Hillary Clinton’s Energy Initiative Pressed Countries to Embrace Fracking, New Emails Reveal
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Omaha Steve (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: The Intercept
Back in April, just before the New York primary, Hillary Clintons campaign aired a commercial on upstate television stations touting her work as secretary of state forcing China, India, some of the worlds worst polluters to make real change. She promised to stand firm with New Yorkers opposing fracking, giving communities the right to say no.
The television spot, which was not announced and does not appear on the official campaign YouTube page with most of Clintons other ads, implied a history of opposition to fracking, here and abroad. But emails obtained by The Intercept from the Department of State reveal new details of behind-the-scenes efforts by Clinton and her close aides to export American-style hydraulic fracturing the horizontal drilling technique best known as fracking to countries all over the world.
Read more: https://theintercept.com/2016/05/23/hillary-clinton-fracking/
Really. Can she be trusted? We just don't see this with Bernie Sanders.
"Everything that we see is a shadow cast by that which we do not see". - MLK,Jr.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)The prices will jump because export has been limited since the 1970s and the demand for natural gas in Asia is huge, and once the spigot is turned on WTO rules say it cannot be turned off until its gone.
This could leave many US communities unable to afford heat! 9Unless we totally redid our aging housing) Milions would be displaced because they would lose rent stabilization and be unable to rent a new place at market rate, leading to mass exodus from the US-many people's equity would be destroyed and stripped of jobs (which are typically dependent on having a place to live in the area) many would also lose pensions-
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)If our country is going to crumble into a cauldron of magma because we will do anything but embrace renewable energy....
.... then their's can too!
Divernan
(15,480 posts)Far from challenging fossil fuel companies, the emails obtained by The Intercept show that State Department officials worked closely with private sector oil and gas companies, pressed other agencies within the Obama administration to commit federal government resources including technical assistance for locating shale reserves, and distributed agreements with partner nations pledging to help secure investments for new fracking projects.
The documents also reveal the departments role in bringing foreign dignitaries to a fracking site in Pennsylvania, and its plans to make Poland a laboratory for testing whether US success in developing shale gas can be repeated in a different country, particularly in Europe, where local governments had expressed opposition and in some cases even banned fracking.
The campaign included plans to spread the drilling technique to China, South Africa, Romania, Morocco, Bulgaria, Chile, India, Pakistan, Argentina, Indonesia, and Ukraine.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)Divernan
(15,480 posts)But she's all for it in Europe, Africa, South America & the Middle East. What a piece of work she is!
markpkessinger
(8,905 posts)Divernan
(15,480 posts)msongs
(73,640 posts)Divernan
(15,480 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)PoliticalMalcontent
(449 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)giving communities the right to say no."
Aawww thanks. We can vote no already, you pandering twister of words..
This insufferable woman must NOT be the Democratic nominee.
NickB79
(20,316 posts)http://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/josh-fox-clinton-v-sanders-on-fracking-641053251653
Given how leaky the fracking industry is, from drilling to piping to compression to end use, our "green bridge to a clean future" via natural gas may actually be WORSE for the climate than burning coal!
Response to Mark 750 (Original post)
OKNancy This message was self-deleted by its author.
0rganism
(25,606 posts)because she's a politician making promises, but he's an "outsider" making "suggestions"
MisterP
(23,730 posts)zalinda
(5,621 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)Bernie and Hillary and Fracking:
https://vimeo.com/157982054
*********************************************************************
(and how she didn't appear to consider much at all those 'conditions' peddling it to other nations)
How Hillary Clinton's State Department Sold Fracking to the World
A trove of secret documents details the US government's global push for shale gas.
By Mariah Blake | September/October 2014 Issue

Hillary Clinton is welcomed to Sofia by Bulgarian Foreign Affairs Minister Nikolay Mladenov, left. US Department of State/flickr
http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/09/hillary-clinton-fracking-shale-state-department-chevron
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/sep/10/how-hillary-clintons-state-department-sold-fracking-to-the-world
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)Vinca
(53,869 posts)then do whatever the heck you want after the election.
jalan48
(14,914 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)And I am sure that she has the same concern for all of us who are not in the 1%.
Hillary has to be stopped. Corporatism has to be stopped. For the sake of the world.
Response to Mark 750 (Original post)
askeptic This message was self-deleted by its author.
PoliticalMalcontent
(449 posts)Fracking is NOT good. It's not good for the environment and has a real impact on human lives. It poisons water supplies and is likely the cause of earthquakes. Who profits? Big corporations. Who loses? The rest of us.
All this seems to really confirm is that Clinton is pro-big business at the expense of the little guy. That's fine, I'll fight for the little guy 10 times out of 10.
I am truly disillusioned by the state of Democracy in America and a big part of that is people suck and vote for stupid things over policy positions.
Omaha Steve
(109,067 posts)Statement of Purpose
Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.