Sanders: No, I'm Not Ready To Endorse Clinton Yet
Source: Talking Points Memo
After Vice President Joe Biden on Thursday said he was confident that Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) will endorse Hillary Clinton, the Vermont senator insisted that he is still not ready to back the presumptive Democratic nominee.
"I talked to Joe, I think it was three weeks ago," Sanders said on MSNBC's "All In with Chris Hayes" when asked about Biden's comment. "On that issue, we are trying to work with Secretary Clintons campaign on areas that we can agree on."
Biden told NPR in an interview published earlier in the day, "I've talked to Bernie, Bernie's going to endorse her, this is going to work out."
After Sanders told Hayes that he will do everything he can to make sure Donald Trump does not become president, Hayes asked if that would involve campaigning for Clinton. In response, Sanders said that he is working with Democrats on the party platform.
-snip- (video @ link)
Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/sanders-biden-endorse-clinton
Arkansas Granny
(31,515 posts)it would be too little, too late, IMO. He took a gamble and it didn't play out the way he had hoped. Now he is more or less an afterthought and no longer has any bargaining position.
obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)Dawgs
(14,755 posts)Many of his supporters will never like her. It doesn't matter what he does.
MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)The Bernie or Bust faction is such a tiny percentage of the Bernie supporters.
Most of the Bernie supporters support him because he is a progressive and they absolutely do not want trump in WH.
Every Bernie supporter with half a brain in their head will be voting for HRC in Nov.
The BoB'ers are this election years PUMA's.
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)OwlinAZ
(410 posts)BUT sanctions are in order and are frequently imposed in similar circumstance.
Senator Sanders should keep his powder dry.
MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)He should.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)OwlinAZ
(410 posts)Even Diane R. whom I deeply respect will not stand up to the right wing guests.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)Since the media is putting all of the pressure on Bernie and none on Hillary I don't think this will heal anytime soon.
She doesn't want to deal because she can't. She has too many campaign debt issues to give in. The people/entities she owes expect their Quid Pro Quo and Bernie's demands would mean she would have to go back on whatever promise she made to these big Donors.
rocktivity
(44,576 posts)Why should Bernie endorse her Hillary for nothing?
rocktivity
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)was the price paid for Clinton's endorsement, you'd be incorrect. She wasn't offered the position until just after Christmas 2008 and she said "no," when President-elect Obama first offered it.
rocktivity
(44,576 posts)Maybe the reason why she initially turned Obama down is because they both knew how it might look!
rocktivity
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Most creative what-if of the week. Add the Illuminati and Rothschilds and you'll have a crappy Bond movie.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)Axelrod was opposed to the appointment, as was former President Clinton. With all due respect, if you're willing to buy into conspiracy theories about Democrats, why are you a Democrat?
Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)She won. To the winner go the spoils. She does not want to 'deal' because he has nothing to offer in the way of a platform or plans to achieve his ideals.
She, conversely has laid out in great detail her ideas and plans and goals.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)Why do I think you would see it differently if the situation were reversed?
If she wants to unite our Party she needs to make some effort to compromise. You cannot lay all of this off on Bernie, Hillary is responsible for our unity and to the other 48% of us as well.
If you want an all or nothing response from Hillary fine, but good luck defeating Trump when much of the 48% don't show up at the polls.
Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)She fully embraced Obama's platform and worked her ass off campaigning for him.
OwlinAZ
(410 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)I don't think Sanders's endorsement will make any further difference anyway.
Unconditional party loyalists who were ever actually supporting Bernie (as opposed to part of the fake supporter contingent #BernieLostMe) pivoted when she became the "presumptive nominee." Others did so when Bernie said he would vote for her. The rest will never pivot, no matter how much more Bernie does or does not say.
stonecutter357
(12,695 posts)Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Post removed
merrily
(45,251 posts)vetting Bernie to be Trump's V.P. seems like a waste of time, but whatever.
tom_kelly
(958 posts)LongtimeAZDem
(4,494 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Post removed
Mass
(27,315 posts)But I can see the Clinton's forces are still busy going after Sanders until he falls on his knees and kisses her feet.
