Clinton adds more campaign stops to avert a Sanders upset in California
Source: Washington Post
NEW YORK -- Hillary Clinton has upended her campaign schedule, adding more stops in California, in an effort to prevent an embarrassing loss there to Bernie Sanders, her rival for the Democratic presidential nomination.
Clinton originally planned to campaign for two days this week in New Jersey, but at the last minute canceled an event on Thursday and will instead return to California for a five-day swing.
The schedule change comes as Sanders has barnstormed California, not leaving the state in more than a week. Meanwhile, a recent poll found the race closing significantly. Clinton's lead over Sanders had narrowed to just two points.
Details are scarce, but Clinton now plans to hold events in California from Thursday until the day before the state's June 7 primary.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/05/30/clinton-adds-more-campaign-stops-to-avert-a-sanders-upset-in-california/
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)She will clinch the nomination n NJ before the polls close in CA
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Baobab
(4,667 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)bjo59
(1,166 posts)SusanLarson
(284 posts)You do know how it makes you look when you make asinine statements like that. It would only take a 85% win in California for either nominee to cinch the nomination.
SusanLarson
(284 posts)Nice tactic raise those expectations to unreasonable levels then when anything less happens then you can say see! I was right. LOL.
As for winning in New Jersey she can't super delegates do not count until the convention. She cannot get the 2383 delegates to win the nomination. What you are advocating is basically election fraud.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)forest444
(5,902 posts)Not even Wassergate-Schultz will be able to force the convention to nominate a candidate under federal indictment(s).
Unless, of course, the GOP has the courts delay said indictment until after the nomination - which is probably indeed how it's going to happen.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)forest444
(5,902 posts)The problem is that even if she isn't indicted by the courts, she already has been by much of the electorate - including most of the crucial independent vote.
With or without an actual indictment, she'll need a strong showing by Gary Johnson to win. I hope for the sake of us all that it does indeed work out that way.
Nitram
(22,765 posts)"Much of the electorate?" LOL!
forest444
(5,902 posts)http://hotair.com/archives/2016/01/27/wapoabc-poll-hillarys-trustworthiness-down-to-36-among-democrats/
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/may/23/donald-trump-poll-hillary-clinton-presidential-election-2016
And we're not even in the general yet. She'll need a small miracle (St. Gary of Johnson, perhaps?).
StevieM
(10,500 posts)the rightful nominee and the SDs will not overturn the PD count.
On June 7 Hillary will secure a majority of PDs to the convention. And she will have commitments from enough SDs to secure a majority of overall delegates to the convention. And that is why she will be recognized at that point as the presumptive nominee, just like Obama was in 2008.
I agree that the race should not be over at that point. Bernie should stay in through June 14 when Washington DC votes so that everyone has the opportunity to vote for the candidate that they prefer.
But if Hillary ends the race with more votes and more delegates it is unrealistic to think that Sanders will be the nominee of the party.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)I tried for months. Finally just gave up.
SusanLarson
(284 posts)2,383 needed for nomination · 908 still available
Clinton
Pledged delegates 1,769
Deficit: 614
Sanders
Pledged delegates 1,501
Deficit: 882
New Jersey
Delegates: 142
Allocation: Proportional
Threshold: 15% (minimum vote to receive any delegates)
Notes: Some delegates allocated statewide and some by each of 20 state-defined delegate districts
Sorry your math does not quite add up.
It is impossible that Clinton will win the 614 delegates needed to seal the nomination before the convention. It's going to a contested convention.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)For Sanders to reach half of the pledged delegate count he needs 541 plus he will need 357 of the super delegates to reach the required delegate count of 2383.
SusanLarson
(284 posts)He just has to keep her from winning.
brooklynite
(94,350 posts)After voting is done, the only people who could be influenced are Superdelegates.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)That's what you called him in the Hillary group, but I'm not sure what you meant. I doubt you meant "brave" and I doubt you meant "tinder". I suspect you meant to use a word that rhymes with another word you are afraid to say.
I notice that some of you who don't have yellow buttons use the Hillary group to spout some pretty ugly things about Bernie, in hopes you won't get a hide for it.
Maybe this is just another ploy?
But, after seeing this and your response to this thread, I think it's time to put you on ignore, yellow button or no.
