Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WhiteTara

(29,692 posts)
Fri May 20, 2016, 10:52 AM May 2016

Mercury rising: India records highest temperature ever

Source: CNN

(CNN)India recorded its highest ever temperature on Thursday when the heat in the town of Phalodi, in the western state of Rajasthan, shot up to a burning 51 degrees Celsius (123.8 degrees Fahrenheit).

It was the second day in a row the town experienced temperatures in excess of 50 degrees Celsius.

Other towns in the state, like Churu, also recorded highs of about 50 degrees Celsius (122 degrees Fahrenheit) on Thursday.
In New Delhi, the capital city of India, the temperature reached nearly 47 degrees Celsius on Wednesday.

The previous temperature record in India was held by Alwar, also in Rajasthan, at 50.6 degrees Celsius (123.1 Fahrenheit) in 1956. According to the Guinness Book of World Records, the highest temperature ever was recorded at 56.7 degrees Celsius (134 degrees Fahrenheit) in Death Valley, California on July 10, 1913.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/20/asia/india-record-temperature/

46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mercury rising: India records highest temperature ever (Original Post) WhiteTara May 2016 OP
Apparently doesn't matter.. phazed0 May 2016 #1
Good God in Butter Botany May 2016 #2
She has only just recently shifted left.... phazed0 May 2016 #3
"She has only just recently shifted left...." no she hasn't Botany May 2016 #5
Lol. Please. Why not post a more reputable site than the liar's own? phazed0 May 2016 #7
Well she is gonna be the nominee .... end of story Botany May 2016 #9
So shift the subject? phazed0 May 2016 #10
Shifting the subject seems less an indictment than moving one's own goalposts LanternWaste May 2016 #12
Lol, making a case based purely on semantics.. phazed0 May 2016 #20
Yes, I changerd the subject. Botany May 2016 #13
I'm voting for Bernie Sanders erlewyne May 2016 #17
A vote for Bernie is a vote for trump Botany May 2016 #25
O.K., it's a deal erlewyne May 2016 #42
Your 'ticket' will be thrown away in the trash if you write name of someone not on a ballot. Sunlei May 2016 #30
Throw it away! erlewyne May 2016 #43
I am also writing Bernie in. nt phazed0 May 2016 #18
A vote for Bernie is a vote for trump Botany May 2016 #26
A vote for hillary is a vote for Trump phazed0 May 2016 #29
Do you think Bernie Sanders would EVER tell anyone to do that? Sunlei May 2016 #31
I'll be writing in Sanders' name Plucketeer May 2016 #22
" ...if it gets us Trump, then that's JUST the medicine that the DNC needs..." Botany May 2016 #27
Did you read the whole post Plucketeer May 2016 #32
And... Duppers May 2016 #11
Just the second E, snort May 2016 #15
I have devoted much of my adult life to the environment thank you very much Botany May 2016 #28
What is the problem with this sentence? JDPriestly May 2016 #16
how do the saudis feel about global warming? reddread May 2016 #6
I would imagine they're all for it. forest444 May 2016 #8
They sumited a plan to the global meeting & already move to diversify their oil economy. Sunlei May 2016 #33
I certainly feel better about their prospects thank you reddread May 2016 #37
I doubt the USA will ever catch up to other 1st world countries, lets hope we don't move into 3rd. Sunlei May 2016 #38
which part? reddread May 2016 #39
which part? education, medical care, food safety, inequity, is that what you meant? Sunlei May 2016 #41
the rich or the poor? reddread May 2016 #45
Hillary has pushed fracking (and it's subsequent methane leakages) for years NickB79 May 2016 #36
State Gov. controls their mining/fracking. Why did Pa. Government allow land owners to lease? Sunlei May 2016 #40
"There is no global warming!" bucolic_frolic May 2016 #4
If this was Arizona or down south, I wonder yuiyoshida May 2016 #14
Does Modi believe in global warming? Jack Rabbit May 2016 #19
Yes Recursion May 2016 #23
Thank you Jack Rabbit May 2016 #46
There are going to be parts of the world leftyladyfrommo May 2016 #21
There will be some parts of the world with much nicer weather then today. Sunlei May 2016 #34
They can if there is plenty of water Warpy May 2016 #35
Yes. So many people live there. leftyladyfrommo May 2016 #44
When you're of the one percent Plucketeer May 2016 #24
 

phazed0

(745 posts)
3. She has only just recently shifted left....
Fri May 20, 2016, 11:29 AM
May 2016

And is likely just pandering to popular opinion instead of genuinely interested in helping in the fight against Climate Change. Also, let's not give Hillary Clinton the credit for "planning the fight" as that's Obama's plan sent to congress in February: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/ of which it is likely will not pass Congress.

http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2016/02/hillary-clinton-leftward-shift-climate

Leading from behind and all that.

