Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NeoConsSuck

(2,544 posts)
Tue May 10, 2016, 08:16 AM May 2016

Poll: Clinton, Trump 'dead even' in Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania

Source: USA Today

It's still early to analyze the general election, but a new poll shows Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump in a dead heat in three key swing states: Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania.

The Quinnipiac University Swing State Poll released Tuesday has Clinton up by a single point in both Florida (43%-42%) and Pennsylvania (43%-42%), while Trump leads Clinton in Ohio by 43%-to-39%

"Six months from Election Day, the presidential races between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump in the three most crucial states, Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania, are too close to call," said Peter A. Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac Poll.

Democratic candidate Bernie Sanders, by the way, has narrow leads over Trump in all three pivotal states.

Read more: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/05/10/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-quinnipiac-poll-florida-ohio-pennsylvania/84173448/

72 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Poll: Clinton, Trump 'dead even' in Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania (Original Post) NeoConsSuck May 2016 OP
Hillary's polls only go in one direction. Biaviians May 2016 #1
why does Quinnipiac not show the partisan breakdown on its poll? ericson00 May 2016 #2
They don't hide it. former9thward May 2016 #22
Independent = GOP Gomez163 May 2016 #26
What does your polling company show? former9thward May 2016 #27
That Hillary is awesome and anyone that doesn't like her sucks?? Gomez163 May 2016 #38
Since when? FBaggins May 2016 #29
An indie is just a hipster Republican. Gomez163 May 2016 #35
Sorry. That's nonsense. FBaggins May 2016 #40
Oh bullshit. I'm an indie truebluegreen May 2016 #41
I have no respect for independents. Either you're with us or against us. Gomez163 May 2016 #49
Oh OK then. With whom? truebluegreen May 2016 #52
Either you're with Hillary or you might as well be a dittohead. Gomez163 May 2016 #53
Such a clever line: dead armadillos. Did you make that up yourself? truebluegreen May 2016 #55
How utterly conformist and lacking in any intellectual rigor... TipTok May 2016 #67
This is why your point may be valid in this case. There was a question in all three states if they still_one May 2016 #56
This post = Bullshit frylock May 2016 #44
Cause you say so? TipTok May 2016 #66
ericson, I question the Quinnipiac polling just based on the fact that Hillary won Ohio, Florida, still_one May 2016 #54
What is wrong with America? Funtatlaguy May 2016 #3
Our democracy has been replaced by oligarchy. fbc May 2016 #9
Just like Jimmy Carter said. tabasco May 2016 #20
Although this is a bit surprising I suspect Trump got a bump from Cruz and Kasich dropping out. DCBob May 2016 #4
You're probably right rpannier May 2016 #7
Not too worry. Loudestlib May 2016 #5
Send me a link of that post Doctor Jack May 2016 #48
Hillary will win Florida handily. Darb May 2016 #6
And I thought Rick Scott would never be my Governor.....twice. Lochloosa May 2016 #11
She'll make a good president, but she's an awful candidate bigworld May 2016 #8
Actually, she'd make an awful president. The very last thing this country needs is Gene Debs May 2016 #14
Florida and Ohio HomerRamone May 2016 #10
Sanders is basically the same, despite his 'favorables' and facing NO attacks. How's that? CrowCityDem May 2016 #12
They Showed This Polling Info pmorlan1 May 2016 #13
Here on the ground in PA.. disillusioned73 May 2016 #15
How does one measure ground feel? I Bought the Law May 2016 #21
I'm old enough to remember elections dating back to Clinton Part I.. disillusioned73 May 2016 #23
I don't think she takes FL either. HooptieWagon May 2016 #32
Of course, that's just science right there Doctor Jack May 2016 #50
Will she get the youth vote Obama did? HooptieWagon May 2016 #51
Will she get the Asian vote Doctor Jack May 2016 #57
You dig a hole anywhere in Pennsylvania Doctor Jack May 2016 #46
And it shows Bernie winning!!! Why is that not in the OP? ViseGrip May 2016 #16
The OP TeddyR May 2016 #17
He will be the nominee Doctor Jack May 2016 #59
As a Sanders supporter but a Democrat first and foremost TeddyR May 2016 #18
All those pragmatic centrist moderates think its a great idea to run a toxic Hillary whereisjustice May 2016 #19
Often a strength can become a weakness nolabels May 2016 #61
Nate Silver has a lot to say about these polls from today Doctor Jack May 2016 #24
Anyone who is the least bit surprised by this has been hiding in a cave for the past 6 months. It is Attorney in Texas May 2016 #25
Or maybe state polls mean very little this far out Doctor Jack May 2016 #33
That argument stopped playing when Trump became the presumptive nominee. State hypothetical head-to- Attorney in Texas May 2016 #36
Citation needed Doctor Jack May 2016 #39
Anyone who thinks these polls foretell anything about November has not been paying attention. LonePirate May 2016 #62
Just means democrats will need to work harder to GOTV in 2016 ffr May 2016 #28
If this doesn't scare the shit out of you, nothing will. Vinca May 2016 #30
I heard the sky is falling Doctor Jack May 2016 #37
Let me guess . . . head-in-the-sand Clinton supporter? Vinca May 2016 #45
People rolling around on the ground talking about Sgt Schultz Doctor Jack May 2016 #47
you win Doctor Jack! Skittles May 2016 #63
One of the other signs is President Trump. Vinca May 2016 #68
Obama won PA by ten points in 2008 even though Clinton beat him in the primary FBaggins May 2016 #31
Exactly Doctor Jack May 2016 #43
Citation needed. tabasco May 2016 #58
My mistake Doctor Jack May 2016 #60
WaPo is questioning their demographics data, as it Nate Silver TwilightZone May 2016 #34
But that doesn't fit the narrative Doctor Jack May 2016 #42
I wish the headline had said "Trump dead, even in Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania." olddad56 May 2016 #64
Reuters tracking poll also Angel Martin May 2016 #65
K&R agracie May 2016 #69
A race to the bottom....who will win? n/t Lodestar May 2016 #70
Both of these presumptive nominees are about as popular as herpes. BlueStater May 2016 #71
probably more fallout from the coal remarks 0rganism May 2016 #72

