Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OrwellwasRight

(5,170 posts)
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:13 PM May 2016

Dems discuss dropping Wasserman Schultz

Source: The Hill

Democrats on Capitol Hill are discussing whether Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz should step down as Democratic National Committee (DNC) chairwoman before the party’s national convention in July.

Democrats backing likely presidential nominee Hillary Clinton worry Wasserman Schultz has become too divisive a figure to unify the party in 2016, which they say is crucial to defeating presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump in November.

Wasserman Schultz has had an increasingly acrimonious relationship with the party’s other presidential candidate, Bernie Sanders, and his supporters, who argue she has tilted the scales in Clinton’s favor.
“There have been a lot of meetings over the past 48 hours about what color plate do we deliver Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s head on,” said one pro-Clinton Democratic senator.

“There have been a lot of meetings over the past 48 hours about what color plate do we deliver Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s head on,” said one pro-Clinton Democratic senator.

Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/281147-dems-discuss-dropping-wasserman-schultz



Further down in the article, many Dem House and Senate members deny all of this. But it is still interesting.
128 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dems discuss dropping Wasserman Schultz (Original Post) OrwellwasRight May 2016 OP
Not going to happen. She will serve until the end of this cycle. But Sanders is free to leave. Trust Buster May 2016 #1
Be careful what you wish for. JDPriestly May 2016 #6
I'm very careful about wishing Sanders gone. LOL Trust Buster May 2016 #16
I'm just happy wishing 840high May 2016 #42
That ship has sailed. She's the presumptive nominee. Trust Buster May 2016 #44
Sorry, nobody remembers "presumptive nominees." tabasco May 2016 #48
Still did better than Sanders. What does that say about him ? Trust Buster May 2016 #51
Why are you obsessed with Sanders if Clinton is the presumptive nominee? tabasco May 2016 #53
No, I'm just reveling in his defeat.......LOL Trust Buster May 2016 #54
Weird. tabasco May 2016 #61
Nevada exaggeration disgraceful Baobab May 2016 #80
So, now out in the open: Better Trump than Bernie? sadoldgirl May 2016 #75
Many Hillary supporters are so corporate they just can't stand the fact that a progressive dared cui bono May 2016 #78
Those are not the two choices before us. Good try.....LOL Trust Buster May 2016 #79
Did better than Sanders cannabis_flower May 2016 #93
Exactly. And will do so much worse in the general. GoneOffShore May 2016 #101
Closed primaries, or open primaries... which on is more reflective of the nation and the will of the FighttheFuture May 2016 #109
English teacher here NJCher May 2016 #64
She does not get labeled the "presumptive nominee" until dflprincess May 2016 #52
She doesn't need the number of pledged delegates required to clinch the nomination Thor_MN May 2016 #63
Clinton's healthcare plan was a diversion from a trade deal that was making Baobab May 2016 #82
Sorry, on CNN the D Party bigwig took our friend Tapper libdem4life May 2016 #127
The Party needs him and his supporters a hella lot more than it needs her. Raster May 2016 #17
With friends like Sanders and his minions, who needs enemies ? I side with DWS. Trust Buster May 2016 #18
I'm sure you do. Raster May 2016 #25
Of Course You Do pmorlan1 May 2016 #26
