Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bonemachine

(757 posts)
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 04:07 PM Jun 2016

House Democrats mistakenly release transcript confirming big payout to Clinton friend

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by NancyBlueINOklahoma (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: Los Angeles Times

But the redaction marks are easily erased by anyone able to use a computer’s cut-and-paste function. Once the marks are lifted, the transcript portion reveals some unflattering things for any partisans on the committee, Republican or Democrat. It shows that Republicans did, indeed, leverage their subpoena of Blumenthal for political gain, digging into his financial contracts with David Brock and forcing him to reveal the details of a lucrative financial arrangement that congressional sources would ultimately leak to Fox News.

And for Democrats, the exchange exposes once again the absurd amounts of money people in the orbit of the Clintons sometimes seem to rake in just for, well, being in the orbit of the Clintons. “I’d say it’s about $200,000 a year,” Blumenthal said when asked by a committee member how much the part-time work offering up advice and ideas was worth.


And how did Blumenthal get such a contract? “I have had a very long friendship with the chairman of Media Matters, whose name is David Brock, from before he founded this organization, and I have sustained that friendship. And he asked me to help provide ideas and advice to him and his organizations,” Blumenthal said.

Actually, the two got to know each other during the impeachment of Bill Clinton, during Brock’s former incarnation as a right-wing “hit man” journalist. He was starting to undergo his political conversion and in the process was feeding then-White House aide Blumenthal intelligence about what the right was plotting against Bill Clinton. Both men wrote about it in their books.

Read more: http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-benghazi-democrats-20160627-snap-story.html



Link contains text of the full transcript excerpt that Democrats intended not to publish.
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
1. So Sid worked for Brock? For 200K a year, I'd work for him.
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 04:10 PM
Jun 2016
 

phazed0

(745 posts)
2. The Democrats once again prove how ignorant they are of technology.
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 04:12 PM
Jun 2016

Among other obvious things.

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
3. No it isn't and stop advocating for a 3rd party. It is against the TOS
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 04:13 PM
Jun 2016
 

phazed0

(745 posts)
9. Removed.
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 04:27 PM
Jun 2016

But I'm not advocating them.. simply stating that it feels like we're losing a lot of support when stuff like this hits.

And yes, if you "redact" something you must do something more than change the text background to that of the text. That shows a lack of understanding technology, hence the article.

BlueCaliDem

(15,444 posts)
5. You should edit and remove the third and last sentence in your post. It's against ToS.
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 04:15 PM
Jun 2016
 

phazed0

(745 posts)
11. Thank you, I did.
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 04:29 PM
Jun 2016

It was not meant to advocate for, but can certainly see how that would be taken - poor choice of wording.

byronius

(8,023 posts)
6. Violation, brother.
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 04:18 PM
Jun 2016

Head on out to somewhere you can bash Dems to your heart's content.

Me, I'll stick to the TOS.

 

phazed0

(745 posts)
7. No, thanks. Factual information is informing voters about the situation.
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 04:25 PM
Jun 2016

I don't even have to bash, "we're" doing it all by ourselves.

Keep pushing long-time D's out of the tent... You're a real problem solver!

nest

(23 posts)
4. Blumenthal was a great asset for Hillary and worth every penny
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 04:14 PM
Jun 2016

Qutzupalotl

(15,860 posts)
13. Even with the Libya fiasco?
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 04:42 PM
Jun 2016
 

still_one

(98,883 posts)
8. wonder how much Tad Devine makes?
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 04:26 PM
Jun 2016

George II

(67,782 posts)
10. His company has been getting just shy of $1M a month if I read the FEC filings correctly.
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 04:28 PM
Jun 2016
 

still_one

(98,883 posts)
12. that is a lot of money
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 04:42 PM
Jun 2016

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
14. Please repost in another forum - Locking
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 04:48 PM
Jun 2016

The Statement of Purpose for posts in Latest Breaking News

Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only.
No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours.
Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.

Article is 24 hours old at time of posting

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House Democrats mistakenl...