Buh Bye!
plonk
chwaliszewski
(1,514 posts)Both sides are equally guilty of spewing some vile diatribe about their opponent (political passion, albeit a tad callow) but I've noticed that some Hillary supporters say some nasty things in the Hillary group which some or many of us Berniacs (including myself) have been blocked from posting in. This kind of impedes our attempt to call bullshit on some of their lies. C'est la vie.
ebayfool
(3,411 posts)termed such because it looks just like male 'jizz' (sorry, couldn't think of a quick, nicer term). I suspect the user was using more in that frame than "brave". Kinda standard for that group, imo. Like calling Sander's supporters "douchebros". Imagine the torches and pitchforks if a Sander's group used that term about Clinton.
Yes, I found the thread used. My definition fits.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Gene Debs
(582 posts)leadership.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)don't make me pee in my britches!
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)I live in So. Cal and have seen no enthusiasm at all for Hillary. Have only seen two bumper stickers referencing her. One said, "I'm with her" and the other, "Hillary for Prison 2016." Bernie stickers are everywhere. It didn't help either that she turned down a debate here. Now she could campaign in the state 24/7 until the 7th and it wouldn't make a difference. Bernie will win California.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)rateyes
(17,438 posts)But remember when that messy convention floor fight happens that we Berniecrats told you so.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)rateyes
(17,438 posts)Pledged are just that.. Pledged til after first round. Personally, I am hoping for a brokered convention.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)be a majority and there will not be a second vote. It will be a done deal. Why do you think it will be a brokered convention?
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)I haven't seen ONE Hillary sticker, sign, shirt - NADA.
pablo_marmol
(2,375 posts)Not saying that this translates to electoral victory, but nobody is 'out' about their support for Hillary.
riversedge
(70,084 posts)for him.
pablo_marmol
(2,375 posts)What part of "Not saying that this translates to electoral victory......" got by you?
riversedge
(70,084 posts)pablo_marmol
(2,375 posts)StevieM
(10,500 posts)Reiyuki
(96 posts)I like playing 'analytics'. Making predictions is really the only way to prove how well we know our field, and forecast the future.
I'll take your duel, sounds like fun
I'm expecting a Clinton 2pt victory.
I'm basing my analysis on:
- CA polls are 'broke', swinging between +2 and +18 for Clinton. It usually means sampling broke somehow and a shift is showing up in some polls but not others. These have tended to favor the challenger (Indiana+WV).
- Because the Republicans have had their nomination locked up, independents had a window to register democratic; that also favors Sanders.
- A personal opinion I base on forum trends. This is hard to describe, but it's about getting past the echo-chamber noise of both sides to see who's constructing bridges to attack vs who's burning bridges to defend.
- The State Department report is going to keep her in the news-cycle for another week, and not in a good way.
Lets check back that Wednesday and compare notes
StevieM
(10,500 posts)Although the AP thing Monday night may have tipped the scales a bit, in the end you were much closer to the actual results.
I tip my hat to you sir
StevieM
(10,500 posts)Sanders supporters will conclude that it depressed their turnout since the race was declared over. Clinton supporters will argue that Sanders voters still turned out for their protest vote while Clinton backers saw no need.
In the end, neither side can prove that they are right. And it is also possible that it had no effect at all.
Either way, I doubt it moved the results more than a couple points in either direction.
And most importantly, we are all back together now. It is time to unite to defeat Donald Trump.
reddread
(6,896 posts)Will she be followed around by a giant chicken with a burning pantsuit?
onecaliberal
(32,777 posts)That's what she gets for thinking this place is nothing more than an atm to her.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Democratic Presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton greets supporters as she makes a campaign appearance at Parkside Hall in San Jose, Calif., Thursday, May 26, 2016.
San Jose: Hillary Clinton bashes 'loose cannon' Trump
SAN JOSE -- Facing a tightening primary battle in California and renewed criticism over her tenure as secretary of state, Hillary Clinton received a hero's welcome Thursday from more than 1,000 supporters in downtown San Jose eager to help the likely Democratic nominee get her campaign back on track.
Clinton devoted much of her 25-minute address in Parkside Hall to blasting "loose cannon" Donald Trump, who clinched the Republican nomination Thursday, as a menace to the world and working-class Americans alike.
"People say you talk about Trump a lot ... and I'll tell you why," Clinton said. "Because what he is saying is dangerous and divisive; what he is saying is harmful to our future and our country."
