White House: Clinton qualified to be president
Source: The Hill
The White House on Thursday said Hillary Clinton is qualified to serve as president, rebutting comments from her Democratic primary opponent, Bernie Sanders.
The president has said that Secretary Clinton comes into this race with more experience than any other non-vice president in recent campaign history, White House spokesman Eric Schultz told reporters aboard Air Force One.
Schultz added the president was fortunate enough to have Clinton as his secretary of State for four years, when they worked together on complicated, on complex issues.
The White House came to Clintons defense after Sanders said his rival was unqualified to serve as president.
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/275513-white-house-clinton-qualified-to-be-president
Javaman
(65,703 posts)navarth
(5,927 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)how things come full circle
Javaman
(65,703 posts)one needs a decoder ring these days.
DhhD
(4,695 posts)beastie boy
(13,283 posts)The president has said that Secretary Clinton comes into this race with more experience than any other non-vice president in recent campaign history,
scottie55
(1,400 posts)Experience matters more than judgement right PBO?
Rest assured. She won't touch tax havens in case you plan on cashing in too.....
beastie boy
(13,283 posts)Let me sleep on this. I'll get back to you later...
leveymg
(36,418 posts)I like the earlier Obama better, one who seemed to care about his legacy and had learned from the stupid shit some of his first term Cabinet had pushed through.
beastie boy
(13,283 posts)Hillary Clinton and John Kerry. No stupid shit.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Which hey, is true. Four years as part of the executive branch is more expedience than anyone else in the running can claim. But as Scottie55 points out, experience and judgement are different things.
As for who you ought to place more weight on, consider ; who has to keep up the appearance of being neutral-yet-positive all the time when these sort of questions come up? Scottie55 can say whatever he thinks, but the president's surrogates have to say something nice, no matter what.
beastie boy
(13,283 posts)I am torn on whose judgement is more informed.
Can't I have my doubts?
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)For a moment, imagine if Obama thought clinton was a stupid yutz who wasted four years of foreign policy potential after blackmailing him into giving her the SecState position. i'm not saying that he does think this, but just imagine he does.
Do you imagine he would ever, ever actually say that he thought that? While in office? While there's a presidential campaign going on/ of course he wouldn't. He can't, due to the demands of politics. The sitting president coming out swinging against clinton - or against sanders, for that matter - would be hugely inappropriate. The White house is pretty much bound by political expectations to "say something nice or say nothing at all."
beastie boy
(13,283 posts)http://www.cbsnews.com/news/obama-hillary-clinton-would-be-an-excellent-president/
If he thought Hillary was that bad, would he be stepping on Bernie's toes even before he endorsed anyone?
just love pithy sarcasm
Blue_Adept
(6,499 posts)There are things where he will end up defending his Secretary of State over.
It's called politics after all.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)Their mutual donors must have placed a call. Not sure why her qualifications need to be reinforced, however
She has terrible judgment and not many people trust her.
There's two reasons.
INdemo
(7,024 posts)"Here's knowing the TPP and all other trade agreements will be safe if you win"
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)But I don't want them say anything with which they disagree. I am disgusted with the WH pandering to clinton.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)Obama has done little other than support the same endless wars, the same Big Banking give aways, and the same destructive Gm farming policies that Clinton represents.
So you shouldn't be too surprised.
Eighty percent of what any President accomplishes has to do with appointments they make.
This man has appointed arch-economic criminal Geithner to be the Head of Treasury. He re-appointed Bernanke. He also appointed countless Monsanto-inclined executives to head up positions at the FDA.
If America's middle class and lower classes had been given the monetary gifts bestowed on Big Bankers, through appointees of the Obama Administration, each man woman and child in those
classes would have received $ 222,000 !!
dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)"She's qualified" isn't any kind of gushing endorsement. She's over 35 and a natural citizen.
rock
(13,218 posts)trouble when he said she wasn't.
