Dems discuss dropping Wasserman Schultz
Source: The Hill
Democrats on Capitol Hill are discussing whether Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz should step down as Democratic National Committee (DNC) chairwoman before the partys national convention in July.
Democrats backing likely presidential nominee Hillary Clinton worry Wasserman Schultz has become too divisive a figure to unify the party in 2016, which they say is crucial to defeating presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump in November.
Wasserman Schultz has had an increasingly acrimonious relationship with the partys other presidential candidate, Bernie Sanders, and his supporters, who argue she has tilted the scales in Clintons favor.
There have been a lot of meetings over the past 48 hours about what color plate do we deliver Debbie Wasserman Schultzs head on, said one pro-Clinton Democratic senator.
There have been a lot of meetings over the past 48 hours about what color plate do we deliver Debbie Wasserman Schultzs head on, said one pro-Clinton Democratic senator.
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/281147-dems-discuss-dropping-wasserman-schultz
Further down in the article, many Dem House and Senate members deny all of this. But it is still interesting.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)Clinton gone.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)tabasco
(22,974 posts)Clinton is polling behind a republican clown car con man and her numbers will only go down.
She is the weakest candidate the Dems have ever put forward and becoming the official nominee won't help her a bit. Get used to hearing "President Trump."
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)tabasco
(22,974 posts)Maybe you know it's the last "victory" H. Clinton will ever enjoy.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)tabasco
(22,974 posts)Have at it.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)It was so very unprofessional.
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)Yes, I thought you might be in his camp for quite a while.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)speak out and wake up the people.
.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)cannabis_flower
(3,764 posts)in states that had closed primaries. The general election isn't a closed primary.
GoneOffShore
(17,339 posts)Although there are great numbers of people who have been persuaded by HRC-WJC, Inc. there are far greater numbers who are ready to never see the brand again.
FighttheFuture
(1,313 posts)people? Open primaries where Sanders did very well, or closed ones restricting choice that favored Hillary? Did she really do better? Don't seem so.
NJCher
(35,667 posts)Laughing at your alliteration: republican clown car con man.
And my friends wonder why I spend so much time on DU.
Cher
dflprincess
(28,075 posts)Sanders drops out or she gets the number of pledged delegates required to clinch the nomination on the first ballot.
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)on the first ballot.
She just needs the number of delegates required to clinch the nomination on the first ballot.
The "Superdelegates don't count" meme was always just that - a meme. Superdelegates do count. And in all likelihood, come the first ballot, Clinton will have well over the number of delegates needed.
The most likely scenario to make that not happen is Sanders doing what Clinton did in 2008.
Pre-emptive note - I am not a Clinton supporter or a Sanders Supporter. I support the nominee, whoever that may be.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)affordable healthcare impossible.
You can verify that in 30 seconds. Use the first link in my sig.
The fourth link will show you the same 1995 trade deal is being used in TiSA and is an existential threat to public education, #1 on a bulleted list of big problems listed by the organization of all 850 accredited institutions of higher learning in the EU, even today.
Also the author of the first link in my sig died suddenly on August 8, 2009.
This is him a few weeks earlier
Something is not right.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)by surprise when he told them they were NOT TO ADD SDs when reporting. Tapper was not amused.
Raster
(20,998 posts)She is being kicked to the curb even now in slow-mo. This little teaser from The Hill is advance publicity. Poor little Debbie...thought she was one of the cool Clinton kids...
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)Raster
(20,998 posts)Maybe she can introduce you to her payday loan buddies...
pmorlan1
(2,096 posts)No one here is surprised.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Well, people do dumb things all the time....
markbark
(1,560 posts)Under her 'awesome' stewardship, Democrats have lost 900+ state legislature seats, 12 Governorships, 69 House seats and 13 Senate seats.
Is this incompetence or malice? (or is it Bernie's fault? )
LeFleur1
(1,197 posts)Or did Democrats lose because a bunch of voters stayed home and did things they thought were more interesting and important than being responsible for the direction of their country?
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)uninspiring and Republican Lite. Like DWS.
That said, I'm sure this is all just kabuki theater and little Debbie can count on a good position with her pal Hillary in the future.
samson212
(83 posts)I don't get this argument. How can you possibly blame the voters for being disinterested? Isn't it exactly the DNC's job to get / keep people engaged?
