Message auto-removed

[Name removed]

[hrmjustin]

1. Right wing sources and a right wing polling operation.

How nice!

[MinnieBlum]

55. My thoughts are you should go back to the Free Republic

Bye bye.

[Blanks]

133. Do you suppose that has anything to do...

With the fact that she didn't do anything 'more wrong' than any other Secretary of State with respect to emails.

It's a witch hunt, like Benghazi. The absurd notion that the president and Secretary of State are responsible for attacks on American embassies is also new. Where was the outage during all of the attacks during the Bush administration.

It doesn't matter who cares about the emails. It's silliness.

[hrmjustin]

65. What do you think?

[hrmjustin]

74. I think it is right wing mastabutory fantasy.

[hrmjustin]

88. Lol enjoy.

[hrmjustin]

100. What do you think?

[Mother Of Four]

106. I think they're trying to bait you -

and they obviously can't tell you won't rise to it.

[hrmjustin]

108. Yep!

[hrmjustin]

110. Are you?

[Hekate]

111. Based on your line of reasoning, you may have dropped into the wrong discussion board. But thanks...

...for your concern anyway.

[Hekate]

116. You had to sign the Terms Of Service (TOS) when you joined DU. Please go back and read them. nt

[Hekate]

120. Reading comprehension is your friend

[Dr Hobbitstein]

129. Actually, YES.

Posting a RW article IS against the rules.

[Dr Hobbitstein]

135. Rightwing sources are not allowed.

Period. Enjoy your stay, however...

[hrmjustin]

127. Who are you calling a troll?

[Jackie Wilson Said]

77. Amazing. A complete non story, made up by the GOP to destroy Hillary, and look

at who joins in.

Makes a real patriot sick to their fucking stomachs.

[hrmjustin]

79. Yep! It is a shame it is posted here.

[Jackie Wilson Said]

81. If the result is a GOP presidency, I am going to hold certain people responsible.

[hrmjustin]

83. Yep! And it will not be forgotten.

[grasswire]

118. anonymous posters on message boards?

Oh brother. Step away from the keyboard for a while.

[Kingofalldems]

92. So take it down if you are sorry.

[Hekate]

114. You can take it down and try another source. But as it is, people are informing you ....

...as kindly as possible, that you are carrying water for the RW by using RW sources.

[bvf]

102. Maybe it would help if you threw a tantrum.

[leftofcool]

2. Translation: We polled a bunch of Republicans that want this non scandal to continue.

[leftofcool]

97. Because only Republicans want to do this

Rasmussen is a rethug pollling outfit.

[dorkzilla]

3. Please self-delete

Washington Examiner and National Review are NOT sites ANY of us link to, whatever side we support.

[giftedgirl77]

10. No, your points a biased & lack all credibility.

[geek tragedy]

31. it's important to rightwingers who get their news from the National Review nt

[giftedgirl77]

4. You know you're desperate when you post such a piece of shit rw source

such as this.

[giftedgirl77]

15. I'm not clicking on that shit.

The FBI is investigating that's not a GOP investigation.

[vdogg]

58. Dear God!

Look below you. He actually just backed his rw source up with Rasmussen, another rw source. I can't even...

[Jackie Wilson Said]

80. FBI is only investigating because the GOP has made a stink about this non story.

I am getting angrier everyday at the whole country unloading on Hillary.

[giftedgirl77]

82. This I understand.

I don't even care if ppl complain about legitimate concerns. This isn't one.

[Jackie Wilson Said]

87. Exactly, there is plenty to not like about here connections to Wall Street

and those legitimate concerns can be addressed, but this bullshit is ridiculous.

[think]

35. You can take the article straight from rasmussen reports and link to it. That way you're not linking

to a right wing story on it:

Special Prosecutor for Hillary?

~Snip~

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 54% of Likely U.S. Voters believe the Justice Department should name an independent prosecutor to decide whether criminal charges should be brought against Clinton for sending and receiving classified information through a private e-mail server while she was secretary of State. Thirty-three percent (33%) disagree, while 13% are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.)....

Read more:
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/february_2016/special_prosecutor_for_hillary

[giftedgirl77]

63. Lol, what's next Fox News?

Maybe you should ask Ham Rove what he thinks?