former9thward

(31,936 posts)
22. They don't hide it.
Tue May 10, 2016, 11:09 AM
May 2016

It is right at your link.

OHIO

REGISTERED VOTERS
PARTY IDENTIFICATION
Republican 30%
Democrat 29
Independent 34
Other/DK/NA 7

And if they were hiding it how do you know they have been oversampling GOP? Because you don't like the results? What does your polling company show?

FBaggins

(26,721 posts)
40. Sorry. That's nonsense.
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:02 PM
May 2016

They split almost 50/50 in the last election and leaned farther left in 2008.

More relevant for this thread... they didn't swing the results of the poll.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
41. Oh bullshit. I'm an indie
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:02 PM
May 2016

have never been a Republican and am very far from being a hipster.

What a steaming pile.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
52. Oh OK then. With whom?
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:34 PM
May 2016

Pray be precise...and btw "with the Democrats" isn't. Anyone can call himself a Democrat, like say Rahm Imanuel or Joe Lieberman. So, please!, define your terms so I can earn your respect. It is very important to me.

 

Gomez163

(2,039 posts)
53. Either you're with Hillary or you might as well be a dittohead.
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:35 PM
May 2016

There is no middle ground. The only thing in the middle of the road are dead armadillos.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
55. Such a clever line: dead armadillos. Did you make that up yourself?
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:37 PM
May 2016

Shows as much depth as the rest of your posts. Buhbye.

 

TipTok

(2,474 posts)
67. How utterly conformist and lacking in any intellectual rigor...
Tue May 10, 2016, 02:34 PM
May 2016

Hillary thanks her lucky stars for folks like you every day.

still_one

(92,061 posts)
56. This is why your point may be valid in this case. There was a question in all three states if they
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:44 PM
May 2016

supported voter IDs. In all three states, it indicated they did. Voter ID is not an issue with Democrats, but is an issue with republicans. So I would not be surprised that some of those that identified themselves as independents, are actually republicans.

still_one

(92,061 posts)
54. ericson, I question the Quinnipiac polling just based on the fact that Hillary won Ohio, Florida,
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:37 PM
May 2016

and Pennsylvania primaries by large amounts. In addition, the total number of votes Hillary has won in primaries over Trump is over 2 million, and the number of total votes Hillary has won over Sanders is 3 million.

Something does not sync up. What I am listing is how people actually voted in the primaries, and those act as a control.

Also, I wonder how many Sanders supporters would identify themselves as an independent, and not a Democrat

Bottom line is that I question the sampling

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
20. Just like Jimmy Carter said.
Tue May 10, 2016, 10:45 AM
May 2016

Bubba Clinton played ball with the billionaire class and his reward will be a new lease in the White House for him and his wife.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
4. Although this is a bit surprising I suspect Trump got a bump from Cruz and Kasich dropping out.
Tue May 10, 2016, 08:28 AM
May 2016

Hillary will likely get a similar bump when Bernie drops.

rpannier

(24,328 posts)
7. You're probably right
Tue May 10, 2016, 08:31 AM
May 2016

I think Quinnipac is usually pretty accurate
It's early and as I recall Obama was shown to be struggling against rMoney 4 years ago about this time as well in several states he ultimately won (and won fairly easily)
I'll worry if this shows up in late September and early October

Loudestlib

(980 posts)
5. Not too worry.
Tue May 10, 2016, 08:29 AM
May 2016

Plenty of Hillary supporters on this board have told me that my vote is not needed and Hillary has this election in the bag. I believe them.