Stryst
(714 posts)But it's easier to say "they just stayed home to watch TV" rather than admit that some of us can't afford a basic ID card or will be homeless if we miss a day of work. Since the party doesn't want to do anything to help anyone that isn't a donor, it's easier for loyal foot soldiers to say "it's their own fault". It's almost like the Dems rhetoric about "helping the middle class" is just white noise to cover the sound of a bunch of middle class people clutching their purses and saying "Get in here, vote for us, then get out and be unseen for the next four years."
nxylas
(6,440 posts)...the taxpayer would be funding their 7-figure bonus by now.
chknltl
(10,558 posts)Gore1FL
(21,132 posts)AntiBank
(1,339 posts)is going to be the site of many a story for the next 5 years.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)The irony...
.
FighttheFuture
(1,313 posts)INdemo
(6,994 posts)Meaning..If Debbie Wassermann Schultz Rove was, or would have been neutral in this nominating process and didnt/wouldn't have
committed election fraud in several of the primaries,would you still support her?
I doubt that you would.
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)Don't worry. She will be rewarded for delivering the crown to its rightful owner.
INdemo
(6,994 posts)Nirgendwo
(32 posts)but instead dug her heels in. What is wrong with letting it play out? What are Hillary and her supporters so afraid of?
GoneOffShore
(17,339 posts)Because they can't change course fast enough to keep up.
And those course corrections are increasingly desperate.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)randr
(12,412 posts)Her performance down the ticket is abysmal. I question anyone's judgement in keeping her around.
riversedge
(70,214 posts)AntiBank
(1,339 posts)cuz thats is right were HRC and DWS are heading us to
Response to riversedge (Reply #2)
silvershadow This message was self-deleted by its author.
Renew Deal
(81,858 posts)zentrum
(9,865 posts)She runs the party like it's a clique. Bad leader.
hedda_foil
(16,373 posts)Too bad mean girl doesn't work so well anymore.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Let's remember that her most memorable act in the house was sporting some strange sun glasses and shouting out some support for the 'Gators'.
(note to respondents: I agree her cozying up to loansharks and prison industry should have been better remembered, but the lame sunglasses moment is the only one widely known on the Internet, thanks to John Oliver's show)
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)She should have apologized for the mess at the Nevada Convention, not asked for Bernie's apology.
There was no violence there. The whole thing was videotaped, and there was no violence.
There was a lot of yelling and fist-shaking, but no violence.
Debbie Wasserman-Schultz misrepresented what happened in Nevada and should resign.
OrwellwasRight
(5,170 posts)All I saw was yelling. And yelling isn't violence. It's just yelling.
Raster
(20,998 posts)Slight-of-hand refers to ballot cheating and election stealing, involving dubious party "leadership," and featuring dog-whistle distractions. See Barbara "I was a-feared for my life" Boxer.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)And if she did step down, or if she loses her seat, Clinton will certainly be there with a golden parachute for her. And we're STILL going to have to put up with DWS as long as the Clintons are abusing their power.
OrwellwasRight
(5,170 posts)Maybe she will be responsible for overseeing the frozen concentrated orange juice futures reports. Great job for a Floridian!
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)OrwellwasRight
(5,170 posts)We don't need any more justices who will side with corporate America over average people.
Gore1FL
(21,132 posts)If she actually pulled bullshit like that, I'd never vote Dem again.
BuelahWitch
(9,083 posts)bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)So if the Sanders crowd wants her out, ok, we can talk about that, but we will want to hear what we are getting in return.
They cannot just be allowed to pocket that concession, give up nothing and demand more and more.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)Besides her obvious favoritism, and the Clintonite nepotism that got her the job in the first place, she's completely incompetent in her job.
Chipper Chat
(9,678 posts)I've been uncomfortable with her interviews on cable where her acid tongue ate in to republicans - ANY republican - for their positions. It embarrassed me that she had to attack them personally and cheaply (this was mostly 4-8 years ago). I don't know if she's moderated any because when I see that she will be a guest I change the channel.
HeartoftheMidwest
(309 posts)"Democrats backing likely presidential nominee Hillary Clinton worry Wasserman Schultz has become too divisive a figure.."