I side with DWS. AlbertCat May 2016 #33
Supporting DWS? markbark May 2016 #50
Really? LeFleur1 May 2016 #73
Maybe Democrats lost a bunch of voters because their candidates were truebluegreen May 2016 #85
Victim blaming? samson212 May 2016 #103
Or maybe there are a bunch of laws screwing over low incomce Dem voters Stryst May 2016 #105
If someone ran a business as badly as DWS runs the Democratic Party.. nxylas May 2016 #94
...and well on track to lose Presidency. nt chknltl May 2016 #111
Do you like her supporting Republicans or her support of usury more? nt Gore1FL May 2016 #66
you damn well better hope the "minions" hold their collective noses or the country of Slovenia AntiBank May 2016 #70
Because you are just such a sweetheart. cui bono May 2016 #76
...and her Payday Lender buddies, too!!! Enjoy your cesspool. FighttheFuture May 2016 #110
If DWS wasn't such a shill for Hillary would you still support her? INdemo May 2016 #125
She will still be a cool Clinton kid --- maybe Secretary of Interior. Hoppy May 2016 #41
She could serve as Bill's scretary setting up his intinerary ?? INdemo May 2016 #126
Just as Hills was free to leave at this point back in 2008 Nirgendwo May 2016 #22
The wind, they're afraid of the wind and the tides. GoneOffShore May 2016 #102
If he did Hillary would lose to him in the GE. cui bono May 2016 #77
Her relationship to Hillary is not the only reason DWS needs the axe randr May 2016 #98
The Hill is not friend to Hillary riversedge May 2016 #2
you think the paper/website Hill is bad, wait for the 2017 Rethug Congress on THE Hill AntiBank May 2016 #62
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow May 2016 #87
She should go some time after June 14. Renew Deal May 2016 #3
Yep. cali May 2016 #89
She is divisive. zentrum May 2016 #4
I think you've hit on it. She tries.to run the party like a sorority president. hedda_foil May 2016 #84
that is a most apt comparison. Betty Karlson May 2016 #124
She should resign, but she probably won't. JDPriestly May 2016 #5
I'm glad somebody else saw what I saw in the NV videos. OrwellwasRight May 2016 #9
There was no violence in NV. It was manufactured outrage and slight-of-hand. Raster May 2016 #23
Clinton is too arrogant and too vindictive to allow her to step down. w4rma May 2016 #7
Maybe she will get a choice appointment in some non-descript corner of the federal government. OrwellwasRight May 2016 #19
Maybe Associate Justice? Hoppy May 2016 #43
I hope not. OrwellwasRight May 2016 #47
If Clinton is the nominee I am only voting for her in the GE for her SCOTUS choices. Gore1FL May 2016 #69
I'm sure there is a place for her in the Payday Loan Industry...n/t BuelahWitch May 2016 #99
There's no free lunch, especially when you lose bluestateguy May 2016 #8
You aren't getting anything back from me for this little morsel. She should have been gone years ago w4rma May 2016 #11
All that and more. Chipper Chat May 2016 #100
It's not the Sanders crowd: HeartoftheMidwest May 2016 #13
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #32
There's no free lunch, even if you manage to win! AlbertCat May 2016 #35
What you will be getting in return passiveporcupine May 2016 #58
Maybe she'll switch to the Republican Party once the Democrats move left. jalan48 May 2016 #10
They don't call her DINO Debbie for nothing. Raster May 2016 #29
Listen! Debbie is no more of a DINO than Hillary! Enthusiast May 2016 #106
You got me there.... cannot disagree! Raster May 2016 #122
Translation: She's done all the rigging we could possibly hope for, Nyan May 2016 #12
Too little too late n/t xloadiex May 2016 #14
