Bernie Sanders And Elizabeth Warren May Have Just Saved Consumers $14 Billion
Source: Huffington Post
WASHINGTON -- Cable customers who are tired of paying through the nose to rent set-top boxes are about to see some serious savings, thanks to a new proposal from the Federal Communications Commission.
The new regulation would open up the set-top box market to consumer choice so that customers could rent or buy devices from providers other than their cable companies. About 99 percent of cable customers currently rent set-top boxes from their cable company. According to a survey commissioned by Sens. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), cable customers pay an average of $232 a year for those rentals -- a $20 billion market annually, just for set-top box rentals.
...
Cable companies and their lobbyists are furious about the plan, which the commission is set to vote on Feb. 18. But the proposal didn't emerge from a vacuum. Liberal senators have been pressuring the FCC to act on cable "monopolies" for months. In July, current Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) organized a letter calling on the agency to collect a host of consumer pricing information from cable companies -- a move designed to show that in many regions of the country, households pay arbitrarily high prices due to a lack of other cable options. Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Al Franken (D-Minn.), Markey and Blumenthal all signed on to the letter.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/fcc-proposal-cable-tv-boxes_us_56aa781ae4b05e4e3703b26e
Way to go Bernie and Elizabeth!! (though we have to wait for Feb 18th vote to really celebrate)
jfern
(5,204 posts)Divernan
(15,480 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)I think we can look to much more of this!
elmac
(4,642 posts)like they have in Europe, competition is the only answer.
we have two providers at our location in Europe and they may be cheaper than the states but they all suck.
nxylas
(6,440 posts)I think they have something like 95% of the cable market.
LittleGirl
(8,280 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Funny how that always works for Sanders - let others do the work and then take credit for it.
Follower, not a leader.
draa
(975 posts)got almost 5000 American soldiers killed. Hmmm...
George II
(67,782 posts)...and I don't know what that has to do with cable television. Care to explain?
draa
(975 posts)You're the one spouting off about leadership. As far as a cable company who gives a shit. It has nothing to do with leadership but even if it did Clinton's not fit to run one of those either.
She supported the Iraq War with Bush and Cheney. There's no running from that. And no, as a veteran myself an apology means shit as far as what she voted for. She will still have to answer for that.
George II
(67,782 posts).....as demonstrated by his votes since the start of the Iraq war, he was "against" it, yet he voted consistently with the republicans to fund that war. Yeah, I know the litany is that "well, we had to support the troops over there", but if we didn't fund the war then the troops would have been withdrawn.
So, how do you draw the connection between cable television set top boxes and the war in Iraq? Does Comcast have the Baghdad cable television franchise?
draa
(975 posts)Even the Blumenthal/Mularkey comment you made was meant to be an insult to Sanders. Then you mentioned leadership, not me.
Your comment below, at 8:54pm would have been a good discussion. Instead you spouted something about Sanders' leadership like Clinton's is somehow better. It's not and Clinton's vote for the Iraq War proves it.
You'll deny and put another up comment trying to tell me why. It doesn't matter so save your time. I didn't read the one I'm replying to because I don't fucking care. I've heard it all and it's still doesn't change my mind or her vote. eom
George II
(67,782 posts)....
*By the way, it's MARKEY, no your blatantly offensive "Mularkey"! In a nutshell, that says a lot. Thanks for playing tonight.
Jenny_92808
(1,342 posts)You are so wrong it makes me wonder if you are trolling.
George II
(67,782 posts)SunSeeker
(51,516 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)into Iraq, she said sure George and I will give a speech to get other Democrats to ditch their principles and FOLLOW you Republicons.
George II
(67,782 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)and I just wanted to point out that your idol didn't lead when the chips were down. She acquiesced to the worst President we've ever had.
George II
(67,782 posts)And I don't have "idols" in politics, I have candidates who I believe will do better jobs than others. Those for whom I feel that way have proven their capabilities over the years.
Now, can we get back to cable boxes?
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....Senators Blumenthal and Markey.
I like Warren a lot, and I think she'll be a great asset in President Clinton's cabinet.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)I doubt that Senator Warren will be bought by the Wealthy 1% that you worship.
