Birth Defects in Brazil - Mosquito or MONSANTO
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by BooScout (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: Reality Sandwich
The microcephaly now reportedly affecting thousands of babies in Brazil, which the media have attributed to the mosquito-borne Zika virus, may not be caused by a virus after all. According to reports from a group of Argentinian doctors called Physicians in Crop-Sprayed Towns (PCST), a chemical called pyriproxyfen which has been introduced to drinking water in mosquito-ridden areas of Brazil to cause deadly mutations in mosquito larvae may be the real cause of the birth defect.
In 2014, there were 147 cases of microcephaly reported in Brazil. That year, the Brazilian government began putting the larvicide into drinking water in Pernambuco, the state now reporting 35% of Brazils 4000 new microcephaly cases.
The PCST doctors say that previous outbreaks of Zika that infected up to 75% of the population in affected countries did not show a spike in microcephaly cases. PCST (and the New York Times) note that in Colombia, none of more than 3000 pregnant women reported to be infected with the virus has given birth to an infant with microcephaly
Read more: http://realitysandwich.com/319585/birth-defects-in-brazil-mosquito-or-monsanto/
Response to pbmus (Original post)
SunSeeker This message was self-deleted by its author.
redruddyred
(1,615 posts)zika is part of a larger pattern of "superbugs" hhs and the media picks up every now and again in order to distract from all the things they're doing wrong.
no mention of chronic fatigue, a serious disabling illness which cdc has ignored for 30 years and is just now admitting ~may~ be viral.
pbmus
(12,422 posts)oregonjen
(3,335 posts)pbmus
(12,422 posts)Thanks for letting us know how much you care...
redruddyred
(1,615 posts)in this case i don't know the facts but they're certainly not incorruptible.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Oh, wait. What?
oregonjen
(3,335 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)And this is not the cause of the birth defects. This has been debunked for days.
KT2000
(20,572 posts)by chemical companies. I wish I could tell you the phrases they used in a meeting discussing an illness directly related to toxic substances. Suffice to say no one except the medical director of a legal source for preventing corporate liability in toxic tort cases would have anything to do with it - and he used character assassination of the sick rather than science to silence to issue.
Look at their history when investigating clusters - the work for that is done by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). They never find a chemical responsible for an illness cluster.
The CDC is not the pure scientific agency people think it is - it is political and economy driven. Doctors make more money being corporate medical directors than working at the CDC.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)For one thing, Monsanto has nothing to do with pyriproxyfen production, but I guess facts and reality shouldn't get in the way of a good rant.
For another, the obviously dubious source referencing an equally dubious source simply dismisses the actual solid science behind the culprit knowing full well that such a misinformation campaign will be well received by those who care little for facts or reality.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/zika-monsanto-pyriproxyfen-microcephaly_us_56c2712de4b0b40245c79f7c
http://www.livescience.com/53756-pesticide-link-to-micracephaly-unlikely.html
pbmus
(12,422 posts)So you have no shame.
pbmus
(12,422 posts)and was told, don't worry about that stuff coming out of those planes
still don't understand why the taxpayers are paying for my disabilities...
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Lame.
pbmus
(12,422 posts)Who is making it up????
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)If you can't admit that reality, you have no business criticizing anyone else. Period.
pbmus
(12,422 posts)Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)you is either misguided, ignorant, or, if you actually know better, a liar.
Its revealing, isn't it?
pbmus
(12,422 posts)be careful who you defend
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)hell, you can't even get the "who" right in your and the article's claims.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)And that's what you're pushing. You owe everyone a big apology.
pbmus
(12,422 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)What are you gaining by pushing a story on LBN that was debunked days ago?
You're the one who is acting in a dangerous manner toward your fellow humans.
We are awaiting an apology.
pbmus
(12,422 posts)that pollute the world and you're asking me to apologize...
Lookup AC/DC Big Balls
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)You are making despicable attacks upon decent people because you posted an OP in LBN that contains nothing but conspiracy nonsense debunked days ago. You have broken DU rules, posted crap from a crap source, and you're not adult enough to admit any of it. That's just sad.
pbmus
(12,422 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Others are simply pointing out the deceit in your posts. The lack of decency is astounding. You owe many apologies.
pbmus
(12,422 posts)Again my monsters are not believed
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)And you shouldn't expect them to be. I am waiting for your apology.
pbmus
(12,422 posts)pbmus
(12,422 posts)Again I don't let my monsters tell me how to see the world
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Still, this backwards confession is almost as good. Oh, goodness.
pbmus
(12,422 posts)So far your comments are offensive and threatening
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Why?
womanofthehills
(8,697 posts)including GMOS - demanding an apology
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)organisms, from old fashioned selective breeding, to accelerated mutation(blasting them with radiation or exposure to chemicals), which was quite popular after WWII, to today's modern methods of genetic manipulation and transposition.