[think]

68. What's wrong with Rasmussen Reports?

[giftedgirl77]

70. Did you miss the last 2 election cycles?

[Orrex]

5. Headline: a fraction of Americans get behind a media-driven non-issue

And is it a majority of Americans? Or a majority of likely voters?

[Tarheel_Dem]

7. The National Review? Really?

[geek tragedy]

16. Welcome back to DU. nt

[Tarheel_Dem]

30. The "evidence", as you call it, comes from disreputable sources, so NO, I can't "look past" that.

But welcome back, anyhoo.

[Tarheel_Dem]

53. Quite frankly, I don't care.

[Tarheel_Dem]

69. Buh - Bye!

[giftedgirl77]

8. BTW, welcome to DU I'm sure your intentions are legit.

[sweetloukillbot]

132. Better Believe It!

[Trust Buster]

9. Using the same tactics as Republicans. They're despicable and their candidate DESERVES to lose.

[dorkzilla]

20. Yeah, we're all despicable

FFS.

[7962]

39. "Right wing! Right wing! Right wing!"

Never fails

[phazed0]

11. Well... maybe not the Right wing Hair on fire stance.. but...

The accusations do hold water. So don't be so quick to dismiss this as Hillary did do some things (or rather, had things done for her) that were 101 stupid errors (regarding technology) that, in my mind, no doubt warrant an investigation.

I'm an IT professional and Hillary's email server setup was deplorable, bordering on malicious. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.

[Trust Buster]

14. Why should our presumptive nominee and her supporters be politically tortured on this forum by

someone with 16 posts ? Could this poster be a Republican troll ?

[4now]

21. Troll like behavior

[giftedgirl77]

19. Lol, there's 2 of them in this thread.

[Tarheel_Dem]

33. That didn't escape my notice either. Looks like we're being tag teamed.

[4now]

18. Right wing BS

How sad that this is all you have.

[jalan48]

24. If Hillary wins and the Republicans control Congress guess what we are in for?

Years of investigations and hearings. Major gridlock on everything important to Americans except issues concerning Wall St. and big business where Hillary will reach across the aisle and find consensus. Sometimes it seems like a staged theater event.

[pnwmom]

27. If Bernie wins and the Rethugs control Congress we'll be in for the same thing.

Guaranteed.

Or haven't you noticed what Obama has been going through for the last seven years?

[jalan48]

36. I hadn't heard Obama or Bernie was undergoing a Federal investigation.

[7962]

42. Ha!

[pnwmom]

45. Obama has faced obstructionist tactics since the day he took office.

The Rethugs will throw anything they can at the next Democratic President.

[pnwmom]

25. Right. They want another Kenneth Starr stalking the Clintons.

No, the majority of Americans don't -- no matter what this right wing pollster claims about the views of his "likely voters."

[pnwmom]

29. There is an FBI investigation being carried out right now. That is all that is needed.

We learned the lesson about "independent prosecutor" fishing expeditions long ago.

[pnwmom]

49. The FBI and their 100 agents are on it. We don't also need an independent

prosecutor with an unlimited license to spend unlimited sums of money going down every rabbit hole searching for fire ants.

Were you paying attention during the Kenneth Starr investigation? We would be insane to join the Rethug call for a similar attack on another Democrat.

[Kingofalldems]

37. Hey I have an idea--How about Ken Starr?

He'll keep it going for at least 8 years.

[yallerdawg]

32. What does "likely voters" have to do with it?

More rightwing gawdamn bullshit!

[pnwmom]

50. No. The GOP would not stop simply because they succeeded in getting

an Independent prosecutor appointed. That would just egg them on.

[BumRushDaShow]

34. It's like the Ides of March redux

DU is swarming.

[etherealtruth]

40. The bigger question: what does Glenn Beck and the Blaze say?

If you truly want discussion, using something other than right wing sources would probably be a better tactic

[geek tragedy]

47. you joined DU to post stuff from National Review and Washington Examiner.

Why should we not assume you are up to no good?

[etherealtruth]

48. Did you point out how asinine the right wingers are in pushing this?

I wasn't willing to wade through the right wing swill to notice your criticism and disavowing their idiocy.

[lamp_shade]

41. Horseshit RW sources. Bah!

[MinnieBlum]

54. Gee Thartic, let's see all your emails...

.. because you're obviously a Republican. Get lost.