George II
(67,782 posts)....you worship were to win the Presidency, he would be instantly catapulted into the 1% himself. Unless, of course, he does the job without pay.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)in less than 15 years. What a slap in the face of honest, hard working Americans struggling to make ends meet. Sanders will never reach that level of wealth.
George II
(67,782 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)over the 99%. Clinton is clearly embroiled in the corrupt Big Money controlled government. She has earned (?) 50 million dollars by working the system, playing the game. She is not the one to lead us out of this horrendous wealth hole that she pretends. There is nothing to stop the financial institutions from having another crash. They jointly made 5 trillion dollars the last time and I don't think Clinton wants to reel them in. Why should she. She and Bill have gotten enormous wealth from this culture.
George II
(67,782 posts).....I'm never surprised with anything you say anymore.
If only you worked as hard for your candidate as you do insulting DUers, perhaps Sanders would have a chance in these primaries.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)and are glad to share them with politicians. Does your sister even work for Goldman-Sachs?
I am working very hard for Sanders, handing out flyers, making calls and going door to door. I see this as a do or die campaign. Let the Conservative Wing of our Party continue the status quo will bring more deaths from poverty, unfair incarceration, and killings in the streets. If I insult fellow Democrats it's because I am frustrated that Democrats would choose Goldman-Sachs over helping the poor. Don't you understand if we keep the status quo and let Goldman-Sachs have influence in the WH that things will continue to get worse? H. Clinton is very invested in accumulating massive wealth and that doesn't coincide with helping the poor, working and middle classes. She doesn't want to raise the cap on SS, she doesn't want to help college students in debt, she doesn't want to stop fracking, didn't want same sex marriage until pushed into it, did want the TPP until she didn't.
This is a class war and H. Clinton with her $50,000,000 and close relationship with Goldman-Sachs, isn't on our side.
George II
(67,782 posts)...it's such a huge industry in NY, and just about every family has at least one member who at one time worked for a bank.
I mentioned that several family members of mine worked for banks at less than "executive" positions, including my sister who was a teller and myself who worked as a computer operator in a bank data center (that's what they were called back in the 1980s) for a cople of years. You said I must be proud of my "family of banksters".
Insulting DUers that you don't know and never met seems to be something you do often (you even admit it above)
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Jenny_92808
(1,342 posts)"Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) organized a letter calling on the agency to collect a host of consumer pricing information from cable companies -- a move designed to show that in many regions of the country, households pay arbitrarily high prices due to a lack of other cable options. Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Al Franken (D-Minn.), Markey and Blumenthal all signed on to the letter."
George II
(67,782 posts)"According to a survey commissioned by Sens. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), cable customers pay an average of $232 a year for those rentals -- a $20 billion market annually, just for set-top box rentals."
Then your excerpt, where Sanders followed Markey's and Blumenthal's lead, which went nowhere. Resulting in this:
"After Markey and Blumenthal did their own pricing survey in July, they organized another letter to the FCC in November, specifically targeting set-top boxes. Sanders, Warren and Franken all signed on, as did Sens. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), Corey Booker (D-N.J.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.). "
So you see, Markey and Blumenthal got the ball rolling, Sanders ran with the ball but sadly fumbled it, causing Blumenthal and Markey to pick up the ball and continue the effort.
I read the ENTIRE article.
Unknown Beatle
(2,672 posts)it's not if Bernie is elected president, it's when Bernie is elected president.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)elmac
(4,642 posts)& good for box makers. Another chip from the cable monopolies.
Jackilope
(819 posts)Where I live there is very little competition. One could drop cable for Direct or Dish, but from what I've heard, they start you out with a low rate for a few years then increase the price.
jfern
(5,204 posts)christx30
(6,241 posts)so it costs like $200 to switch to another provider if you aren't happy. And they charge for trouble calls.
Unknown Beatle
(2,672 posts)I have Direct TV, and I had to sign a two year contract. The first year it's very affordable, but the second year, which I'm currently on, is very expensive. They nickle and dime you for everything, plus the rentals for the set top boxes and it ballooned to a little over a hundred bucks a month, and my wife and I only watch about ten channels regularly.
If this passes into law, then by all means, I would continue with one of the dish or the only cable company in town. It would be very affordable then.