TomCADem
(17,837 posts)It is one thing to disagree with her positions, but claiming that she is "unqualified" just makes Bernie lose credibility.
riversedge
(80,783 posts)Gregorian
(23,867 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Hardly
All the corporate Dems who admire Reagan have been propping up Bill's wife since the 20th century.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)Blue_Adept
(6,499 posts)He ran for Senate in 2005. In government for 25, sure. But your phrasing implies a Senator far longer.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)Gregorian
(23,867 posts)It's kind of unique in modern politics.
kadaholo
(304 posts)Bernie has been on the right side of history with both judgment and experience. In addition, and certainly just as important, he never lost his moral compass.
beastie boy
(13,283 posts)No indication so far that Bernie wants it back.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)beastie boy
(13,283 posts)I am still missing a third line. May take me a few years to finish it.
Democat
(11,617 posts)Nice that you seem to dismiss both Clinton and Obama though - much like your allies Trump and Rush Limbaugh.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)One imagines Strom Thurmond would agree with your premise.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Than just his senatorial position.
pnwmom
(110,257 posts)No wonder so many Obama supporters are supporting Hillary.
raindaddy
(1,370 posts)legitimizes the question. Exactly what Clinton is doing when she suggests Sanders is responsible for Sandy Hook..
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Surely you forgot the
tag.
If not, can you please send me some of what you are drinking, smoking, or otherwise ingesting to get into such a delusional way. It could come in handy.
raindaddy
(1,370 posts)Make an outrageous claim, lie, etc and just the fact that it's out in the public and being addressed places the negative in the public's mind..
pnwmom
(110,257 posts)Hillary deliberately refused to rise to the reporter's bait about him being unqualified ,but Bernie jumped on the quote without even bothering to read the actual text of her words. She was addressing specific issues, not his overall qualifications, and she never said he was unqualified.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Gregorian
(23,867 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)KansDem
(28,498 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)Pathetic in a way. I would be embarrassed -- but thank goodness I am not running, giggle. I sometimes wonder if people really know how hard it is to campaign for the presidency. So much awful stuff.
beastie boy
(13,283 posts)Bernie is catching up to Trump with his rhetoric. What's next, Hillary not qualified because she is ugly?
SammyWinstonJack
(44,316 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)"In America, anybody can be president. That's one of the risks you take." - Adlai Stevenson (1900-1965)
Democat
(11,617 posts)If you don't think so, then you don't belong on Democratic Underground. Try Trump Underground.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)suggest to me that she does not have the tact or intelligent to be president.
Obama would never say or insinuate the nasty things about Bernie that Hillary has been saying and insinuating.
These low digs are the resort of a loser, of a vicious loser.
Hillary is alienating Bernie supporters with her loose tongue and her lack of graciousness and lovingness.
The technical aspects of being president are less important than the social ones.
Hillary fails on social graces.
It's not because she is a woman. Elizabeth Warren is a woman and succeeds when it comes to the social graces.
Obama is a man and is as kind and gracious as a person can be.
Hillary -- no. And that is why I do not think that she is qualified to be president.
Democat
(11,617 posts)Here, let me rewrite your post for you from the other side:
Sanders recent statements such as his failure to affirm that Clinton is qualified to be Democratic president
suggest to me that he does not have the tact or intelligent to be president.
Obama would never say or insinuate the nasty things about Clinton that Sanders has been saying and insinuating.
These low digs are the resort of a loser, of a vicious loser.
Sanders is alienating Clinton supporters with his loose tongue and his lack of graciousness and lovingness.
The technical aspects of being president are less important than the social ones.
Sanders fails on social graces.
It's not because he is a man. Obama is a man and succeeds when it comes to the social graces.
Warren is a woman and is as kind and gracious as a person can be.
Sander -- no. And that is why I do not think that he is qualified to be president.
That is exactly what a Clinton supporter could say about Sanders and they believe it as much as you believe your nonsense.
Here is the correct answer:
Both Democratic candidates are qualified to be president and both of them would make excellent presidents, especially compared to Trump or Cruz.
Stuckinthebush
(11,203 posts)Well played.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)to be president.
I agree that Bernie is qualified to be president, but Hillary's lack of tact which was demonstrated by her unwillingness to confirm that Bernie is qualified and by her, as I have heard but did not see myself, REPEATED UNWILLINGNESS TO CONFIRM THAT BERNIE IS A DEMOCRAT reveal.
It is not the specific statements that she has made but her lack of graciousness toward Bernie that disqualify her as a candidate.
Bernie was responding to her nastiness. Not the other way around.
And it is true that a person who accepts as much money from the wealthiest people and interests is not qualified to be a president who is supposed to be president for all of us.
In this respect, Bernie is the only candidate out there who qualifies for the presidency.
Hillary along with Cruz, Kasich and Trump are all running on corporate money and gifts from the wealthy.
Bernie is the only one running on people money, ordinary people money. In my book, that means he is the only one of them who is truly qualified to be president of the people.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)The accusation that Bernie was not qualified was in the Washington Post.
That thread at the link I am giving you explains this controversy.
earthmanneil
(25 posts)Sanders would make an excellent president, initiating a bold new and needed direction for this country. Clinton #2 might make for another in a line of mediocre presidents who prioritize corporate interests over that of working Americans. Clinton only looks "good" in the fiendish light of authoritarian Trump and theocrat Cruz. But excellent, no!
beastie boy
(13,283 posts)oops, you beat me to it, Democrat!
I will leave the link just in case there are any challenges to your post.
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-15/sanders-yes-im-a-democrat-of-convenience
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)he really is. He is the kind of Democrat my parents were -- an FDR Democrat.
He criticizes Bill Clinton for having gone too far to the right, and as an FDR Democrat myself, I very much agree with him.
The Democratic Party used to brag that it is a big tent.
I hope it is big enough for me and other Sanders supporters because if it isn't, well, there may be some big surprises in November.
Do you think I am a Democrat?
Check back on my history on DU? Do you think I am a Democrat?
Because I have always voted for Democrats, but I am a strong Bernie supporter.
For me, he is what other Democrats should be. We are the party of FDR, and I am proud of that fact.
beastie boy
(13,283 posts)You stated that Hillary's failure to affirm Bernie is a democrat disqualifies her from being President.
As late as March 15, Bernie also failed to affirm he is a Democrat.
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-15/sanders-yes-im-a-democrat-of-convenience
By your own words, you just disqualified Bernie.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Food for thought, huh?
lark
(26,078 posts)OMG. Hillary is supposed to be awesome 1 on 1, has plenty of social graces. I can't believe you gave that as a reason. She's not great in crowds or in front of crowds, but that doesn't disqualify her, just makes her more likely not to win. That's not the same thing at all.
Hillary and Bernie are both qualified to be president, much more than any Repug running. I don't think Bernie should have said she was "unqualified", that was wrong. I agree that she made some bad decisions, but all of the Repugs did too and they are running for president, so obviously they all qualified to run. Would they make good presidents, hell no, but they are qualified to run.
Hillary, though I wish otherwise, is probably going to be the Dem candidate. She is far more qualified by temperament and discernment than any of the Repugs and needs our votes if she is the general candidate.
Still hoping for Bernie, and voted for him, but the games rigged and it will be a miracle if he wins.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)lark
(26,078 posts)Wish I could open the articles, but sadly can't on this computer. I'll try again when I get home.
Thanks.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Think of what Obama has gone through.
He has been patient from the deepest depth of his soul.
I am always amazed by his grace. I disagree with him on some of the issues, but as a person, he is in his nature exceptionally well qualified to be president.
