Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
Wed May 11, 2016, 08:03 PM May 2016

U.S. plan to lift Yellowstone grizzly protections faces mounting opposition

Source: Reuters

A U.S. government plan to lift Endangered Species Act protection of the grizzly bear in and around Yellowstone National Park drew a torrent of criticism from environmentalists and Indian tribes as the public comment period for the proposal came to a close on Wednesday.

Much of the discontent has focused on the prospect of grizzlies in the region becoming open to trophy hunting under state management plans put in place once federal safeguards are removed.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service formally proposed in March that grizzlies in the Yellowstone area - spanning parts of Wyoming, Montana and Idaho - be removed from the list of threatened species, citing data showing their numbers have rebounded to healthy levels.

Some 700 grizzlies currently frequent the Yellowstone area, up from as few as 136 bears when they were listed as threatened throughout the Lower 48 states in 1975, after decades of being hunted, trapped and poisoned to near-extinction.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/usa-grizzlies-idUSL2N1882A9



As it should...
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. plan to lift Yellowstone grizzly protections faces mounting opposition (Original Post) HuckleB May 2016 OP
If I wanted the kind of short-sighted, anti-wildlife policies promulgated by this administration, I villager May 2016 #1
Unfortunately, there are varying degrees of Republicans. HuckleB May 2016 #2
Yes. We now have the "Democratic" kind of Republican, and the Fascist kind. some choice, eh? villager May 2016 #4
Uh huh. HuckleB May 2016 #5
Yes. A huge disappointment in this area. nt Mojorabbit May 2016 #3
Agreed. nt villager May 2016 #6
Ranchers Bayard May 2016 #7
Possibly. HuckleB May 2016 #8
 

villager

(26,001 posts)
1. If I wanted the kind of short-sighted, anti-wildlife policies promulgated by this administration, I
Wed May 11, 2016, 08:04 PM
May 2016

...would have voted for a Republican.

In retrospect, evidently, I did.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
2. Unfortunately, there are varying degrees of Republicans.
Wed May 11, 2016, 08:37 PM
May 2016

As we learned from the last official Republican presidency, and I don't want to think about what a possible next official Republican presidency would bring.

Or we could think about the reality that people within a party are going to disagree in some areas, and that's just being human, to some extent. Here, I don't think the current administration is doing well with making policy follow evidence.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
8. Possibly.
Thu May 12, 2016, 04:52 PM
May 2016

It does seem ludicrous, considering the number of cattle, and the land they get to use for very little.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. plan to lift Yellows...