Sanders needs to change 'tone' if he wants NY debate
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by etherealtruth (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: The Hill
A top aide to Hillary Clinton's campaign on Monday dodged questions about setting up a debate with Bernie Sanders in New York, saying it depends on the senator's "tone."
"This is a man who said he'd never run a negative ad ever. He's now running them. They're planning to run more," Joel Benenson, Clinton's chief strategist, said on CNN. "Let's see the tone of the campaign he wants to run before we get to any other questions."
After winning a trio of states over the weekend, Sanders on Sunday called for a debate in New York ahead of that state's April 19 primary. The Vermont senator is looking to cut into Clinton's delegate lead and says he has the "momentum" heading into the latter half of the race.
The pair faced off in a Miami debate earlier this month, and a Sanders campaign letter on Sunday said the two campaigns had agreed to a California debate in May but had not agreed to terms on a debate in April, according to The New York Times.
Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/274470-clinton-aide-new-york-debate-depends-on-tone-of-sanders
forest444
(5,902 posts)"Why doesn't he realize I'm inevitable, and address me as such!"
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)A big reason is the criminal investigation ramping up.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/28/there-are-147-fbi-agents-involved-in-the-hillary-clinton-email-investigation/?tid=sm_tw
yall crack me up!
angrychair
(12,284 posts)You mean two others? Rice and Powell?
Yep, I want these examples of good judgment as my yard stick to measure my own by.
Those two idiots are perfect examples of how not to do that job or are Clinton supporters defending the Bush administration now????
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)angrychair
(12,284 posts)Two does not "a lot" make.
More importantly, I have seen these two names brought up in her defense, so I ask again, is it the position of Clinton supporters that the Bush Administration did a great job and legitimized the "if they did it than its ok if I do it" defense?
Chasstev365
(7,798 posts)Are you saying Hillary is so perfect that no one can be critical of her and her record?
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts).... again?
Tone.
How lame.
Wake me when Sanders' claims she's gonna take away people's health insurance.
SusanaMontana41
(3,233 posts)Which criticisms are OK with you?
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)I don't know if the writer favors one candidate over the other or not. I personally would never ask Hillary to drop out. But her hubris and her supporters arrogance make it so that she deserves this treatment given that they asked Bernie to drop out.
SusanaMontana41
(3,233 posts)But you just keep right on dismissing us.
George II
(67,782 posts)The funny thing is that stuff like this is posted on DU over and over again every day, but a post earlier today was hidden because it talked about how Sanders spends money on his campaign (which is available on FEC.gov)
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)I think Nytimes has turn into a rag!
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)"legal experts" there are in this country? You might as well say "according to Hillary's lawyers" for all the veracity "according to legal experts" provides.
humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)you have some witty way to explain away the transcripts from her yucking it up with the Goldman fat cats too.... Or will you be one of those that will excoriate me for not defending her when Trump makes those transcripts public during the GE .... Yeah I am sure I will be told that I must defend her, all the time knowing that if those were made public now she wouldn't stand a chance in hell of winning a Democratic nomination.....
forest444
(5,902 posts)Hillary can do this the easy way (withdraw in the near future, citing the fact she's being railroaded by the GOP and thus earning some much-needed public sympathy).
Or she can be stubborn about it, which will put her thorough a federal indictment anyway and probably lead to this:

[center]Imagine this; but on election night (!).[/center]
Of course the last time I posted a thread like that I garnered a hide. The Hillary court thought it was too offensive.
I'm posting it anyway. Update - someone beat me too it.
I realize I'm new but the only thing I've seen with your guy's jury system is it massively favors Hillary and it consistently goes the wrong way. I suspect Hillary isn't the only "liberal Democrat" today, who went the wrong way for civil rights in the 60's and kept going the wrong way for decades after. I think she attracts people just like her. Maybe a lot of voters remorse here still from 2008? Just saying as they seem to be long time Hillary supporters and unwilling acknowledge or care about her record. I wonder how many voted for Hope and Change Obama? That sounds more like the MO of a Bernie supporter. Dang those unicorns and rainbows! We keep trying!
pnwmom
(110,261 posts)Goodman has already made his 2016 Presidential endorsement public: Rand Paul. His opinion should be of zero relevance to any progressive.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Goodman is so anti-war and anti-fascist that this very liberal guy got tricked into thinking Rand would be different than Bush or Hillary. That's a blunder on his part you are correct. I didn't notice his blog was from the guy who suggested Rand would be best to change the NeoCon landscape. He is definitely duped you are right. We shall see though if anything happens to Hillary. Immunity for underlings and FBI interviews generally mean more than just tying an investigation together as WaPost suggests. It certainly wouldn't be fair to target Hillary who was just doing what Bush and his administration did and got away with it. But there is the problem. She's very much like Bush. Why do you think so many of us are afraid of her? That's the biggest reason.
pnwmom
(110,261 posts)She is highly intelligent and conscientious, and she is a progressive.
And she is also a woman, which means a higher standard has always been set for her. Elizabeth Warren has written about that.