She has openly supported her GOP cronies, down here in Florida. djean111 May 2016 #15
Which GOP candidates did she support over Democrats? oberliner May 2016 #46
Here you go dflprincess May 2016 #57
Ouch! StoneCarver May 2016 #97
was totally unaware of this NJCher May 2016 #68
What a bullshit article. Not one Democrat who is calling for this is named, but those that are still_one May 2016 #20
This is not based on confirmed sources, but innuendos and rumors AlbertCat May 2016 #38
....... imari362 May 2016 #40
A little late, but not going to happen anyway. NV Whino May 2016 #21
In 1 year Hillary will be President, and Debbie Wasserman Schultz will be a sitting Representative. onehandle May 2016 #24
Bernie will be back to only being seen on MSNBC and other cable news channels. AlbertCat May 2016 #39
Bernie has been doing his job this entire time Lordquinton May 2016 #88
She gets paid to tell... freebrew May 2016 #104
a sitting Representative making sure that usury payday loans flow like water to rape the poor AntiBank May 2016 #65
If your scenario plays out, in 4 years Hillary will likely be primaried if she wins at all. Gore1FL May 2016 #71
Won't be good enough for the purists. Gman May 2016 #27
I love how now actually being even mildly progressive is now "purist" into today's triangulated AntiBank May 2016 #67
Blue is a nice. ThoughtCriminal May 2016 #28
and see, I was leaning toward a silver platter. but, I am willing to compromise Hiraeth May 2016 #116
FIRE DWS! Donate to Democratic Underground for Tim Canova FL-23 here Omaha Steve May 2016 #30
She's served her purpose. Jester Messiah May 2016 #31
If they were smart pmorlan1 May 2016 #34
I'll believe it when I see it. mudstump May 2016 #36
Dump her... ReRe May 2016 #37
Even if they dump her d_legendary1 May 2016 #45
Term limits is there. I just don't care if they are discussing her leaving. Xyzse May 2016 #49
Can We Dance... LovingA2andMI May 2016 #55
CNN is covering this as I type... eom Purveyor May 2016 #56
Ding Dong' the merry-oh, sing it high, sing it low. Cobalt Violet May 2016 #59
the ONLY reason ANYONE is siding with DWS is because she is a Clinton Shill AntiBank May 2016 #60
It certainly isn't talent or job performance. n/t Gore1FL May 2016 #72
PLEASE let it be so... bullwinkle428 May 2016 #74
Wow.. disillusioned73 May 2016 #81
If it happens drinks are on the house at the DU Pub...... raindaddy May 2016 #83
Not a good week for Clinton DNC heads trudyco May 2016 #86
That would be a start Android3.14 May 2016 #90
Already everyone is at each others throats.. Harriety May 2016 #91
A voice of reason. jonestonesusa May 2016 #96
Agree. OrwellwasRight May 2016 #112
Waaaaaaaaay too lat for that. jeff47 May 2016 #117
The Real Story - DWS Has Become A Drag On HRC cantbeserious May 2016 #92
True. nt. OrwellwasRight May 2016 #95
Bingo hueymahl May 2016 #108
DWS offered up as the sacrificial lamb to bring Sanders supporters on board with HRC GummyBearz May 2016 #107
She needs to go becasue she is bad at the job (and bad at being human) Gore1FL May 2016 #113
I agree with you completely GummyBearz May 2016 #114
Meanwhile, let's help kick DWS's ass out of Congress. . . DinahMoeHum May 2016 #115
Fire the republican sympathizer! fbc May 2016 #118
Thankyou Bernie Sanders. marble falls May 2016 #119
Wonder how much a GOP PAC coming out in support of her had to do with it? CrispyQ May 2016 #120
DWS, the shit sandwich. Helen Borg May 2016 #121
DISCUSS? SmittynMo May 2016 #123
NOT ditching her could fracture the party. citizen blues May 2016 #128
 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
48. Sorry, nobody remembers "presumptive nominees."
Tue May 24, 2016, 10:09 PM
May 2016

