Trump, Clinton in virtual tie in Missouri
Source: STL Post Dispatch
"The Post-Dispatch poll, conducted between the national political conventions July 23-24, showed a much closer contest than those done earlier this month by KSDK/Survey USA and Public Policy Polling. Both showed a 10-point Trump advantage in Missouri.
Cokers sample was made up of 35 percent self-identified Democrats, 34 percent Republicans and 31 percent independents. Coker said independents tend to lean Republican in Missouri. Romney won 59 percent of self-identified independents in Missouri in 2012, according to exit polls for the New York Times the largest percentage of independents won by Romney of 18 states polled."
Read more: http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/trump-clinton-in-virtual-tie-in-missouri/article_ecbca03a-ea36-5bef-bf8c-fcb817cc7c31.html
Chemisse
(30,817 posts)Following the Dem convention.
exboyfil
(17,865 posts)Nictuku
(3,618 posts)... and it is all about the guns, from what I can tell. This will be an uphill battle.
Ex Lurker
(3,816 posts)pstokely
(10,531 posts)I assume your relatives in outstate MO
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)My husband walked away from his golf buddies last night when he couldn't listen to any more of their lies about Hillary. Apparently, the waitress from the bar followed him out, and told him those guys never stop talking about how much they hate Hillary. She complimented him for standing up, and telling them he would vote for Hillary. I think I will send some extra $ with him next week to leave for the waitress.
4lbs
(6,865 posts)Trump lost support in the span of several weeks, in Moderate-Right Conservative-leaning Missouri.
It showed that most of those right-leaning conservatives are trending towards Libertarian Gary Johnson. The Libertarian is hurting Trump a lot, by presenting a credible alternative to Trump to those Republicans that still can't see marking their ballots for Clinton.
Think about that.
pstokely
(10,531 posts)nt
FBaggins
(26,775 posts)The latest KSDK-TV poll overlaps the period that this poll was taken (7/20-7/24). So we can't say that we're seeing movement... but different takes on the same electorate at the same time. Could be differences in how they see the electorate, but it is slightly too large to be sampling error alone within the 95% confidence band alone.
However, those who point out that anything close to even in the state is good news. Even a 10% deficit in a state that Obama lost by 14% (while winning overall by about 4%) is good news.
bornskeptic
(1,330 posts)He lost it by a miniscule 0.13% in 2008.
roamer65
(36,747 posts)I think Drumpf is going to finish 3rd.
MrModerate
(9,753 posts)If it's now faint pink . . . (a small yee-haw).
Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)The polls will change. She will win.
forgotmylogin
(7,539 posts)that had the evening version of the paper out with the gigantic headline "TRIUMPHANT" on the last day of the RNC before Don had barely even finished his late-running speech, and before the general consensus was one of jaw-agape speechlessness.
apnu
(8,759 posts)riversedge
(70,350 posts)Loki
(3,825 posts)And I can tell that this is going to be very close. We have friends who are staunch Republicans who have already stated they will be voting for Hillary Clinton. Both my husband and I are rabid progressives, and to hear this from these people, because we know them personally, is truly a sea change. Get out the Vote!!!!
bellmartin
(218 posts)I so want for my state to move back to a bellwether, which it was for so long. I want to turn it blue again!
And the best part of those poll results? Look at the dates the polling was done! After the RNC convention, and before ours started!
Grammy23
(5,815 posts)Let's hope that he gets buried in ads that compare his crazy, unhinged statements with the rational, measured comments from Hillary Clinton. It is obvious that Donald is not well....from a mental health standpoint. His remarks give him away every. Single. Time. For those inclined to vote for Trump, the amount of convincing to abandon this demagogue may need to be much more than you'd expect. Fortunately, the Clinton campaign has plenty of money to build an avalanche against Trump. With any luck at all, we will start to see the number of followers plummet after he faces a steady, unrelenting drum beat of the story this man has revealed about himself in recent months and over his whole life. The truth is there. Now spread the word.
wcmagumba
(2,892 posts)very, very red SW MO and will GOTV as much as I can. I already have had several interactions with hard core, Hillary/Liberal/Dem hating RW coworkers, I don't argue with them but play a coy, middle ground about my vote and encourage them to vote for Johnson...I would rather hurt Trump in that way with these people who will never vote Dem.
Fresh_Start
(11,330 posts)Let him do the heavy lifting of peeling away support from Trump?
wcmagumba
(2,892 posts)but I will primarily donate to Dems...
apnu
(8,759 posts)But McCain won MO by a few thousand votes. So much for MO as a predictor of Presidential elections.
molova
(543 posts)Virtual tie is not a thing. https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/628950531172638721
It doesn't matter if the margin of error is higher than 1.
"Virtual tie" is a term created by pundits, not statisticians.
Nitram
(22,913 posts)I would never have expected Clinton do do that well there.
TryLogic
(1,723 posts)pstokely
(10,531 posts)gerrymandering has concentrated all the Dem districts in the cities giving more power the rural (and whiter) conservative areas, overall, the population of MO is older and whiter than average
TryLogic
(1,723 posts)Trump will continue to characterize Hillary as Crooked Hillary. Crooked Hillary versus the Bully or the Mean Guy is unlikely to be successful for Hillary. But, in my opinion, Crooked Hillary versus the Loose Cannon tilts the contest toward Hillary. Crooked can be debated, but every time Trump opens his mouth, most of his history, everything validates the label of Loose Cannon. And, a Loose Cannon is someone who is scary and dangerous.
Gamecock Lefty
(700 posts)and to see this in today's Post-Dispatch warmed my little heart.
Hope springs eternal for MO going blue.
And you should see the governor's race up here on the Republican side. They can't pull out their guns fast enough to show you how tough they are! Such silliness.
Moostache
(9,897 posts)The rabidly hateful bigots that populate this enclave on the outskirts of the St. Louis Metro area is truly depressing at times.
Hearing that the Talking Yam has essentially lost 10 points poll over poll is heartening. The rural areas of this state are hopeless for Democrats, I would not waste 15 seconds or $0.15 campaigning out in those regions. I remember taking my business out of an auto repair shop in the area in 2012 because of the casual tossing around of the 'n-word' to describe President Obama in the waiting lounge and the owner of the shop not giving a damn about it at all.
The urban areas in St. Louis, Kansas City and Columbia are the islands of blue in this sea of red back-ass state.
GOTV is going to be crucial everywhere, but maybe we can pull a rabbit out of the hat with exceptional GOTV in the urban centers of East Kansas...if that were to become reality, Trump will lose in a Mondale-esque landslide in the EC.
Gore1FL
(21,158 posts)Unfortunately, I suspect the GOP win s in 2008 and 2012 in the presidential contest had more to do with the race of the candidate.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)The House and Senate are veto proof red. We haven't been a bellweather state since 2000.
Koster was a Republican until 2007 when he wanted to run for AG and set himself up to be governor. I saw him talking awhile back about how Democrats and the GOP agree that there should be minimal regulations. I am desperately hoping he wins, though.
Something that scares me is that voters will try to use Hillary's coattails to make "feminist" history republican style and elect Catherine Hanaway as governor.