Pregnant Connecticut Teen Who Tested Positive for Zika Virus Says She Will Keep Her Baby
Source: People
Pregnant Connecticut Teen Who Tested Positive for Zika Virus Says She Will Keep Her Baby: 'God Has Given Me a Miracle'
A pregnant Connecticut teen who tested positive for the Zika virus has decided to carry her baby to full term despite the risks of birth defects. Mujica and her fiancé, Victor Cruz, 19, learned they were pregnant on March 14 just four days after she started exhibiting symptoms of the Zika virus, which has been linked to severe birth defects, including microcephaly.
"I'm not happy that my baby is going to be born with Zika but God has given me a miracle," Sara Mujica tells PEOPLE.
The 17-year-old from Danbury, Connecticut, says that doctors told her she would never be able to conceive because she had meningitis at age 15.
"Doctors said that I would never get pregnant so this is a big miracle for me," she says.
Mujica and her fiancé, Victor Cruz, 19, learned they were pregnant on March 14 just four days after she started exhibiting symptoms of the Zika virus, which has been linked to severe birth defects, including microcephaly.
Read more: http://www.people.com/article/sara-mujica-pregnant-connecticut-teen-zika-virus-will-keep-her-baby
Very sad.
In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)riversedge
(70,186 posts)EL34x4
(2,003 posts)She's only $80 towards her $50,000 goal.
cheapdate
(3,811 posts)Expressions of sympathy not followed up with concrete action are hollow and disingenuous and must be called out every time!
Demit
(11,238 posts)You cannot possibly act on every situation you feel sympathy for, in this world. But that doesn't negate the emotion. It isn't a reason to suppress expressing it, either. You go too far.
cheapdate
(3,811 posts)It was directed toward the preceding poster. Their post was simply poor manners.
Demit
(11,238 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(26,324 posts)Although, I think the parents would have a better result if they claimed evil liberals were forcing the baby to bake a gay wedding cake.
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)Even healthy children are extremely expensive.
24601
(3,959 posts)different than shaming her for aborting it.
What you expressed is the kind of sentiment that enables the right to claim pro-choice = pro-abortion.
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)In fact, one of the best things about the option of abortion is people understanding they aren't in a position to have children at that time.
24601
(3,959 posts)Pro-choice means a decision freely made by the mother in consultation with her doctor without people arhuing that she will go to hell is she has an abortion or will suffer financially if she does not.
It means that it's her body and her choice.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)in what conditions someone should be allowed to have children.
daa
(2,621 posts)uppityperson
(115,677 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Demit
(11,238 posts)The poster didn't say anything remotely like "she should be ashamed!"
Lots of luck to her getting people to kick in $ for the baby, but having a baby at 17 is more romantic than sensible. Especially a baby that might have special needs. Her choice, all right, but then and forever after, her responsibility. Hope she accepts that.
lbrtbell
(2,389 posts)womanofthehills
(8,697 posts)The only high risk numbers are in Brazil - Columbia had thousands of Zita cases and no rise in microcephaly.
Who knows - it could be a combo thing - Zito virus + the unknown = microcephaly.
LiberalArkie
(15,713 posts)hamsterjill
(15,220 posts)I've heard it many times from my daughter's contemporaries. I like the idea that it is inclusive of the father in situations where a pregnancy is a positive event.
I don't like it because, in my opinion, it's not factual and it degrades the idea that choice is a woman's decision in situations where pregnancy might not be a positive event.
old guy
(3,283 posts)A "choice" she would be denied if she had chosen to abort.
enlightenment
(8,830 posts)If she had chosen to abort, it would have also been her choice. That's the thing with choices; choosing one thing often precludes choosing something else - but whatever the end result, it was still a choice.