Clinton took a much different tack with Bernie Sanders, whom she described as a kindred spirit who would help her defeat Trump after they battle it out in the days leading up to California's June 7 primary.
"We are on the same page," she said, noting her support of universal health coverage, making college affordable and reining in Wall Street. "We are going to be coming together as a unified Democratic Party ... because Sen. Sanders and I -- our supporters together-- have so much more in common than we do with Donald Trump."
http://www.eastbaytimes.com/bay-area-news/ci_29942585/clinton-san-jose-sanders-and-trump-ponder-california
elljay
(1,178 posts)on a holiday weekend impresses not. Bernie's rally in San Jose drew 5500 during a working day and he drew thousands in Vallejo, population 110k. She is getting at least two votes in my town of 30k, though, as I've seen two cars with Hillary stickers. No point counting the Bernie stickers- hey are all over. Alabama loves her; Silicon Valley, not so much.
http://www.mercurynews.com/politics-government/ci_29909443/san-jose-bernie-sanders-continues-call-political-revolution
http://patch.com/california/napavalley/thousands-greet-bernie-sanders-vallejo-images
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)This was described in GDP as a crowd of 25,000 in Oakland for example. I'd say that 250 would be putting it generously:
elljay
(1,178 posts)which estimated 20,000. I assume you were actually there and not posting an opinion from one photo? Or, perhaps you have a psychic gift?
http://abc7news.com/politics/20000-people-expected-for-bernie-sanders-rally-in-oakland----watch-live/1362730/
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)500 tops and that's being generous. Which is 1/20 of 25,000. No, I don't know where these crazy figures are coming from, but I can guess.
elljay
(1,178 posts)".@oaklandpoliceca estimates crowd at Frank Ogawa Plaza for @BernieSanders rally tops 20 thousand.
4:00 PM - 30 May 2016 · Oakland, CA, United States"
"Sanders supporters started lining up here much earlier in the morning, before the gates opened. The line extended all the way around the downtown area. Oakland police estimate the crowd topped 20,000."
Or, you can watch the tv news report and see the crowd.
http://video-kgo-abc-news-yahoopartner.tumblr.com/post/145184683289/estimated-20000-people-attend-bernie-sanders
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)thesquanderer
(11,972 posts)At this video
if you skip to 10:22, you can see that if you look further to the right of the image you posted, that people are spread out much further and deeper than in your photo (though you still can't tell how much further and deeper it might go, they disappear into the distance). The reporter at that same point in the video also mentions 26K at last count according to police... now, you might question the accuracy of the police estimate, but if you are a reporter on the scene and the police say 26k and you're seeing what looks like 250 or a generous 500 tops (as you suggest), you would be unlikely to simply pass along the 26k figure without comment. Also in ths same video, if you watch the 30 second clip that starts at about 1 hr 29 min in (i.e. when he's done), the camera pans so you can see that crowds extend in each direction.Also you can see more photos at http://heavy.com/news/2016/05/bernie-sanders-oakland-california-rally-pictures-frank-ogawa-plaza-ca-photos-pics-how-many/
including this one from which the opening still of the video was derived:
StoneCarver
(249 posts)That fact's going to leave a mark.
Stonecarver
leftinportland
(247 posts)At least this time you didn't show up 3 hours late and claim no one was there...stay in your fantasy
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Response to ucrdem (Reply #31)
Name removed Message auto-removed
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)I saw it with my own eyes in my own little burg:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512046962#op
INdemo
(6,994 posts)campaign when Kerry would have huge crowds and the networks would show empty bleachers at a completely different location.
Do you suppose Hillary will have her audience bused in to her rallies as Bush did?
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Where did all those tens of thousands do what people typically need to do after standing in the sun for hours?
leftinportland
(247 posts)You saw only the remnants of the overflow crown...why do you continue this charade?
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)leftinportland
(247 posts)You ought to take up your false impression with your local press...their estimate of the crowd is 5,900...
http://www.sbsun.com/government-and-politics/20160524/bernie-sanders-visits-san-bernardino
You insistence that the crowd was only a few hundred there and in Oakland is false. I know it must obviously bother you that your candidate can not draw the same numbers of people, but your insistence that Sanders does not either makes you look ridiculous.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)And there was no "overflow section." In fact video screenshots posted in the thread show that room dividers were used to reduce the capacity of the room.