[still_one]

59. Let's see, Washington Examiner, National Review, are you sure you are on the forum?

[jalan48]

60. Definitely Ms. Samsonite.

[vdogg]

62. Unfortunately, Skinner's detente

Means some that were legitimately kicked out get to come back too. Oh well, gotta take the good with the bad I guess.

[still_one]

66. right wing links as LBN. Maybe this site should be renamed to "republican underground"

[Kingofalldems]

71. I alerted to hosts. Nothing as of yet.

[etherealtruth]

73. Its been posted ...unfortunately I participated in this thread

[Kingofalldems]

76. I just posted to Skinner in ATA about this whole subject.

I have seen more than one in the last week that were not taken down.

[etherealtruth]

84. This also survived a jury

For the record (you probably know, but) .... sources are beyond the purview of hosts in the main forums .... except LBN. in GD, V&M, GDP etc its up to juries to hide this sh*t

[Kingofalldems]

90. Whoa--the first line of the SOP:

'Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs.'

You are saying hosts cannot enforce SOP? That is a shocker. Thanks.

BTW, the fact this survived a jury is most depressing.

[geek tragedy]

93. at least one juror voted to keep it explicitly because it was anti-Clinton

JURY RESULTS

A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Thu Mar 17, 2016, 06:17 PM, and voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT ALONE.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: What is this I don't even
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Agree with alerter.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Isn't this alert in itself a violation of the newbie clause of DU rules?
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: another day in Clintonville
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Far too many right wing sources used. Hide it.

Juror # 6 should lose jury privileges.

[Kingofalldems]

96. Alert on the jury results.

[geek tragedy]

98. already did. nt

[Kingofalldems]

101. Excellent.

[etherealtruth]

99. ???? Please reread my post ... I said LBN is the only forum we can consider sources ....????

sources are beyond the purview of hosts in the main forums .... except LBN.

Sometimes, I wonder why I even try ... I won't make that mistake with you, again

[Kingofalldems]

103. Oops sorry. I had no intention of attacking you, I promise.

I truly apologize, all my anger is directed at the poster, not you or any host.

[etherealtruth]

105. Thanks ... I probably over reacted

I jump in and "attack" right wing sources and those that promote them when ever I see them ... so I was probably overly sensitive to criticism.

I can't participate in the host forum on this one because I participated in a very non-neutral way in this thread

[Kingofalldems]

107. Got it. Peace.

[leftyladyfrommo]

67. Everybody I know quit caring about 5 investgations ago.

Clinic Powell and C. Rice used personal emails. Many people at State did because the State computers were so outdated they were inadequate. And then we find out that Hillary requested a Blackberry 2009 but NSA refused to giver her one.

I think she did pretty well. Lots of government systems have been hacked but hers wasn't.

But I am sure we will need to spend another few million dollars and do endless more investigations to prove nothing.

[Skittles]

78. and they found....what?

this is as much a bullshit "scandal" as Benghazi

[Nailzberg]

86. Whatever. She's already sent eleventeen GOP investgations to the showers.

Highly doubt an independent will turn up something the republicans missed.

[Hekate]

89. That's what Right Wing propaganda will do for you. nt

[DJ13]

104. I'm surprised the Clinton supporters arent jumping at this as a chance to stall the issue

So Hillary wins the Presidency long before any investigation is finished.

She could exert more influence on the final report that way.

[Kingofalldems]

112. Oh look you changed the title.

Now it's independent Americans, whereas before it was all Americans.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=thread&address=10141381872&info=1#edits

Isn't that special.

[JDPriestly]

121. For people who talk about the deficit so much, the Republicans sure like to waste money on

crazy investigations like this.

Why don't they investigate Colin Powell too while they are at it?

[Kingofalldems]

123. BTW, your headline does not match the headline at the link.

Another SOP violation.

[Kingofalldems]

131. I guess you might want to read them.

They were explained during your posting process.

[Botany]

125. There is no scandal

the only scandal is the one made up by republicans and repeated in the media.

[Dr Hobbitstein]

126. Yay! RW bullshit from a low count poster!

Enjoy your stay!

[yallerdawg]

130. Just more of this:

Tarc