Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
Mon May 9, 2016, 12:43 PM May 2016

Russian offer to send water bombers to fight Fort McMurray fire in limbo

Source: CBC

The Trudeau government has yet to respond to an offer by Russia to dispatch massive water bombers and fire fighting specialists to battle the growing inferno around Fort McMurray, Alta.

The proposal was made late last week by Vladimir Puchkov, the Russian minister of emergency measures.

A spokesman for Russia's embassy in Ottawa, Kirill Kalinin, said Sunday that they continue to stand "ready to help our Canadian partners to fight the ongoing wildfires in Alberta."

The offer involves sending converted Ilyushin Il-76 transport planes — the kind occasionally leased by the Canadian military — that can dump as much as "42 tons of fire retardant into fire spots," according to a statement on the web site of Russia's Civil Defence, Emergencies and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters.

Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/politics/russia-water-bombers-alberta-wildfires-1.3572825



I don't see what the hold is besides the obvious.
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Russian offer to send water bombers to fight Fort McMurray fire in limbo (Original Post) NWCorona May 2016 OP
Those Russians know a bit about fighting hella big fires! yourpaljoey May 2016 #1
Reading the article it sounds like it may be an issue of air space and congestion. drm604 May 2016 #2
That very well be but the equipment being offered is far superior to some of the planes being used NWCorona May 2016 #4
And they may take that into account. drm604 May 2016 #9
A Michigan Professor has barked about this for years laserhaas May 2016 #16
Here's a video of an Ilyushin II-76 making a retardant drop LastLiberal in PalmSprings May 2016 #3
That BE-200 video was pretty cool! NWCorona May 2016 #5
What is that stuff? philosslayer May 2016 #12
It's a mixture of water and fertilizer LastLiberal in PalmSprings May 2016 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author Brother Buzz May 2016 #6
........... polly7 May 2016 #7
Thank you, Russia. n/t NewImproved Deal May 2016 #8
If it works logistically, what better way to further the goals of friendship? truthisfreedom May 2016 #10
Let them help. Don't wait. 840high May 2016 #11
I can state, unequivocally, that these are the BEST anti-wildfire aircraft anywhere. raven mad May 2016 #14
Not sure it's politics... More likely logistics. Adrahil May 2016 #15

drm604

(16,230 posts)
2. Reading the article it sounds like it may be an issue of air space and congestion.
Mon May 9, 2016, 01:11 PM
May 2016

It may not be possible to safely have more flights over the area.

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
4. That very well be but the equipment being offered is far superior to some of the planes being used
Mon May 9, 2016, 01:26 PM
May 2016

at the moment. Like the Lockheed P2V.

drm604

(16,230 posts)
9. And they may take that into account.
Mon May 9, 2016, 01:44 PM
May 2016

It appears that they're still trying to decide. They probably have to clear it with their version of the FAA or whatever and those things take time.

There may also be some agreements with the US involving foreign forces so they may have to consult with us also.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
16. A Michigan Professor has barked about this for years
Tue May 10, 2016, 07:37 AM
May 2016

C W (Bill) Kaufman has been screaming about how the Russian planes are far superior and could save lives/ property

3. Here's a video of an Ilyushin II-76 making a retardant drop
Mon May 9, 2016, 01:24 PM
May 2016


Personally, I think the BE-200 would be more effective because it would have quicker turnaround times.

13. It's a mixture of water and fertilizer
Mon May 9, 2016, 05:10 PM
May 2016
link

It's a slurry that cools and smothers the fire while at the same time spreading fertilizer to help the vegetation regrow. The red dye is there to help the pilots have a reference for subsequent drops.

If you really want to see something impressive:



I saw this once in Southern California -- it's impressive. And how low they fly!

Response to NWCorona (Original post)

polly7

(20,582 posts)
7. ...........
Mon May 9, 2016, 01:30 PM
May 2016

Canadian officials did tell Russian media that the proposal was being studied.

At least 27 air tankers and 15 helicopters are involved in fighting the wildfire that has driven over 88,000 people from their homes in the oil patch community.

Goodale was also not prepared Sunday to call out the army to join the over 600 firefighters from Alberta, Ontario, Quebec, Manitoba and New Brunswick who have been part of the effort to contain the blaze, the origins of which remain a mystery.

Troops were deployed last year to help contain a massive woodland blaze in Saskatchewan, but Goodale said Sunday it was best to leave the current disaster to full-time firefighters.

“This is a beast of a fire and it needs the most professional fighters to contend with it,” he said.

The air force, meanwhile, deployed one of its new heavy-lift battlefield helicopters Sunday for the first time in support of the disaster relief operation. The CH-147F Chinook took two loads of food, medicine and emergency supplies to a First Nations community 50 kilometres outside of Fort McMurray.

It bolsters the existing four CH-146 Griffons and the one C-130J Hercules, which have been involved since midway through last week.

The Chinook, with its 10,886-kilogram load capacity, is an important addition for moving relief supplies quickly into remote area, said Maj. Gord Gushue, the deputy commander of the air task force supporting the operation.

He said the skies around the wildfire are already pretty congested and military pilots have had to take care.

“You can appreciate that the (civilian pilots) might be running a bucket ops where they scoop up water and move it around, going up and down quite a ways. So, they have to be very careful to make sure no one is flying underneath them — or overhead,” Gushue said in an interview from Edmonton.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/russian-offer-to-send-heavy-water-bombers-to-fort-mac-in-limbo/article29935985/

raven mad

(4,940 posts)
14. I can state, unequivocally, that these are the BEST anti-wildfire aircraft anywhere.
Tue May 10, 2016, 01:42 AM
May 2016

Don't let politics prevent them; they've helped us up here before.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
15. Not sure it's politics... More likely logistics.
Tue May 10, 2016, 07:11 AM
May 2016

I was involved in an air effort to fight fires some years ago, and the biggest issue,I think will be logistical and operational. There can be no issue with language. The pilots must be able to understand and respond in English with a high level of fluency. That's a major safety issue. The aircraft must be willing to subordinate the,selves to the fire scene commander. There has to be approapriate support facilities for the aircraft. The aircraft must be equipped to use the proper fire retardant ( if theybare not just pure water bombers). Lots of issues involved that lots of folks dont't ever consider.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Russian offer to send wat...