Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TomCADem

(17,387 posts)
Sun May 15, 2016, 12:57 AM May 2016

‘Not about bathrooms’: Critics decry North Carolina law’s lesser-known elements

Source: Washington Post

DURHAM, N.C. — In this state where the modern bathroom wars began, some church and civil rights leaders have begun to spread the word that there’s plenty else to worry about in the controversial new law known formally as the Public Facilities Privacy and Security Act.

The law not only reverses a Charlotte ordinance that had extended some rights to gay and transgender people. It also prevents city and county governments from setting a minimum-wage standard for private employers and limits how people can sue for discrimination in state court. And it contains a provision allowing for remaining parts of the law to stand if others are struck down in court.

Those provisions, opponents say, are pernicious attempts to roll back rights, and they have been tucked into a bill that has a very different public face.

“This is really a devious bill that harms workers under the guise of regulating bathrooms,” said Harold Lloyd, a professor at Wake Forest University School of Law.


Read more: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/%e2%80%98not-about-bathrooms%e2%80%99-critics-decry-north-carolina-law%e2%80%99s-lesser-known-elements/ar-BBt3iGr?li=BBnbfcL&ocid=iehp

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
‘Not about bathrooms’: Critics decry North Carolina law’s lesser-known elements (Original Post) TomCADem May 2016 OP
Thanks for that! Wounded Bear May 2016 #1
At least they know they have to be sneaky The Blue Flower May 2016 #2
My daughter who lives in NC notemason May 2016 #3
Whoa. zentrum May 2016 #4
This Is North Carolina State law, Not Federal TomCADem May 2016 #8
Ooops. Duh. zentrum May 2016 #12
Much legislation contains a severability provision. Igel May 2016 #5
Of course it's not.... paleotn May 2016 #6
Repugs have no shame. lark May 2016 #7
When the GOP talks about taking the country back, this is a glimpse of how far back they want to liberal N proud May 2016 #9
K&R Beartracks May 2016 #10
Thanks for the rest of the story alfredo May 2016 #11
Spot On! libodem May 2016 #13
Oh god I'm so tired of this passiveporcupine May 2016 #14
Always something we don't hear about rpannier May 2016 #15

Wounded Bear

(58,647 posts)
1. Thanks for that!
Sun May 15, 2016, 01:01 AM
May 2016

The Talibangelists in our midst are getting more devious, and they're working with other forces trying to roll back personal rights all over the country.

Everyone focuses on the bathroom bullshit while they are attacking workers' rights and trying to repeal rights protections across the board.

The Blue Flower

(5,442 posts)
2. At least they know they have to be sneaky
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:51 AM
May 2016

They won't try to pass these provisions out in the open because they know the people are against them. What is it about taking care of their constituents that's so odious to them?

notemason

(299 posts)
3. My daughter who lives in NC
Sun May 15, 2016, 08:24 AM
May 2016

and I have marveled for weeks that no one was mentioning the other provisions of the bill as if the rest room was just a smokescreen. These people are power-cray-cray.

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
4. Whoa.
Sun May 15, 2016, 08:28 AM
May 2016

So Obama lost control of the bill? Why is he going to bat for it? Why not expose these elements?

I'm really confused.

TomCADem

(17,387 posts)
8. This Is North Carolina State law, Not Federal
Sun May 15, 2016, 11:59 AM
May 2016

President Obama is not the Governor of North Carolina, and the OP pertains to a NC state law.

Igel

(35,300 posts)
5. Much legislation contains a severability provision.
Sun May 15, 2016, 09:21 AM
May 2016

That's what it's called. Otherwise, imagine something like the ACA--if one part was struck down, then the entire thing would die. Instead, it, too, is apparently sneaky in that it has a fairly standard severability clause.

There are times when you want the opposite. Some states and such have standard legislation saying legislation should be generally construed as severable or inseverable.

paleotn

(17,911 posts)
6. Of course it's not....
Sun May 15, 2016, 09:45 AM
May 2016

It never was. That's just the wedge our duly elected, lying bastards are using as a smokescreen. It's always been about not letting more liberal metropolitan areas pass ordinances the lying bastards don't like.

lark

(23,094 posts)
7. Repugs have no shame.
Sun May 15, 2016, 10:32 AM
May 2016

They go to great lengths to hide their anti-worker bias, tuck the pernicious provisions away in unrelated bills. They are truly heinous people, and I'm being kind to say they are even part of the human race.

Beartracks

(12,809 posts)
10. K&R
Sun May 15, 2016, 02:23 PM
May 2016

It's like the rightwing activists are now actually willing to let people think it was about bathroom regulation all along, willing to let their reputations sink even lower, just to pass all the other nefarious stuff -- while STILL, in the end, regulating transgender bathroom use.

======================

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»‘Not about bathrooms’: Cr...