What a weird thing to say.
snort
(2,334 posts)old guy
(3,283 posts)Save your foolish snark for someone else.
snort
(2,334 posts)So it's only a choice if it goes your way?
old guy
(3,283 posts)She had every right to make the choice she made, but if her choice was to abort would that choice be accepted? Not a chance.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)struggle with because my oldest daughter is severely disabled. But if she had chosen to abort there would have been a stigma. That is why I struggle and remind myself that it is none of my business. I am glad that I did not have that choice when I was carrying my daughter.
The world had better get busy finding an answer to this disease because this is going to cost a fortune - the same way that my daughter has cost the taxpayer a fortune. Now multiply my daughter time the number of babies this is going to produce.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)secondwind
(16,903 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)That is one asshole of a God you got there.
6:20 talks about god being a prick
and here is the follow up video
CountAllVotes
(20,868 posts)Sad reality she will be facing, very sad. She'll be needing a lot more that $500,000 before this thing is over.
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)Her little miracle may be long term care.
dembotoz
(16,799 posts)seems the way we are heading and how special needs are being funded
3catwoman3
(23,972 posts)...has no boots.
24601
(3,959 posts)dembotoz
(16,799 posts)I have can more more forthcoming if you wish.....
24601
(3,959 posts)dembotoz
(16,799 posts)womanofthehills
(8,697 posts)The last numbers I saw from Columbia, were 2 cases of Microcephaly among 5000 pregnant women with Zita. The numbers are way less than Brazil.
The chances of her baby being normal are very good.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I'm quite sure we all cost the taxpayers at one time or another. No doubt though, many idiots pretend they have absolute knowledge of who is worth what, and imply as much...
Moostache
(9,895 posts)Unless they start making public appearances for rightwing nutjob anti-abortionists...
I loathe the Palins for a lot of reasons, but chief among them was the crass parading around of their son with Down's Syndrome and promotion of their choice as some sort of moral beacon. Congratulations on choosing a lifetime commitment to caring for someone else's needs, but stop thinking that its a public good deed.
Private choices should remain private or they become publicity stunts. Palin has proven over and over that she never was anything but a living and breathing publicity stunt and grifter. I hope these kids don't try to tap that same well, but after watching the GOP and rightwing nuts make Kim Davis a "star" for being a biogted hate monger, I have very little doubt how this is going to turn out as well...
stonecutter357
(12,695 posts)CarrieLynne
(497 posts)what a torturous life
Ineeda
(3,626 posts)We can't have it both ways.
CarrieLynne
(497 posts)I just cant imagine the hell that baby would go thru
RobinA
(9,888 posts)As a parent or potential parent, part (if not all) of your responsibility is to think about the child. Choice isn't all about me, me, me. It's about making a decision weighing what you believe to be best for all involved. People's mileage may differ as to what is best, but choice should never be, although it often is, What do *I* want?
Ineeda
(3,626 posts)You say "Choice isn't all about me, me, me. It's about making a decision weighing what you believe to be best for all involved." I would choose differently than this young woman, but in the most basic way, that choice would be about me, me, me and my evaluation of how I would deal with things. I'm honest enough to admit I would be unable to emotionally, financially and physically handle the lifelong challenges associated with having a severely disabled child. So call me selfish, but the "best" for that child would be debatable. We should not judge other people's choices, even when they differ from ours. That's what CHOICE is all about.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Normally, microcephaly occurs in about 1 in 5,000 to 1 in 10,000 of all births. Scientists analyzing outbreaks of the Zika virus in French Polynesia and northeast Brazil have estimated that the incidence rose to nearly 1 in 100 births nine months after those outbreaks peaked.
If a mere 1% is too high a risk, what then is the number and on what is it that measure on?
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)I thought I saw recently that the incidence of birth defects was still low.
JI7
(89,247 posts)CountAllVotes
(20,868 posts)n/t
JI7
(89,247 posts)CountAllVotes
(20,868 posts)JI7
(89,247 posts)That's why she is calling it a miracle
womanofthehills
(8,697 posts)Her mom was told she could not get pregnant.
