Fri Mar 18, 2016, 05:12 PM
Attorney in Texas (3,373 posts)
GOP Senator: We Should ‘Man Up And Cast A Vote’ On Obama’s Court Pick
Source: HuffingtonPost
WASHINGTON — Sen. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) said Friday that his party needs to “just man up and cast a vote” on President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nominee — a break from GOP leaders’ position that there will be no votes or even hearings until there’s a new president....He went on to say, in essence, what Senate Democrats have been saying all along about voting on Merrick Garland: It’s our job. “The tough thing about these Senatorial jobs is you get yes or no votes,” he said. “Your whole job is to either say yes or no, and explain why.” The Illinois Republican is in a tight race with Rep. Tammy Duckworth (D), who is trying to unseat him in November. He’s been trying to cast himself as above politics, and in recent days has been distancing himself from his party leaders’ firm stance on denying Garland hearings. Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/mark-kirk-supreme-court-nominee_us_56ec29e8e4b084c672201134
|
9 replies, 2070 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Attorney in Texas | Mar 2016 | OP |
jpak | Mar 2016 | #1 | |
Jackie Wilson Said | Mar 2016 | #2 | |
ColesCountyDem | Mar 2016 | #3 | |
scscholar | Mar 2016 | #4 | |
houston16revival | Mar 2016 | #5 | |
Skittles | Mar 2016 | #6 | |
oldandhappy | Mar 2016 | #7 | |
Gidney N Cloyd | Mar 2016 | #8 | |
cstanleytech | Mar 2016 | #9 |
Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 05:14 PM
jpak (41,189 posts)
1. Turtleboy will not comply
above his grade
yup |
Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 05:15 PM
Jackie Wilson Said (4,176 posts)
2. Mark is not an idiot.
He knows that a flat refusal to do his job could cost him, his job.
|
Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 05:18 PM
ColesCountyDem (6,941 posts)
3. "Hey, Illinois voters, look--I'm not like the rest of them!"
Horse hockey, you spineless asshole!
|
Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 05:21 PM
scscholar (2,902 posts)
4. They have REFUSED to vote. REFUSED to vote.
Why expect them to change?
|
Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 05:39 PM
houston16revival (953 posts)
5. Shredding the Constitution
as well as their Bible sworn oaths to execute their duties
is not a winning position. Kirk understands if he means what he says. What are they hiding from? They're hiding from the naked partisan motives behind their refusing to do their jobs. No one can deny they can vote NO if they want to. Stall, stonewall, hedge, delay ... that's a strategy. That's politics. Not doing your job so you can escape responsibility? He's nailed it. Man up! Don't be Senate Wimpies. |
Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 07:34 PM
Skittles (144,725 posts)
6. translation: he likes the pick
Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 07:59 PM
oldandhappy (6,719 posts)
7. yup
I am not holding my breathe.
|
Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 10:18 PM
Gidney N Cloyd (18,537 posts)
8. I suspect Kirk got clearance from McConnell's tower for this, much as with ...
... how some got permission to not support Trump. He's in big trouble this November.
(http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/271044-mcconnell-preps-senators-to-run-against-trump) |
Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 11:00 PM
cstanleytech (23,985 posts)