 

Gene Debs

(582 posts)
14. Actually, she'd make an awful president. The very last thing this country needs is
Tue May 10, 2016, 09:20 AM
May 2016

more of the status quo—and if you took the status quo and put a pantsuit on it, you'd have Hillary Clinton.

 

disillusioned73

(2,872 posts)
23. I'm old enough to remember elections dating back to Clinton Part I..
Tue May 10, 2016, 11:11 AM
May 2016

it's not scientific, but gauging by the last 2 elections (that were won by the Democratic candidate) I can temper the local feel for a candidate, and the total lack of passion FOR Hillary in my region compared to those elections is very real and noticeable.. JMO - but PA may be in play.. but, she isn't the candidate yet - so we'll see..

Looking at the PA GE in 2004 Kerrys small margin (less then 150,000) is also concerning.. because of the lack of passion on the left and the fever pitch anti-Hillary from the right might just make for this state a bit more interesting come this November..

[link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election_in_Pennsylvania,_2004|

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
32. I don't think she takes FL either.
Tue May 10, 2016, 11:54 AM
May 2016

Obama barely squeaked out victories in 2008 and 2012. Hillary will pull in far fewer votes.

Doctor Jack

(3,072 posts)
50. Of course, that's just science right there
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:26 PM
May 2016
Hillary will pull in far fewer votes.

It is an immutable fact. One must not question or argue with this. It is already so
 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
51. Will she get the youth vote Obama did?
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:31 PM
May 2016

No.
Will she get the independant vote Obama did?
No.
Will AAs turn out in same numbers for her as Obama?
No.
Will the left wing of the party vote for her as they did Obama?
No.

She is courting support from Republicans, but it's doubtfull she can make up all the votes lost. She'll get far fewer votes than Obama.

Doctor Jack

(3,072 posts)
57. Will she get the Asian vote
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:45 PM
May 2016

No

Will she get the Canadian vote

No

Will she get the cat vote

No

Will she get the hobgoblin vote

No


See I agree with you. Well argued

Doctor Jack

(3,072 posts)
46. You dig a hole anywhere in Pennsylvania
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:17 PM
May 2016

Climb inside, have a loved one bury you alive and and if you hear the earth murmur the name of the Republican candidate for president, you will know who is going to win the general. Or there will be 6 more weeks of winter. It's kind of a toss up

 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
18. As a Sanders supporter but a Democrat first and foremost
Tue May 10, 2016, 10:08 AM
May 2016

This poll is shocking. It confirms (once again) that national polls really don't matter. You have to win the states to win the election, and a general national poll isn't particularly predictive. Ohio perhaps doesn't surprise me as much as Pennsylvania and Florida, but if Hillary isn't doing well in those states I can't imagine Virginia, Colorado or North Carolina (for example) will be much better. She needs to get her act together. Hopefully Trump will continue to insert foot in mouth.

whereisjustice

(2,941 posts)
19. All those pragmatic centrist moderates think its a great idea to run a toxic Hillary
Tue May 10, 2016, 10:18 AM
May 2016

foolishly applauding the rise of Trump.

Trump's success is a product of a vacuum of representation and leadership for the middle class and below.

Clinton's success is due to her willingness to trade principals, values and voters for cash from the 1% and war for the defense industry.

We could have found a better candidate. The money grubbing DNC - our corporate mother, thought it better to sell us out to Wall Street.

nolabels

(13,133 posts)
61. Often a strength can become a weakness
Tue May 10, 2016, 01:06 PM
May 2016

You state:

"Clinton's success is due to her willingness to trade principals, values and voters for cash from the 1% and war for the defense industry. "



In the G.E. that will be used by Trump as pounding point to lure independents. Not that Trump has any real morals, but those who might be listening might think they have them. Trump is not getting there by accident, he is feeding them the bullshit they want to hear (even if it's just more lies packaged in different way)

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
25. Anyone who is the least bit surprised by this has been hiding in a cave for the past 6 months. It is
Tue May 10, 2016, 11:34 AM
May 2016

not by chance that Trump bested Jeb Bush, Ben Carson, Chris Christie, Ted Cruz, Carly Fiorina, Jim Gilmore, Lindsey Graham, Mike Huckabee, Bobby Jindal, John Kasich, George Pataki, Rand Paul, Rick Perry, Marco Rubio, Rick Santorum, and Scott Walker.