Democrats...Backing....Clinton.
Response to bluestateguy (Reply #8)
Name removed Message auto-removed
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Hillary will have a lot of bankers and lobbyists calling in favors for years!
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Would hopefully be a more fair democratic process. And if that doesn't please you, that's on you.
jalan48
(13,864 posts)It's all about "values".
Raster
(20,998 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Raster
(20,998 posts)Nyan
(1,192 posts)and now, off you go. We'll put you in the cabinet if we get there. Just wait.
xloadiex
(628 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)This is how fucked up the Democratic Party is - Debbie DINO would be tossed from DU for supporting GOP candidates over Democratic candidates - but she is welcomed as National Chair of the Democratic National Party by Obama and Hillary.
I am told I must swear allegiance to the Democratic Party and to always vote for the "D" (that they order me to vote for) - but their National Chair can openly support her GOP buddies here in Florida.
How can anyone think this is okay, and that this must be supported?
Oh, I do hope that Hillary & Campaign Co. does not think that sacrificing DWS will make things all better and make it easier to support Hillary. This is just doing something that should have been done a long time ago.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Can you provide some examples?
dflprincess
(28,075 posts)[div class = "excerpt"]
..But as three Miami Democrats look to unseat three of her South Florida Republican colleagues, Wasserman Schultz is staying on the sidelines. So is Rep. Kendrick Meek, a Miami Democrat and loyal ally to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
That wasn't the case just two years ago when the pair flouted a long-standing Florida delegation agreement to not campaign against colleagues and vigorously backed Ron Klein in his winning bid to oust veteran Republican Rep. Clay Shaw.
This time around, Wasserman Schultz and Meek say their relationships with the Republican incumbents, Reps. Lincoln Diaz-Balart and his brother Mario, and Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, leave them little choice but to sit out the three races.
The decision comes as Democrats believe they have their best shot in years to defeat at least one of the Cuban-American incumbents with a roster of Democrats that include former Hialeah Mayor Raul Martinez, outgoing Miami-Dade Democratic party chair Joe Garcia and businesswoman Annette Taddeo.
But Wasserman Schultz and Meek say their ties to the three Republicans are personal as well as professional: Both served in the state Legislature with Mario Diaz-Balart and say they work in concert with all three on South Florida issues.
Why she wasn't removed from the DNC when she pulled this stunt, I'll never understand. The DFL doesn't allow you to hold a post as lowly as precinct chair if you get caught supporting a Republican.
StoneCarver
(249 posts)Thanks for the info. The DNC sent me a letter asking for money. I sent it back with a note "I'll send money when you fire DWS". I'll support Tim C. And send him money, but it won't matter. She'll be rewarded if Hillary wins!
Stonecarver
NJCher
(35,667 posts)Glad you posted it.
Downthread is an article to back you up. In it, DWS has the nerve to come right out and say she and the repukes are personal friends.
How unprofessional. Unbelievable what she gets away with. And your point about getting booted off here for doing the same is 100 per cent correct.
Cher
still_one
(92,190 posts)named say that the DNC chair isn't going anyway
This is not based on confirmed sources, but innuendos and rumors
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Like Hillary's awesomeness is.
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)She might not be the DNC Chair. Things change with a new President. We'll see.
Bernie will be back to only being seen on MSNBC and other cable news channels.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)He's been seen a lot in the Senate for years now.
Dismissive, smug hubris is the Clinton stamp..... as we can clearly see by your post.
It's also like her supporters were born yesterday!
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)One thing holding back his campaign was his trips back to the hill to vote when needed. Is Hillary even employed right now?
freebrew
(1,917 posts)the bankers how bad they are: "Now, Cut that out!"
AntiBank
(1,339 posts)Gore1FL
(21,132 posts)But at least you'll have your vitriol!
Gman
(24,780 posts)Nothing ever is and they make sure of it.
AntiBank
(1,339 posts)Democratic Party. We are so screwed.
ThoughtCriminal
(14,047 posts)If that will save some debate over plate color, you're welcome.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)Omaha Steve
(99,628 posts)Get her out of US Congress too.