Clinton is polling behind a republican clown car con man and her numbers will only go down.

She is the weakest candidate the Dems have ever put forward and becoming the official nominee won't help her a bit. Get used to hearing "President Trump."

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
53. Why are you obsessed with Sanders if Clinton is the presumptive nominee?
Tue May 24, 2016, 10:37 PM
May 2016

Maybe you know it's the last "victory" H. Clinton will ever enjoy.

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
75. So, now out in the open: Better Trump than Bernie?
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:31 PM
May 2016

Yes, I thought you might be in his camp for quite a while.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
78. Many Hillary supporters are so corporate they just can't stand the fact that a progressive dared
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:35 PM
May 2016

speak out and wake up the people.

.

GoneOffShore

(17,339 posts)
101. Exactly. And will do so much worse in the general.
Wed May 25, 2016, 10:10 AM
May 2016

Although there are great numbers of people who have been persuaded by HRC-WJC, Inc. there are far greater numbers who are ready to never see the brand again.

 

FighttheFuture

(1,313 posts)
109. Closed primaries, or open primaries... which on is more reflective of the nation and the will of the
Wed May 25, 2016, 11:56 AM
May 2016

people? Open primaries where Sanders did very well, or closed ones restricting choice that favored Hillary? Did she really do better? Don't seem so.

NJCher

(35,667 posts)
64. English teacher here
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:11 PM
May 2016

Laughing at your alliteration: republican clown car con man.

And my friends wonder why I spend so much time on DU.


Cher

dflprincess

(28,075 posts)
52. She does not get labeled the "presumptive nominee" until
Tue May 24, 2016, 10:34 PM
May 2016

Sanders drops out or she gets the number of pledged delegates required to clinch the nomination on the first ballot.

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
63. She doesn't need the number of pledged delegates required to clinch the nomination
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:08 PM
May 2016

on the first ballot.

She just needs the number of delegates required to clinch the nomination on the first ballot.

The "Superdelegates don't count" meme was always just that - a meme. Superdelegates do count. And in all likelihood, come the first ballot, Clinton will have well over the number of delegates needed.

The most likely scenario to make that not happen is Sanders doing what Clinton did in 2008.



Pre-emptive note - I am not a Clinton supporter or a Sanders Supporter. I support the nominee, whoever that may be.

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
82. Clinton's healthcare plan was a diversion from a trade deal that was making
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:48 PM
May 2016

affordable healthcare impossible.

You can verify that in 30 seconds. Use the first link in my sig.

The fourth link will show you the same 1995 trade deal is being used in TiSA and is an existential threat to public education, #1 on a bulleted list of big problems listed by the organization of all 850 accredited institutions of higher learning in the EU, even today.

Also the author of the first link in my sig died suddenly on August 8, 2009.

This is him a few weeks earlier



Something is not right.
 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
127. Sorry, on CNN the D Party bigwig took our friend Tapper
Wed May 25, 2016, 06:02 PM
May 2016

by surprise when he told them they were NOT TO ADD SDs when reporting. Tapper was not amused.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
17. The Party needs him and his supporters a hella lot more than it needs her.
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:25 PM
May 2016

She is being kicked to the curb even now in slow-mo. This little teaser from The Hill is advance publicity. Poor little Debbie...thought she was one of the cool Clinton kids...

markbark

(1,560 posts)
50. Supporting DWS?
Tue May 24, 2016, 10:29 PM
May 2016

Under her 'awesome' stewardship, Democrats have lost 900+ state legislature seats, 12 Governorships, 69 House seats and 13 Senate seats.
Is this incompetence or malice? (or is it Bernie's fault? )

LeFleur1

(1,197 posts)
73. Really?
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:26 PM
May 2016

Or did Democrats lose because a bunch of voters stayed home and did things they thought were more interesting and important than being responsible for the direction of their country?

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
85. Maybe Democrats lost a bunch of voters because their candidates were
Wed May 25, 2016, 12:03 AM
May 2016

uninspiring and Republican Lite. Like DWS.

That said, I'm sure this is all just kabuki theater and little Debbie can count on a good position with her pal Hillary in the future.

samson212

(83 posts)
103. Victim blaming?
Wed May 25, 2016, 10:19 AM
May 2016

I don't get this argument. How can you possibly blame the voters for being disinterested? Isn't it exactly the DNC's job to get / keep people engaged?

Stryst

(714 posts)
105. Or maybe there are a bunch of laws screwing over low incomce Dem voters
Wed May 25, 2016, 10:58 AM
May 2016

But it's easier to say "they just stayed home to watch TV" rather than admit that some of us can't afford a basic ID card or will be homeless if we miss a day of work. Since the party doesn't want to do anything to help anyone that isn't a donor, it's easier for loyal foot soldiers to say "it's their own fault". It's almost like the Dems rhetoric about "helping the middle class" is just white noise to cover the sound of a bunch of middle class people clutching their purses and saying "Get in here, vote for us, then get out and be unseen for the next four years."

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
94. If someone ran a business as badly as DWS runs the Democratic Party..
Wed May 25, 2016, 08:34 AM
May 2016

...the taxpayer would be funding their 7-figure bonus by now.

 

AntiBank

(1,339 posts)
70. you damn well better hope the "minions" hold their collective noses or the country of Slovenia
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:17 PM
May 2016

is going to be the site of many a story for the next 5 years.

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
125. If DWS wasn't such a shill for Hillary would you still support her?
Wed May 25, 2016, 05:58 PM
May 2016

Meaning..If Debbie Wassermann Schultz Rove was, or would have been neutral in this nominating process and didnt/wouldn't have
committed election fraud in several of the primaries,would you still support her?
I doubt that you would.

 

Hoppy

(3,595 posts)
41. She will still be a cool Clinton kid --- maybe Secretary of Interior.
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:54 PM
May 2016

Don't worry. She will be rewarded for delivering the crown to its rightful owner.

Nirgendwo

(32 posts)
22. Just as Hills was free to leave at this point back in 2008
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:35 PM
May 2016

but instead dug her heels in. What is wrong with letting it play out? What are Hillary and her supporters so afraid of?

GoneOffShore

(17,339 posts)
102. The wind, they're afraid of the wind and the tides.
Wed May 25, 2016, 10:14 AM
May 2016

Because they can't change course fast enough to keep up.

And those course corrections are increasingly desperate.

randr

(12,412 posts)
98. Her relationship to Hillary is not the only reason DWS needs the axe
Wed May 25, 2016, 09:05 AM
May 2016

Her performance down the ticket is abysmal. I question anyone's judgement in keeping her around.

 

AntiBank

(1,339 posts)
62. you think the paper/website Hill is bad, wait for the 2017 Rethug Congress on THE Hill
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:03 PM
May 2016

cuz thats is right were HRC and DWS are heading us to

Response to riversedge (Reply #2)

hedda_foil

(16,373 posts)
84. I think you've hit on it. She tries.to run the party like a sorority president.
Wed May 25, 2016, 12:01 AM
May 2016

Too bad mean girl doesn't work so well anymore.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
124. that is a most apt comparison.
Wed May 25, 2016, 05:35 PM
May 2016

Let's remember that her most memorable act in the house was sporting some strange sun glasses and shouting out some support for the 'Gators'.

(note to respondents: I agree her cozying up to loansharks and prison industry should have been better remembered, but the lame sunglasses moment is the only one widely known on the Internet, thanks to John Oliver's show)

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
5. She should resign, but she probably won't.
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:18 PM
May 2016

She should have apologized for the mess at the Nevada Convention, not asked for Bernie's apology.

There was no violence there. The whole thing was videotaped, and there was no violence.

There was a lot of yelling and fist-shaking, but no violence.

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz misrepresented what happened in Nevada and should resign.

OrwellwasRight

(5,170 posts)
9. I'm glad somebody else saw what I saw in the NV videos.
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:20 PM
May 2016

All I saw was yelling. And yelling isn't violence. It's just yelling.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
23. There was no violence in NV. It was manufactured outrage and slight-of-hand.
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:35 PM
May 2016
Sleight of hand (also known as prestidigitation or legerdemain) refers to fine motor skills when used by performing artists in different art forms to entertain or manipulate. It is closely associated with close-up magic, card cheating, card flourishing and stealing.

