Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Galraedia

(5,026 posts)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 03:14 PM Jun 2012

Mitch McConnell Argues Against More Donor Disclosure, Accuses Obama Of Political Retribution

Source: Huffington Post

WASHINGTON -- In a series of speeches and interviews over the past day, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) argued against adding a further layer of disclosure to the campaign finance system, suggesting that the Obama administration would use it to browbeat political opponents.

The Kentucky Republican has long been one of Congress' foremost advocates of a far-reaching interpretation of First Amendment rights. And his remarks, first to Fox News, then to the Faith and Freedom Conference and finally to the American Enterprise Institute, followed in that vein.

But in arguing against the Disclose Act -- which would require nonprofit groups that spend money on campaign-related advertisements to disclose their funders -- McConnell trotted out another wrinkle. Donors to politically active nonprofit groups, he said, do not deserve to be subjected to public scrutiny or backlash.

"My own view has always been that if you can’t convince people of the wisdom of your policies, then you should come up with some better arguments," McConnell said in his American Enterprise Institute speech, according to advanced remarks. "But for all its vaunted tolerance, the political left has consistently demonstrated a militant intolerance for dissent. Sadly, a growing number of people on the left, and now within government itself, appear to have concluded that they can’t win on the merits. So they’ve resorted to bullying and intimidation instead."

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/15/mitch-mcconnell-donor-disclosure_n_1600487.html?utm_hp_ref=politics

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mitch McConnell Argues Against More Donor Disclosure, Accuses Obama Of Political Retribution (Original Post) Galraedia Jun 2012 OP
what a dumb sonofamitch...trying to stay relevant. Roland99 Jun 2012 #1
The real question is what is that crook hiding? Joe Bacon Jun 2012 #22
blow it out your shell turtleman leftyohiolib Jun 2012 #2
Turtles are too good for snitch mcCONnel Dont call me Shirley Jun 2012 #12
Is he up for reelection? Beaverhausen Jun 2012 #3
The GOP can't win elections, so they buy and/or steal them Blue Owl Jun 2012 #4
Does anyone still listen to this old woman? savannah43 Jun 2012 #5
Please have more respect to women SoutherDem Jun 2012 #9
No one should respond to McConnell until madashelltoo Jun 2012 #6
can always count on a heaping Phlem Jun 2012 #7
oh it's a heaping pile already.. but it smells worse than fascism. n/t progressivebydesign Jun 2012 #10
Projecting as usual. GeorgeGist Jun 2012 #8
I am a strong proponent of the 1st Amendment.......... Swede Atlanta Jun 2012 #11
Disgusting Cowards Teamster Jeff Jun 2012 #13
That's right, you can't convince anyone of the wisdom of your policies, can you? freshwest Jun 2012 #14
well. barbtries Jun 2012 #15
We want Proof the North Koreans are not buying US politicians... Bandit Jun 2012 #16
"the political left has consistently demonstrated a militant intolerance for dissent." eggplant Jun 2012 #17
America sold to the higest bidder. nineteen50 Jun 2012 #18
Yeah right, Mitch . . . Brigid Jun 2012 #19
I think they fear Teamster Jeff Jun 2012 #20
The Turtle is a huge idiot Angry Dragon Jun 2012 #21

Joe Bacon

(5,165 posts)
22. The real question is what is that crook hiding?
Sat Jun 16, 2012, 10:35 AM
Jun 2012

We DEMAND to know what the Republic Party is hiding!

Where is Adelman's money coming from? China? Israel? Elsewhere?

WE HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW!

Blue Owl

(50,482 posts)
4. The GOP can't win elections, so they buy and/or steal them
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 03:26 PM
Jun 2012

Which is why McConnell wants to keep his little Koch habit a big secret...

madashelltoo

(1,698 posts)
6. No one should respond to McConnell until
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 03:36 PM
Jun 2012

he explains that face-freeze thing he's got going on. It could be causing issues with his thought processes. Maybe his synapses aren't synapping properly.

 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
11. I am a strong proponent of the 1st Amendment..........
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 03:59 PM
Jun 2012

but the Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized the government can place reasonable restrictions on that freedom. For example, speech that is intended or is likely to cause or encourage violence can be restricted.

Corporations are not people. They themselves do not exist. They are complex man-made creations with shareholders, executives, boards of directors, employees, customers, etc. But they themselves are NOT human beings.

Further if the Court has previously ruled that reasonable regulation is permitted, why is it not possible to limit contributions to avoid undue influence or require donor disclosure?

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
14. That's right, you can't convince anyone of the wisdom of your policies, can you?
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 04:20 PM
Jun 2012
Your stated policy from January of 2009 is to ensure Obama does not get another term even if you destroy the government, no matter who or what is taken down with it.

You want to hide the names of traitors paying your way, promoting selling this land along with the future of coming generations off to your pals.

You dare to say we don't have the right to know who is planning to burn the house down to prevent the arson?

Try again.

barbtries

(28,810 posts)
15. well.
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 04:53 PM
Jun 2012

if it was transparent, right minded people would be in a better position to know where they maybe don't want to spend their money. oh well.
fuck him. the republicans imo are getting very OBVIOUS in their "take what you do and use it against your opponent" bullshit.

Bandit

(21,475 posts)
16. We want Proof the North Koreans are not buying US politicians...
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 05:05 PM
Jun 2012

The ONLY way we can KNOW that foreign money is not influencing our elections is by complete disclosure...

eggplant

(3,912 posts)
17. "the political left has consistently demonstrated a militant intolerance for dissent."
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 05:08 PM
Jun 2012

Wait, what? Tell that to the Dixie Chicks. And everyone else on the left that has been shouted down.

Brigid

(17,621 posts)
19. Yeah right, Mitch . . .
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 06:24 PM
Jun 2012

And the political right has never resorted to "political retribution" or "bullying and intimidation," right?

Teamster Jeff

(1,598 posts)
20. I think they fear
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 08:23 PM
Jun 2012

consumer retribution. Corporations don't want to piss off 50% of their customers. Cubs couldn't back pedal fast enough when it became known old man Ricketts was about to finance anti Obama TV ads. Cubs 3 Red Sox 0

Angry Dragon

(36,693 posts)
21. The Turtle is a huge idiot
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 11:42 PM
Jun 2012

The First Amendment guarantees free speech, it does not guarantee anonymous speech

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Mitch McConnell Argues Ag...