Donate through DU here: https://secure.actblue.com/contribute/page/du4timcanova
Or through JPR: https://secure.actblue.com/contribute/page/jpr4timcanova
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)She put her thumb on all the right scales. Now she can bow out and get rewarded with a cushy position at the Clinton Foundation.
pmorlan1
(2,096 posts)they would get rid of her but sadly I haven't seen them be smart for quite some time.
mudstump
(342 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)... and tell her to take Hillary with her.
d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)She'll come back to Congress as a lobbyist.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)She's going to be gone as chair anyhow.
Intimating that they will remove her as chair as a peace offering or an opening to heal the rifts Clinton's campaign and her actions has done is ridiculous and a cynical action to a wholly cynical campaign.
Besides, this seems to be an article with no substance, as if floating an idea to allow DWS to take a pretense of a fall.
I just don't see the point.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)Debbie on OUT THE DOOR. LET...THIS...HAPPEN....YESTERDAY!
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)Maybe premature but I got excite for a few and this song just appeared in my head.
AntiBank
(1,339 posts)There is NO WAY to spin it in any other direction
Gore1FL
(21,132 posts)bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)One can hope, maybe they are just putting feelers out there.. like the Harry Reid statement about Bernie.. maybe the establishment is just trying to play nice after the Nevada fiasco.. just long enough to come up with a new smear campaign... u know itz coming
raindaddy
(1,370 posts)trudyco
(1,258 posts)Wonder what's going on.
Wonder if they've gotten anywhere with the NYC corruption investigation, too. Police and de Blasio and those two Real Estate magnates. Is Andrew Cuomo next?
Using nonprofits as a slush fund for politicians seems to be the new in thing.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)But it's going to take much more than finding a scapegoat to fix the damage the HRC camp has done to the party and to the democratic process.
Harriety
(298 posts)and making this about their candidates. We need to pull together to make sure Trump is not elected. Too many Trump trolls have gotten in the way. Last week they took over twitter, and don't I know it. Yes, we want to back out candidates but we need to put more focus on what we can do to unite and beat that asshole Trump to the punch.
Wake up. His trolls have been very busy pitting us against each other and winning. I do not hate Hillary, she is very capable of being our next President, and I am sure Hillary's supporters remember when Bernie was out on the floor filibustering for days for people to receive unemployment benefits and being the good senator he has always been. Both are good choices in their own ways.
To the point: Debbie Wasserman Schultz has not been good for our party. She has cast a very negative pall over the whole election process that was already messed up to begin with, and she needs to be ousted as chairwoman. I think it would be a good move for everyone concerned about our country's welfare.
jonestonesusa
(880 posts)Whether one supports Clinton or Sanders, it's clear that DWS has not been a unifying party leader, nor has she had a good record of winning down ticket campaigns. What's the upside of her leadership? I see none. Why not look for effective leadership if you don't have it now?
OrwellwasRight
(5,170 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)And this goes back to before Trump even announced his campaign, so you can't blame it only on pro-Trump trolls.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
OrwellwasRight
(5,170 posts)hueymahl
(2,496 posts)HRC was loyal to her as long as it is advantageous to do so. It no longer is.
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)It is pretty poetic. I bet Debbie didn't see that one coming. She worked her ass off to make HRC the nominee and then gets shit canned in order to help HRC in the general. Shakespear level plot line.
Gore1FL
(21,132 posts)Getting rid of her will neither harm nor help my healing in regards to Clinton. It will make me feel a lot better about the DNC.
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)I'm just saying its funny to me thinking of DWS getting canned by Hillary after all that DWS did to help her out. It could end up being the best part of a HRC nomination
DinahMoeHum
(21,786 posts). . .come the Florida congressional primary August 30.
Donate to her opponent, Tim Canova:
https://secure.actblue.com/contribute/page/du4timcanova
https://timcanova.com/
https://www.facebook.com/TimCanovaForCongress/
fbc
(1,668 posts)marble falls
(57,081 posts)CrispyQ
(36,463 posts)Good riddance. I'm sending monthly contributions to her challenger!
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)SmittynMo
(3,544 posts)Fuck discussing!!!!! Let's DO THIS THING!!!! It's long overdue.
citizen blues
(570 posts)I know if she's still Chair, then right after the election in November, I will be changing my party affiliation to Independent after 33 years of being a registered Democrat!