Sanders campaign touts another endorsement that didn't happen
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by one_voice (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: cnn
Sanders campaign touts another endorsement that didn't happen
By Dan Merica, CNN
Updated 6:59 AM ET, Thu February 11, 2016 | Video Source: CNN
Story highlights
The Sanders campaign is touting the support of a Nevada activist who says she's actually backing Hillary Clinton
This is not the first time that the Vermont independent's campaign has incorrectly said someone endorsed them
(CNN)Once again, the Bernie Sanders' campaign finds itself having claimed the support of someone who didn't exactly endorse the Vermont senator.
Brenda Romero, a Nevada student leader and DREAMer that Bernie Sanders' campaign touted as someone who endorsed their campaign, tells CNN she never endorsed the Vermont senator and is backing Hillary Clinton.
Romero said Monday she had agreed to be part of Sanders' Nevada Latino Steering Committee, but that she never endorsed the senator....................
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/11/politics/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-dreamer-support/index.html

Response to riversedge (Original post)
thomservo This message was self-deleted by its author.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)Are you talkin' about the OP or a Hillary faithful?
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Response to Plucketeer (Reply #3)
thomservo This message was self-deleted by its author.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)Welp.... that's it! T'was fun while it lasted. Time for the Bernie bros to concede defeat and fall in line like good little automatons.
Wait a minute! If this is a LIE contest, we Bernie folks better get in gear! We gonna A LOT of ground to cover to catch up with the liar-in-chief.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)this makes sense, 'cause being part of a steering committee does indeed seem like an endorsement unless she was really steering voters elsewhere
NJCher
(43,160 posts)it seems like a fairly credible report, due to the detail. However, it appears that both campaigns have, in the heat of competition, jumped the gun. This same CNN report says:
Clinton, too, has dealt with touting endorsements that haven't actually happened. Two mayors -- one from Wilmington, Delaware, and another from San Antonio -- were among a list of 50 mayors that endorsed Clinton in October. But shortly after the list was released to the public, both mayors said they had yet to officially endorse the former secretary of state.
I do hope that if this is true, the Sanders' campaign nails down future endorsements in writing so there are no questions about whether an endorsement is correct or not.

Cher
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)honestly though sometimes I wonder if the M$M isn't looking to it's own future with the unvarnished Hillary favoritism, because after 8 years of the relatively personally boring Obama's, who's going to give them more red meat scandal reporting another Clinton WH or a Sanders one?
riversedge
(80,802 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)then she's endorsing Clinton-so what gives here can you explain it?
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)I can't imagine myself on any Clinton steering committee. Good God.
When someone joins your campaign, on a committee--you assume that they are supporting you.
I guess, due to the disgusting nature of this current race, Sanders will have to get things in writing.
Watch out Bernie--the kitchen sink knows no bounds.
He warned us...and here it is!
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)do 'charitable foundations" have to publicly list which organizations ect they donate to?
George II
(67,782 posts)....instead of throwing out speculative, and negative, motives.
Thank you.
tommcc99
(48 posts)From the CNN article provided by the OP -
"Clinton, too, has dealt with touting endorsements that haven't actually happened. Two mayors -- one from Wilmington, Delaware, and another from San Antonio -- were among a list of 50 mayors that endorsed Clinton in October. But shortly after the list was released to the public, both mayors said they had yet to officially endorse the former secretary of state."
Geronimoe
(1,539 posts)Supports Hillary, yet is working within Bernie's campaign.
6chars
(3,967 posts)Agreed to join Bernie's Latino Steering Committee. I mean, why join it if you don't support the candidate?
NoMoreRepugs
(12,075 posts)The overall intelligence level of this country is falling faster than I imagined.
No offense to the Nevada activist but who gives a shit? This is important and should
take up time to ponder? - c'mon people, we are better than this (I hope)
ProfessorGAC
(76,693 posts)A college kid changes her mind and it's news? People change their mind about things every day.
This is a non-story
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Blue State Bandit
(2,122 posts)and promptly steer your campaign into a ravine.
Kitchen sink?
George II
(67,782 posts)....chases potential voters away.
Apparently they didn't learn from their bogus masquerading as Culinary Union workers (and trespassing) a couple of weeks ago. The Sanders campaign has said that the union "incident" has been resolved. Yes, it's over, but most certainly not forgotten.
So now they've claimed this student leader, a DREAMER, has endorsed Sanders even though she has not. Remember, and I hope Ms. Romero remembers that Sanders voted AGAINST the Dream Act!
One has to wonder how they'll explain this one.
Omaha Steve
(109,221 posts)Was she truthful upfront?