Makes me sad there is nobody else than her to vote for (and no, Stein is not an option. A protest votes would hurt us more than than anybody else)
Sad to see Hayes and TMP are aiming at becoming another CNN by asking irrelevant questions.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Just being gracious in defeat by conceding and joining the other Democrats in combating, not just Trump, but the rest of the Republicans running for office this year.
Instead, Sanders is arguing about open primaries and super delegates.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)LongtimeAZDem
(4,494 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)comradebillyboy
(10,143 posts)avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)I am proud of him. Sanders has really had a positive influence on this election and I sincerely hope he continues to do so.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Elizabeth Warren to see what that means.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
brooklynite
(94,502 posts)Igel
(35,300 posts)Once the rest of the people are off the track, you can stop running.
Gamecock Lefty
(700 posts)There are going to be Bernie supporters that will never vote for Hillary. These are probably the same folks that went to his rallies and didnt remember to actually vote in the primary for him!
And Im tiring of the storyline what will Hillary do to win Bernie supporters? I say do exactly what shes been doing - taking her message to the people and then using Trumps own words against him. If BS supporters join in, fine; if not, who cares?
We have received Bernies message loud and clear and it is important. But Bernie did not win our nomination; Hillary did. If Bernie wants to play coy and say we must defeat Trump and certainly hell vote for Hillary, yet no endorsement and the Dems had better listen to him, well, guess what? Were moving on, Sanders.
Bernie, you are important member of the Senate. Dont blow your relevance because you seem to be trying to do just that.
Response to Gamecock Lefty (Reply #21)
Name removed Message auto-removed
leftyladyfrommo
(18,868 posts)But I like him less and less.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,173 posts)The easy route is simply acquiescing and disappearing. Almost half of Democrats, by the end, supported his more progressive platform. It would be remiss of him NOT to stand up for that amount of Democrats. As it would be remiss if Hillary did NOT realize she needs the support of those Democrats to bring the party together.
Its ironic that a candidate, that was for most all his political life has been an independent, is the one that is pushing the traditional Democratic ideals and positive directions. He is a thorn in the side of those in the DLC that are salivating at completing the process of changing the Democratic party to the new 1% party, in wake of the GOP meltdown.
mountain grammy
(26,619 posts)Me too!
brooklynite
(94,502 posts)riversedge
(70,189 posts)OwlinAZ
(410 posts)brooklynite
(94,502 posts)Godhumor
(6,437 posts)The only move he has left is to endorse and start campaigning for her.
brush
(53,765 posts)liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)By not endorsing Hillary, Bernie has made himself insignificant
Response to liberal N proud (Reply #29)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Gamecock Lefty
(700 posts)You say Bernie supporters were kicked off voter rolls and couldnt vote. How do you know Hillary supporters were not kicked off?
And you say you know Hillary wants to move to the right after the election. Did she tell you that?
Funny that primaries where Bernie lost it was rigged but those he won were just fine. That always happens to the 2nd place finisher, doesnt it?
Sounds like sour grapes to me.
Response to Gamecock Lefty (Reply #30)
Name removed Message auto-removed
cstanleytech
(26,283 posts)I honestly dont think he is the type who will run as a spoiler candidate when it comes down to actually voting for whatever Democrat is running (probably Hillary) vs Trump.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)I even sent him a few bucks and bought some Bernie merchandise.
But it's time to move forward, united, against "The Donald".
Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)and his holier than thou followers.
How did that end up for us?
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)I couldn't believe the country could vote for someone as obviously bad as nixon.
And I couldn't believe that a bunch of self-congratulating idiots could let the country down the way the Gene stay-at-homes did. I was young. I was an idealist. I was not savvy to the finer parts of politics. But even then, I knew Humphrey would better than nixon.
A lot of the ills our country has faced since then can be dumped at Eugene McCarthy's clay feet.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Agree totally. Purist absolutism is self-defeating. Nixon was the beginning of the end of FDR's liberal dream.
That was my first presidential election, and I was gutted.
Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)I was in college. I remember leaving the dorm and wandering the campus almost all night long. It was the beginning of a long stint of cynicism that I still have problems with.
That is why the deja vu of our current situation bums me out so much. I mean, come on people, at least 3 Supreme Court judges. Do we really want three thirty-year-old scalias?
mountain grammy
(26,619 posts)considering he began with nearly no recognition. Despite the fact Bernie's not been a Democrat, 46% of us felt like he is speaking to issues that our party should be supporting. Thanks to Bernie, the Democratic platform is addressing issues, I believe, would not have been addressed. I think Warren withheld her endorsement for just these reasons.
From charter schools, to a private insurance based health care system, to drone strike diplomacy, etc., the Democratic party has moved away from a commitment to provide basic goods and services and peaceful solutions as products of good governance. Bernie has renewed this commitment in 46% of Democratic voters, and, now it's our job to convince the rest.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,173 posts)I sure hope Hillary herself is not as dumb, vindictive, and sore winner as some on this board.
Its only a "winner take all" in an abstract way. In reality, she needs most of that 46% to win in November.
Bernie's platform is desperately needed in these times. Dems blew their chance to have a truly transformative change and to refocus back to the 99% from its slow slide to be the new Republican party. But lets hope they don't blow it again by ignoring almost half their members in forming a platform.
mountain grammy
(26,619 posts)or I don't believe Warren would be spending so much time with her. Hillary knows, Bernie has been on board with Democrats for decades, and he's always fought for liberal voices to be heard too. We're still here, and we still vote, and we sent a message loud and clear. What a shame some here want us to go away.. go figure.
harun
(11,348 posts)mountain grammy
(26,619 posts)and it stuck. The people who showed up for Bernie at my caucus were hearing a message that gave them hope. This being a small, mountain community, I know these people. They are the working poor, saddled with crushing debt because they got sick, or the car broke, or they were forced to move because the landlord could get richer by renting to tourists. Simple life events that, at best, are disruptive and expensive, at worst are the difference between shelter and the streets.
I think those who run our Democratic party have largely forgotten the working poor, who can't afford insurance, but make $100 too much a month to qualify for Medicaid. The system is rigged and Bernie Sanders honestly wants to fix it. Honestly! If withholding Clinton's endorsement gets us closer to fixing the system, I'm all for it!
harun
(11,348 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)The guy's holding a pair of three's, but still thinks he's going home with a stack of chips.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)and dot all the "i's".
Meanwhile, everybody else is focused on the GE.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)Thats a lot of demands by someone who lost the election by 4 million votes.
David__77
(23,370 posts)Realclearpolitics shows Clinton with 15.8 million votes and Sanders with 12.0 votes. More importantly, Clinton has more delegates than Sanders.
I can understand those who lose elections making demands. I can also understand those who win elections not accepting those demands.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)CherokeeDem
(3,709 posts)Someone needs to explain to him, he lost. I am appalled at his continued need to steal the limelight like anyone cares.
The job now is to elect our nominee and keep this country out of Trump's hands. That Sanders cannot acknowledge that is very telling about his personality.
Disappointed in him.
Leontius
(2,270 posts)CherokeeDem
(3,709 posts)leftyladyfrommo
(18,868 posts)Or just not vote?
I know some people voting libertarian because they don't like either candidate.
He needs to pack it in and go do great things in Congress that need doing. Back to being an independent which is what he was all along.
OregonBlue
(7,754 posts)how he's handled his loss. I thought he would be much more magnanimous but he just seems grump.
MFM008
(19,805 posts)Can't stick to his word. He said he would endorse. His speaking slot would be about where Bill Clinton was in 1988.
nest
(23 posts)And even if Hillary were recommended for an indictment (Which will never in a blue moon happen), The DNC would go with Biden NOT Bernie. He is toast no matter how this plays out.
RussBLib
(9,006 posts)and how many would go back to Bernie?
Quite a mess of a campaign season.
bigdarryl
(13,190 posts)In November in the Senate races and all down ballot races.