Slight-of-hand refers to ballot cheating and election stealing, involving dubious party "leadership," and featuring dog-whistle distractions. See Barbara "I was a-feared for my life" Boxer.
 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
7. Clinton is too arrogant and too vindictive to allow her to step down.
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:19 PM
May 2016

And if she did step down, or if she loses her seat, Clinton will certainly be there with a golden parachute for her. And we're STILL going to have to put up with DWS as long as the Clintons are abusing their power.

OrwellwasRight

(5,170 posts)
19. Maybe she will get a choice appointment in some non-descript corner of the federal government.
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:28 PM
May 2016


Maybe she will be responsible for overseeing the frozen concentrated orange juice futures reports. Great job for a Floridian!



OrwellwasRight

(5,170 posts)
47. I hope not.
Tue May 24, 2016, 10:05 PM
May 2016

We don't need any more justices who will side with corporate America over average people.

Gore1FL

(21,132 posts)
69. If Clinton is the nominee I am only voting for her in the GE for her SCOTUS choices.
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:16 PM
May 2016

If she actually pulled bullshit like that, I'd never vote Dem again.

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
8. There's no free lunch, especially when you lose
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:19 PM
May 2016

So if the Sanders crowd wants her out, ok, we can talk about that, but we will want to hear what we are getting in return.

They cannot just be allowed to pocket that concession, give up nothing and demand more and more.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
11. You aren't getting anything back from me for this little morsel. She should have been gone years ago
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:22 PM
May 2016

Besides her obvious favoritism, and the Clintonite nepotism that got her the job in the first place, she's completely incompetent in her job.

Chipper Chat

(9,678 posts)
100. All that and more.
Wed May 25, 2016, 10:04 AM
May 2016

I've been uncomfortable with her interviews on cable where her acid tongue ate in to republicans - ANY republican - for their positions. It embarrassed me that she had to attack them personally and cheaply (this was mostly 4-8 years ago). I don't know if she's moderated any because when I see that she will be a guest I change the channel.

HeartoftheMidwest

(309 posts)
13. It's not the Sanders crowd:
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:22 PM
May 2016

"Democrats backing likely presidential nominee Hillary Clinton worry Wasserman Schultz has become too divisive a figure.."

Democrats...Backing....Clinton.

Response to bluestateguy (Reply #8)

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
35. There's no free lunch, even if you manage to win!
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:44 PM
May 2016

Hillary will have a lot of bankers and lobbyists calling in favors for years!

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
58. What you will be getting in return
Tue May 24, 2016, 10:50 PM
May 2016

Would hopefully be a more fair democratic process. And if that doesn't please you, that's on you.

Nyan

(1,192 posts)
12. Translation: She's done all the rigging we could possibly hope for,
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:22 PM
May 2016

and now, off you go. We'll put you in the cabinet if we get there. Just wait.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
15. She has openly supported her GOP cronies, down here in Florida.
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:24 PM
May 2016

This is how fucked up the Democratic Party is - Debbie DINO would be tossed from DU for supporting GOP candidates over Democratic candidates - but she is welcomed as National Chair of the Democratic National Party by Obama and Hillary.

I am told I must swear allegiance to the Democratic Party and to always vote for the "D" (that they order me to vote for) - but their National Chair can openly support her GOP buddies here in Florida.

How can anyone think this is okay, and that this must be supported?

Oh, I do hope that Hillary & Campaign Co. does not think that sacrificing DWS will make things all better and make it easier to support Hillary. This is just doing something that should have been done a long time ago.

dflprincess

(28,075 posts)
57. Here you go
Tue May 24, 2016, 10:45 PM
May 2016
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/article24478039.html

[div class = "excerpt"]
..But as three Miami Democrats look to unseat three of her South Florida Republican colleagues, Wasserman Schultz is staying on the sidelines. So is Rep. Kendrick Meek, a Miami Democrat and loyal ally to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

That wasn't the case just two years ago when the pair flouted a long-standing Florida delegation agreement to not campaign against colleagues and vigorously backed Ron Klein in his winning bid to oust veteran Republican Rep. Clay Shaw.

