Bernie Sanders to Cut Hundreds of Staff Members and Turn to California
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by mcar (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: NYT
Senator Bernie Sanders is planning to lay off hundreds of campaign staffers across the country and focus much of his remaining effort on winning California, he said in an interview Wednesday.
The Vermont senator revealed the changes a day after losing four of the five states that voted Tuesday and falling further behind Hillary Clinton in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination. Despite the changes, Mr. Sanders said he would remain in the race through the partys summer convention and stressed that he hoped to bring staff members back on board if his political fortunes improved.
We want to win as many delegates as we can, so we do not need workers now in states around the country, Mr. Sanders said in the interview. We dont need people right now in Connecticut. That election is over. We dont need them in Maryland. So what we are going to do is allocate our resources to the 14 contests that remain, and that means that we are going to be cutting back on staff.
It will be hundreds of staff members, Mr. Sanders said. We have had a very large staff, which was designed to deal with 50 states in this country; 40 of the states are now behind us. So we have had a great staff, great people.
Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/28/us/politics/bernie-sanders-campaign.html?_r=0
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)pnwmom
(110,260 posts)72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Sanders has been yelling against. And he supposedly has campaign funds, so it sounds like he's trying to hold on to it. Not to mention, you'd think his supporters would not want campaign workers to be treated shabbily.
I get conserving money for the greater good -- but Sanders can't even manage his staff and keep them employed. He's kind of treating them like pawns. He's just another cold-hearted business person. He and Trump are a lot a like.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)primary is over?
In California, the political reality is very different from New York.
How many New Yorkers know who Kamala Harris really is?
Political work is temp work. That's the nature of it.
I've neer done it for pay, but I have worked as a volunteer for lots of campaigns. And when the campaign is over, you don't continue working to elect your candidate. You go home and rest. I suppose the paid staff have to find new jobs and expect that they will be laid off before long when they start a new job.
NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)... he gave himself a bonus - a private jet getaway to Rome for himself and his family - before laying off staff.
crock
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)RealAmericanDem
(221 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)If I carped this much and this shamelessly, I think I'd have to get rid of all my mirrors in order to make life just a bit more bearable.
democrattotheend
(12,011 posts)All campaign jobs end when the election is over, the candidate withdraws, or the election is mostly over (few states left) and fewer staff are needed. If he were to drop out, as many here have urged him to do, he would have to let his entire campaign staff go. By staying in until the end, at least some people stay employed longer.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)conserving money and treating loyal staff like crud.
democrattotheend
(12,011 posts)beastie boy
(13,283 posts)redwitch
(15,260 posts)And at least he paid his staff!
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)or his product isn't se4lling well. ALL his money comes from guys and gals like lil ol me - retired an on SS and a small VA disability allowance. As an "investor", I'd want him to be fiscally frugal. Especially since I'm fixin' to send him a few more bucks!
erlewyne
(1,115 posts)Thank you Plucketeer!
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)They knew it was a temporary job when they signed on and that he was losing. I can slam Sanders for a lot, but not this.
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)it's easy to criticize, but solutions are also needed.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)you know that after you have done your gig, whether it lasts an evening or a year, you have to look for new work. Politics is the same way. It isn't a job. It is a short-term gig.
progree
(12,972 posts)No campaign lasts more than a year or so. Everyone, literally everyone except a few silly dumb-ass bozos know that.
And I don't give a hoot in hell if this is hidden. Such asinine stupidity needs to be called out, whatever the consequence.
I haven't had a hide since 2012. But calling out your ridiculous, silly, asinine, stupid comment is well worth despoiling my almost pristine record. Now I will only be able to "brag" that I haven't had a hide since April 2016. Oh well. Very definitely worth it. Congratulations!!!!!!
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)happynewyear
(1,724 posts)Jobs with Bernie 2016
California
PDI Specialist
Regional Field Director
Field Organizer
https://berniesanders.com/jobswithbernie2016/
pnwmom
(110,260 posts)happynewyear
(1,724 posts)Did you click on that link and check-out these jobs?
Would require relocating among other things.
Sanders 2016!
beastie boy
(13,283 posts)MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)democrattotheend
(12,011 posts)I doubt they are hiring right now.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)geography and mentality.
