Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(141,926 posts)
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 01:47 PM Apr 2016

Rhode Island closes 66 percent of polling places to cut election costs.

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by mcar (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: raw story

The Rhode Island Board of Elections announced this week that two-thirds of the state’s polling places would remain closed for the upcoming primary as a costs savings measure.

According to WPRI, the Board of Elections plans to cut costs by opening only 144 of the state’s 419 polling places for the April 26 primary.
Board of Elections Director Robert Rapoza argued that the state had handled record turnout in 2008 after implementing similar cost savings measures.

But since 2008, the state has reduced the total number of polling places. Meaning that there were 33 more voting locations in 2008 than there will be this year.

“I don’t think enough has been done to make sure voters know that they likely won’t be casting their ballot at the same location as they did in November of 2014,” John Marion of Common Cause Rhode Island warned. He noted that voters could review their polling place location and sample ballots online before election day.

Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/2016/04/rhode-island-closes-66-percent-of-polling-places-to-cut-election-costs/

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rhode Island closes 66 percent of polling places to cut election costs. (Original Post) elleng Apr 2016 OP
I'm not sure they are meeting their Constitutional obligations. But as Cheney once said silvershadow Apr 2016 #1
SO democracy is too expensive now? flor-de-jasmim Apr 2016 #2
Was thinking the same thing, flor. elleng Apr 2016 #3
Yes, that is exactly it. bjo59 Apr 2016 #4
Bingo. Bodych Apr 2016 #16
Did they learn nothing from the fiasco in Arizona? n/t OnlinePoker Apr 2016 #5
'They' who? elleng Apr 2016 #7
Our election process and the political system has become a joke. When does the YOHABLO Apr 2016 #6
We need to call in the United Nations election observers....we are now officially a third world haikugal Apr 2016 #8
What is it with these people running this stuff........................ turbinetree Apr 2016 #9
Election costs? I don't buy it. Gregorian Apr 2016 #10
The finest voter suppression money can buy. blackspade Apr 2016 #11
As a Rhode Island Voter gaspee Apr 2016 #12
Thanks. It's good to know. elleng Apr 2016 #15
I didn't know about it gaspee Apr 2016 #19
IF they did it like Oregon Ferd Berfel Apr 2016 #13
That's pretty crappy. I hope people lodge complaints ahead of time. LisaM Apr 2016 #14
These elections are getting too darned expensive elljay Apr 2016 #17
Hi elleng Andy823 Apr 2016 #18
Locking mcar Apr 2016 #20
 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
1. I'm not sure they are meeting their Constitutional obligations. But as Cheney once said
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 01:52 PM
Apr 2016

about the Constitution, (paraphrasing) "That's quaint".

On edit: If we can't afford proper elections, then we can't afford the Bush tax cuts that were supposed to expire in 5 years, then was extended to expire at the 10-year mark, then were extended, I believe, without an expiration date.

flor-de-jasmim

(2,282 posts)
2. SO democracy is too expensive now?
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 01:52 PM
Apr 2016

elleng

(141,926 posts)
3. Was thinking the same thing, flor.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 01:52 PM
Apr 2016

bjo59

(1,166 posts)
4. Yes, that is exactly it.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 01:53 PM
Apr 2016

Bodych

(133 posts)
16. Bingo.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:23 PM
Apr 2016

How much is being saved is the question.

I can't find a figure anywhere.

OnlinePoker

(6,127 posts)
5. Did they learn nothing from the fiasco in Arizona? n/t
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 01:55 PM
Apr 2016

elleng

(141,926 posts)
7. 'They' who?
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 01:58 PM
Apr 2016

50 states are entitled to make their own mistakes, aren't they?

AND, with elections, the harm is always done and MAYBE later some patch is applied for the future.

 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
6. Our election process and the political system has become a joke. When does the
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 01:58 PM
Apr 2016

anger start.. what will it take? A Trump presidency? Maybe Susan was right.

haikugal

(6,476 posts)
8. We need to call in the United Nations election observers....we are now officially a third world
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:00 PM
Apr 2016

country.

turbinetree

(27,551 posts)
9. What is it with these people running this stuff........................
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:07 PM
Apr 2016

its like hey legislature, did you think just like in Oregon , to have a thirty day process whereby you use mail in ballots---------------------or better yet if people want to go and vote have a thirty day window, ..........................this is just outrageous
People go and go and die and protest to have this voting, and these people in the government cannot and will not do anything,
it like they all follow this right wing hypocrites mantra.......................lets play this................and just think the Koch Foundation is in the back ground behind this "stuff"...............................................but you don't have good old Joe and Mika asking any of the Koch's questions like that -------------------hell no..............................






Honk-------------------for a political revolution Bernie 2016


Gregorian

(23,867 posts)
10. Election costs? I don't buy it.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:13 PM
Apr 2016

Sorry, but it sounds like voter suppression, not cost cutting.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
11. The finest voter suppression money can buy.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:13 PM
Apr 2016

gaspee

(3,231 posts)
12. As a Rhode Island Voter
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:16 PM
Apr 2016

Who has never had to wait in a line to vote, and I mean that literally - I have never not walked in and voted right away - not even one person in front of me, I wish they would close more of them to save money.

Every single time I have voted, I have commented what a waste of money it is to have so many polling places.

Look, people who aren't from here have no clue just how small this state is.

I live in the 2nd largest city in the state. We do not need as many polling places as we have.

elleng

(141,926 posts)
15. Thanks. It's good to know.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:20 PM
Apr 2016

What about this? '“I don’t think enough has been done to make sure voters know that they likely won’t be casting their ballot at the same location as they did in November of 2014,” John Marion of Common Cause Rhode Island warned. He noted that voters could review their polling place location and sample ballots online before election day.'

gaspee

(3,231 posts)
19. I didn't know about it
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:25 PM
Apr 2016

until this morning when it was on every single news outlet and the front page of the paper and my mother told me

I do not have a cell phone and am not "plugged in" as they say and I still found out about it multiple ways.

M normal polling place is the elementary school in my neighborhood - it's been moved to the senior center on the other side of the parking lot - another known polling place and a notice will be on the elementary school door.

RI is a really small place. As long as you not a shut in without a television, you will know by next Tuesday.

Ferd Berfel

(3,687 posts)
13. IF they did it like Oregon
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:17 PM
Apr 2016

(by mail) and had early voting it probably wouldn't matter. As is stands, the assholes should be run out for crimes against democracy

LisaM

(29,634 posts)
14. That's pretty crappy. I hope people lodge complaints ahead of time.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:18 PM
Apr 2016

They now have the Arizona example to use when they make their calls.

elljay

(1,178 posts)
17. These elections are getting too darned expensive
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:23 PM
Apr 2016

Why don't we just eliminate the expenses by appointing a group of very wealthy people to take care of this voting business for us. We can schedule the election for one of their annual get-togethers in Davos. We'll save tens of millions of dollars, get the same results we get from voting ourselves (ignored in favor of the rich and multinational corporations) and won't have to waste hours standing on line to press Democrat and have our votes switched to Republican.

Andy823

(11,555 posts)
18. Hi elleng
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:23 PM
Apr 2016

I live in Washington state, and like Oregon we do mail in ballots. I thin only one county in the state does not do it that way, there rest of us do. It's the only way to go if you ask me.

Hope you are doing well. I miss the O'Malley group. They were the greatest bunch of supporters I have ever come across on any internet discussion board.

mcar

(46,058 posts)
20. Locking
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:46 PM
Apr 2016
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Rhode Island closes 66 pe...