I was told I probably could not get pregnant, but got pregnant 3 times. Dr. said you better start trying for a baby now because you might have a real hard time getting pregnant - I was pregnant the next month.
Anyway, Columbia is showing no rise in microcephaly despite thousands of cases of Zita.
Iggo
(47,549 posts)And yes. Very sad, no matter what choice she makes.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)Warpy
(111,245 posts)Early in the pregnancy seems to be when the virus is most dangerous, women either miscarrying or giving preterm birth to non viable infants.
I wish her the best and hope she's one of the exceptions.
womanofthehills
(8,697 posts)What neither country is seeing so far, however, is a spike in microcephaly. That's what experts are really watching for, because a replication of what scientists believe happened in Brazil would be ominous for everyone.
Colombia and Venezuela are really the places that will verify whether Brazil is unique, or if the pattern will repeat, said Uriel Kitron, an expert in tropical infectious diseases at Emory University in Atlanta.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2016/04/04/zika-spreading-birth-defects-arent-yet/82607406/
Warpy
(111,245 posts)Colombia will tell us a lot, said Marcos Espinal, director of communicable diseases and health analysis for the Pan American Health Organization.
Authorities there are monitoring pregnant women who have already been diagnosed with Zika, he said.
But one challenge is that the birth defects don't typically appear in a fetus until the end of the second trimester or the beginning of the third, according to experts. Other types of damage can't be detected until birth, or even later, they say and many of the Zika cases are fresh. Researchers only detected transmission of Zika in Colombia last October, while it had emerged in Brazil at least five months earlier.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,174 posts)He/she is the one who told her she could never become pregnant.
I had a friend who was told she couldn't get pregnant because she had an inverted uterus. So she didn't bother with birth control. She got pregnant and gave the baby up for adoption.
B2G
(9,766 posts)There's also a good chance the baby will be born healthy. Not every pregnant woman who has contracted the virus has a child with defects.
If a pregnant woman is exposed ◦We dont know how likely she is to get Zika.
If a pregnant woman is infected ◦We dont know how the virus will affect her or her pregnancy.
◦We dont know how likely it is that Zika will pass to her fetus.
◦We dont know if the fetus is infected, if the fetus will develop birth defects.
◦We dont know when in pregnancy the infection might cause harm to the fetus.
◦We dont know whether her baby will have birth defects.
◦We dont know if sexual transmission of Zika virus poses a different risk of birth defects than mosquito-borne transmission.
http://www.cdc.gov/zika/pregnancy/question-answers.html
CTyankee
(63,902 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)Coventina
(27,101 posts)This young woman was told she would probably never be able to have a baby.
How can someone get on their high-horse and deny her this unexpected opportunity?
The baby might turn out to be perfectly healthy. It might not.
Every pregnancy has its risks.
This is her CHOICE and she's allowed to make it.
cannabis_flower
(3,764 posts)Not every baby born to a Zika infected woman is born with birth defects. Hoping her baby also is not.
Zoetrope
(1 post)This claim sounds dubious. She is free to make any decision she chooses, but I don't think that this is a miracle, just unprotected sex.
I wasn't able to find that meningitis is linked to infertility and so why would a doctor tell her she would be infertile?
3catwoman3
(23,972 posts)Infection of the Fallopian tubes, sure. Mentingitis? Dubious, indeed.
Blandocyte
(1,231 posts)Thank you. I'll be here all week.
truthisfreedom
(23,145 posts)and the people around her supporting this decision are idiots.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I'm sure your bias compels you to allege as much, much as mine compels me to think that same of you.
truthisfreedom
(23,145 posts)The Zika virus has been proven to deliver the most horrific of birth defects.
Only an idiot would wish this outcome on an unborn child, when there's an alternative.
Vinca
(50,261 posts)I can't begin to imagine being only 17 and suddenly responsible for a severely disabled child. Maybe a sonogram will rule things in or out at some point and she'll change her mind. I hope she's getting better advice than "it's a miracle."