TPP, Clinton says Yes to the "Gold Standard" - barf.

Botany

(70,447 posts)
5. "She has only just recently shifted left...." no she hasn't
Fri May 20, 2016, 11:36 AM
May 2016
https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/climate/


You are either a troll or you are looking for a fight where none exists.
Hot temps in India? It must be HRC's vault.

HRC has a long history of talking about green energy, the climate and jobs.

Her honest talk about the coal business has cost her votes too.
 

phazed0

(745 posts)
7. Lol. Please. Why not post a more reputable site than the liar's own?
Fri May 20, 2016, 11:50 AM
May 2016

Let's see how long she has been conveniently on the side of helping Climate. When did she finally denounce KeystoneXL? Hmm. How convenient for her political run.

http://environmental-action.org/blog/lip-service-clintons-green-plan-bad-news-for-brown-communities/

At a time when scientists are telling us that we must leave 80 percent of fossil fuels in the ground to avert the worst case scenarios of climate catastrophe, Clinton’s platform is the antithesis of the “Leave It In The Ground” Manifesto. Further, it would increase investments in fracked-gas infrastructure instead of a renewable energy revolution. To choose to plow countless dollars and jobs into building a new generation of pipelines and export terminals, when the clean energy economy is already creating more jobs than the fossil fuel industry is ridiculous.

Clinton’s plan even considers technologies like carbon capture and sequestration (CCS), a long-since unproven technology with no future in a global warming action plan. We need to vastly reduce the amount of global warming pollution we produce, not invest in technology that doesn’t work and can only be used by our worst polluters. Further, we all know, based on our country’s legacy of targeting Black and Brown communities for the placement of toxic waste, where CCS facilities would likely be situated — certainly not communities like Chappaqua, NY.


Bernie Sanders Will Ban Fracking. Hillary Clinton ‘Sold Fracking to the World’
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/bernie-sanders-will-ban-fracking-_b_9156182.html
Less than a week before the Iowa caucuses, Hillary Clinton attended a gala fundraiser in Philadelphia at the headquarters of Franklin Square Capital Partners, a major investor in the fossil-fuel industry, particularly domestic fracking. The controversial fracking industry is particularly powerful in Pennsylvania, which will host the Democratic National Convention this July.

Clinton has avoided taking any clear stand on fracking...

The pro-Clinton Super PAC Correct the Record, run by David Brock, touts Clinton’s aggressive pro-fracking record.

Bernie Sanders never accepted money from corporations involved in fracking, and certainly never accepted money from prison lobbyists. His challenger, on the other hand, is linked to oil and gas contributions that span across the globe. According to Reuters, “the Wall Street Journal reported that the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation and the Clinton Global Initiative have accepted large donations from major energy companies Exxon Mobil and Chevron.” Clinton’s foundations also accepted money from an office of the Canadian government linked to promoting Keystone XL.


http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/09/hillary-clinton-fracking-shale-state-department-chevron
The episode sheds light on a crucial but little-known dimension of Clinton's diplomatic legacy. Under her leadership, the State Department worked closely with energy companies to spread fracking around the globe—part of a broader push to fight climate change, boost global energy supply, and undercut the power of adversaries such as Russia that use their energy resources as a cudgel. But environmental groups fear that exporting fracking, which has been linked to drinking-water contamination and earthquakes at home, could wreak havoc in countries with scant environmental regulation. And according to interviews, diplomatic cables, and other documents obtained by Mother Jones, American officials—some with deep ties to industry—also helped US firms clinch potentially lucrative shale concessions overseas, raising troubling questions about whose interests the program actually serves.


http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/the-holes-in-hillary-clintons-climate-plan-120682#ixzz49DFGLEWd
“Clinton’s climate plan is remarkable for what it doesn’t say, yet,” California-based environmental activist R.L. Miller, who founded the Climate Hawks Vote PAC, said in a statement. Specifically, she added, Clinton offered “no effort to keep fossil fuels in the ground, no price on carbon; no word on Keystone XL, Arctic oil or other carbon bombs; no word on fracking.”


Don't be gullible people.

Botany

(70,447 posts)
9. Well she is gonna be the nominee .... end of story
Fri May 20, 2016, 12:14 PM
May 2016

Are you going to vote for her or not vote and support Trump?

