consistently with the republicans to fund that war. Yeah, I know the litany is that "well, we had to support the troops over there", but if we didn't fund the war then the troops would have been withdrawn.
So, how do you draw the connection between cable television set top boxes and the war in Iraq? Does Comcast have the Baghdad cable television franchise? |
Response to George II (Reply #33)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:45 AM
draa (975 posts)
35. In the discussion we're currently in you had no point.
Even the Blumenthal/Mularkey comment you made was meant to be an insult to Sanders. Then you mentioned leadership, not me.
Your comment below, at 8:54pm would have been a good discussion. Instead you spouted something about Sanders' leadership like Clinton's is somehow better. It's not and Clinton's vote for the Iraq War proves it. You'll deny and put another up comment trying to tell me why. It doesn't matter so save your time. I didn't read the one I'm replying to because I don't fucking care. I've heard it all and it's still doesn't change my mind or her vote. eom |
Response to draa (Reply #35)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:57 AM
George II (67,782 posts)
36. The subject initiative is Blumenthal's and Markey's*. Attributing it to Sanders "had no point"....
....
*By the way, it's MARKEY, no your blatantly offensive "Mularkey"! In a nutshell, that says a lot. Thanks for playing tonight. |
Response to George II (Reply #36)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 10:08 PM
Jenny_92808 (1,342 posts)
59. Leave
You are so wrong it makes me wonder if you are trolling.
|
Response to Jenny_92808 (Reply #59)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 11:01 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
64. Excuse me?
Response to George II (Reply #21)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:39 AM
SunSeeker (49,116 posts)
34. LOL. Thanks for the facts. nt
Response to George II (Reply #21)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 09:15 PM
rhett o rick (55,981 posts)
55. When HRC had her chance to be a leader she failed terribly. When George Bush ask her to FOLLOW him
into Iraq, she said sure George and I will give a speech to get other Democrats to ditch their principles and FOLLOW you Republicons.
|
Response to rhett o rick (Reply #55)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 10:49 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
61. What does that have to do with cable television boxes?
Response to George II (Reply #61)
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 01:04 AM
rhett o rick (55,981 posts)
67. Maybe if I speak slower you will understand. You disparaged Sen Sanders for not being a leader
and I just wanted to point out that your idol didn't lead when the chips were down. She acquiesced to the worst President we've ever had.
|
Response to rhett o rick (Reply #67)
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 01:20 AM
George II (67,782 posts)
68. Speak (or type) as slowly as you'd like. I didn't "disparage" Sanders, I pointed out the truth.
And I don't have "idols" in politics, I have candidates who I believe will do better jobs than others. Those for whom I feel that way have proven their capabilities over the years.
Now, can we get back to cable boxes? |
Response to George II (Reply #21)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 09:16 PM
rhett o rick (55,981 posts)
56. Are you disparaging Elizabeth Warren as well as Sanders? nm
Response to rhett o rick (Reply #56)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 10:51 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
62. I'm giving credit where credit is due - to the two Senators who really got this started....
....Senators Blumenthal and Markey.
I like Warren a lot, and I think she'll be a great asset in President Clinton's cabinet. |
Response to George II (Reply #62)
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 01:02 AM
rhett o rick (55,981 posts)
66. No you are not. You disparage Sanders for not "leading" but give Warren a pass.
I doubt that Senator Warren will be bought by the Wealthy 1% that you worship.
|
Response to rhett o rick (Reply #66)
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 01:22 AM
George II (67,782 posts)
69. And where do you get the idea that I "worship" the wealthy 1%? Remember, if the candidate that....
....you worship were to win the Presidency, he would be instantly catapulted into the 1% himself. Unless, of course, he does the job without pay.
|
Response to George II (Reply #69)
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 01:32 AM
rhett o rick (55,981 posts)
70. You need to check your math. Your idol is worth $50,000,000. She accumulated that
in less than 15 years. What a slap in the face of honest, hard working Americans struggling to make ends meet. Sanders will never reach that level of wealth.
|
Response to rhett o rick (Reply #70)
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 01:35 AM
George II (67,782 posts)
71. Again with the "idol" stuff. If nothing else, you are persistent!
Response to George II (Reply #71)
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 11:06 AM
rhett o rick (55,981 posts)
72. It's the only reason I can think of for people to choose to side with her and Goldman-Sachs
over the 99%. Clinton is clearly embroiled in the corrupt Big Money controlled government. She has earned (?) 50 million dollars by working the system, playing the game. She is not the one to lead us out of this horrendous wealth hole that she pretends. There is nothing to stop the financial institutions from having another crash. They jointly made 5 trillion dollars the last time and I don't think Clinton wants to reel them in. Why should she. She and Bill have gotten enormous wealth from this culture.
|
Response to rhett o rick (Reply #72)
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 11:09 AM
George II (67,782 posts)
73. You're the person who claimed my $700 a week bank-teller sister was a "bankster", so....
.....I'm never surprised with anything you say anymore.