Hillary is too nervous. People really make her mad. She is deeply hurt by criticisms that are unkind. She did a pretty good job at the congressional hearing on the crazy e-mails and Benghazi. But by nature she is not easy-going and graced with the ability to relax even when people are pointing their fingers at her.
Bernie is more able to take that kind of pressure, but Obama is the master of the kind of grace I am talking about. He is genuinely not too upset by nasty opponents, and goodness knows, he has had to deal with more than his share of them.
Bill Clinton was fairly good at this aspect of being president too. But Hillary? No. She is not. Has nothing to do with her views on the issues. It's her personality. It just is.
Being president is really, really tough. Bernie is better suited for it. Read his book, Outsider in the White House and you will see.
lark
(26,078 posts)Just don't think that she's unqualified.
captainarizona
(363 posts)I don't think so! Nor do the families of the over 4000 dead americans in iraq. the worst mistake america has ever made with vietnam war a close second.
revbones
(3,660 posts)Bleacher Creature
(11,504 posts)This President is hugely popular among Democrats in PA, NY, and CA. Other than a direct rebuke by Obama himself, the Clinton campaign couldn't have asked for more.
Wow.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)INdemo
(7,024 posts)farther to the right than you did Mr. President..Her cabinet GFB if elected will look more like a Republican staff.
Just take a look at the Right Wing advisers she has on her campaign staff...they will want rewarded.
JudyM
(29,785 posts)lamp_shade
(15,478 posts)litlbilly
(2,227 posts)ImaPolitico
(150 posts)Hillary is qualified. Sanders, definitely not.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Clinton hides behind or coops Obama's policies and legacy and now has to be bailed out when the going gets rough.
Typical.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)JustABozoOnThisBus
(24,681 posts)Skwmom
(12,685 posts)still be a major fuck up.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)The logic in this eats it's own tail.
Response to Android3.14 (Reply #47)
beastie boy This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to beastie boy (Reply #55)
Android3.14 This message was self-deleted by its author.
beastie boy
(13,283 posts)It was intended for a different recipient.
In the context of your post, it is indeed bizarre.
Self-deleting in a few...
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Oakland
(67 posts)and is still at war 8 years after taking office isn't qualified to talk about who is qualified to be President.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Bernie's not a Democrat, so he obviously has his own way of viewing the world.
Wibly
(613 posts)The people will decide who is qualified to be President, or not. The sitting President will not be the decider on that file.
That said, while Clinton may be qualified as per her CV, the question Sanders is asking is if she is morally qualified to be President. And its a good question.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,683 posts)
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Ho so?
Greybnk48
(10,723 posts)Cruz, Trump, Kasich, and Lyin' Ryan...not so much.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)But only at $12 an hour.
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)His statement could have been as broad as the scope of my statement.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)ish of the hammer
(444 posts)Podesta and Blumenthal are named in them.
you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas! and the Clintons are busy scratching!
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)See how that works?
ish of the hammer
(444 posts)the Clintons have their hand out for MONEY.
see how that works
ish of the hammer
(444 posts)the Clintons are filthy rich and how did they acquire that wealth?
what did they promise behind closed doors?
do you know?
see how that works.
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)Sanders just responded to what Clinton said about him.
liberal N proud
(61,194 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)ashtonelijah
(340 posts)So called liberals using Tea Party talking points. Another reason I will never support a demagogue like Bernie Sanders.
INdemo
(7,024 posts)SunSeeker
(58,267 posts)riversedge
(80,783 posts)AgerolanAmerican
(1,000 posts)Her qualifications:
a) a natural born citizen
b) over 35 years of age
c) has lived in the US for more than 14 years
This "qualified" thing is so juvenile, it's beneath everyone participating in it. My face has a visible palm print on it from reading these threads.
riversedge
(80,783 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)Confidence..where did it go? lol
Reter
(2,188 posts)So I guess she's as qualified as Trump.
pressbox69
(2,252 posts)I would vote for you again.