Can you identify which ones are toxic? What those toxins are? What are their health effects? Other concerns?
William Seger
(10,778 posts)... but conspiracy theorists simply don't understand how rational people think.
pbmus
(12,422 posts)William Seger
(10,778 posts)You're more than welcome to attack Monsanto with actual facts.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Still, one has to wonder how creative speculation items like this are allowed full time on prominent forums like LBN.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)It's weird that the virus settles in the fetus' brain to replicate, as noted in that Huffpost link. That would explain the damage to the brain and stunted brain/skull growth.
IsItJustMe
(7,012 posts)Sure sounds like you work for them. LOL
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)I want to know.
Oh, right, nothing.
In fact, you have posted the lowest of low hanging fruit. Not only is your post bereft of original thought, it demonstrates that not only are you uninformed, but purposefully misinformed about this subject, and proudly so, apparently. I'm so sorry that knowledge is so anathema to your worldview that you feel the need to actually spout such ignorance as you have in your post. You will, unfortunately, be completely oblivious about what is actually wrong with your post, on so many different levels, wrapped, as you are, in a haze of conspiracy theory dribble and confirmation bias.
Rather than welcoming challenges to your preconceived notions, or presenting evidence to support them, or thinking critically about subjects such as this, you instead mock that which you do not understand, shielded as you are by your incurious nature and lack of knowledge. Rather than attempting to understand the subjects you feel are threats with an open mind, you instead lock it up tight, so much so that you can't even understand how people can reasonably disagree with you. No, the conspiracy is too vast, in your head, we must be paid shills, its the only thing that makes sense, for if you thought anything else, your safe cocoon may come crashing down.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Why is it in LBN? Sheesh.
womanofthehills
(8,697 posts)From your past posts, you seem to seem to believe pesticides and toxic chemicals are the same as candy.
My whole neighborhood was poisoned by pesticides in the late 90's and I can attest to the horrors of being exposed to toxic chemicals.
I worked at a children's hospital in NM and we had babies born with partial brains to Mexican mothers who worked in the Agricultural fields.
There are lots of studies linking microcephaly to pesticides.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)The scientific community debunked this. I merely pointed that out. Why do you think it's ok to promote baseless fictions? Ethics matter. Reality matters. That's the only way we can help the planet and each other. Conspiracy nonsense helps no one but those few who gain from the con.
womanofthehills
(8,697 posts)What Would It Take to Prove the ZikaMicrocephaly Link
Public health officials are not yet ready to say the connection is causal
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-would-it-take-to-prove-the-zika-microcephaly-link1/
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)The fact that the virus as a cause hasn't been confirmed has nothing to do with the reality that this "proposed" cause has been shown to be baseless. It's time to stop playing games.
libodem
(19,288 posts)I've been suspicious of the hype since it started. Not sure why but this gives me something to think about.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)being credulous isn't a virtue.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)http://www.cbsnews.com/news/health-experts-dismiss-claims-larvicide-linked-to-microcephaly/
Also the many references in this Wikipedia article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyriproxyfen
Seems like this claim has already been debunked days ago.
In addition, looking at the home page of the website you linked to, I don't think critical thinking is a strong suite of the site administrators.
womanofthehills
(8,697 posts)Should pregnant women be concerned about Zika?
"Health authorities are currently investigating a potential link between Zika virus in pregnant women and microcephaly in their babies. Until more is known, women who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant should take extra care to protect themselves from mosquito bites.
If you are pregnant and suspect that you may have Zika virus disease, consult your doctor for close monitoring during your pregnancy.
What is microcephaly?
Microcephaly is a rare condition where a baby has an abnormally small head. This is due to abnormal brain development of the baby in the womb or during infancy. Babies and children with microcephaly often have challenges with their brain development as they grow older.
Microcephaly can be caused by a variety of environmental and genetic factors such as Downs syndrome; exposure to drugs, alcohol or other toxins in the womb; and rubella infection during pregnancy."
http://www.who.int/features/qa/zika/en/
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)microcephaly, and the adage "better safe than sorry" applies there.
Outside of that, I'm not sure how your link is relevant to this thread, which is discussing an already debunked correlation/causal link between one particularly pesticide and micocephaly.
