Calif. Shuts GOP Out From Senate Race With 2 Dems Advancing To Runoff
Source: TPM
LOS ANGELES (AP) In a historic first, California voters Tuesday sent two Democrats, both minority women, to a November runoff for the state's open U.S. Senate seat.
The matchup between state Attorney General Kamala Harris and 10-term Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez marks the first time since voters started electing senators a century ago that Republicans will be absent from California's general election ballot for the Senate. The outcome reaffirms the GOP's diminished stature in the nation's most populous state.
The two were among 34 candidates seeking the seat being vacated by retiring Sen. Barbara Boxer, a liberal favorite first elected a generation ago, in 1992.
Under California election rules, only two candidates the top vote-getters advance to the November election.
Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/california-senate-race-between-two-minority-female-democrats
With Hillary making history in California, it's easy to overlook the other historic development in the State's elections.
scottie55
(1,400 posts)To support any Republican these days you would need to be an idiot.
In California the time isn't 1928..... Up isn't down..... Corporations aren't people...... Billionaires pay taxes......
beastie boy
(9,345 posts)An encouraging trend!
muntrv
(14,505 posts)turbinetree
(24,701 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)especially since their 1994 ballot initiative, Proposition 187, with which the GOP set out to institutionalize further discrimination, including blocking undocumented workers from public education and healthcare.
The national GOP is increasingly concerned that this same syndrome will play out nationally. As it should. Most of the 26% or so of the electorate who remain in the GOP are hard core, and Trump's merely torn the top off the pustule the leadership's been trying to keep powdered over.
stopwastingmymoney
(2,042 posts)And you know what they say, 'As goes California...'
I'm thrilled about this
turbo_satan
(372 posts)"...Trump's merely torn the top off the pustule the leadership's been trying to keep powdered over."
Quite an elegant turn of phrase. Apt, too. Kudos!
jeffreyi
(1,940 posts)Trump is the festering carbuncle on the GOP's backside.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Enough of the gross turn, though. I'd rather laugh over Ryan's and O'Connell's predicaments and how they so deserve them. I was reading that, of the 3 GOP power groups, Trump's, those who had backed Cruz, and the leadership, the leadership is weakest.
brooklynite
(94,558 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)It's a first.
PatSeg
(47,430 posts)And they are both excellent candidates as well.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)Just MHO
niyad
(113,303 posts)Nitram
(22,801 posts)LeftishBrit
(41,205 posts)a certain Richard M. Nixon!
Some things do change for the better.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)And it stayed that way too.
Before that it was a bunch of Republicans going back to when Republicans weren't all conservatives.
beastie boy
(9,345 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,161 posts)Is there a bad choice here?
Not for Democrats.
Way to go California!
The GOP can't even think about pushing a write-in candidate, it
would be a total waste of money
Native
(5,942 posts)AntiBank
(1,339 posts)Brother Buzz
(36,430 posts)Harris was the top vote getter in the primary, but Sanchez will receive most of the Republican vote in November. It's going to be a horse race right down to the wire.
SaschaHM
(2,897 posts)Republicans now can actually make a choice between which Democrat they want instead of throwing their support behind a losing candidate.
On the slightly sadder side, this might be bad for Kamala Harris if Republicans decide to coalesce behind Loretta Sanchez while democrats are split between the two.
deurbano
(2,895 posts)ability to influence the final outcome. I really don't see this an an advantage for Democrats, since we'd win in Nov., anyway. And this pits Democrats against Democrats even after the primary...