Poll: Clinton, Trump 'dead even' in Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania
Source: USA Today
It's still early to analyze the general election, but a new poll shows Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump in a dead heat in three key swing states: Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania.
The Quinnipiac University Swing State Poll released Tuesday has Clinton up by a single point in both Florida (43%-42%) and Pennsylvania (43%-42%), while Trump leads Clinton in Ohio by 43%-to-39%
"Six months from Election Day, the presidential races between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump in the three most crucial states, Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania, are too close to call," said Peter A. Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac Poll.
Democratic candidate Bernie Sanders, by the way, has narrow leads over Trump in all three pivotal states.
Read more: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/05/10/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-quinnipiac-poll-florida-ohio-pennsylvania/84173448/
Biaviians
(167 posts)ericson00
(2,707 posts)to hide the GOP oversample they've been doing since campaign '16 began?
https://www.qu.edu/images/polling/ps/ps05102016_Sw4b42d.pdf
former9thward
(31,936 posts)It is right at your link.
OHIO
REGISTERED VOTERS
PARTY IDENTIFICATION
Republican 30%
Democrat 29
Independent 34
Other/DK/NA 7
And if they were hiding it how do you know they have been oversampling GOP? Because you don't like the results? What does your polling company show?
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)former9thward
(31,936 posts)Gomez163
(2,039 posts)Its been poll tested.
FBaggins
(26,721 posts)???
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)FBaggins
(26,721 posts)They split almost 50/50 in the last election and leaned farther left in 2008.
More relevant for this thread... they didn't swing the results of the poll.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)have never been a Republican and am very far from being a hipster.
What a steaming pile.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Pray be precise...and btw "with the Democrats" isn't. Anyone can call himself a Democrat, like say Rahm Imanuel or Joe Lieberman. So, please!, define your terms so I can earn your respect. It is very important to me.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)There is no middle ground. The only thing in the middle of the road are dead armadillos.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Shows as much depth as the rest of your posts. Buhbye.
TipTok
(2,474 posts)Hillary thanks her lucky stars for folks like you every day.
still_one
(92,061 posts)supported voter IDs. In all three states, it indicated they did. Voter ID is not an issue with Democrats, but is an issue with republicans. So I would not be surprised that some of those that identified themselves as independents, are actually republicans.
frylock
(34,825 posts)TipTok
(2,474 posts)Do you fight with the same fervor when they release a poll you do like?
still_one
(92,061 posts)and Pennsylvania primaries by large amounts. In addition, the total number of votes Hillary has won in primaries over Trump is over 2 million, and the number of total votes Hillary has won over Sanders is 3 million.
Something does not sync up. What I am listing is how people actually voted in the primaries, and those act as a control.
Also, I wonder how many Sanders supporters would identify themselves as an independent, and not a Democrat
Bottom line is that I question the sampling
Funtatlaguy
(10,862 posts)Seriously.
Hard to fathom.
fbc
(1,668 posts)tabasco
(22,974 posts)Bubba Clinton played ball with the billionaire class and his reward will be a new lease in the White House for him and his wife.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Hillary will likely get a similar bump when Bernie drops.
rpannier
(24,328 posts)I think Quinnipac is usually pretty accurate
It's early and as I recall Obama was shown to be struggling against rMoney 4 years ago about this time as well in several states he ultimately won (and won fairly easily)
I'll worry if this shows up in late September and early October
Loudestlib
(980 posts)Plenty of Hillary supporters on this board have told me that my vote is not needed and Hillary has this election in the bag. I believe them.
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)I want to read it
Darb
(2,807 posts)Ohio a bit closer, and Pennsylvania in a rout.
Lochloosa
(16,061 posts)bigworld
(1,807 posts)... she needs to improve, and quickly.
Gene Debs
(582 posts)more of the status quoand if you took the status quo and put a pantsuit on it, you'd have Hillary Clinton.
HomerRamone
(1,112 posts)the states Republicans love to steal when it's close
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)pmorlan1
(2,096 posts)on CBS this morning.
disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)not a good feel for Hillary. Polls are just confirming that reality..
I Bought the Law
(4 posts)disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)it's not scientific, but gauging by the last 2 elections (that were won by the Democratic candidate) I can temper the local feel for a candidate, and the total lack of passion FOR Hillary in my region compared to those elections is very real and noticeable.. JMO - but PA may be in play.. but, she isn't the candidate yet - so we'll see..
Looking at the PA GE in 2004 Kerrys small margin (less then 150,000) is also concerning.. because of the lack of passion on the left and the fever pitch anti-Hillary from the right might just make for this state a bit more interesting come this November..
[link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election_in_Pennsylvania,_2004|
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Obama barely squeaked out victories in 2008 and 2012. Hillary will pull in far fewer votes.
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)It is an immutable fact. One must not question or argue with this. It is already so
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)No.
Will she get the independant vote Obama did?
No.
Will AAs turn out in same numbers for her as Obama?
No.
Will the left wing of the party vote for her as they did Obama?
No.
She is courting support from Republicans, but it's doubtfull she can make up all the votes lost. She'll get far fewer votes than Obama.
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)No
Will she get the Canadian vote
No
Will she get the cat vote
No
Will she get the hobgoblin vote
No
See I agree with you. Well argued
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)Climb inside, have a loved one bury you alive and and if you hear the earth murmur the name of the Republican candidate for president, you will know who is going to win the general. Or there will be 6 more weeks of winter. It's kind of a toss up
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)States that Bernie has narrow leads in all three states.