This time around, Wasserman Schultz and Meek say their relationships with the Republican incumbents, Reps. Lincoln Diaz-Balart and his brother Mario, and Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, leave them little choice but to sit out the three races.

The decision comes as Democrats believe they have their best shot in years to defeat at least one of the Cuban-American incumbents with a roster of Democrats that include former Hialeah Mayor Raul Martinez, outgoing Miami-Dade Democratic party chair Joe Garcia and businesswoman Annette Taddeo.

But Wasserman Schultz and Meek say their ties to the three Republicans are personal as well as professional: Both served in the state Legislature with Mario Diaz-Balart and say they work in concert with all three on South Florida issues.


Why she wasn't removed from the DNC when she pulled this stunt, I'll never understand. The DFL doesn't allow you to hold a post as lowly as precinct chair if you get caught supporting a Republican.

 

StoneCarver

(249 posts)
97. Ouch!
Wed May 25, 2016, 08:55 AM
May 2016

Thanks for the info. The DNC sent me a letter asking for money. I sent it back with a note "I'll send money when you fire DWS". I'll support Tim C. And send him money, but it won't matter. She'll be rewarded if Hillary wins!
Stonecarver

NJCher

(35,667 posts)
68. was totally unaware of this
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:16 PM
May 2016

Glad you posted it.

Downthread is an article to back you up. In it, DWS has the nerve to come right out and say she and the repukes are personal friends.

How unprofessional. Unbelievable what she gets away with. And your point about getting booted off here for doing the same is 100 per cent correct.



Cher

still_one

(92,190 posts)
20. What a bullshit article. Not one Democrat who is calling for this is named, but those that are
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:28 PM
May 2016

named say that the DNC chair isn't going anyway

This is not based on confirmed sources, but innuendos and rumors

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
24. In 1 year Hillary will be President, and Debbie Wasserman Schultz will be a sitting Representative.
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:36 PM
May 2016

She might not be the DNC Chair. Things change with a new President. We'll see.

Bernie will be back to only being seen on MSNBC and other cable news channels.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
39. Bernie will be back to only being seen on MSNBC and other cable news channels.
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:51 PM
May 2016

He's been seen a lot in the Senate for years now.

Dismissive, smug hubris is the Clinton stamp..... as we can clearly see by your post.

It's also like her supporters were born yesterday!

Lordquinton

(7,886 posts)
88. Bernie has been doing his job this entire time
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:16 AM
May 2016

One thing holding back his campaign was his trips back to the hill to vote when needed. Is Hillary even employed right now?

Gore1FL

(21,132 posts)
71. If your scenario plays out, in 4 years Hillary will likely be primaried if she wins at all.
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:19 PM
May 2016

But at least you'll have your vitriol!

 

AntiBank

(1,339 posts)
67. I love how now actually being even mildly progressive is now "purist" into today's triangulated
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:13 PM
May 2016

Democratic Party. We are so screwed.

 

Jester Messiah

(4,711 posts)
31. She's served her purpose.
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:40 PM
May 2016

She put her thumb on all the right scales. Now she can bow out and get rewarded with a cushy position at the Clinton Foundation.

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
49. Term limits is there. I just don't care if they are discussing her leaving.
Tue May 24, 2016, 10:15 PM
May 2016

She's going to be gone as chair anyhow.

Intimating that they will remove her as chair as a peace offering or an opening to heal the rifts Clinton's campaign and her actions has done is ridiculous and a cynical action to a wholly cynical campaign.

Besides, this seems to be an article with no substance, as if floating an idea to allow DWS to take a pretense of a fall.

I just don't see the point.

Cobalt Violet

(9,905 posts)
59. Ding Dong' the merry-oh, sing it high, sing it low.
Tue May 24, 2016, 10:54 PM
May 2016

Maybe premature but I got excite for a few and this song just appeared in my head.