But thank you for acknowledging my point about Goodman. In view of his endorsement of Paul, and his continued use of libertarian sources, he is not to be taken seriously.
raindaddy
(1,370 posts)I thought this was from the Onion.. If Hillary can't handle Bernie pointing out facts how is she going to deal with Trump?
deutsey
(20,166 posts)They're truly insane, imo. As in "disconnected from reality."
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)How DOES one tone down the facts? My God! The Donald will rattle her right out of her pants suit with his first volley of bullshit! It will not matter if it's total bullcrap, the tone of his delivery will leave this unseasoned non-politician stuttering haplessly!
trueblue2007
(19,251 posts)maybe during the next debate, he wants to wave his finger so close to Sec Clinton he hits her in the nose
GreatGazoo
(4,612 posts)here is Obama doing it
tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)I do believe one-Bill-Clinton is the best finger-raiser in the business
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)
PatrickforO
(15,426 posts)especially in the face of all the negative shit Clinton surrogates, and Clinton herself, have thrown at him.
She doesn't want a debate unless he changes his 'tone?' I guess my answer would begin with the letter 'f.'
Duval
(4,280 posts)My answer would begin with the same letter as yours, btw.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)that supports Clinton.
The premise is a big steaming pile of bovine fecal matter, in that it equates discussing differences in issues as attacks.
Clinton's Camp Weathervane is VERY scared that they will lose.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)dpatbrown
(368 posts)Benenson, Clinton's chief strategist, is an idiot and a mouse.
montanacowboy
(6,714 posts)I am sure Bernie will change his "tone" for the queenbee
These entitled Clintons - they are what is wrong with this country
HillareeeHillaraah
(685 posts)To distill our nation's challenges down to its core source: the Clintons
Hyperbole, much?
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)jalan48
(14,914 posts)Fritz Walter
(4,370 posts)Her Panda Ring.
One ring to rule them all.
BeyondGeography
(41,101 posts)Politics, where all the rats only have one hole. When you need something a whole lot more than your opponent, this is how you can expect to be treated.
xocet
(4,442 posts)n/t
SammyWinstonJack
(44,316 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)A bit like "I'll release my transcripts as soon as they release theirs."
http://iwilllookintoit.com

paleotn
(22,218 posts).....waiting.......
Arizona Roadrunner
(168 posts)It is bad enough that Clinton is such a flawed candidate but the people around her are even worse. Really builds enthusiasm and comfort with her and her "team"....... By the way, isn't Benenson a corporate lobbyist for wall Street firms?
morningfog
(18,115 posts)LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)with, "Don't you dare talk to me that way," even if what the kid said was absolutely spot on and completely justified. Disgusting bullying behavior.
Today I'm seeing a whole lot of the corporate media downplaying and speaking dismissively of Bernie's big wins over the weekend. Just part of the media and Hillary campaign strategy of keeping him "at heel."
Cobalt Violet
(9,976 posts)Purveyor
(29,876 posts)
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)clg311
(119 posts)She's the most conniving politician since Richard Nixon.
C Moon
(13,643 posts)salinsky
(1,065 posts)... tone-deaf people aren't capable of changing their tone.
Response to Freddie Stubbs (Original post)
silvershadow This message was self-deleted by its author.
shawn703
(2,712 posts)How is Hillary going to deal with world leaders if she can't even deal with Sanders?
Divernan
(15,480 posts)As I occasionally was known to say to my 12 year old, going through a rebellious stage, daughter.
Omaha Steve
(109,229 posts)Please continue.
OS
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)greymouse
(872 posts)Is that what you mean?
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)Gene Debs
(582 posts)anything in their power to avoid it. They both know that the more exposure Clinton gets, the more obvious it is that she's a deeply, deeply flawed candidate, and her numbers invariably go down. Why do you think they only scheduled six Democratic primary debates at all, when in 2008 they had twenty-four? They figured they just had to keep things quiet for a short while and limit Clinton's exposure so they could just hand her the nomination.
Remember how Camp Clinton fought tooth and nail against scheduling any additional debatesuntil it became apparent that Sanders was actually eating into her lead, and her coronation was threatened? And then they agreed, suddenly, to two more, so they could whip the tarp off the new Clinton 2.0, into which they'd hurriedly installed all the features that was attracting buyers to the new guy? I sure do.
You're right, though, in that she doesn't need another debate, but not in the way you imagine...In reality she doesn't need another debate in much the same way the Titanic doesn't need another iceberg. And she and Wasserman Schultz know it all too well.
greymouse
(872 posts)angrychair
(12,284 posts)She is one of the political and economic elite! She is part of the Clinton/Bush royalty that has been ruling this land, in one capacity or another, for 35 straight years!
So is "watch you tone" another way of putting the uppity Jew in his place?
SHRED
(28,136 posts)Duppers
(28,469 posts)about Hillary.
sgmcenroe
(30 posts)The Clinton campaign is starting to run scared. Despite the MSM's best efforts, this campaign is not over and Bernie is beginning to close the gap. Note that the MSM did their best to not cover Sanders' 3 state sweep by overwhelming margins this past weekend. And Hillary's campaign - no debate unless Bernie changes his "tone". What BS - it might be time for HRC to change her tone.
ejbr
(5,892 posts)should be for patty cakes. Got it
SmittynMo
(3,544 posts)This is beyond sickening.