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)Just wait for that indictment...*checks watch*...any second now
TeddyR
(2,493 posts)This poll is shocking. It confirms (once again) that national polls really don't matter. You have to win the states to win the election, and a general national poll isn't particularly predictive. Ohio perhaps doesn't surprise me as much as Pennsylvania and Florida, but if Hillary isn't doing well in those states I can't imagine Virginia, Colorado or North Carolina (for example) will be much better. She needs to get her act together. Hopefully Trump will continue to insert foot in mouth.
whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)foolishly applauding the rise of Trump.
Trump's success is a product of a vacuum of representation and leadership for the middle class and below.
Clinton's success is due to her willingness to trade principals, values and voters for cash from the 1% and war for the defense industry.
We could have found a better candidate. The money grubbing DNC - our corporate mother, thought it better to sell us out to Wall Street.
nolabels
(13,133 posts)You state:
"Clinton's success is due to her willingness to trade principals, values and voters for cash from the 1% and war for the defense industry. "
In the G.E. that will be used by Trump as pounding point to lure independents. Not that Trump has any real morals, but those who might be listening might think they have them. Trump is not getting there by accident, he is feeding them the bullshit they want to hear (even if it's just more lies packaged in different way)
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)not by chance that Trump bested Jeb Bush, Ben Carson, Chris Christie, Ted Cruz, Carly Fiorina, Jim Gilmore, Lindsey Graham, Mike Huckabee, Bobby Jindal, John Kasich, George Pataki, Rand Paul, Rick Perry, Marco Rubio, Rick Santorum, and Scott Walker.
Trump's greatest asset has been his opponents' underestimating the appeal of his campaign, and Hillary is a world-class underestimater of her opponents.
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)But if people want to wring their hands and give themselves an ulcer over these largely meaningless polls, that is their right
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)head polls mean little when neither party has a presumptive nominee, but now they need to be credited.
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)Forgive my ignorance, I'll need a source please.
LonePirate
(13,408 posts)First off, these polls over sampled Repubs and under sampled Dems. They over sampled white voters and under sampled minority voters. Second, polls from 2008 and 2012 around this time show how unreliable they are. Last, these polls are from the polling organization with the worst track record so far in 2016.
There is not a single reason to place any faith in these polls which redefine what a junk poll is.
ffr
(22,665 posts)Don't take any state or contest for granted. Get democrats to the polls.
Vinca
(50,236 posts)Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)We may be in the end times. One set of polls 6 months before the election when the candidates aren't even in place yet. Surely a prophecy of doom. Get your affairs in order, few of us will survive this Quinnipiac poll
Vinca
(50,236 posts)Sgt. Schultz must be your hero: "I see nothing."
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)That is one of the 7 signs of the apocalypse
Skittles
(153,111 posts)Vinca
(50,236 posts)FBaggins
(26,721 posts)I think it was closer to 6% in 2012.
If PA is even close to being in play... we have problems.
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)President Romney was ahead at this point in 2012 in Pennsylvania and he went on to crush Obama in the general.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)Source required.
Here, I'll help you out. YOU'RE WRONG.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/pa/pennsylvania_romney_vs_obama-1891.html#polls
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)Obama barely led in Pennsylvania at this point in 2012, much like Clintons small lead today. I guess we are going to lose in November. Abandon all hope. Can someone loan me a gun and a single bullet? If the situation is only nearly the same as 2012 then I don't want to live on this mortal plane anymore.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/trump-clinton-florida-ohio-pennsylvania-222994
Maybe we can talk about mccain 10 point lead in Pennsylvania in late April 2008 or Obama 2 point lead in late may 2008?
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/pa/pennsylvania_mccain_vs_obama-244.html#polls
TwilightZone
(25,428 posts)Another poster posted the link to Silver's comments above.
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)Don't try to bring math and logic into this. We are doomed, did you hear? Now until you agree that thsee are the end times, I'm going to have to ask you to leave
olddad56
(5,732 posts)Angel Martin
(942 posts)agracie
(950 posts)Lodestar
(2,388 posts)BlueStater
(7,596 posts)What a depressing election.
0rganism
(23,927 posts)damn, that was a stupid thing to say, and it's gonna show up in more than 1 attack ad as the GE campaign continues
i've had some really high hopes for this election, and Hillary's already started trashing them. she'd better get it together pronto or we're going to have to survive under il Douche for 8 long years.
W43 was by far the worst president in my lifetime (which goes back to Nixon). Trump45 is going to be much much worse.
i can see it now at the next Trump rally: "HAVE YOU SEEN MY POLL NUMBERS IN OHIO, PENNSYLVANIA AND FLORIDA? WE'RE KICKING HER ASS, SEVERELY! SHE'S COMPLETELY CROOKED AND INCOMPETENT. LOOK AROUND PEOPLE, LOOK IN A MIRROR, YOU ARE ALL AWESOME, AND TOGETHER WE'RE GOING TO WIN, AND WIN, AND WIN SOME MORE. YOU'RE GOING TO GET TIRED OF WINNING."
and it's going to go on and on and on like that for 8 fucking years, because HRC went off her carefully-prepared script.