Trump's greatest asset has been his opponents' underestimating the appeal of his campaign, and Hillary is a world-class underestimater of her opponents.

Doctor Jack

(3,072 posts)
33. Or maybe state polls mean very little this far out
Tue May 10, 2016, 11:54 AM
May 2016

But if people want to wring their hands and give themselves an ulcer over these largely meaningless polls, that is their right

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
36. That argument stopped playing when Trump became the presumptive nominee. State hypothetical head-to-
Tue May 10, 2016, 11:58 AM
May 2016

head polls mean little when neither party has a presumptive nominee, but now they need to be credited.

LonePirate

(13,408 posts)
62. Anyone who thinks these polls foretell anything about November has not been paying attention.
Tue May 10, 2016, 01:19 PM
May 2016

First off, these polls over sampled Repubs and under sampled Dems. They over sampled white voters and under sampled minority voters. Second, polls from 2008 and 2012 around this time show how unreliable they are. Last, these polls are from the polling organization with the worst track record so far in 2016.

There is not a single reason to place any faith in these polls which redefine what a junk poll is.

ffr

(22,665 posts)
28. Just means democrats will need to work harder to GOTV in 2016
Tue May 10, 2016, 11:39 AM
May 2016

Don't take any state or contest for granted. Get democrats to the polls.

Doctor Jack

(3,072 posts)
37. I heard the sky is falling
Tue May 10, 2016, 11:58 AM
May 2016

We may be in the end times. One set of polls 6 months before the election when the candidates aren't even in place yet. Surely a prophecy of doom. Get your affairs in order, few of us will survive this Quinnipiac poll

Vinca

(50,236 posts)
45. Let me guess . . . head-in-the-sand Clinton supporter?
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:15 PM
May 2016

Sgt. Schultz must be your hero: "I see nothing."

Doctor Jack

(3,072 posts)
47. People rolling around on the ground talking about Sgt Schultz
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:19 PM
May 2016

That is one of the 7 signs of the apocalypse

FBaggins

(26,721 posts)
31. Obama won PA by ten points in 2008 even though Clinton beat him in the primary
Tue May 10, 2016, 11:50 AM
May 2016

I think it was closer to 6% in 2012.

If PA is even close to being in play... we have problems.

Doctor Jack

(3,072 posts)
43. Exactly
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:11 PM
May 2016

President Romney was ahead at this point in 2012 in Pennsylvania and he went on to crush Obama in the general.

Doctor Jack

(3,072 posts)
60. My mistake
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:59 PM
May 2016

Obama barely led in Pennsylvania at this point in 2012, much like Clintons small lead today. I guess we are going to lose in November. Abandon all hope. Can someone loan me a gun and a single bullet? If the situation is only nearly the same as 2012 then I don't want to live on this mortal plane anymore.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/trump-clinton-florida-ohio-pennsylvania-222994


Maybe we can talk about mccain 10 point lead in Pennsylvania in late April 2008 or Obama 2 point lead in late may 2008?

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/pa/pennsylvania_mccain_vs_obama-244.html#polls

Doctor Jack

(3,072 posts)
42. But that doesn't fit the narrative
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:05 PM
May 2016

Don't try to bring math and logic into this. We are doomed, did you hear? Now until you agree that thsee are the end times, I'm going to have to ask you to leave

0rganism

(23,927 posts)
72. probably more fallout from the coal remarks
Tue May 10, 2016, 07:50 PM
May 2016

damn, that was a stupid thing to say, and it's gonna show up in more than 1 attack ad as the GE campaign continues

i've had some really high hopes for this election, and Hillary's already started trashing them. she'd better get it together pronto or we're going to have to survive under il Douche for 8 long years.

W43 was by far the worst president in my lifetime (which goes back to Nixon). Trump45 is going to be much much worse.

i can see it now at the next Trump rally: "HAVE YOU SEEN MY POLL NUMBERS IN OHIO, PENNSYLVANIA AND FLORIDA? WE'RE KICKING HER ASS, SEVERELY! SHE'S COMPLETELY CROOKED AND INCOMPETENT. LOOK AROUND PEOPLE, LOOK IN A MIRROR, YOU ARE ALL AWESOME, AND TOGETHER WE'RE GOING TO WIN, AND WIN, AND WIN SOME MORE. YOU'RE GOING TO GET TIRED OF WINNING."



and it's going to go on and on and on like that for 8 fucking years, because HRC went off her carefully-prepared script.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Poll: Clinton, Trump 'dea...