George II
(67,782 posts)From the article, it was Senators Markey and Blumenthal who commissioned the survey and got this going.
As usual, coat-tailing someone else's work, Sanders jumped on it and "organized" a letter which was signed by him, Markey, Blumenthal, Franken, and Warren. That letter merely called for the FCC to gather pricing information. Of course he just asked the FCC to gather information, he did nothing substantive.
And, you conveniently failed to post this excerpt from the article, which is what is REALLY prompting the FCC to act further:
"After Markey and Blumenthal did their own pricing survey in July, they organized another letter to the FCC in November, specifically targeting set-top boxes. Sanders, Warren and Franken all signed on, as did Sens. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), Corey Booker (D-N.J.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.)."
So why is it that only Sanders and Warren get credit for this?
Blumenthal is my Senator, and he gets ALL the credit for anything that is accomplished. Sanders, in both cases, is simply following Blumenthal's and Markey's lead and piggy-backing on their work. Once again, Sanders demonstrates that he's a follower, not a leader.
7962
(11,841 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Duval
(4,280 posts)FreedomRain
(413 posts)what's the point of that?
Give credit to those 2 that started it, give credit to the rest who used their power and influence to get it done.
George II
(67,782 posts)....the original two Senators had to pursue it further to get any action from the FCC.
George II
(67,782 posts)...and again to Blumenthal and Markey for keeping it going after Sanders' effort stalled.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....of everyone around here over the decades.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Sen Sanders but carefully don't hold Sen Warren to the same standard.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)sends chills ...
George II
(67,782 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)I have thus far refused to 'upgrade' to a DVR to the tune of $10 extra a month.
$6/mo is plenty for the one I already have.
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)It's going to be great when President Hillary Clinton continues that work with them.
Jarqui
(10,122 posts)Do we get to look forward to more of that with President Hillary?
They're going to be knocking heads over Wall Street who have bought Hillary until at least 2020.
No Glass-Steagall for Elizabeth and Bernie. Hillary is against that.
But if Bernie is president, he and Elizabeth are on the same page for bankruptcy, Glass-Steagall, too -big-to-fail and Wall Street reform.
Like the top of this thread, they have proven to work together well. No problems.
wildbilln864
(13,382 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Jarqui
(10,122 posts)started to get into bankruptcy in the 80s. She did some advisory stuff in the 90s on bankruptcy. In the mid 90s, she wound up at Harvard law school until she became a senator in 2012. She started to get published and well known. She was trying to fight the passage of that bankruptcy bill in 2004 in an activist role (I think - I'm not positive on all of the above - it's the gist).
George II
(67,782 posts)napi21
(45,806 posts)Duval
(4,280 posts)Duval
(4,280 posts)fbc
(1,668 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)everything Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders rail against.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,146 posts)mrmpa
(4,033 posts)we had two phones in the house. One in the kitchen and one in my parents bedroom. Just about the day you didn't have to rent it anymore, my folks bought 2 new phones and installed them. The rented ones were returned to the phone company.
Mr. Evil
(2,825 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)They are both awesome. Truly.
mountain grammy
(26,598 posts)I think a Sanders/Warren ticket is a sure winner.
bigbrother05
(5,995 posts)mountain grammy
(26,598 posts)bigbrother05
(5,995 posts)that could be upgraded or used apps to improve. Maybe have built in wifi to access Netflix, etc and a DVR function that would let you chose or enhance your storage capacity. Can see Roku making a big move in this area as well as the Google/Amazon/Apple/MS folks. Would be nice to have capability to plug in added hard drives or wireless to a personal cloud server.
Downloading content off cycle for later viewing or local sharing would be great as well and help level internet loads.
ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)are fighting so hard to keep Bernie from becoming POTUS! You try to make people understand this kind of power and WHY we need to fight the STATUS QUO, of which Hillary is entrenched with, and many here just don't understand this. Or, for whatever other reason they have to look the other way about this, it baffles me.
So many things are in the hands of these Corporations and Wall Street, you can list a long list, but POWER is determined to keep POWER. We have an opening to begin to have our voices heard and let them know that running a country that's basically already an Oligarchy that we've had ENOUGH!
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)of the developed world, US.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)But the people using this as an opportunity to shit on Hillary take away from the positive aspects of it.