Debbie Wasserman Schultz Out As Democratic Convention Chair After Email Leak
Source: NPR
Amid furor over an email leak that revealed a bias against Bernie Sanders inside the Democratic National Committee, Debbie Wasserman Schultz is out as chair of the convention.
In an email to NPR, the office of Rep. Marcia Fudge said she "has been named permanent chair of the Democratic National Convention."
Sen. Bernie Sanders featured heavily in the hacked Democratic National Committee emails released by WikiLeaks Friday.
The emails, which were released by WikiLeaks just days before the party's convention launches in Philadelphia, appear to show top DNC officials trading ideas on how to hurt Sanders at the polls.
In one email out of the 20,000 leaked, the committee's Chief Financial Officer Brad Marshall appears to float an idea to question Sanders' Jewish faith.
Read more: http://www.npr.org/2016/07/24/487242426/bernie-sanders-dnc-emails-outrageous-but-not-a-shock
Good decision.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)meaningful way for violating rules in such an egregious way. She has been bad news from day one with her bias.
Not sure what can be done. Perhaps refuse to back her in future elections?
DinahMoeHum
(22,505 posts). . .howsabout throwing some $$$ his way?
https://www.tincanova.com
https://www.facebook.com/TimCanovaForCongress/
https://twitter.com/Tim_Canova
DU's own ActBlue page:
https://secure.actblue.com/contribute/page/du4timcanova
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)I may just do that.
Iggo
(48,354 posts)ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)Peigan68
(137 posts)I'd say he's pretty darn progressive.
humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)DURHAM D
(32,846 posts)This whole thing is just stupid and I am not surprised at the straw grasping that is going on. Democrats are being used by Trump/Putin.
Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Moving on...
runaway hero
(835 posts)vi5
(13,305 posts)Someone who used their power to tamper with true democracy and the people that think she should be punished are the ones on the side of facists and dictators.
I'm not even saying that Bernie would have won if DWS and her cronies had kept their hands off the scale. But it just feeds in to one of the many aspects of the HRC candidacy that people really do have legitimate gripes with (being the epitome of the "establishment" that people are tired of and who use their power to subvert democracy).
Chemisse
(31,004 posts)What matters is that what she did altered the Democratic process. Next primary season it could've been your candidate who she didn't like. The DNC chair is not supposed to make those decisions - we voters are.
creeksneakers2
(7,597 posts)and defenses against Bernie's smears. There is nothing in the E-mails that shows an altering of the democratic process.
BlueMTexpat
(15,501 posts)I'm no fan of DWS, but this latest crap is OTT.
Response to kestrel91316 (Reply #1)
Name removed Message auto-removed
PassingFair
(22,437 posts)... The play book.
scipan
(2,637 posts)not just Convention Chair. The bias against Bernie was just blatant.
Politicub
(12,289 posts)Can throw a tomato at her in the spirit of punishment.
IthinkThereforeIAM
(3,113 posts)... eom.
mrmpa
(4,033 posts)just kind of did a scan read of what was being said. However, I have said previously that the DNC in 2008 made a pact with Hillary that if she stepped aside from trying to gather delegate votes for the nomination that in 2016 if she came back she would have the full backing of the DNC. I think the DNC did not think that there would be a strong candidate against her, and when one emerged they did what they needed to do, to keep their promise.
KPN
(16,141 posts)mrmpa
(4,033 posts)bad judgement of what the DNC did?
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)mrmpa
(4,033 posts)runaway hero
(835 posts)This is all her fault. All of it.
Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)I'm tired of her and her sloppy ass handling of the issues.
I'd like to see her out as chair of the DNC.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Both need to go. Enough of this nonsense! We have an election to win and deny the megalomaniac ANY chance of ruining the USA!
femmocrat
(28,394 posts)Craig234
(335 posts)KPN
(16,141 posts)Is it enough? Guess we'll find out soon.
femmocrat
(28,394 posts)Hopefully the media will focus on the actual convention tomorrow and during the week. They are trying so hard to gin up dissension in the democratic ranks. It is best to squelch this quickly, IMO.
KPN
(16,141 posts)Yeah, it'll disappear like everything else of import after one or two news cycles. Don't know that the media needs to gin up dissension in the Party -- there's enough of that already. But I think Bernie will be able to cool those flames sufficiently.
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Post removed
DURHAM D
(32,846 posts)Paulites got to Paulite.
Response to DURHAM D (Reply #14)
Post removed
baldguy
(36,649 posts)I do seem to have struck a nerve, though.
Craig234
(335 posts)And did you know all issues with trump are a secret raging hatred of all white men?
What a ridiculous overuse of the issue of misogyny.
ThoughtCriminal
(14,337 posts)True.
KPN
(16,141 posts)Enough said.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)And I really hope you don't think this OLD SCHOOL FEMINIST FEMALE FROM THE 70s. is a misogynist.
LakeArenal
(29,840 posts)Sometimes Hillary supporters (?) really say terrible stuff. "Simmering misogyny". that just makes pent up anti-supporter anger. I hadn't realized it before, but I can be pro-Hillary and anti-Hillary supporters. Sometimes the supporters' messages scream louder than the candidate's message.
elmac
(4,642 posts)and yet DU lets it slide.
