Judge Aaron Persky: Prospective jurors refuse to serve
Source: San Jose Mercury News
At least 10 prospective jurors who oppose Judge Aaron Persky's decision to spare former Stanford swimmer Brock Turner prison for a sex crime refused this week to serve on a jury in a unrelated case he is handling.
"I can't be here, I'm so upset,'' one juror told the judge while the lawyers were picking the jury in the misdemeanor receiving stolen property case.
Another prospective juror stood up and said, "I can't believe what you did,'' referring to the six-month county jail sentence Persky handed to Turner, who was convicted for sexually assaulting an unconscious intoxicated woman last year outside a Stanford University frat party.
Read more: http://www.mercurynews.com/crime-courts/ci_29997198/judge-aaron-persky-prospective-jurors-refuse-serve
Raster
(20,998 posts)elljay
(1,178 posts)Big mistake this year!
It's interesting... because I don't think that he can hold them in contempt for what is actually justifiable contempt.
Dustlawyer
(10,494 posts)It is part of what "Voir Dire" (speak the truth) is all about!
FBaggins
(26,727 posts)But that translates to them (properly) having contempt for the judge... but it isn't grounds to hold them legally in contempt of court.
rug
(82,333 posts)If they said they could, they'd be charged with perjury, not contempt.
LonePirate
(13,412 posts)Brickbat
(19,339 posts)TwilightZone
(25,451 posts)bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)nt
47of74
(18,470 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,294 posts)and if significant numbers of them cannot, there's a good case that he needs to resign from any case with a jury.
Spazito
(50,232 posts)If enough do it, maybe the case/s in question will be reassigned to a judge who still has the respect of the public.
lark
(23,078 posts)I'd bet he's totally OK with the verdict, the cad.
mountain grammy
(26,605 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)ailsagirl
(22,893 posts)Geronimoe
(1,539 posts)you Persky make me want to heave my meal.
allan01
(1,950 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Like the previous affluent teen excuse.
Only this time it's because he is a star athlete...another unjustifiable excuse. Kobe Bryant?
what kind of person decides someone in the money or in the public eye is going to contribute more to society than their victims, so they don't deserve jail time?
radicalliberal
(907 posts)Celebs, athletes, politicians, and the rich -- America's overly privileged royalty.
The Special People.
IronLionZion
(45,403 posts)this dude needs to be removed from the bench or pressured to resign.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)dhill926
(16,333 posts)I was just up for jury duty a couple weeks ago. Courtrooms can be intimidating...as can judges. Good for them.
Ilsa
(61,690 posts)If I was in the courtroom, I think I'd be staring at him, dumbfounded.
Only I would be glaring at him with contempt.
Scruffy1
(3,254 posts)This call is so rank that I have to suspect some dollars changed hands.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)If I were in his courtroom, I would do the same and ask I be reassigned to another jury pool outside of his court so none of his "supporters" could accuse me of being some sort of scofflaw.
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)A judge has near god-like powers in his little fiefdom that is a courtroom.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)DinahMoeHum
(21,783 posts)It's called voir dire, meaning, speak truth. These potential jurors are speaking the truth in his courtroom, indicating why they cannot and do not wish to serve in his court.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)unblock
(52,163 posts)say i'm the defendant in this "unrelated" case, and found guilty after several prospective jurors had pulled themselves out because they didn't like the judge.
i would think i could argue on appeal that i didn't get a fair trial because potential jurors with an awareness of the world around them and a sense of fair play didn't serve, leaving behind a jury that was less aware and had less of a sense of fair play, resulting in a bias toward conviction.
an appeals court could of course decide the bias would likely go the other way, but it sure doesn't look good if the jury selection process is distorted by "unrelated" actions of the judge.
niyad
(113,205 posts)and a great big FU to that worthless pos former lacrosse captain, stanford alum "judge", who thinks it is okay to ruin a rape survivor's life, but not the life of the RAPIST.
Crash2Parties
(6,017 posts)Almost seems like the sentencing and punishment really was planned so that it wouldn't affect his schooling in the slightest.
niyad
(113,205 posts)GOLGO 13
(1,681 posts)I hope more jurors keep doing this to him. Even if they don't feel the outrage, it might get him shipped to traffic court.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)More resistance is needed when it comes to corrupt judges like Persky. He needs to be made an example of.
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)Wow! And it is high time Bill Cosby is taken to task now too.
Judi Lynn
(160,501 posts)avebury
(10,952 posts)He should be thoroughly investigated.
elljay
(1,178 posts)of DU readers have been drunk or used drugs. Anyone here rape someone while under the influence? How about assault? Betting the answer is no because that kind of behavior doesn't arise out of nowhere. The judge knows this because Many if not most of the criminal cases he sees involve alcohol or drugs in some fashion.
niyad
(113,205 posts)susanna
(5,231 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,825 posts)I would tell the judge that it was pointless for their to be a jury when the judge won't impose an appropriate sentence.
Paladin
(28,246 posts)myrna minx
(22,772 posts)sendero
(28,552 posts)... actions have consequences, even if you are a judge.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,159 posts)It seems he just thinks athletes should be able to rape passed out women.
http://www.sportsgrid.com/swimming/judge-in-brock-turner-case-has-ruled-in-favor-of-athletes-accused-of-rape-in-the-past/
"IN ONE SUCH RULING, PERSKY ALLOWED LAWYERS FOR THE BASEBALL PLAYERS TO SHOW FACEBOOK PHOTOS OF THE FEMALE PLAINTIFF SOCIALIZING IN REVEALING CLOTHING MORE THAN SIX MONTHS AFTER THE ALLEGED SEX ASSAULT." (Sorry, the CAPS are from the article)
The bottom line is that Persky seems to think the being drunk makes the rape the victim's fault and the rapist's excuse. It's obvious Persky has issues with women. I wonder if he has issues with alcohol as well.