Orrex
(63,200 posts)womanofthehills
(8,697 posts)
Abstract
Pesticides used in agriculture are designed to protect crops against unwanted species, such as weeds, insects, and fungus. Many compounds target the nervous system of insect pests. Because of the similarity in brain biochemistry, such pesticides may also be neurotoxic to humans. Concerns have been raised that the developing brain may be particularly vulnerable to adverse effects of neurotoxic pesticides. Current requirements for safety testing do not include developmental neurotoxicity. We therefore undertook a systematic evaluation of published evidence on neurotoxicity of pesticides in current use, with specific emphasis on risks during early development. Epidemiologic studies show associations with neurodevelopmental deficits, but mainly deal with mixed exposures to pesticides. Laboratory experimental studies using model compounds suggest that many pesticides currently used in Europe including organophosphates, carbamates, pyrethroids, ethylenebisdithiocarbamates, and chlorophenoxy herbicides can cause neurodevelopmental toxicity. Adverse effects on brain development can be severe and irreversible. Prevention should therefore be a public health priority. The occurrence of residues in food and other types of human exposures should be prevented with regard to the pesticide groups that are known to be neurotoxic. For other substances, given their widespread use and the unique vulnerability of the developing brain, the general lack of data on developmental neurotoxicity calls for investment in targeted research. While awaiting more definite evidence, existing uncertainties should be considered in light of the need for precautionary action to protect brain development.
ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1476-069X-7-50
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)So, while your post is interesting, its also irrelevant to the discussion.
womanofthehills
(8,697 posts)Brazil is the largest buyer of pesticides in the world - they used pesticides banned in the US
http://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/brazil-pesticides/
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)effect human health and development. But this OP was talking about pyriproxyfen, for which there is little to no evidence that it causes micocephaly in humans.
Please bear in mind that just because something is a pesticide doesn't automatically make it dangerous for humans to consume.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Save your popcorn for a better show.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)I read one of the linked articles upthread that supposedly debunks it, it read like an industry perspective with interests in debunking.
They said they'd found Zika in te blood samples of newborns with the deformites (or their Moms, I forget which) and seemed to think that was a big deal. They gave no numbers as to what percent of the deformed babies or Moms showed Zika., at least not that I saw.
They also said the deformities have been found in areas that didn't use the larvicide. Proves nothing. At what raate, and compared to areas that used larvacide?
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)It's in Malheur County, Oregon. PM for the details.
womanofthehills
(8,697 posts)All the statements from the WHO say "appear to" and "strongly suspected" - no actual research connecting it.
A causal relationship between Zika virus infection and birth malformations and neurological syndromes has not yet been established, but is strongly suspected.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3426401/Australian-man-27-diagnosed-Zika-virus-bitten-monkey-mosquitos-Bali.html#ixzz40gXYzBIz
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)You know that. To pretend otherwise is simply unethical. You actually chased down the posts with links about this. If you didn't read the links, you shouldn't have attacked as you did. If you had read the multiple links to science based information, then you know this claim of yours is nonsense. Which is it?
womanofthehills
(8,697 posts)when anything about health is discussed. The WHO still says the link is not proven- suspected but not proven. So are you telling me the World Health Organization doesn't know what they are talking about.
Its one thing to not trust corporations, I can understand that. But to trust something called "Physicians in Crop-Sprayed Towns" over the majority of science is very odd. The name itself tells you they have a bias.
womanofthehills
(8,697 posts)Brazil Shown to Be Largest Global Consumer of Pesticides - See more at: http://riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/rio-politics/brazil-is-largest-global-consumer-of-pesticides-shows-report/#sthash.iv8dNrOY.dpuf
"Petersen argues that what has been seen in reality is the opposite. Not only are we using more [pesticides] but we are using more powerful, stronger pesticides. We have been forced to import pesticides which were not even allowed in Brazil to combat pests which attacked GM soybean and cotton plants, he is quoted as saying.
The executive adds that 22 of the fifty main active ingredients used in pesticides in Brazil today have been banned in most other countries. We are facing a situation of total lack of control [of pesticide use]. The state does not monitor as it should and the legislation for the use of pesticides is not being obeyed, he concludes.
- See more at: http://riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/rio-politics/brazil-is-largest-global-consumer-of-pesticides-shows-report/#sthash.iv8dNrOY.dpuf
cstanleytech
(26,281 posts)womanofthehills
(8,697 posts)are exposed to a huge variety of horrible pesticides and herbicides - dangerous pesticides and herbicides other countries do not use. So pyriproxyfen in the water might not be connected but what about all the other herbicides and pesticides that get into the water supply from runnoff and in the air from drift. Are the woman of Brazil agricultural guinea pigs?
Demonaut
(8,914 posts)prosocution liability liability
MisterP
(23,730 posts)womanofthehills
(8,697 posts)All things are connected.
7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)Old Crow
(2,212 posts)... as a result of the arguing in the thread. The best information on the topic I've found so far is contained in the NYT article linked below. Hope this helps.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/02/18/health/what-causes-zika-virus-theories-rumors.html
jmowreader
(50,553 posts)Monsanto doesn't even make this product. Sumitomo Chemical does.
BooScout
(10,406 posts)Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours.