Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:03 AM Feb 2016

Clinton: People wonder if I’m ‘in it for myself’

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by NH Ethylene (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: The Hill

Democratic primary front-runner Hillary Clinton on Sunday said voters are trying to “sort through” whether she’s only in the presidential race for herself.

“I understand that voters have questions,” Clinton said on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “I’m going to do my very best to answer those questions."

"I think there’s an underlying question that is really in the back of people’s minds, and that is, you know, ‘Is she in it for us or is she in it for herself?’” she added.

“I think that’s, you know, a question that people are trying to sort through."

Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/270204-clinton-people-wonder-if-im-in-it-for-myself

85 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton: People wonder if I’m ‘in it for myself’ (Original Post) Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 OP
Like she would tell us. Release those speech transcripts & let us decide. pacalo Feb 2016 #1
Stop taking money from Big Pharma. 840high Feb 2016 #4
Stop taking $Millions from the 3rd Way FreakinDJ Feb 2016 #28
Maybe the reporter cannabis_flower Feb 2016 #84
HRC's problem is not with people who wonder if she's in this race just for herself. mikehiggins Feb 2016 #2
I disagree. Cassiopeia Feb 2016 #25
LOL, great response. ChairmanAgnostic Feb 2016 #73
this is so rich I gained weight just reading it azurnoir Feb 2016 #3
When will that be? Sounds like an afterthought that should have been already done. pacalo Feb 2016 #6
It'll be one heck of a case to make too azurnoir Feb 2016 #8
I've never seen her as sleazy but I do now. pacalo Feb 2016 #11
True I'll admit I've seen her as cold, calculating, petty but not sleazy not as much as recently azurnoir Feb 2016 #12
As consistent as a flip-flopping coin. n/t jtuck004 Feb 2016 #49
Time for a... Bangbangdem Feb 2016 #16
But before the primaries are over. pacalo Feb 2016 #19
You don't need a hactivist. The dirt is in goolge. trillion Feb 2016 #21
+10000 trillion Feb 2016 #20
My first thought after reading that line was Cassiopeia Feb 2016 #26
MSM is no longer as effective at mud slinging against Bernie jwirr Feb 2016 #58
+10000 trillion Feb 2016 #80
No we don't.... daleanime Feb 2016 #5
Yet another gag line that has my ass rolling on the floor . . . DrBulldog Feb 2016 #7
And now a word from Hillary's sponsors Feeling the Bern Feb 2016 #9
Fracking - she's major into fracking trillion Feb 2016 #22
I have heard Okies using the term "another liffle Hillary" for their fracking-induced earthquakes. jtuck004 Feb 2016 #50
This message was self-deleted by its author polly7 Feb 2016 #72
+10000 trillion Feb 2016 #82
No, she's not only in it for herself... Contrary1 Feb 2016 #10
Yes, forgot about them... n/t Merryland Feb 2016 #54
No, we don't wonder anymore. By now we KNOW it. eom Betty Karlson Feb 2016 #13
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #14
People wonder the exact same thing about all of their top 0.1% capitalist masters. mhatrw Feb 2016 #15
There are whole sectors in her super pac - fiance industry, fracking industry, banking industry trillion Feb 2016 #17
Well, I'm shocked that some of the blacks are questioning if she's in it for herself. trillion Feb 2016 #18
Hillary and Bill made $130 million in two years Geronimoe Feb 2016 #23
By who? trillion Feb 2016 #46
Release the Goldman transcripts. Cassiopeia Feb 2016 #24
Goldman Handcuffs prevent her from doing so. ChairmanAgnostic Feb 2016 #74
I'm still not convinced whether this woman is as altruistic as Sanders. I guess YOHABLO Feb 2016 #27
Long past wondering about it. You are. n/t sarge43 Feb 2016 #29
We don't think it demwing Feb 2016 #30
What tripe. I am not trying to "sort through" anything. War, fracking, TPP, cluster bombs - djean111 Feb 2016 #31
I don't wonder. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Feb 2016 #32
It's not all or nothing. The question is to what extent. JudyM Feb 2016 #33
Oh, I don't wonder. Oneironaut Feb 2016 #34
+1, for saying it before I could... friendly_iconoclast Feb 2016 #64
Considering her rhetoric has been "I, I, I," "me, me,me" until the last week, Vinca Feb 2016 #35
Wonder? Only one candidate is doing it for US. And it ain't the Clintons. Gregorian Feb 2016 #36
No, I don't wonder at all Rebkeh Feb 2016 #37
THIS RIGHT HERE^^^^^ nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #39
You just KNOW the ONLY reason they feel the need to address this is because of a poll. Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2016 #38
No doubt in my mind whatsoever jonjon Feb 2016 #40
Well, she clearly is Bradical79 Feb 2016 #41
oh...we know the answer to that one Roland99 Feb 2016 #42
oh, yes, we do. Indeed we do. nt antigop Feb 2016 #43
Even her answer is ego-centric farleftlib Feb 2016 #44
Well, to be honest, she is. Nedsdag Feb 2016 #45
Hey Hillary, you and most of your endorsers spent years hindering my family's rights. You did that Bluenorthwest Feb 2016 #47
Hey, forgive me if this seems sexist or racist or something but mikehiggins Feb 2016 #71
Either one of our candidates will make a terrific President davekriss Feb 2016 #48
Is she in it for herself? Merryland Feb 2016 #51
Prove it...where are those Goldman Sachs transcripts? hoosierlib Feb 2016 #52
A play from the book - Frame the debate - no "Kissingers friend" that is not what I wonder... SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #53
Sort through? CoffeeCat Feb 2016 #55
It's not a question for me. ananda Feb 2016 #56
That and the fact that Plucketeer Feb 2016 #75
It's past wondering Kall Feb 2016 #57
$20 million in paid speeches Dems to Win Feb 2016 #59
Do some research DownriverDem Feb 2016 #60
Electable? How? LibDemAlways Feb 2016 #63
Her little escapade of trashing a young Monika Lewinsky instead of her husband for his infidelities notadmblnd Feb 2016 #65
Hillary is farleftlib Feb 2016 #81
There is no doubt timmymoff Feb 2016 #61
What surprised me about that clip... thesquanderer Feb 2016 #62
#ShesWithHer frylock Feb 2016 #66
People will wonder that, Hillary. n/t Herman4747 Feb 2016 #67
Forgot the third option, In it for the special interests! harun Feb 2016 #68
Nice focus groups.. Helen Borg Feb 2016 #69
Seems to me like she is. The Clintons have always been about themselves first (nt) bigwillq Feb 2016 #70
I am not wondering at all. nt thereismore Feb 2016 #76
I've already sorted through it just fine pengu Feb 2016 #77
It's not just DUers that feel Pastiche423 Feb 2016 #78
No they don't. They know you are. CharlotteVale Feb 2016 #79
+1 MosheFeingold Feb 2016 #83
Sorry, we're locking this. Chemisse Feb 2016 #85

pacalo

(24,857 posts)
1. Like she would tell us. Release those speech transcripts & let us decide.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:05 AM
Feb 2016
 

840high

(17,196 posts)
4. Stop taking money from Big Pharma.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:12 AM
Feb 2016
 

FreakinDJ

(17,644 posts)
28. Stop taking $Millions from the 3rd Way
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:12 AM
Feb 2016

their board of Trustees has been donating HEAVILY to Hillary Clinton





Bernard L. Schwartz

$1.0 million

Chairman and chief executive of BLS Investments.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/top-presidential-donors-campaign-money.html

cannabis_flower

(3,931 posts)
84. Maybe the reporter
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:05 PM
Feb 2016

Who has the transcripts will release a couple of them a couple of days before the South Carolina Primary and another a couple of days before Super Tuesday. Pretty p!ease! Hint, hint.

http://iwilllookintoit.com

Maybe she shouldn't think too long.

mikehiggins

(5,614 posts)
2. HRC's problem is not with people who wonder if she's in this race just for herself.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:07 AM
Feb 2016

Her problem is with the huge number of people who have already made a decision about that question.

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
25. I disagree.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 06:22 AM
Feb 2016

There are millions that don't know yet. They need to be informed, encouraged to register, and concerned enough to go to their polling location.

Generally speaking, people are not well informed. It's up to us.

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)
73. LOL, great response.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:34 PM
Feb 2016

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
3. this is so rich I gained weight just reading it
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:11 AM
Feb 2016
Clinton said she has to make her case to the voters that she’s been consistent on the issues throughout her career in public service.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/270204-clinton-people-wonder-if-im-in-it-for-myself

pacalo

(24,857 posts)
6. When will that be? Sounds like an afterthought that should have been already done.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:16 AM
Feb 2016

Let us decide for ourselves -- show us the speech transcripts so that we can see what you're like when you're not asking for our votes.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
8. It'll be one heck of a case to make too
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:18 AM
Feb 2016

she's been consistent, well if constantly changing I'll give her that

pacalo

(24,857 posts)
11. I've never seen her as sleazy but I do now.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:26 AM
Feb 2016

"Work hard & you'll be successful, too" doesn't work for those working 2 or 3 jobs just to survive. Her rhetoric is cold. I didn't like it when she was approached by those two BLM kids, either -- "Mmm hmm, mmm hmm." She's not the person I thought she was.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
12. True I'll admit I've seen her as cold, calculating, petty but not sleazy not as much as recently
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:29 AM
Feb 2016
 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
49. As consistent as a flip-flopping coin. n/t
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:06 PM
Feb 2016
 

Bangbangdem

(140 posts)
16. Time for a...
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:04 AM
Feb 2016

Hacktavist! This content is out there. Let's get cracking!

pacalo

(24,857 posts)
19. But before the primaries are over.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:12 AM
Feb 2016
 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
21. You don't need a hactivist. The dirt is in goolge.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:17 AM
Feb 2016

Pick any issue other than planned parenthood.

google

hillary fracking
hillary monsanto
hillary gays
hillary honduras
hillary plan columbia
hillary syria
hillary for profit prison
hillary fossil fuels
etc.
etc.

Ther dirt is out there on every google.

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
20. +10000
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:14 AM
Feb 2016

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
26. My first thought after reading that line was
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 06:29 AM
Feb 2016

how the fuck do you do that?

Well, the MSM has been trying really hard since June of '15. They've done well, but still struggle, it's hard to push a ton of bullshit up a 30% grade.

Tied, 3 states in and tied when we we're supposed to be shut down and broke after NH. Funny enough, the only one broke and begging is Clinton.

SC will be another blow. Super tuesday will get ugly, but VA and CO may surprise us. then we get to settle in and see what the super pacs do. If Rubio catches some votes, Hillary may find a real drought in campaign funds.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
58. MSM is no longer as effective at mud slinging against Bernie
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:37 PM
Feb 2016

as they would have been in 08. This time around we have another source of news. She may sell them a bill of goods to suggest she is for the people but they will not be able to make it stick.

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
80. +10000
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:36 PM
Feb 2016

"then we get to settle in and see what the super pacs do. If Rubio catches some votes, Hillary may find a real drought in campaign funds."

And wow, someone who totally _gets_ it.

daleanime

(17,796 posts)
5. No we don't....
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:15 AM
Feb 2016

it's pretty obvious.

 

DrBulldog

(841 posts)
7. Yet another gag line that has my ass rolling on the floor . . .
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:17 AM
Feb 2016
 

Feeling the Bern

(3,839 posts)
9. And now a word from Hillary's sponsors
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:19 AM
Feb 2016

Big Pharma
Private Prisons
Too Big to Fail Banks
Wall Street
MIC Contractors
For Profit Universities
Big Oil
Big Insurance

Seriously, she should wear a NASCAR jacket with all her corporate sponsors.

And now, back to our regularly scheduled program: Camp Weathervane's daily "How to make our candidate not see what everyone knows she is" campaign, starting all Democratic Party insiders, the DNC elite and the host of our show, Hillary Rodham Clinton!

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
22. Fracking - she's major into fracking
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:20 AM
Feb 2016

just google her name and fracking - she's spent a lot of time promoting fracking.

She also has off shore drilling in her super pacs along with fracking

Hillary Clinton Fracking Cash
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brad-johnson/on-eve-of-caucuses-clinto_b_9117712.html

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
50. I have heard Okies using the term "another liffle Hillary" for their fracking-induced earthquakes.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:09 PM
Feb 2016

She always claimed to be a mover and a shaker...

Response to trillion (Reply #22)

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
82. +10000
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:56 PM
Feb 2016

Contrary1

(12,629 posts)
10. No, she's not only in it for herself...
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:25 AM
Feb 2016

There's Bill and Chelsea to consider.

Merryland

(1,134 posts)
54. Yes, forgot about them... n/t
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:17 PM
Feb 2016
 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
13. No, we don't wonder anymore. By now we KNOW it. eom
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:37 AM
Feb 2016

Response to Cheese Sandwich (Original post)

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
15. People wonder the exact same thing about all of their top 0.1% capitalist masters.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:44 AM
Feb 2016

"Are they in it to create jobs for us or are they in it for themselves?’”



