EU referendum: Why is there no exit poll?
Source: Independent
The exit polls at general elections, which are run for the BBC, ITV and Sky by Professor John Curtice of Strathclyde University, have built up a reputation for getting the result right over many election cycles.
The polls work by asking people how they voted at sampling points across the country, and comparing that with surveys at the same places in the previous election. The changes can then be projected to build up a national picture. Last year, the exit poll announced when the polls closed at 10pm put the Conservatives on 316 seats and Labour on 239: the Tories ended up winning 15 more and Labour seven fewer.
However, there will be no exit poll published at 10pm when voting in the EU referendum closes because the broadcasters have no way of knowing how accurate it would be.
Read more: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/eu-referendum-exit-poll-who-has-won-remain-leave-brexit-live-updates-a7094886.html
Stevepol
(4,234 posts)If it's counted by electronic voting machines, I suspect that the exit polls won't match the reported results. The two might match closely but if there's no way to verify the result with a hand-count, I'd bet the opposite. If the vote theft machines are not used, then almost certainly the exit polls and the results will match up just as they always have up to now and as they do in every country where the paper ballots are hand-counted.
AntiBank
(1,339 posts)CountAllVotes
(20,868 posts)At the moment, the bookies have it at ~65% leave; ~35% stay.
We'll see I guess.
That said, this is not going over so hot.
AntiBank
(1,339 posts)CountAllVotes
(20,868 posts)Lock him up before he does more damage to the world.
AntiBank
(1,339 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Response to CountAllVotes (Reply #2)
AntiBank This message was self-deleted by its author.
forest444
(5,902 posts)Ballots counted in a huge hangar (making scrutiny by observers almost impossible), absurdly simple - and thus easily forged - ballots, 'yes' ballots being created by poll workers, 'yes' ballots being tucked into 'no' piles by prestidigitators, 'no' tables with piles of 'yes' ballots, exit polls being published (favoring 'no') when none where held, ballots summarily destroyed the day after tabulation, and so on.
If even half that much had happened in some country the State Dept. or Wall Street isn't particularly fond of, 'fraud' would have screamed form every headline.
This is probably going to be no different - especially with so much riding on the result.
CountAllVotes
(20,868 posts)Seems to be a split, almost 50/50 in Ireland I'd say.
Difficult to know how this will turn out.
forest444
(5,902 posts)Personally, I'm inclined to believe the U.K. should stay in the EU - but have seen good arguments on either side. It may be hard to extol the importance of European unity to the average British citizen when Britain has a £8 billion ($11 billion) trade deficit with the EU every month.
CountAllVotes
(20,868 posts)Some need it badly, others do not want it anymore and want OUT NOW (like The Netherlands).
When the whole EU thing started I remember saying I did not see how it could possibly work as many of the countries in the EU don't especially love each other to death if you know what I mean.
Whatever happens happens I suppose. I have no vote in this one today but if I did, I vote to get out of it before they form the "European Army" ... next on Merkel's agenda it seems. This is very distasteful to countries that are neutral like Ireland is for example.
Denzil_DC
(7,227 posts)I voted for Yes, but have heard absolutely no credible evidence of vote tampering in the two years since the vote.
brooklynite
(94,452 posts)Unless you have, you know, evidence
Reter
(2,188 posts)Why do all of these referendums to become independent go into the polls leading, then lose when it comes to a vote? Let's hope sanity prevails this time.
brooklynite
(94,452 posts)Reter
(2,188 posts)I'm still upset that one lost. But here's the Wiki article. Approximately 86,000 ballots were rejected by Deputy Returning Officers. It was leading going into the vote.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec_referendum,_1995
Denzil_DC
(7,227 posts)The last UK EU referendum was in 1974, so there just isn't the relevant data to make it worthwhile.
The real results will come in soon enough anyway. There's no reason to believe any polling firm would be more reliable than the actual tally.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)I don't see the EU honoring the vote, though. I think it will say "so what". These are undemocratic Eurocrats.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)brooklynite
(94,452 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)http://www.metafilter.com/21399/Voter-News-Service-has-abandoned-its-state-and-national-exit-polls
Bush's cousin calls FL for Dubya.
The SCOTUS stops the FL legally-mandated re-count.
The SCOTUS subsequently declares Bush the victor, because to do otherwise would have "harmed" him.
Bot no conspiracy here, folks. (This message brought to you by the PDB of August 2000.)
brooklynite
(94,452 posts)...or one of the nine States he lost that Clinton had won, Florida would have been meaningless. Bottom line, Gote was a lousy candidate.