Zira
(1,054 posts)Response to Freddie Stubbs (Original post)
DUbeornot2be This message was self-deleted by its author.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)Someone should start that in social media. But insist she release her transcripts so we know how much to send her for the debate time.
lakeguy
(1,645 posts)then she can tell Bernie to "cut it out" in person, just like she supposedly did with the banks.
eggplant
(4,199 posts)We have a winner!
Madam Mossfern
(2,340 posts)sees the sexism in this request. Have you ever heard of any candidate complaining about the "tone" of another as a reason to debate or not? It makes Clinton seem even weaker and assumes the mantle of the 'helpless woman.'
farleftlib
(2,125 posts)She wants to have it both ways. She says she's tough and capable but and she can sling the mud like nobody's business. But she sure can't take any dissent or criticism. She's a whiner and a moaner and it's not presidential.
greymouse
(872 posts)Can you imagine Obama complaining about Hillary's tone in 2008?
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Zen Democrat
(5,901 posts)When Hillary's tone is shrill and harsh. She's gone far more negative on Bernie than he on she. Even Bill and Chelsea have lied about Bernie.
Tone, ha!
-none
(1,884 posts)"Bernie should be campaigning for me."
pnwmom
(110,261 posts)saying the same three things endlessly in all of them -- and all nationally broadcast.
What a waste of Hillary's time, giving him yet another showcase to repeat himself yet again.
greymouse
(872 posts)who changes what she says depending on the audience.
Gene Debs
(582 posts)for every audience. And changes those if they don't poll well.
pnwmom
(110,261 posts)Bernie gets asked different questions and ignores them to give his canned replies.
Gene Debs
(582 posts)slowly and methodically building her answer while trying to remember what she said yesterday, in an attempt to make sure it all matches up. Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't.
pnwmom
(110,261 posts)what the interviewer was asking, as opposed to Bernie who merely looks for the fastest way to seque into one of his canned responses.
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)pnwmom
(110,261 posts)agreeing to take a 1 to 2 Federal Cost matching deal who already turned down a 1 to 9 cost matching deal on the Medicaid expansion.
I would rather a plan like Hillary's, that targeted all the aid at students who need it, allowing them to graduate debt free.
I also don't think the time is right for a candidate to be advocating for single payer. That would mean both parties would be criticizing Obamacare and the voters would choose the alternate plan they thought would be cheaper . Bernie plans to raise taxes on everyone to do it and that will never fly.
And I would like a President who had Hillary's knowledge of foreign affairs, not Bernie's.
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)I kinda think there was a reason he didn't hold her policies in the first place.
pnwmom
(110,261 posts)as saying that he won't endorse her unless she switches to his policies.
So fair is fair.
glowing
(12,233 posts)And after the smear campaign they pulled trying to make Bernie appear like a racist? Crazy, crazy, crazy!
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)If she gets the nomination she will be the more qualified candidate and I will vote for her. I would prefer, however, not to be required to since there is a substantially better candidate available.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Has anyone else?
I don't watch TV, so it is possible that there are some.
What is the story on this?
Hillary is just running scared because Bernie won three states by huge margins on the weekend.
FailureToCommunicate
(14,605 posts)Is he clairvoyant?
"This is a man who said he'd never run a negative ad ever. He's now running them. They're planning to run more," Joel Benenson, Clinton's chief strategist, said on CNN. "Let's see the tone of the campaign he wants to run before we get to any other questions."

secondwind
(16,903 posts)Hugabear
(10,340 posts)This is an election campaign. Part of that process means talking about what separates you from your opponent. How is that being "negative"?
ConsiderThis_2016
(274 posts)If she can just hold her breath long enough...
ConsiderThis_2016
(274 posts)Downtown near Wall Street. :-/
DrBulldog
(841 posts)Translation: Bernie is telling the people the DOCUMENTED TRUTH about her. And there is so much "good stuff" to tell!
paleotn
(22,218 posts)Niobe, in response to similar bullshit from her husband Vorenus....."Tone?! My father's c---! How's that for tone?!
chervilant
(8,267 posts)are calling for a whaaaambulance for poor Hi11ary. I think a lot of people view her current campaign strategy unfavorably.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)How's she going to handle Trump?
WOW. She really shouldn't be our nominee.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Bernie Sanders has asked for a debate in NY State, prior to the very important up coming primary. Hillary Clinton has demanded that in order for this to take place he must stop talking about her stands on the issues that are very important to the people of this country. Hillary Clinton claims several ads are negative without challenging a single one of them on substance. This appears more a way to avoid a debate than an actual concern about the tone of some ads which contents are on Hillary's policy and not her fitness to assume the office of the President of the United States. However, her insistence on a change in tone suggests that Hillary might not be up to the rigors of the office as many world leaders will have an unpleasant tone.
Old Vet
(2,001 posts)If Bernies tone is to harsh trump will eat her for lunch.
whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)Bernie beating her over the head with his fingertip during a debate
bwhahahahahaha
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)Statement of Purpose for LBN
Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.