Also, if you want to discuss this, discuss it there because this is ridiculous. Link:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512046962
elljay
(1,178 posts)SJ itself is just over 1M. I've worked there for years and never knew there was a Little Italy! I have no idea where it is, do you?
http://abc7news.com/news/san-joses-population-passes-one-million-mark-/734654/
pangaia
(24,324 posts)How dare she !!
The woman is the most dishonest, liar I have ever seen run for the Democratic nomination.
She is just insufferable.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)No, they really aren't very kindred, because Bernie is one-man font of negativity and Hillary is basically running against two guys who really don't like Democrats. But she's still winning.
Wibly
(613 posts)What is hurting Clinton most in Cali, aside from all the usual stuff, is the fact she won't debate Sanders.
Clearly Trump tried to help her out on that one, but she still looks bad for not debating.
Then again, it's a tough one. If she did debate Sanders, she would clearly lose.
Oh the perplexity of being the anointed one but not having the support of the people.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Good old WaPo, carrying water for Wall Street-on-the-Potomac.
In Michigan, I couldn't find a dozen Hillary supporters outside the local small suburb Democratic club.
I didn't believe the polling as almost everybody was on the Bernie bandwagon, which surprised me how close it was.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)Clinton is trying to avoid a possible message that people in the biggest state agree with Bernie Sanders' ideas:
- Single Payer
- free tuition
- no fracking
- raise the cap on putting into Soc Security
- legal marijuana
- no mandatory minimums
- no death penalty
- separate savings banks from investment banks
Duval
(4,280 posts)Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)NT
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)She said she did not need us
stonecutter357
(12,693 posts)Little Tich
(6,171 posts)I was looking forward to watch it.
Duval
(4,280 posts)Will Bill be there, also?
hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)I would hope that she would anyway, but I think the idea that she wins using superdelegates that were pledged to her before the primary started would accentuate the perception that the fix was in and it was just a coronation of another member of the Royal Family. Not really what the Democratic Party is about.
Flatpicker
(894 posts)Not confident she can beat Trump alone.
Let Bernie play out the schedule. I'm a supporter and know that he isn't going to be the candidate. I think he has made great strides for the future of progressive politics.
Hillary should give him the VP slot. He brings committed followers with him and can do some real good. Plus, It's only going to be a Hillary/Bernie ticket that will beat the media darling.
This is going to be an ugly season.
emsimon33
(3,128 posts)I hope that we trounce her and do so badly. There are already shenanigans going on (no exit polls, for one), but I hope that we can overcome our own California Democratic Party's attempts to steal the election and give Bernie a BIG (a uuuge) win.
George Clooney, the eye candy who can't act, is holding another big fund raiser for her--another reason to deign to come to our state. For Hillary, it is all about the bucks!
slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)month.
Clinton cannot win the needed pledged delegates with the remaining primaries and the super delegates do not vote until the end of July and Clinton is still under several investigations and last I looked there are 150 super delegates that are uncommitted.
As much as the media and the Dem establishment would like to call her the nominee on 6/7 she will not have the needed delegates prior to the convention.
Trajan
(19,089 posts)A few more coffee klatches should do the trick ...
Uh huh ...
youceyec
(394 posts)Carolina
(6,960 posts)Please do the right thing. You elected Ronald Reagan governor and from there, he was able to launch a presidential bid in 1976 and 1980. He went from unremarkable actor, to shilling for GE, to CA governor to the two-term POTUS who started US/us on this disastrous oligarchic, corporatist slide to hell.
Next Tuesday, PLEASE don't be fooled by HRC's campaign rhetoric and increased appearances in CA. Don't vote for HRC out of the fear promulgated in Gov. Brown's statement, a fear that maintains the status quo. Please send US the anti-Reagan, the man of real hope and change.
Vote for Bernie Sanders. Send a message to the third way, to the bought and paid for (corporate bribed) DINOs, to the establishment, to those in the Democratic Party who want you to vote AGAINST the opposition rather than FOR someone you can believe in, meaning voting yet again for the not so lesser of two evils.
This time there is a real choice between Wall Street Red and Wall Street Blue, and his name is Bernie Sanders.
Do what you can to START undoing Reagan!
OwlinAZ
(410 posts)from a long time, devoted Democrat.
California is my favorite state, next to New Mexico
MisterP
(23,730 posts)Brother Buzz
(36,375 posts)We got a horse race going on in California, and I like it. Hat tip to the Sanders campaign for bringing the ground game to California.