Trump bashes Hillary Clinton's foreign policy, calling her a 'world-class liar'
Source: CNBC
Donald Trump lit into Hillary Clinton on Wednesday, calling her a "world class liar" and criticizing her time as secretary of state as the tycoon looked to reset his presidential campaign after several rocky weeks.
The presumptive Republican nominee said Clinton ran the State Department like her "own personal hedge fund," and he criticized trade deals negotiated during her tenure. He also called on Sen. Bernie Sanders' voters to support him.
"She doesn't have the temperament, or as Bernie Sanders said very strongly, the judgment to be president," Trump said, using a word she hurled against him recently in raising questions about his emotional stability.
Trump said that during Clinton's tenure as America's top diplomat, she "managed to almost single-handedly destabilize the entire Middle East." He cited the loss of a friendly government in Egypt and an aggressive military approach that he said handed Libya to ISIS.
Read more: http://www.cnbc.com/2016/06/22/trump-bashes-hillary-clintons-foreign-policy-calling-her-a-world-class-liar.html
World class liar, eh Mr. Trump? Wow. Project much?
And also, fuck you Mr. Trump.
wiggs
(8,724 posts)the best our fourth estate can do, we really are screwed.
rug
(82,333 posts)bucolic_frolic
(54,490 posts)His rhetoric is pitched at a low level, and very broadly without specifics
Just keep the heat on that goon
PatSeg
(52,560 posts)their adversaries of the weaknesses they find in themselves. Trump is a classic example of this.
The_Casual_Observer
(27,742 posts)Hate speech.
His new Joe Goebbels campaign manager is going to ramp up the bile.
olddad56
(5,732 posts)I guess that , often, what we see in others is a reflection of ourselves.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)she "managed to almost single-handedly destabilize the entire Middle East." He cited the loss of a friendly government in Egypt and an aggressive military approach that he said handed Libya to ISIS....
Mr. Dumpster, let's fact check that statement - I have been on this planet as long as you have - I do believe the fact remains George W Bush unilaterally,"single-handedly destabilize the entire Middle East"..we all know how that ended up -
"The loss of a friendly government in Egypt" - I need to do more research - there is pro and con on the subject..fill in facts at your convenience folk's -
Now how hypocritical is this "aggressive military approach that he said handed Libya to ISIS - as I live and breathe....can't have it both ways....and yet, NO ONE has a solution....
My focus is on the prize - and that is the DEM HOUSE, SENATE, and White House....
This worm can crawl back under the nearest rock....and wait for the tide to come in and wash the scum from our shores....(I know, Harsh) - Be well all!
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)with Egypt being hostile to US - just question pro or con whether they remain friendly or not....the people of Egypt had had enough - Dignity was at the forefront of every protest movement's demands; dignity in the face of decades of authoritarianism and repression
Hey Trump - why do you blame Hillary - I so wish we had honest journalism...I'm sure Crooks and Liars will do a piece on this comment as well as fact checkers.... Media Matters etc....
Maeve
(43,346 posts)http://www.factcheck.org/2015/12/the-king-of-whoppers-donald-trump/
A quote from factcheck--
In the 12 years of FactCheck.orgs existence, weve never seen his match.
He stands out not only for the sheer number of his factually false claims, but also for his brazen refusals to admit error when proven wrong.
Would that make him "Universal Class"? He's yuuuuge! (except his hands...his hands are tiny)
47of74
(18,470 posts)Filing away for future use!
Maeve
(43,346 posts)turbinetree
(27,208 posts)in his right wing hate speech, he spoke about the "trade deals" , trying to lay the blame on these deals as being from the democratic party----------------------no they were not, and the presumptive nominee had better get a point to point rebuttal on these "deals .
I would have to say that the presumptive nominee in this party had better get ahead of this issue and quickly.
Ever since Nixon, the American public has said NO to these "trade deals", it should be remembered that almost everyone of these "trade deals" came from a republican house, senate and president.
And the presumptive nominee in this party had better start in my opinion start talking on who, what, and why on the "trade deals'--------------------end of story--------------instead of drumpf setting the agenda--------------those mid west rust states are critical
Angel Martin
(942 posts)Clinton and a lame duck Democratic House and Senate.
Clinton can't let Trump get to the left of her on these terrible trade deals.
turbinetree
(27,208 posts)drumpf and the right wing are trying to lay this issue at the feet of the democrats, granted some voted for this, but --------------------
She has to come out and say something about this issue directly
Honk-----------------for a political revolution
pansypoo53219
(22,957 posts)RUMP is the king of lies.
Hawaii Hiker
(3,168 posts)The facts: According to PolitiFact, 59% of Trump's checked claims have been deemed false or "Pants on Fire" false, versus 12% for Clinton.
Donald Trump:
True: 2%
Mostly True: 7%
Half True: 15%
Mostly False: 17%
False: 40%
Pants on Fire: 19%
Hillary Clinton:
True: 23%
Mostly True: 28%
Half True: 21%
Mostly False: 15%
False: 11%
Pants on Fire: 1%
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/fact-checking-trump-s-speech-n597051
Go "F" yourself Donald Trump....
BadGimp
(4,107 posts)L. Coyote
(51,134 posts)#PleaseProceed is going to be my new fav #hashtag if #TrumpSoPoor he got nothin but bile to spew.
Oh yeah, I go another new one #MakeMeGreatAgain so tell me which is your fav.

Hekate
(100,133 posts)Tinyhands, making friends every day.