If only you worked as hard for your candidate as you do insulting DUers, perhaps Sanders would have a chance in these primaries. |
Response to George II (Reply #73)
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 11:21 AM
rhett o rick (55,981 posts)
74. I never claimed such a thing. I was referring to those execs that get huge bonus
and are glad to share them with politicians. Does your sister even work for Goldman-Sachs?
I am working very hard for Sanders, handing out flyers, making calls and going door to door. I see this as a do or die campaign. Let the Conservative Wing of our Party continue the status quo will bring more deaths from poverty, unfair incarceration, and killings in the streets. If I insult fellow Democrats it's because I am frustrated that Democrats would choose Goldman-Sachs over helping the poor. Don't you understand if we keep the status quo and let Goldman-Sachs have influence in the WH that things will continue to get worse? H. Clinton is very invested in accumulating massive wealth and that doesn't coincide with helping the poor, working and middle classes. She doesn't want to raise the cap on SS, she doesn't want to help college students in debt, she doesn't want to stop fracking, didn't want same sex marriage until pushed into it, did want the TPP until she didn't. This is a class war and H. Clinton with her $50,000,000 and close relationship with Goldman-Sachs, isn't on our side. |
Response to rhett o rick (Reply #74)
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 11:28 AM
George II (67,782 posts)
75. Yes you did, when I pointed out how many people in New York have "ties" to banks simply because...
...it's such a huge industry in NY, and just about every family has at least one member who at one time worked for a bank.
I mentioned that several family members of mine worked for banks at less than "executive" positions, including my sister who was a teller and myself who worked as a computer operator in a bank data center (that's what they were called back in the 1980s) for a cople of years. You said I must be proud of my "family of banksters". Insulting DUers that you don't know and never met seems to be something you do often (you even admit it above) |
Response to George II (Reply #75)
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 11:39 AM
rhett o rick (55,981 posts)
76. You are clearly thinking of someone else. nm
Response to rhett o rick (Reply #76)
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 11:42 AM
George II (67,782 posts)
79. No, when someone say something that offensive (and false) about a person's family, I remember.
Response to George II (Reply #21)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 10:21 PM
Jenny_92808 (1,342 posts)
60. Try again
"Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) organized a letter calling on the agency to collect a host of consumer pricing information from cable companies -- a move designed to show that in many regions of the country, households pay arbitrarily high prices due to a lack of other cable options. Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Al Franken (D-Minn.), Markey and Blumenthal all signed on to the letter."
|
Response to Jenny_92808 (Reply #60)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 10:56 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
63. Selective excerpt....how about the rest of the article? Here:
"According to a survey commissioned by Sens. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), cable customers pay an average of $232 a year for those rentals -- a $20 billion market annually, just for set-top box rentals."
Then your excerpt, where Sanders followed Markey's and Blumenthal's lead, which went nowhere. Resulting in this: "After Markey and Blumenthal did their own pricing survey in July, they organized another letter to the FCC in November, specifically targeting set-top boxes. Sanders, Warren and Franken all signed on, as did Sens. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), Corey Booker (D-N.J.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.). " So you see, Markey and Blumenthal got the ball rolling, Sanders ran with the ball but sadly fumbled it, causing Blumenthal and Markey to pick up the ball and continue the effort. I read the ENTIRE article. |
Response to retrowire (Reply #2)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 04:16 PM
Unknown Beatle (2,643 posts)
45. Hey, wait a minute,
it's not if Bernie is elected president, it's when Bernie is elected president.
|
Response to Unknown Beatle (Reply #45)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 04:20 PM
retrowire (10,345 posts)
46. You right! nt
Response to Jarqui (Original post)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 09:48 PM
elmac (4,642 posts)
3. Good for consumers
& good for box makers. Another chip from the cable monopolies.
|
Response to Jarqui (Original post)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 09:52 PM
Jackilope (819 posts)
6. $$ shelled out for cable is outrageous as it is
Where I live there is very little competition. One could drop cable for Direct or Dish, but from what I've heard, they start you out with a low rate for a few years then increase the price.
|
Response to Jackilope (Reply #6)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 09:55 PM
jfern (5,204 posts)
8. There's really basically no competition if you want anything faster than 20 Mbps down
Response to Jackilope (Reply #6)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:07 PM
christx30 (6,236 posts)
12. And they lock you into a contract
so it costs like $200 to switch to another provider if you aren't happy. And they charge for trouble calls.
|
Response to Jackilope (Reply #6)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 04:27 PM
Unknown Beatle (2,643 posts)
47. You're right about what you write.
I have Direct TV, and I had to sign a two year contract. The first year it's very affordable, but the second year, which I'm currently on, is very expensive. They nickle and dime you for everything, plus the rentals for the set top boxes and it ballooned to a little over a hundred bucks a month, and my wife and I only watch about ten channels regularly.
