Judge dismisses case filed by Sanders supporters against state Democratic party
Source: Las Vegas Sun
A lower court judge ruled today to dismiss a case filed by a group of Bernie Sanders supporters against the state Democratic party, saying that it wasnt the courts place to interfere in intra-party politics.
The Sanders supporters had asked the court to grant an injunction allowing them to run for state party office at Saturday's state Democratic convention. The judge, however, said that case law precludes him from interfering with a partys internal political process.
The lawsuit had alleged the state Democratic party had failed to properly notify Democrats of a deadline to run for state party office in violation of both its own internal rules as well as Nevada law. The defendants argued the confusion over the deadline had been caused internally by Sanders supporters and that the party had made the deadline clear in emails it had sent out.
Courts are not allowed to interfere with intra-party squabbles unless there is a compelling state interest to do so, said Judge Ronald Israel at a hearing this morning.
Read more: https://lasvegassun.com/news/2016/may/13/judge-dismisses-case-filed-by-sanders-supporters-a/
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)What a litigious man he's become. The court system shouldn't be used the same way DU's "alert" button is used.
( Hello, Alerter. The word "litigious" is not a "smear" or "insult". Click here to see its meaning.)
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)NobodyHere
(2,810 posts)So your comment is kind of out of place for this thread.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)on the actual voters and not whoever they wanna pounce on. It's annoying. And a total turn off.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)brooklynite
(94,502 posts)...except for joining in the evil DNC's suit against the State of Arizona.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)I do see your point, though.
scscholar
(2,902 posts)than winning.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... and just doing their own thing without guidance or inspiration. Split hairs if you must, but that only suggests to me that you're arguing from a position of weakness. Besides, what's done is done, and nothing will change the fact that Hillary will be our nominee. It's after-the-fact behavior like this, rather than proactively addressing state party requirements, that's one of the big reason y'all are losing. Oh well! Lessons learned, I guess.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Not that I'm surprised, mind you.
Losing doesn't make oneself unable to revel in the stupid acts of others. As I am doing right now!
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Office should be able to do themselves. If they do not take basis responsibility of finding the filing dates then they are just not ready to hold any office.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)The GOP thanks you for your talking points.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Office should be able to do themselves. If they do not take basis responsibility of finding the filing dates then they are just not ready to hold any office."
<====>
"Taking responsibility for signing up for a voter ID should be something one interested in voting should be able to do themselves. If they do not take basis [sic] responsibility of finding the voter ID registration or cannot take responsibilty in their life to afford the cost then they are just not ready to cast a ballot in an election"
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)running for an office is not.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)The part of my argument that is weak, that I thought you might point out, is that it is a party election, not a State/Federal election.
Which is, well, why this case was thrown out.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)I was about to edit my comment to reflect that; but, you beat me to it.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)especially since the foul up was of their own making.
And, no ... that wasn't/isn't a right wing talking point.
question everything
(47,470 posts)bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)As of now, he can't even be a superdelegate to vote for himself on the convention floor because he is not a Democrat.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)if an OP has a negative tone to it and just happens to have Sander's name mentioned, the Hillary Piranha will tear it to shreds BEFORE they even realize it was not relevant to start with!
Duval
(4,280 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,888 posts)that had voting power. He could be a member at an associate level type membership if they had that type of membership.
beastie boy
(9,310 posts)When you have to change the rules, get off your butts and change the rules. Don't talk.
4now
(1,596 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Color me shocked.
OwlinAZ
(410 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)The Plaintiff-Bernie Supporters were on the conference call where the dates and deadlines were set ... the misinformation came from Bernie supporters, telling people what they thought they might have heard.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Judge to people who want to use the court system to bail them out from their screw up: "Fuck You!" ... And. rightfully so.