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
12. Shifting the subject seems less an indictment than moving one's own goalposts
Fri May 20, 2016, 12:30 PM
May 2016

Shifting the subject seems less an indictment than moving one's own goalposts (from "she won't" to "she shifted her position&quot .

However, I understand the desire to hold others to a higher standard we hold ourselves to-- it's less complicated to an undisciplined and biased mind.

Good luck! Wishing you well!

 

phazed0

(745 posts)
20. Lol, making a case based purely on semantics..
Fri May 20, 2016, 01:22 PM
May 2016

Way to go, what a winning strategy. Any opinion on the OP or will you continue to ignore the important bits? Hmm.

Botany

(70,447 posts)
13. Yes, I changerd the subject.
Fri May 20, 2016, 12:40 PM
May 2016

Are you or are you not going to vote for HRC in Nov.? And do you want
a President Trump?

Because from where I sit you seem like a troll trying to stir up shit.

Global warming in India? Let's blame HRC.

erlewyne

(1,115 posts)
17. I'm voting for Bernie Sanders
Fri May 20, 2016, 01:07 PM
May 2016

I do not support the DNC.

If we are so stupid to vote foe Trump then we deserve him.
Take our medicine.

I will write BERNIE SANDERS on my ticket.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
30. Your 'ticket' will be thrown away in the trash if you write name of someone not on a ballot.
Fri May 20, 2016, 03:10 PM
May 2016
Do you think Bernie Sanders would EVER tell anyone to do that?

You'll have to ask for a "special Ballot" & not use the computer to vote, so you can hand write on it.

May as well not vote at all.

Do you think Bernie Sanders would EVER tell anyone to do that?
 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
22. I'll be writing in Sanders' name
Fri May 20, 2016, 01:42 PM
May 2016

if it comes to that. AND.... if it gets us Trump, then that's JUST the medicine that the DNC needs to pull its head out of its backside. Some of the better medicines taste like hell. Right now, we have the establishment banking on the ignorance and apathy of this nation to be able to execute the coup they're striving for. LOL! Just LOOK where DS Hillary's money's coming from. The powerful don't care WHO we send to the WH so long as they own the selectee.

Botany

(70,447 posts)
27. " ...if it gets us Trump, then that's JUST the medicine that the DNC needs..."
Fri May 20, 2016, 02:58 PM
May 2016

I don't give a shit about the DNC but about America, the World and the SCOTUS if
Trump gets in. Remember w bush's "fun run?"

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
32. Did you read the whole post
Fri May 20, 2016, 03:13 PM
May 2016

or just pick out what served you? There was this also: " we have the establishment banking on the ignorance and apathy of this nation". See - I'd read this line and have the savvy to realize that the word "nation" exceeded DNC. It would be nice if there were NEVER any deaths on this whirling rock. But that's not a valid hope given the history of humankind's rise and flourish. No matter what the aims are for good, there's going to be casualties - and not necessarily physical deaths.

I'm really finding it quizzical that there's NO reference back to the time of this nation's independence. When I mentioned it in a thread yesterday, I was backhanded with the facts that the founding fathers were slave owners, so how could I compare todays impending dooms to those cretins??? WTF??? When DOES the nice world start - or does it EVER?

Duppers

(28,117 posts)
11. And...
Fri May 20, 2016, 12:28 PM
May 2016

It's strange for someone whose favorite group is E&E not to have known this.


Good job, phazed.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
16. What is the problem with this sentence?
Fri May 20, 2016, 01:04 PM
May 2016

"HRC has a long history of talking about green energy, the climate and jobs. "

It's the word, "talking." She was with Bill in the White House for 8 years.

We had to wait until Obama to get a garden in front of the White House that reminds people of the importance of our food and the fact that we won't be able to grow enough food to feed us if the temperatures keep rising as they are.

We had to wait until Obama to get solar panels back on the White House.

The Clintons, neither of them, are environmentally as conscious as we all need to be at this time. I do not trust Hillary on this issue, not at all.

Bernie will really take steps to bring consciousness about the environment home to the American people. Hillary will not.

It's unfortunate that so many Hillary supporters are unrealistic about who Hillary really is.

Read this and notice that the Clinton administration is not mentioned.

Jimmy Carter installed 32 solar panels on the White House roof when he was president in the late 1970s. When Ronald Reagan took office in 1981, one of his first actions as president was to have the panels, which his chief-of-staff allegedly said Reagan felt were “just a joke,” removed. The panels ended up at Unity College in Maine, where they were installed on the roof of the school’s cafeteria.