George II
(67,782 posts)She agreed to be on his steering committee, perhaps to try to steer that committee to set Sanders' policy on Latino relations.
Omaha Steve
(109,221 posts)So she wasn't upfront about her commitment to Hillary? Cause I wouldn't want her there if she was committed to Hillary. She could actually propose bad steering purposely, or report back to Hillary's camp on events etc!
Or is this like Hillary and the Black Caucus?
Seems what goes around comes around: http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511199614
Clinton Endorsement NOT from Congressional Black Caucus but FROM Cong. Black Caucus SUPERPAC
On Democracy Now this morning.
Listening to Barbara Lee of the Congressional Black Caucus WHO IS NOT ENDORSING ANYONE - explain the difference. She is NOT a member of the CBC PAC. She said this is a group that raises money for specific candidates and they have a strong firewall between the actual CBC and the CBC PAC.
OS
George II
(67,782 posts)I saw the OP from someone else a little while ago and discussed this there, but that OP is an attempt to create an issue that doesn't exist.
Every report that I saw, including the stories earlier this week speculating on that endorsement, pointed out that it is the CBCPAC that has endorsed Hillary Clinton.
Omaha Steve
(109,221 posts)On first look at goggle. Rep. Keith Ellison
https://twitter.com/keithellison/status/697809288203522048
Cong'l Black Caucus (CBC) has NOT endorsed in presidential. Separate CBCPAC endorsed withOUT input from CBC membership, including me.
Donate to DU 4 Keith Ellison MN-05 here: https://secure.actblue.com/contribute/page/du4keithellison
George II
(67,782 posts)....into a discussion of the Sanders Campaign falsely claiming that a Latina woman endorsed them when they didn't?
There is no correlation between the two..
Omaha Steve
(109,221 posts)Just like NARAL and PP didn't ask it's members. Then down the road one of Hillary's PAC's are free to transfer $ to other PAC's that endorse her as a thank you. There is a lot of $ floating around with Clinton strings.
So why was she there helping give info and take notes if she is a Hillary person? If she was a Hillary person she should not have been there on ethics.
Just got home from the store. Sorry for the delay.
karynnj
(60,965 posts)Either she was happy to have been asked and joined or she actively perused getting the posittion. I understand resume building, but if you sign on to a campaign's steering committee, you shouldn't have a problem with the campaign saying so.
She is young, but this does not impress me.
George II
(67,782 posts)...steering committee. Is that what they said? No.
This isn't too much different than saying three or four New Hampshire newspapers endorsed Sanders when they didn't (indeed, a couple of them endorsed Clinton), or that Veterans' groups in New Hampshire endorsed Sanders, when they didn't. Or printing flyers with Veterans' photographs without getting their permission.
Now they're doing this in Nevada, where they've already been exposed for masquerading as union workers and trespassing on private property.
Incidents like this are becoming more and more pervasive, and they're alienating more people than they're attracting.
karynnj
(60,965 posts)This is well within what is honest. As to this, the assumption that seine who joins the team is for him is pretty reasonable. There is more a question of what this young woman was thinking in joining. My question is what if anything she did in this role.
LiberalArkie
(19,798 posts)karynnj
(60,965 posts)It means you are actively involved. I give the student leader the benefit of the doubt, but she is more responsible for this error than the Sanders' campaign. Should they ask everyone ACTUALLY ON THEIR CAMPAIGN if they really support Bernie?
I credit CNN for including this fact, but think it should have been higher up.
Billsmile
(404 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)LannyDeVaney
(1,033 posts)the question becomes, can the Sanders campaign be trusted?
Too many issues to answer yes.
Bernin
(311 posts)have you volunteered for where you did not support the candidate you were volunteering for?
Bernin
(311 posts)resume just took a hit.
No wonder she supports Hillary.
Birds of a feather and all.
Wibly
(613 posts)Clinton campaign is claiming an endorsement from the Congressional Black Caucus when in truth is just a lobby PAC that has endorsed her, not the Congressional Black Caucus.
I swear, the Clinton campaign has gone all "artful smear" and wholly dishonest.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)doesn't meet SoP for LBN. Please repost in GDP. Thanks.