Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wellstone dem

(4,460 posts)
Thu Jun 14, 2012, 12:54 PM Jun 2012

General Mills opposes marriage amendment

Source: Minneapolis Tribune


“We do not believe the proposed constitutional amendment is in the best interests of our employees or our state economy – and as a Minnesota-based company we oppose it,” Ken Charles, vice president of global diversity and inclusion for General Mills, wrote in a letter to employees and the public. “We value diversity. We value inclusion. We always have … and we always will.”

Charles said company CEO Ken Powell addressed 400 local gay and lesbian professionals Wednesday and announced the company would oppose the amendment, which will be on the November ballot.

“While General Mills doesn’t normally take positions on ballot measures, this is a business issue that impacts our employees,” Charles said. “I am proud to see our company join the ranks of local and national employers speaking out for inclusion.”

“Obviously, there are strongly held views on both sides. We acknowledge those views, including those on religious grounds,” he said. “We respect and defend the right of others to disagree. But we truly value diversity and inclusion – and that makes our choice clear.”




Read more: http://www.startribune.com/politics/blogs/159057195.html



NOM sent out a letter asking the 50 largest Minnesota Companies to remain neutral. Apparently, that request is not working.
28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
General Mills opposes marriage amendment (Original Post) wellstone dem Jun 2012 OP
NOM is such a sleezy organization! I am glad that General Mills is on the... hrmjustin Jun 2012 #1
Minnesota was going to discriminate, too? I'm so sick of these reactionaries. freshwest Jun 2012 #2
Their secuirty blanket is xxqqqzme Jun 2012 #5
And those who don't want to support human dignity, need to know that they're next on the list. freshwest Jun 2012 #14
K&R... awoke_in_2003 Jun 2012 #3
I'll go buy my box of Lucky Charms right now! nightscanner59 Jun 2012 #4
Good for the General! Don't buy his products too often GoneOffShore Jun 2012 #6
Go, General Mills! closeupready Jun 2012 #7
Where does NOM get off telling companies what to do? siligut Jun 2012 #8
I hate lousy and ambiguous headlines! MADem Jun 2012 #9
Agree. It's too bad too because this is an important issue. bluesbassman Jun 2012 #12
Yeah, I was confused too, but it's from a Minneapolis paper nilram Jun 2012 #15
It is clear in the context of Minnesotans geardaddy Jun 2012 #17
Oh sure! Locals get it; it's us outta towners that are left picking our noses and MADem Jun 2012 #22
I hear ya. geardaddy Jun 2012 #23
I think that's just wonderful! It needs crushing, decisively, too. nt MADem Jun 2012 #25
Bravo! GodlessBiker Jun 2012 #10
Good for GM azurnoir Jun 2012 #11
Yay for General Mills! Are they hiring? nt shcrane71 Jun 2012 #13
It makes me mad that not a single major North Carolina-based company bothered to do this. yardwork Jun 2012 #16
I love this comment... geardaddy Jun 2012 #18
Good for them! nt Gemini Cat Jun 2012 #19
And it's not just the big businesses in Minnesota doing this wellstone dem Jun 2012 #20
Awesome. geardaddy Jun 2012 #24
Well Done General Mills iandhr Jun 2012 #21
If Corporations are persons, what sex are they? Downwinder Jun 2012 #26
More on this from the General Mills blog wellstone dem Jun 2012 #27
Good news! fishwax Jun 2012 #28
 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
1. NOM is such a sleezy organization! I am glad that General Mills is on the...
Thu Jun 14, 2012, 12:56 PM
Jun 2012

...of the angels on this one!

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
2. Minnesota was going to discriminate, too? I'm so sick of these reactionaries.
Thu Jun 14, 2012, 12:57 PM
Jun 2012

This is good because General Mills is well known and a big employer even in rural areas, if I'm not mistaken.

xxqqqzme

(14,887 posts)
5. Their secuirty blanket is
Thu Jun 14, 2012, 01:01 PM
Jun 2012

unraveling. They are desperately trying to gather all the threads so it can be put back together. It will never be the same. Too many people have already moved on. Too many people are seeing it as a civil right.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
14. And those who don't want to support human dignity, need to know that they're next on the list.
Thu Jun 14, 2012, 01:44 PM
Jun 2012
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.

Martin Luther King Jr., Letter from Birmingham Jail, April 16, 1963
US black civil rights leader & clergyman (1929 - 1968)

siligut

(12,272 posts)
8. Where does NOM get off telling companies what to do?
Thu Jun 14, 2012, 01:09 PM
Jun 2012

The audacity of the bigots knows no bounds. I hope more independent thinking companies will follow GM's lead.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
9. I hate lousy and ambiguous headlines!
Thu Jun 14, 2012, 01:15 PM
Jun 2012

I would add the word "BAN" in there somewhere--it reads, to uninformed readers, like General Mills opposes marriage....when ya get down into the context, it's possible to figure it out, but a skimmer could get the wrong idea!

General Mills opposes marriage amendment BAN makes the situation a bit more clear!

In any event, good for General Mills--they are the diametric opposite of some of the General Nuisances and General Assholes on the other side of this debate.

bluesbassman

(19,370 posts)
12. Agree. It's too bad too because this is an important issue.
Thu Jun 14, 2012, 01:42 PM
Jun 2012

Unfortunately it's in LBN so the article title has to be verbatim. However, the entire article was poorly written IMO.

Good for General Mills in taking this position. Funny how NOM's strategy is to keep the major businesses from taking a position. That reeks of fear.

nilram

(2,886 posts)
15. Yeah, I was confused too, but it's from a Minneapolis paper
Thu Jun 14, 2012, 02:28 PM
Jun 2012

so the context would be totally clear to their readers.

geardaddy

(24,926 posts)
17. It is clear in the context of Minnesotans
Thu Jun 14, 2012, 02:44 PM
Jun 2012

There's a marriage amendment coming up to, as you said, ban gay marriage.

I agree, it would be clearer if they talked about the amendment banning gay marriage.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
22. Oh sure! Locals get it; it's us outta towners that are left picking our noses and
Thu Jun 14, 2012, 04:28 PM
Jun 2012

screwing up our faces!!

It's a national issue, though, so I wish these headline writers would write for all of us from Maine to California! Of course, if I got everything I wanted, I'd be driving a new car and be forty years younger!

yardwork

(61,588 posts)
16. It makes me mad that not a single major North Carolina-based company bothered to do this.
Thu Jun 14, 2012, 02:34 PM
Jun 2012

Bank of America remained silent on the subject, as did Lowe's and other major corporations based in North Carolina. The bigoted amendment passed in North Carolina. I'm glad to see General Mills stepping up for their home state, and I hope that others do as well.

wellstone dem

(4,460 posts)
20. And it's not just the big businesses in Minnesota doing this
Thu Jun 14, 2012, 03:40 PM
Jun 2012

Take a look at the front page of the website of this Central Minnesota business where I'm now buying my coffee.

http://www.muggsysbeans.com/

"Apparently, the National Organization for Marriage is asking businesses to "stay neutral" in regards to the MN Marriage Amendment. So let us go on record here, in full defiance of the hateful people involved in NOM, that Muggsy's Beans fully supports gay marriage and looks forward to defeating this horrible piece of legislation."

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»General Mills opposes mar...