But as famous as the Carter installation — and subsequent Reagan removal — was, it was George W. Bush administration that installed the first active solar electric system at the White House (Carter’s panels were largely symbolic, though they were used for heating water). In 2002, multiple solar grids were installed on the White House grounds. The installation was done quietly, with far less fanfare than Carter’s, but the panels provided energy to several White House operations. According to a New York Times article from 2003, “a grid of 167 solar panels on the roof of a maintenance shed has been delivering electricity to the White House grounds. Another solar installation has been helping to provide hot water. Yet another has been keeping the water warm in the presidential pool.”


http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/08/15/2242481/solar-panels-white-house/

The Clintons did nothing about improving solar technology at the White House although they could have. We need far more of that technology here in the Southwest. We have so, so, so much sun.
 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
6. how do the saudis feel about global warming?
Fri May 20, 2016, 11:41 AM
May 2016

now you know HRC's actual future policies.
youre welcome!

forest444

(5,902 posts)
8. I would imagine they're all for it.
Fri May 20, 2016, 11:55 AM
May 2016

It's no secret they'd the rest of the world to look like Saudi Arabia: cheesy, flashy, backward, and hot as hell.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
33. They sumited a plan to the global meeting & already move to diversify their oil economy.
Fri May 20, 2016, 03:24 PM
May 2016

Solar and wind, they desalinate their close sea water using solar power.

Their countries climate change will mean more flooding, so they will use that flood runoff for a growth in agriculture. To green-up deserts. The Saudis have made plans for the past decade.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
37. I certainly feel better about their prospects thank you
Fri May 20, 2016, 03:56 PM
May 2016

I would not want them to pay the full price for their achievement.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
38. I doubt the USA will ever catch up to other 1st world countries, lets hope we don't move into 3rd.
Fri May 20, 2016, 04:16 PM
May 2016

We're really only a major disaster or major epidemic away from real problems for American citizens.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
41. which part? education, medical care, food safety, inequity, is that what you meant?
Fri May 20, 2016, 04:24 PM
May 2016
have a good day, I'm going to the beach.

NickB79

(19,224 posts)
36. Hillary has pushed fracking (and it's subsequent methane leakages) for years
Fri May 20, 2016, 03:43 PM
May 2016

Actions speak louder than words, and Hillary's actions have been God-awful up to this point.



And if the estimated leakage rates from these wells are even close to accurate, converting from coal to natural gas derived from fracking could actually be making climate change WORSE, not better.

But sure, Hillary cares about climate change. Whatever you say

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
40. State Gov. controls their mining/fracking. Why did Pa. Government allow land owners to lease?
Fri May 20, 2016, 04:20 PM
May 2016

Why didn't the State Government force the Corps to clean up their mess?

yuiyoshida

(41,818 posts)
14. If this was Arizona or down south, I wonder
Fri May 20, 2016, 12:47 PM
May 2016

if Republicans would feel any different about climate change? I am guessing not.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
23. Yes
Fri May 20, 2016, 01:42 PM
May 2016

His plan for it is kind of vague (the "smart cities" initiative; nobody can actually figure out what it concretely means).

He also doesn't want an arbitrary emissions target; his argument is that controlling population growth is more important than controlling per capita energy use, and controlling population growth requires economic development.

Jack Rabbit

(45,984 posts)
46. Thank you
Fri May 20, 2016, 08:34 PM
May 2016

I'm pleasantly surprised to learn that he actually believes in global warming. I'm not at all surprised that he's doing little or nothing about it.

leftyladyfrommo

(18,866 posts)
21. There are going to be parts of the world
Fri May 20, 2016, 01:27 PM
May 2016

that are just not habitable. The whole near east is just turning into a huge desert. Water shortages are becoming commonplace in those areas.

People are just going to have to learn to adapt or move to other areas.

Humans can't survive in that kind of heat.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
34. There will be some parts of the world with much nicer weather then today.
Fri May 20, 2016, 03:29 PM
May 2016

We have to move the crop growing areas to all the places that will have much milder winters. People can adapt.

Warpy

(111,164 posts)
35. They can if there is plenty of water
Fri May 20, 2016, 03:32 PM
May 2016

Unfortunately, India is having an extreme drought with a third of its population under threat.

leftyladyfrommo

(18,866 posts)
44. Yes. So many people live there.
Fri May 20, 2016, 05:49 PM
May 2016

And so many if them are really poor. They don't have the ability to adapt.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Mercury rising: India rec...