Larry Sabato’s Crystal Ball portends a potential Democratic blowout presidential election
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by one_voice (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: AL Today
University of Virginia political science professor Larry Sabato latest Crystal Ball prediction of the 2016 presidential election spells gloom for the Republican Party this November.
The longtime political analyst is predicting that if its a Hillary ClintonDonald Trump matchup, it will be an electoral college blowout, 347-191.
Sabatos Crystal Ball is a weekly online political newsletter and website that analyzes American politics. In the new column, written by Sabato, Kyle Kondik, and Geoffrey Skelley, the authors acknowledge that while its an extra-early, ridiculously premature projection that could change after the conventions and a possible third-party candidacy. However at the moment, the electoral map doesnt look very competitive for the GOP going into November.
Nearly a year ago, Sabato put Florida into the toss-up column, but no longer.
Now the Sunshine State is being put into the same bucket of other swing states like Virginia, Ohio, New Hampshire, Nevada, Iowa and Colorado. The Sabado Crystal Ball has now moved all seven states from toss-up last May, to now leaning Democratic.
Read more: http://altoday.wpengine.com/?p=9654

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
wow,,, that must choke the Right wing Alabama Today to have to report this.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)...with some vulnerabilities for further losses by the GOP in GA and AZ
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Hopefully we have a Dem Congress as icing on the cake.
Then we rebuild the Supreme Court.
I really think we have the wind in our sails
Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts)...Trump will be the nominee.
My worth nothing opinion is it will be Ryan/Kasich.
MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)Didn't he say he wasn't interested?
Or am I imagining things again?
Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts)....whether or not it holds at the convention
MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)Only time will tell.
Dopers_Greed
(2,647 posts)He also wasn't interested in becoming speaker of the house.
I don't see any of the current Repug candidates getting the nomination though, so we'll see what happens.
MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)was clumsily dropping hints that he is interested.
Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts)....but I don't think it will happen.
LyndaG
(683 posts)He's certainly played that card before.
0rganism
(25,713 posts)"i am so disinterested in this donut, i barely recognize its existence, with its shiny sprinkles and delectable jelly filling. not interested at all, really. nice chocolate glaze there. completely uninterested, couldn't give less of a shit."
Cosmocat
(15,469 posts)but I don't think Ryan ...
1) He is speaker of the house, the second most powerful position in the country. He has a LONG career there and in the House ahead of him, so I am not sure he would give it up to MAYBE win POTUS this early on ...
2) Even if he would be so inclined, its a TOUGH sell for the electorate to bring someone in who did not go through the primaries at all, when there were over a dozen other candidates, did not win a single vote or delegate in this election, and nominate him. They are going to lose Trump supporters for decades if they do it, if they also jilt Cruz, they will lose his voters, too.
IMO, if they do this, they pretty much have to do with Cruz ...
Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts)...also no matter who they replace Trump with I think they will loose the Trump supporters. I don't see the majority of Trump supporters going for Cruz.
As I said in my first post....only my opinion.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)A lot of Trump's delegates at the convention will be Ted Cruz fans, if it gets past a first ballot, second ballot will go to Cruz, not Kasich or another white knight figure
Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts)....has little support among his peers. The outside support may not be available to him.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)and he's been quietly organizing at the state convention level to make sure his people get appointed as delegates not only for himself, but for Trump.
So, on the first ballot they'll *probably* be bound to vote for Trump, but on the second ballot Trump will lose votes to Cruz.
Cruz acts like a crazy moron, but he's smart and cunning.
Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts)....and they do vote.
As I said in my first post...it is my worth nothing opinion. Seriously, if I were betting I'd take a long shot over even money.
MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)on either side, it's gonna be a big win for the Dems.
LyndaG
(683 posts)But, I hope he's right !!!!!
obamanut2012
(29,512 posts)A bit of a tool IRL, but legit.
Jemmons
(711 posts)Even if they force the issue and install someone like Ryan, it will be a bloodbath come november. Looking good!
it will be a longer term problem for them if they take it from Trump.
They stick with him, they take a beating this election ... then the completely deranged jackass wing gets back into the fold.
They jilt the Donald, they won't have 1/3 of their voters for decades.
AllyCat
(18,988 posts)Get people registered and to the polls. Knock doors, call people, invite friends and family.
Botany
(77,857 posts)
LBJ showed a tv spot w/Bill Miller's daughter ... stephanie miller ... and the rest is history
BTW w/Trump as the nominee they could lose Texas .... Hispanics and Women don't like Trump
houston16revival
(953 posts)will be the greatest Tea Party ever
when we throw them overboard
Person 2713
(3,263 posts)LynneSin
(95,337 posts)A Texan who is also Hispanic and parents of Mexican Immigrants. That would be a total boon for the Democrats plus the guy has all-around great political record and could one day make a great president!
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)LynneSin
(95,337 posts)And no, I do not think it should be a Hillary/Bernie or Bernie/Hillary ticket. Both democratic candidates are older and I think both of them need a younger VP. Since both Hillary and Bernie have experience they can go young with their VP Candidate (Obama was weak on experience and needed an older statesman like Biden to balance his ticket).
My top #2 choices for VP would be either Julian Castro from Texas or Cory Booker from New Jersey.
I think one thing that hurt us in 2000 and 2004 was the boring VP Candidates on the Democratic Ticket. Neither Gore nor Kerry had that charisma to bring out the occasional voter. By picking Lieberman (Gore) and Edwards (Kerry), they didn't add anything to the ticket.
In this day and age you need at least one candidate on that ticket that will appeal to a cross-section of voters. Castro would appeal to the Hispanic Voters and Booker to the African-American voters. And both of those men are extremely qualified to be VP and possibly President one day. I'm not sure how Cory Booker's single status would play out as VP although he is a good-looking man so that might help too, but some might play against his lack of family.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)It is the consensus of the hosts this doesn't meet SoP for LBN. It's better suited for GD. Please re-post there. Thanks.
Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.