TexasBushwhacker
(21,202 posts)is that HE PAID THEM. All of them! Even the lowliest intern was paid at least $10 an hour. All the other candidates have unpaid interns.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(21,202 posts)And $10 an hour is more than the ZERO that Clinton pays her interns.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)He's rolling in his grave.
TexasBushwhacker
(21,202 posts)and adjust it for inflation. It was $2.30 an hour on 1976 and adjusted for 40 years of inflation it would be $9.63 now.
http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl?cost1=2.30&year1=1976&year2=2016
So not only was Bernie paying $10.10/hr which is still 47 cents more per hour than $9.63, it's almost 40% higher than $7.25. My guess is that he used the $10 minimum wage in California and Massachusetts as a guideline.
beastie boy
(13,283 posts)If he kept his media buys in Wisconsin and New York on par with Hillary's, he would have been left with a hell of a lot of $10 bills to pay his staff!
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)make that decision to invest in media in those states. It was especially important in New York where he did better than Obama did in 2008 and where he kept her total number of votes to about 14,000 less than what she had in 2008.
beastie boy
(13,283 posts)No name recognition in his home state? Pahleeze!
He paid tens of millions for a net loss of over 20 delegates in those two states. Sounds like mismanagement of millions of those $27 contributions to me...
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)in 2008 in her home state. Enough is enough. Bernie did a great job in New York state. It is his childhood home state, but he has not be politically active there for maybe 50 years. She was the senator from that state from maybe 2001 until 2008.
beastie boy
(13,283 posts)Hillary got less votes than before, yet Bernie lost over 20 delegates to the carpetbagger while outspending her 2 to 1.
You want to call this embezzlement instead of mismanagement?...
democrattotheend
(12,011 posts)His plan calls for phasing it in over several years. Plus, he's the only candidate I have ever heard of who paid interns at all.
colorado_ufo
(6,251 posts)through the donations of many people, many of whom have limited resources and to whom a campaign contribution represented a sacrifice.
Campaign workers have one objective: to get their candidate elected. That is the sum total of their job description. When the campaign is over, their job is over, and if they believe in the purpose of their job, then they will understand that this is a necessary strategy.
No one wants to be laid off work, but it is hopefully for a more long-term gain.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(21,202 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(21,202 posts)I knew from the beginning they were temporary. I didn't expect them to last forever.
I've been laid off from permanent jobs too. I didn't like it, but in my situation I understood why they did it. It was a cost cutting measure that made sense for the company.
Working decades for the same company and getting a gold watch has been gone for a long time. For political campaigns it was never there to begin with.
Doitnow
(1,103 posts)colorado_ufo
(6,251 posts)unless they were promised a certain length of employment.
Do you know if they were promised a certain length of employment?
George II
(67,782 posts)....the nomination he would need all those workers for the General Election.
"What we are going to do is allocate our resources to the 14 contests that remain". Who gets allocated to Guam?
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)Tim Robbins said, about how SC matters as much as Guam. Pretty sure SC was mad, too
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)There are only ten states left. Political aides know from the get-go that their work is temporary. I've never done political work other than as a volunteer, but I have always figured they must be very flexible in their job approach.
Bernie's staff has done a fantastic job bringing Bernie from virtually no even name recognition to being a real contender and possible candidate.
Feel the Bern!
California is the big one, and we are just starting to organize over the past couple of weeks.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Good luck in the future. You did a great job.
I bet you are tired, but still: Feel the Bern!
I'm also pretty sure it hurts when the work ends and you get laid off, but that is part of political work.
I've never done it professionally in any capacity, but I can imagine that it is not very dependable.
colorado_ufo
(6,251 posts)with another big "thank you." I hope that your excellent work will shine on your resume and help give you a step-up to even better jobs in the future. It will be very nice to be able to put a United States Senator, and hopefully future President, as a reference.
FailureToCommunicate
(14,605 posts)
xloadiex
(628 posts)in that state was over? I see this article as nothing more than to try and make it seem like Bernie is giving up.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)I think not.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)There have been numerous articles over the past months about her campaign bringing on and then letting go...many, many not even paid in the first place.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)has been calculated. Bern now must win CAL three times. this is going to take all his focus,,,but plz keep those $27 a rolling in!