If this passes into law, then by all means, I would continue with one of the dish or the only cable company in town. It would be very affordable then. |
Response to Jarqui (Original post)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 09:54 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
7. Amazing projection!
From the article, it was Senators Markey and Blumenthal who commissioned the survey and got this going.
As usual, coat-tailing someone else's work, Sanders jumped on it and "organized" a letter which was signed by him, Markey, Blumenthal, Franken, and Warren. That letter merely called for the FCC to gather pricing information. Of course he just asked the FCC to gather information, he did nothing substantive. And, you conveniently failed to post this excerpt from the article, which is what is REALLY prompting the FCC to act further: "After Markey and Blumenthal did their own pricing survey in July, they organized another letter to the FCC in November, specifically targeting set-top boxes. Sanders, Warren and Franken all signed on, as did Sens. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), Corey Booker (D-N.J.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.)." So why is it that only Sanders and Warren get credit for this? Blumenthal is my Senator, and he gets ALL the credit for anything that is accomplished. Sanders, in both cases, is simply following Blumenthal's and Markey's lead and piggy-backing on their work. Once again, Sanders demonstrates that he's a follower, not a leader. |
Response to George II (Reply #7)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:06 PM
7962 (11,841 posts)
11. It appears he shouldnt count on your vote
Response to 7962 (Reply #11)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:09 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
14. Well, if he had a record of accomplishment I might have considered him, but he doesn't.
Response to George II (Reply #7)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 09:54 PM
FreedomRain (413 posts)
57. you cant get mad at someone for signing on to a good idea
what's the point of that?
Give credit to those 2 that started it, give credit to the rest who used their power and influence to get it done. |
Response to FreedomRain (Reply #57)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 11:02 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
65. Yes, he signed on to a good idea (which wasn't his in the first place), his effort failed, so....
....the original two Senators had to pursue it further to get any action from the FCC.
|
Response to FreedomRain (Reply #57)
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 11:45 AM
George II (67,782 posts)
81. That's what I've done - I give credit to Blumenthal and Markey for getting it started....
...and again to Blumenthal and Markey for keeping it going after Sanders' effort stalled.
|
Response to George II (Reply #7)
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 11:41 AM
rhett o rick (55,981 posts)
77. So I assume you think that Sen Warren is also a follower and not a leader. nm
Response to rhett o rick (Reply #77)
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 11:44 AM
George II (67,782 posts)
80. Elizabeth Warren isn't running for President by taking credit for the efforts....
....of everyone around here over the decades.
|
Response to George II (Reply #80)
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 11:46 AM
rhett o rick (55,981 posts)
82. I asked about leadership and you carefully avoided the question. You are quick to disparage
Sen Sanders but carefully don't hold Sen Warren to the same standard.
|
Response to Jarqui (Original post)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 09:56 PM
Hoyt (54,770 posts)
9. Another Obama appointee does the right thing as he did with net neutrality.
Response to Jarqui (Original post)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:04 PM
FlatBaroque (3,160 posts)
10. The thought of E Warren and Bernie working in tandem
sends chills ...
|
Response to FlatBaroque (Reply #10)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:08 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
13. Too bad it was Blumenthal and Markey who did all the work.
Response to Jarqui (Original post)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:23 PM
blackspade (10,056 posts)
15. This would potentially result in a tremendous amount of savings.
I have thus far refused to 'upgrade' to a DVR to the tune of $10 extra a month.
$6/mo is plenty for the one I already have. |
Response to Jarqui (Original post)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:25 PM
joshcryer (62,168 posts)
16. No love for Wheeler?
Response to Jarqui (Original post)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:30 PM
onehandle (51,122 posts)
17. Hillary has been working with Senator Sanders and Senator Warren for years.
It's going to be great when President Hillary Clinton continues that work with them.