Ford_Prefect
(8,204 posts)Your insistence on absolutism doesn't reflect reality. There are all kinds of people who are Democrats who will be in Philadelphia. Some of them feel as strongly as you do about Hillary. Some of them do not. That does not mean they wish her to fail, nor does it mean they desire a GOP presidency.
The same can be said for DU. Some of us have reservations about HRC and the conditions and associations of her Campaign. That does not mean we are not Democrats, nor does it mean that all of us wish her to fail, nor does it mean your insult has basis.
I hear your anger and your apparent desire for ideological purity. I suggest that is a trait of the man you most wish not to be president.
I also suggest you would be wise to consider that your neighbors here have as much right to their views of the Democratic process as do you. Do not let your fear of fascism cloud your views of those who likewise abhor it.
runaway hero
(835 posts)Last edited Sun Jul 24, 2016, 03:31 PM - Edit history (1)
LakeArenal
(29,840 posts)I see yours. Thanks, have a nice day.
Response to Post removed (Reply #9)
Post removed
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)among other things....
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)When she shut Bernie's access to state funding, donor, and voter records?
When she undermined a democratic candidate at every turn, in violation of DNC rules?
Since when do awful facts constitute misogyny?
Martin Eden
(13,537 posts)Shame on you for typing such offensive bullshit.
zentrum
(9,866 posts).....you are defaming would have supported Warren in a heart beat. Doesn't look so much like misogyny at that point, eh?
Not to mention all the support they feel for people like Barbara Lee and Barbara Boxer.
As a lifelong feminist and a female, I take great exception when the term "misogyny" is misused and actually used against people like me.
FailureToCommunicate
(14,340 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)are those whose only motive is to trash good Democrats.
FailureToCommunicate
(14,340 posts)I guess I should feel honored.
DWS's own actions over the past several years as DNC chair made her not a "good Democrat." Criticizing her for things that are true is not "trashing."
I'll ask nicely again: please change the wording of your post. Otherwise, people may think you only stated your feeling that way to get responses.
ozone_man
(4,825 posts)isn't another turd way Democrat. No to Donna Brazille.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)JI7
(90,716 posts)So this isn't really anything.
Craig234
(335 posts)It's about accountability and what the party stands for, not just the operations of the DNC.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)Violating the SPIRIT of the rules has to have serious consequences.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)KPN
(16,141 posts)avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)She is an embarrassment and blight to the Democratic party.
Ellipsis
(9,187 posts)Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)None of this news changes my support for our nominee. The more I know about HRC the more I like her. But DWS? This is crap, and I'm glad she's gone.
dawnie51
(959 posts)he comes and goes under the spotlight. There is a reason this guy is in Trumps campaign, and its nothing good for this country.....
runaway hero
(835 posts)this problem was there before yesterday.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)were not a problem, a Russian plot, and should be ignored because Juluan Assange.
pnwmom
(109,603 posts)Craig234
(335 posts)I think there will be earlier ones coming.
pnwmom
(109,603 posts)Craig234
(335 posts)And going after her is an effect but not the purpose of the leak.
pnwmom
(109,603 posts)Craig234
(335 posts)The timing more likely has to do with increasing the attention to the leak.
Don Draper
(187 posts)the convention because they know that chaos and backlash would ensue on the convention floor if DWS took the stage. Being removed as convention chairperson doesn't go far enough. She needs to be removed as DNC chair
Third Doctor
(1,574 posts)She needs to be out of congress. Then again she will just make the transition to lobbyist.
turbinetree
(25,365 posts)I kinda like sending $27.00 it makes a yuuuuuuge difference
Honk--------------------for a political revolution Bernie
Fritz Walter
(4,349 posts)vi5
(13,305 posts)..but because she's horrible and ineffective as a Democrat, to the extent that she deserves not a single lick of extra power.
I'm sure she'll be getting a nice job in the Clinton administration though, if there is one.
Goodbye and good riddance though.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)ousted a long time ago.
R0ckyRac00n
(98 posts)I believe
humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)as chair of the DNC... nothing else will suffice.
Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)This action is just to 'hide' her from being booooed of the stage.
It's not enough. She must go entirely and everyone knows it.
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Post removed
napi21
(45,806 posts)I heard of several of the Sunday gossip shows that she would have no speaking spot but would still gavel the sessions .
femmocrat
(28,394 posts)This is for the best. The sooner DWS resigns the better.
napi21
(45,806 posts)ozone_man
(4,825 posts)But, you know she was only following orders from higher ups, who must not be named.
Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)femmocrat
(28,394 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)For party healing to begin
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Guess for now I will just see how it plays out.
Jopin Klobe
(779 posts)The Chairperson shall be responsible for ensuring that the national officers and staff of the Democratic National Committee maintain impartiality and even-handedness during the Democratic Party Presidential nominating process.
BlueEye
(449 posts)Absolutely, DWS has to go. I hope the Party can find someone who can bring unity going forward. I wouldn't mind seeing a high profile progressive senator take the job. Amy Klobuchar anyone?