 

AntiBank

(1,339 posts)
60. the ONLY reason ANYONE is siding with DWS is because she is a Clinton Shill
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:01 PM
May 2016

There is NO WAY to spin it in any other direction

 

disillusioned73

(2,872 posts)
81. Wow..
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:42 PM
May 2016

One can hope, maybe they are just putting feelers out there.. like the Harry Reid statement about Bernie.. maybe the establishment is just trying to play nice after the Nevada fiasco.. just long enough to come up with a new smear campaign... u know itz coming

trudyco

(1,258 posts)
86. Not a good week for Clinton DNC heads
Wed May 25, 2016, 12:13 AM
May 2016

Wonder what's going on.

Wonder if they've gotten anywhere with the NYC corruption investigation, too. Police and de Blasio and those two Real Estate magnates. Is Andrew Cuomo next?

Using nonprofits as a slush fund for politicians seems to be the new in thing.

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
90. That would be a start
Wed May 25, 2016, 05:53 AM
May 2016

But it's going to take much more than finding a scapegoat to fix the damage the HRC camp has done to the party and to the democratic process.

Harriety

(298 posts)
91. Already everyone is at each others throats..
Wed May 25, 2016, 07:32 AM
May 2016

and making this about their candidates. We need to pull together to make sure Trump is not elected. Too many Trump trolls have gotten in the way. Last week they took over twitter, and don't I know it. Yes, we want to back out candidates but we need to put more focus on what we can do to unite and beat that asshole Trump to the punch.

Wake up. His trolls have been very busy pitting us against each other and winning. I do not hate Hillary, she is very capable of being our next President, and I am sure Hillary's supporters remember when Bernie was out on the floor filibustering for days for people to receive unemployment benefits and being the good senator he has always been. Both are good choices in their own ways.

To the point: Debbie Wasserman Schultz has not been good for our party. She has cast a very negative pall over the whole election process that was already messed up to begin with, and she needs to be ousted as chairwoman. I think it would be a good move for everyone concerned about our country's welfare.

jonestonesusa

(880 posts)
96. A voice of reason.
Wed May 25, 2016, 08:44 AM
May 2016

Whether one supports Clinton or Sanders, it's clear that DWS has not been a unifying party leader, nor has she had a good record of winning down ticket campaigns. What's the upside of her leadership? I see none. Why not look for effective leadership if you don't have it now?

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
117. Waaaaaaaaay too lat for that.
Wed May 25, 2016, 01:34 PM
May 2016

And this goes back to before Trump even announced his campaign, so you can't blame it only on pro-Trump trolls.

 

GummyBearz

(2,931 posts)
107. DWS offered up as the sacrificial lamb to bring Sanders supporters on board with HRC
Wed May 25, 2016, 11:44 AM
May 2016

It is pretty poetic. I bet Debbie didn't see that one coming. She worked her ass off to make HRC the nominee and then gets shit canned in order to help HRC in the general. Shakespear level plot line.

Gore1FL

(21,132 posts)
113. She needs to go becasue she is bad at the job (and bad at being human)
Wed May 25, 2016, 12:20 PM
May 2016

Getting rid of her will neither harm nor help my healing in regards to Clinton. It will make me feel a lot better about the DNC.

 

GummyBearz

(2,931 posts)
114. I agree with you completely
Wed May 25, 2016, 12:23 PM
May 2016

I'm just saying its funny to me thinking of DWS getting canned by Hillary after all that DWS did to help her out. It could end up being the best part of a HRC nomination

CrispyQ

(36,463 posts)
120. Wonder how much a GOP PAC coming out in support of her had to do with it?
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:04 PM
May 2016

Good riddance. I'm sending monthly contributions to her challenger!

citizen blues

(570 posts)
128. NOT ditching her could fracture the party.
Wed May 25, 2016, 06:54 PM
May 2016

I know if she's still Chair, then right after the election in November, I will be changing my party affiliation to Independent after 33 years of being a registered Democrat!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Dems discuss dropping Was...