|
Response to onehandle (Reply #17)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:32 PM
Jarqui (9,138 posts)
18. She has indeed
Do we get to look forward to more of that with President Hillary? They're going to be knocking heads over Wall Street who have bought Hillary until at least 2020. No Glass-Steagall for Elizabeth and Bernie. Hillary is against that. But if Bernie is president, he and Elizabeth are on the same page for bankruptcy, Glass-Steagall, too -big-to-fail and Wall Street reform. Like the top of this thread, they have proven to work together well. No problems. |
Response to Jarqui (Reply #18)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:01 PM
wildbilln864 (13,382 posts)
20. thank you! n/t
Response to Jarqui (Reply #18)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:29 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
22. What/where was Elizabeth Warren in 2004?
Response to George II (Reply #22)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:39 PM
Jarqui (9,138 posts)
27. She became a lawyer and professor that
started to get into bankruptcy in the 80s. She did some advisory stuff in the 90s on bankruptcy. In the mid 90s, she wound up at Harvard law school until she became a senator in 2012. She started to get published and well known. She was trying to fight the passage of that bankruptcy bill in 2004 in an activist role (I think - I'm not positive on all of the above - it's the gist).
|
Response to Jarqui (Reply #27)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:57 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
31. In 2004 she was only a few years removed from being a republican. Talk about "camp weathervane"!!!!
Response to George II (Reply #22)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:43 PM
napi21 (45,785 posts)
28. Teaching at the College I presume. She wasn't a Senator for sure! nt
Response to Jarqui (Original post)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:34 PM
Duval (4,280 posts)
25. Bernie and Elizabeth make a winning pair.
Response to Jarqui (Original post)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:56 PM
fbc (1,668 posts)
30. That explains why Comcast is pouring so much money into Clinton's campaign.
Response to fbc (Reply #30)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 01:44 AM
senz (11,945 posts)
38. Yep. Clinton represents the oligarchs --
everything Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders rail against.
|
Response to Jarqui (Original post)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 01:42 AM
TexasBushwhacker (18,692 posts)
37. I remember having to rent our PHONE n/t
Response to TexasBushwhacker (Reply #37)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 04:14 PM
mrmpa (4,033 posts)
44. I do too.............
we had two phones in the house. One in the kitchen and one in my parents bedroom. Just about the day you didn't have to rent it anymore, my folks bought 2 new phones and installed them. The rented ones were returned to the phone company.
|
Response to Jarqui (Original post)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 01:45 AM
Mr. Evil (2,440 posts)
39. This is so such a good thing!
Response to Jarqui (Original post)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 01:51 AM
senz (11,945 posts)
40. Bernie got the entire process started. Good show of leadership! Great results!
![]() |
Response to Jarqui (Original post)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 10:44 AM
WillyT (72,631 posts)
41. HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!!
![]() |
Response to Jarqui (Original post)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 02:21 PM
avaistheone1 (14,626 posts)
42. Just another amazing day at the office for Bernie and Elizabeth.
They are both awesome. Truly.
![]() ![]() |
Response to Jarqui (Original post)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 05:19 PM
mountain grammy (25,286 posts)
48. I don't care about a VP pick from a different region.
I think a Sanders/Warren ticket is a sure winner.
|
Response to mountain grammy (Reply #48)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 05:21 PM
bigbrother05 (5,995 posts)
50. He's from Brooklyn, she's from OKC, so problem solved
Response to bigbrother05 (Reply #50)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 05:22 PM
mountain grammy (25,286 posts)
51. Yep, forgot about that.. Problem solved.
Response to Jarqui (Original post)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 05:19 PM
bigbrother05 (5,995 posts)
49. Imagine owing a box that worked with any cable/satellite system
that could be upgraded or used apps to improve. Maybe have built in wifi to access Netflix, etc and a DVR function that would let you chose or enhance your storage capacity. Can see Roku making a big move in this area as well as the Google/Amazon/Apple/MS folks. Would be nice to have capability to plug in added hard drives or wireless to a personal cloud server.
Downloading content off cycle for later viewing or local sharing would be great as well and help level internet loads. |
Response to Jarqui (Original post)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 08:25 PM
ChiciB1 (15,435 posts)
54. Unfortunately This Is A HUGE Reason Why TPTB
are fighting so hard to keep Bernie from becoming POTUS! You try to make people understand this kind of power and WHY we need to fight the STATUS QUO, of which Hillary is entrenched with, and many here just don't understand this. Or, for whatever other reason they have to look the other way about this, it baffles me.
So many things are in the hands of these Corporations and Wall Street, you can list a long list, but POWER is determined to keep POWER. We have an opening to begin to have our voices heard and let them know that running a country that's basically already an Oligarchy that we've had ENOUGH! |
Response to Jarqui (Original post)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 09:57 PM
Dont call me Shirley (10,998 posts)
58. Cable, Internet and phone prices need to go down, while quality needs to go up. Let's join the rest
of the developed world, US.
|
Response to Jarqui (Original post)
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 11:42 AM
Politicub (12,145 posts)
78. Good proposal
But the people using this as an opportunity to shit on Hillary take away from the positive aspects of it.
|