Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
Thu May 26, 2016, 01:43 PM May 2016

The U.S. is still using floppy disks to run its nuclear program

Source: CNN

Want to launch a nuclear missile? You'll need a floppy disk.

That's according to a new report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), which found that the Pentagon was still using 1970s-era computing systems that require "eight-inch floppy disks."

Such disks were already becoming obsolete by the end of that decade, being edged out by smaller, non-floppy 3.5 to 5.25-inch disks, before being almost completely replaced by the CD in the late 90s.

Except in Washington that is. The GAO report says that U.S. government departments spend upwards of $60 billion a year on operating and maintaining out-of-date technologies.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/26/us/pentagon-floppy-disks-nuclear/



CNN presents this as a bad thing, but there Is a giant positive.

Floppy systems are not connected to the Internet and are essentially un-hackable. If there's one system we don't want the design public and easily available for review by anyone who wants it, it's this one.

39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The U.S. is still using floppy disks to run its nuclear program (Original Post) Calista241 May 2016 OP
"Floppy systems are not connected to the Internet"? knightmaar May 2016 #1
You're confusing the 8in disc systems with the much newer 3'1/2 systems. Lancero May 2016 #12
I'm old enough to have actually used the 8 inch disks in high school knightmaar May 2016 #15
That's to connect a 8in drive to a modern computer system, not to connect a... Lancero May 2016 #16
Good luck finding an 8bit NIC that isn't BNC token ring shit that most people don't AtheistCrusader May 2016 #25
You don't even need an ethernet adapter sdfernando May 2016 #33
Oh, it wouldn't be *trivial* ... :-) knightmaar May 2016 #34
You're logically & historically confused. Floppies 8 / 3.5 are storage devices, not network devices. Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #21
All true, but the bus is old. AtheistCrusader May 2016 #26
Sometimes those systems had dial-up access. tclambert May 2016 #37
antiques.crazy how fucked up and OLD our infrastructure is, yet DOD can spend a billion a spy blimp Sunlei May 2016 #2
Republicans specialize starving govt infrastructure while giving corp welfare to def contractors. nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #22
n fairness, you really don't 'need' anything more than that to do the job. AtheistCrusader May 2016 #27
The SNL skit writes itself. DURHAM D May 2016 #3
Never touch a running system.../nt jakeXT May 2016 #4
Wisdom. (though even your point has limits) . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #23
Yep. eggplant May 2016 #31
It's not nuts. James48 May 2016 #5
LOL "Do you want to... upgrade?" MidwestTech May 2016 #7
Clippy comes up: christx30 May 2016 #14
"Dozens of hot, single women in YOUR area!" MynameisBlarney May 2016 #17
I have some insider information as to why this is... MidwestTech May 2016 #6
Yes but I learned software from the inside discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2016 #10
I'd know what to do, but yeah, security through obscurity is a valid layer. AtheistCrusader May 2016 #28
Probably similar to the "Bernoulli Box" technology Ellipsis May 2016 #8
There is security in simplicity IronLionZion May 2016 #9
As long as we have... jayfish May 2016 #11
Nothing on a network but radio and phone. Just think now we can put it on the internet LiberalArkie May 2016 #13
Deterioration? SmittynMo May 2016 #18
"If some of these discs are 30 years old and damaged/deteriorated, how does one recreate another?" James48 May 2016 #19
I'm pretty sure SmittynMo May 2016 #20
I'm fine with this, too. It's a program never meant to actually be used, since it ends the world. w4rma May 2016 #36
Active archiving. Passive archiving is for dodos and parchment. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #24
finally something useful comes out of this investigation Actor May 2016 #29
Many banks are still running ancient COBOL-based mainframes. Odin2005 May 2016 #30
If you've got billions of lines of code that you spent decades debugging, why try to replace it? tclambert May 2016 #38
As the joke goes... eggplant May 2016 #32
I'm perfectly fine with this. I'm perfectly fine with as little money as possible spent on upgrades w4rma May 2016 #35
CONFIG.SYS jtuck004 May 2016 #39

knightmaar

(748 posts)
1. "Floppy systems are not connected to the Internet"?
Thu May 26, 2016, 01:47 PM
May 2016

Unless, of course, you put them in a computer that is connected to the Internet.
Which you could easily do.
And that makes them like every other reasonable storage technology.

The chief benefit for the military is that they don't have to test new systems.

The chief benefit for the rest of the world is that the medium decays relatively rapidly and they probably wouldn't be able to launch the missiles. If only everyone in the world had the same limitation.

Lancero

(3,003 posts)
12. You're confusing the 8in disc systems with the much newer 3'1/2 systems.
Thu May 26, 2016, 02:48 PM
May 2016

The 8in systems predate a lot of the 'modern' internet infrastructure. 8in systems wouldn't be able to connect to the internet like you think.

What you're talking about 'might' be possible with the successor 5'1/4 systems, but for the 70s era 8in systems that the DoD is using? These systems are far to old to be connected to the internet.

knightmaar

(748 posts)
15. I'm old enough to have actually used the 8 inch disks in high school
Thu May 26, 2016, 03:03 PM
May 2016

So, no, I'm not confusing them.

http://www.classiccmp.org/dunfield/img/index.htm

This guy describes how to make the cables so you can connect the 8" disk drives to a normal PC. At that point, you're just an Ethernet adapter away from the Internet. (Admittedly, it'll probably be a co-ax Ethernet adapter, but what the hell, you're in the military, I'm sure you could requisition one).

There's nothing special about "The Internet" that requires any kind of special hardware. If a PC or a Linux box can be cabled to your storage medium, I don't care if it's microfiche or reel-to-reel, it can be on the Internet.

Lancero

(3,003 posts)
16. That's to connect a 8in drive to a modern computer system, not to connect a...
Thu May 26, 2016, 03:22 PM
May 2016

70's era computer system to the internet. (Note though, I am specifying internet, not networking. These system can be connected to a LAN, which is diffrient from simply 'connecting them to the net'.)

My point still stands.

In any event, he admits that such a jury rigging can, and likely will, be error-prone. So I highly doubt that anyone in the military would authorize this modification for use in any of their hardware, especially hardware that is controlling nukes.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
25. Good luck finding an 8bit NIC that isn't BNC token ring shit that most people don't
Thu May 26, 2016, 04:46 PM
May 2016

even know how to plug in.

Those old floppy drives don't use the modern floppy port cable, these are going to be old IBM XT line 8086 shit. Single channel PCI boards, etc. Old. Old old old.

And there's probably one company out there with a gold plated military contract to keep producing those damn disks too.

sdfernando

(4,930 posts)
33. You don't even need an ethernet adapter
Thu May 26, 2016, 06:21 PM
May 2016

Just a computer with a UART chip and serial port connected to an acoustic coupler and a POTS line...of course you would still need a dial-up ISP.

knightmaar

(748 posts)
34. Oh, it wouldn't be *trivial* ... :-)
Thu May 26, 2016, 07:51 PM
May 2016

But I'm pretty confident there's nothing intrinsic about 8" floppy drives that makes them non-Internet-capable.

ETA: Yeah, and I can totally set up a BBS at my house. You can dial in from your setup and I'll connect it to my LAN. Then, boom, the 8" floppy is on the Internet!

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,999 posts)
21. You're logically & historically confused. Floppies 8 / 3.5 are storage devices, not network devices.
Thu May 26, 2016, 04:38 PM
May 2016

Any storage device, even paper tape or mercury echo baths, could be connected to a computer that also contains a network device.

I have two 8 inch floppy disks that I used new in 1979 and was still using in 1980 when I was sending email (albeit on a different computer).

The internet dates from 1973, basically, which actually predates floppy disks. I was on discussion forums (boards) in the early 1980s, via a workplace that was always on the net (not needing to dial up each time).

The internet is NOT the World Wide Web (a common mistake many people make), which dates from 1993 give or take a few months depending how you count it. The internet existed for about 20 years before the web.

A system could use ultramodern Blu Ray and post Blu Ray storage technology and still not be connected to the web.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
26. All true, but the bus is old.
Thu May 26, 2016, 04:50 PM
May 2016

They don't have the modern cable connector. They have the old bladed plug, like an old RLL hard drive. I don't remember the connector name, but it pre-dates the pin type IDE drive.

You'd have to go through some major hoops to get a card that would connect that thing to a modern Ethernet network.

Edit: See that bladed connector on the top back? That doesn't have a modern analog to the floppy port on a motherboard.

tclambert

(11,085 posts)
37. Sometimes those systems had dial-up access.
Thu May 26, 2016, 09:33 PM
May 2016

You know, with like an acoustic modem where you put the handset from your landline phone into two little rubber cups and then your computer and some other computer could squeal at each other at I think it was 9600 bps. I doubt that our nuclear program would have allowed dial-up access to their computers. Security issues aside, data transfer rates were higher if you copied the data onto magnetic tapes and drove them over in your car.

Graphics were really primitive back then. Computer games were mostly text-based.

Ah, it takes me back. I still have some 3.5 inch disks around here somewhere. I think I got rid of all my 5 1/4 inch floppies. I don't recall having any 8 inch floppies for home use. I think they went away before PCs became a thing.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
2. antiques.crazy how fucked up and OLD our infrastructure is, yet DOD can spend a billion a spy blimp
Thu May 26, 2016, 01:56 PM
May 2016

When Obama took office he had to get DOI off paper maps & Veterans had paper medical files, some several feet thick.

James48

(4,435 posts)
5. It's not nuts.
Thu May 26, 2016, 02:24 PM
May 2016

Not all at.

The 8 inch disks contain the geographic targeting data of the specific targets that one wishes to program the missile warhead for.

No, none of the programming or launch computers are connected to the internet. No modems, no hard-wires- and therefore safe from being hacked.

You don't want WINDOWS 10 to pop up and self-install while you are trying to program a missile for someplace, now do you?

MidwestTech

(170 posts)
7. LOL "Do you want to... upgrade?"
Thu May 26, 2016, 02:29 PM
May 2016

I can jsut see the modern wargames "Do you want to pla a......" 'PLEASE WAIT WHILE WINDOWS UPDATES!'

NO! I nede to launch the missiles now dammit!

or...

"NO I don't want viagra, or pay for the upgrade, jsut launch my fucking missiles!"

"What do you mean google maps can't find that location!?"

the jokes with modern equipment write themselves lol

christx30

(6,241 posts)
14. Clippy comes up:
Thu May 26, 2016, 03:01 PM
May 2016

"it looks like you're trying to obliterate Pyongyang. Would you like some help with that?"

MidwestTech

(170 posts)
6. I have some insider information as to why this is...
Thu May 26, 2016, 02:27 PM
May 2016

My dad was an EE for the government his entire career.
Basically before ray-gun when the government saw a technology they liked they bought it... ALL OF IT!
that way they had direct control over it's maintenance, secrets et all.

this is a very wise and secure thing to do.

If the government has it's own techs to maintain it's own equipment, and those techs tend to be loyal lifers, you end up with very good security. That means they own the schematics, the source code, everything!

Now consider the process of controlling the nuclear arsenal. and now consider how INsecure the government is BECAUSE of all those contractors they have constantly cycling through the system.

Honestly it makes sense to keep the equipment vintage. Actually two main reasons.
one: That old tech was very large and V E R Y "easy" to maintain and repair. If you had to replace a resister or what have you, the board it was on wasn't multi layered. It may not even have traces on the back of the unit. That makes repairs feasible even 40 years later!

Second, very few people outside of the military even understand that old tech anymore. in a funny kind of way it makes it unhackable by obsolescence.

Be honest, if I sat you down in front of an old IBM 8088 xt would you know what the hell to do?

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
10. Yes but I learned software from the inside
Thu May 26, 2016, 02:48 PM
May 2016

One of my projects my microprocessor course was to build a 4 bit micro using 7400 series ICs.
I learned 8080 and 6800 assembly. In the '80s I worked on systems that were still using core memory.

Many DoD systems run embedded code that involves no OS. It doesn't timeshare or multi-process.
It does only one thing and does exactly that.

Many types of mission and safety critical software development projects have, as a portion of their verification and validation phrase, the finding and removal of any code not exercised in the testing of the item's requirements.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
28. I'd know what to do, but yeah, security through obscurity is a valid layer.
Thu May 26, 2016, 05:02 PM
May 2016

Even asking questions about that gear to familiarize yourself with it could set off flags that warrant follow-up.

Ellipsis

(9,124 posts)
8. Probably similar to the "Bernoulli Box" technology
Thu May 26, 2016, 02:34 PM
May 2016

Bernoulli Box’ and was a high-capacity magnetic disk storage system, using Bernoulli’s principle to pull a fast-spinning PET disk towards the read-write head, but keep it separated from it by a cushion of air to make the system crash-proof.


If it ain't broke don't fix it.

IronLionZion

(45,432 posts)
9. There is security in simplicity
Thu May 26, 2016, 02:45 PM
May 2016

We all know it's not for a lack of funding or of new technology/research since DOD has more than enough of both.

Keeping old technology for the nuclear missile systems is a well thought out decision.

LiberalArkie

(15,715 posts)
13. Nothing on a network but radio and phone. Just think now we can put it on the internet
Thu May 26, 2016, 02:56 PM
May 2016

with each silo having its own IP address. What could possibly go wrong with new upgraded network capable equipment.

SmittynMo

(3,544 posts)
18. Deterioration?
Thu May 26, 2016, 03:41 PM
May 2016

How long do you think the data on the floppys will be readable? I know for a fact that after 7 years, data on a CD is questionable. Keep in mind the only protection for a 5.25 disc, is a cardboard envelope.

Now think about this. If some of these discs are 30 years old and damaged/deteriorated, how does one recreate another?

James48

(4,435 posts)
19. "If some of these discs are 30 years old and damaged/deteriorated, how does one recreate another?"
Thu May 26, 2016, 03:47 PM
May 2016

Um... I could tell you-


but if I told you, then I would have to put you inside the silo and keep you there.

SmittynMo

(3,544 posts)
20. I'm pretty sure
Thu May 26, 2016, 04:32 PM
May 2016

there are a limited supply of 5.25 diskette burners out there, if any. I barely remember them. And then, what about the media? I'm pretty sure they don't make them any more.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
36. I'm fine with this, too. It's a program never meant to actually be used, since it ends the world.
Thu May 26, 2016, 08:25 PM
May 2016

If the the launch orders are given and a few missiles don't get launched, I'm not going to cry over it, since I'll probably be dead along with most of the world.

tclambert

(11,085 posts)
38. If you've got billions of lines of code that you spent decades debugging, why try to replace it?
Thu May 26, 2016, 09:45 PM
May 2016

You know if you rewrite the programs in a more modern programming language, you'll have to redo a lot of that debugging.

In defense of COBOL, they have updated the compiler with new features to support structured programming and now object oriented programming. The big selling point of COBOL was always that it was based on English language rules. So anybody can read a COBOL program and get a pretty fair idea what it does. Thirty years from now, when people look at old Java and C++ programs, they may think they're looking at some secret spy code.

eggplant

(3,911 posts)
32. As the joke goes...
Thu May 26, 2016, 05:22 PM
May 2016

The reason God was able to create the universe in only six days was because he didn't have an installed user base.

The problem with upgrading systems that require 100% up time is that you can't just shut them down and swap them out. Critical infrastructure is like a plane that never lands. Sure, we've figured out how to keep them restocked and refueled a long time ago. But it is pretty tough replacing an engine mid-flight.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
35. I'm perfectly fine with this. I'm perfectly fine with as little money as possible spent on upgrades
Thu May 26, 2016, 08:22 PM
May 2016

to any nuclear weapons program. One day, we should dismantle the entire thing, and upgrades would just be money wasted.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
39. CONFIG.SYS
Fri May 27, 2016, 12:06 AM
May 2016

DEVICE=C OSSETVER.EXE
DEVICE=C OSHIMEM.SYS
DOS=HIGH
FILES=10
SHELL=C OSCOMMAND.COM C OS /p
READY TUBE 1
READY TUBE 2
READY TUBE 3
; LAUNCH.COM

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»The U.S. is still using f...