People wonder the exact same thing about Dick Cheney and other war profiteers.

"Are they in it to make the world safer for us or are they in it for themselves?’”

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
17. There are whole sectors in her super pac - fiance industry, fracking industry, banking industry
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:07 AM
Feb 2016

War industry, Insurance Industry.

She's in it for her super pac.

I think a whole lot of Hillary supporters have a really mistaken idea that she's in it for them though.

I'm sure if you pay her enough she would be.

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
18. Well, I'm shocked that some of the blacks are questioning if she's in it for herself.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:12 AM
Feb 2016

Where on earth would they get that idea?

 

Geronimoe

(1,539 posts)
23. Hillary and Bill made $130 million in two years
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:49 AM
Feb 2016

because it was offered to them for the good work they used to do for we the people.

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
46. By who?
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 11:42 AM
Feb 2016

Hillary supporters don't give a damn about her massive bad work that tramples over any good work. All the blood on that woman's hands? Toppling a left wing president when she helped orchestrate the Honduras coup and completely destabilizing that country? The UN says she was the key part in causing the Syrian bloodshed because she kept undermining the peace treaty that may have prevented it. "Good works" in her case means helping cause massive death and 3 refugee crises' - Honduras, Columbia and Syria.

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
24. Release the Goldman transcripts.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 06:15 AM
Feb 2016

I'm sure that will answer most of our questions.

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)
74. Goldman Handcuffs prevent her from doing so.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:35 PM
Feb 2016
 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
27. I'm still not convinced whether this woman is as altruistic as Sanders. I guess
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 06:48 AM
Feb 2016

she is, or it seems as if she is, but wait, oh never mind.

sarge43

(29,173 posts)
29. Long past wondering about it. You are. n/t
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:14 AM
Feb 2016
 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
30. We don't think it
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:32 AM
Feb 2016

we're already convinced of it, which is why no one trusts you

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
31. What tripe. I am not trying to "sort through" anything. War, fracking, TPP, cluster bombs -
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:37 AM
Feb 2016

to name just some of the things Hillary is for and I am against. I don't give a flying fuck not do I waste any time what her motives are - they are power and money. No need to sort through anything.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
32. I don't wonder.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:51 AM
Feb 2016

I'm sure.

JudyM

(29,785 posts)
33. It's not all or nothing. The question is to what extent.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 08:40 AM
Feb 2016

I think the answer is clearly that the best view of her is that it's 50:50.

Personally I think she started her career with good intentions but was co-opted by the thirst for $ and social power. She grew to thirst for political power as well.

Even if she hasn't lost sight of her more altruistic values - and I don't think she has - she has played the system to such an extent, and flip-flopped to such an extent, and exercised poor judgment bordering on hurting our economy and our national security to such an extent, that her good intentions have been subjugated.

She's still wearing the jacket, but it is positively THREADBARE.
Bernie's is older but looks good as new because he has acted in service of his altruistic values his whole life. Hillary just has it as a blurb on her resume with minimal continuity to today.

Oneironaut

(6,293 posts)
34. Oh, I don't wonder.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 08:41 AM
Feb 2016
 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
64. +1, for saying it before I could...
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:00 PM
Feb 2016

Vinca

(53,954 posts)
35. Considering her rhetoric has been "I, I, I," "me, me,me" until the last week,
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 09:18 AM
Feb 2016

that's pretty much how it appears. Now she's using Bernie's model - "we, we, we," "our, our, our" - and we're supposed to believe she's not in it for a spot in history.

Gregorian

(23,867 posts)
36. Wonder? Only one candidate is doing it for US. And it ain't the Clintons.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:02 AM
Feb 2016

Rebkeh

(2,450 posts)
37. No, I don't wonder at all
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:06 AM
Feb 2016

It's pretty obvious by now. She has shown us who she is, I believe her.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
39. THIS RIGHT HERE^^^^^ nt
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:29 AM
Feb 2016
 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
38. You just KNOW the ONLY reason they feel the need to address this is because of a poll.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:25 AM
Feb 2016
 

jonjon

(68 posts)
40. No doubt in my mind whatsoever
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:32 AM
Feb 2016

She'll do her best to fuck us over and steal the rest of the furniture.
 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
41. Well, she clearly is
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:32 AM
Feb 2016

If she wins, I'love take her over the other corrupt politicians though. It'll suck not being able to address numerous serious concerns, but at least 2 of the 3 Republicans give me Hitler vibes, and she's not going to roll back any gains under Obama.

Roland99

(53,345 posts)
42. oh...we know the answer to that one
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 11:11 AM
Feb 2016

antigop

(12,778 posts)
43. oh, yes, we do. Indeed we do. nt
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 11:14 AM
Feb 2016
 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
44. Even her answer is ego-centric
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 11:31 AM
Feb 2016
“I’m going to demonstrate that I have always been the same person, fighting for the same values, fighting to make a real difference in people’s lives long before I was ever in elected office, even before my husband was in the presidency,” she said.

“So I know that I have to, you know, make my case,” she continued. “I have to demonstrate what I have achieved.”


Me, me, me, I, I.

How about something along the lines of: this is what I plan to do for the American people. My platform is X, Y and Z.

I'm tired of her reciting her resume every time she's asked a question.

Nedsdag

(2,437 posts)
45. Well, to be honest, she is.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 11:32 AM
Feb 2016

If she cannot be honest with herself, how can she be honest running the country?

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
47. Hey Hillary, you and most of your endorsers spent years hindering my family's rights. You did that
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 11:50 AM
Feb 2016

for you, certainly not for us. Three years ago you were saying your God does not see us as worthy of equal rights, most of those who are so strongly attacking Bernie Sanders today also attacked LGBT equality, they are the DOMA voters and the last hold outs, the people who kept claiming Jesus was on their side and against us.

So Hillary you and your cohort have never been in it for my family, my community nor for my industry. In fact for most of your career you have openly objected to my rights as have all of your Bernie Bashing Endorsers.

If you got some people who never voted against the rights of others to bash Bernie for you that would be far more convincing. As it is, their past history suggests bias is their guide.

mikehiggins

(5,614 posts)
71. Hey, forgive me if this seems sexist or racist or something but
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:18 PM
Feb 2016

most of the gay guys I know (and I admit I don't know a lot--I wish they'd start wearing special bandanas or something so they wouldn't look so much like the rest of us) are pretty smart people. How does it happen that gays support a candidate who has a record of being against their best interests?

It is, as Yul Brynner might say, a puzzlement. If I could go on YouTube and view her speech about the "Sacred bond between men and women..." what more would there need to be said? How do people choose to ignore the evidence in front of their noses?

davekriss

(5,420 posts)
48. Either one of our candidates will make a terrific President
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:00 PM
Feb 2016

Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders stand 1000 feet above the heads and shoulders of any of the Republican candidates. Isn't that obvious to all?

Senator Sanders does more closely cleave to positions I hold, but Secretary Clinton is not that far off that I can't support her. In fact, I can support either enthusiastically. They're great candidates, both of them.

I do believe we should fight it out in the primaries, but I wish we'd do so without injuring whomever is our nominee in the end. It should be a battle of ideas, policies, and positions, not about motives and who is more authentic than who. Just my 2 cents. But once chosen, we really do need to rally around our candidate. I don't think it's too extreme to say that the fate of our planet depends on who occupies the Oval Office on January 20, 2017.

Merryland

(1,134 posts)
51. Is she in it for herself?
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:13 PM
Feb 2016

"That's a question people are still trying to sort through" - Oh my God, that's her answer?? She insanely passive agressive along with so many other charming personality traits.

 

hoosierlib

(710 posts)
52. Prove it...where are those Goldman Sachs transcripts?
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:13 PM
Feb 2016
 

SoLeftIAmRight

(4,883 posts)
53. A play from the book - Frame the debate - no "Kissingers friend" that is not what I wonder...
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:14 PM
Feb 2016

I know the answer to that question.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
55. Sort through?
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:18 PM
Feb 2016

Seriously?

HRC is the most well-known politicians in the world. Just ask her supporters how much Hillary has been "vetted."

HRC has been around forever. People have made up their minds about her. Republicans and many Democrats may have very different reasons and rationales for their negative viewpoints of her.

However, it is clear--the majority of our country doesn't like her and doesn't trust her.

I'm sorry, but that cake is baked. A few lofty platitudes during a political campaign won't make a dent in her high negatives.

But thanks, DNC--for leveraging a dud who will lose the GE. We'll see you in hell during the Trump Presidency.

ananda

(35,107 posts)
56. It's not a question for me.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:23 PM
Feb 2016

She is definitely in it for both herself and for her big money
and corporate backers.

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
75. That and the fact that
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:36 PM
Feb 2016

it's HER TURN!

Kall

(615 posts)
57. It's past wondering
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:27 PM
Feb 2016
 

Dems to Win

(2,161 posts)
59. $20 million in paid speeches
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:39 PM
Feb 2016

Hillary cashed in on her public service, now she wants our votes AFTER getting rich.

I do believe this problem was wholly predictable, by anyone with good judgement.

It's just one more glaring example of Hillary's poor judgement.

DownriverDem

(7,012 posts)
60. Do some research
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:51 PM
Feb 2016

As I've been reading the hate against Hillary it is very clear that the haters use RWNJ talking points to attack her. They don't even know her - Attorney, First Lady of AR, First Lady of the US, Senator, Secretary of State She has worked for women and kids for decades. She is the most qualified out of all the candidates running. Folks in Nevada said that they voted for her because of her experience and the fact that she will be electable in November.

Stop the hate. It makes you all look foolish.

LibDemAlways

(15,139 posts)
63. Electable? How?
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:30 PM
Feb 2016

Are Bernie voters going to beat a path to her headquarters to volunteer? Probably not. At best many will hold their noses and vote against the Republican rather than for her. She generates little enthusiasm, represents the status quo, has more personal baggage than a millionaire on a world cruise, and Democratic turnout in the caucuses and primaries has down down thus far -- not a good sign for either candidate. Republicans hate her with a passion. The media is poised to turn on her with a vengeance once she gets the nod. This is a formula for victory? I admire your optimism, but I repectfully disagree.



notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
65. Her little escapade of trashing a young Monika Lewinsky instead of her husband for his infidelities
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:02 PM
Feb 2016

sure showed me how hard she's worked for and stood up for woman. And all those immigrant kids she'll send back to South America where they came from to avoid being killed- Yep that shows me how hard she'll fight for children.

Gotta love her.

 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
81. Hillary is
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:42 PM
Feb 2016

more of a RWNJ than anybody.

The left, whom she detests passionately, are sick of her neoliberal, warhawk, corporate sellout ways. She and all her followers just recite her resume, posts she was given because of who she's married to and by whom owes her or Bill a favor. She will be trounced badly in Nov. Irretrievably.

Foolish are those who follow a destined loser.

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
61. There is no doubt
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:52 PM
Feb 2016

I do not wonder if you are in it for yourself. I've been well aware of it since 2008. Your disconnect with us voters shows me who you are in it for. It isn't me and my family.

thesquanderer

(13,001 posts)
62. What surprised me about that clip...
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:26 PM
Feb 2016

...is that that wasn't actually a question she was asked. She actually chose to independently bring up that people are questioning whether she's just in it for herself. The question was more benign than that. I'm surprised that she actually chose to bring that up, which in a way kind of legitimized it as a voter concern. Maybe her internal polls are showing that it's a big issue, and she's trying to get out in front of it.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
66. #ShesWithHer
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:05 PM
Feb 2016
 

Herman4747

(1,825 posts)
67. People will wonder that, Hillary. n/t
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:20 PM
Feb 2016

harun

(11,381 posts)
68. Forgot the third option, In it for the special interests!
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:43 PM
Feb 2016

I don't think it is between Hillary and the people. She has said more to support special interests than to support the people. So, what are we going to expect her to be like in office?

Helen Borg

(3,963 posts)
69. Nice focus groups..
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:51 PM
Feb 2016
 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
70. Seems to me like she is. The Clintons have always been about themselves first (nt)
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:00 PM
Feb 2016

thereismore

(13,326 posts)
76. I am not wondering at all. nt
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:37 PM
Feb 2016

pengu

(462 posts)
77. I've already sorted through it just fine
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:53 PM
Feb 2016

Pastiche423

(15,406 posts)
78. It's not just DUers that feel
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:21 PM
Feb 2016

that she's in it for herself.

Check out the comments at the bottom of the article.

CharlotteVale

(2,717 posts)
79. No they don't. They know you are.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:24 PM
Feb 2016

MosheFeingold

(3,051 posts)
83. +1
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 06:35 PM
Feb 2016

Chemisse

(31,341 posts)
85. Sorry, we're locking this.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:22 PM
Feb 2016

This should be posted in GD P instead. It is not Important news of national interest.

Statement of Purpose

Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Clinton: People wonder if...