Thu Aug 11, 2016, 05:42 PM

NWCorona (8,541 posts)

Top Clinton State Department aide helped Clinton Foundation

Source: CNN

A top aide to Hillary Clinton at the State Department traveled to New York to interview job candidates for a top job at the Clinton Foundation, a CNN investigation has found.

The fact that the aide, Cheryl Mills, was taking part in such a high level task for the Clinton foundation while also working as chief of staff for the secretary of state raises new questions about the blurred lines that have dogged the Clintons in recent years.

On June 19, 2012, Mills, then the chief of staff for Clinton at the State Department, boarded a New York City-bound Amtrak train in Washington's Union station.

The next morning, at the offices of a New York based executive search firm, Mills would interview two high-level business executives. Her mission was to help the Clinton Foundation find a new leader, a source told CNN.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/11/politics/hillary-clinton-cgi-cheryl-mills/index.html

57 replies, 4738 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

57 replies	Author	Time	Post
Top Clinton State Department aide helped Clinton Foundation (Original post)	NWCorona	Aug 2016	OP
?	Agschmid	Aug 2016	#1
And this breaking new how?	liberal N proud	Aug 2016	#2
If you could supply a 3 day old link I'll gladly self delete.	NWCorona	Aug 2016	#4
and so? n/t	chillfactor	Aug 2016	#3
Did you read the link?	NWCorona	Aug 2016	#5
There was no conflict of interest. It was volunteer work that Ms. Mills engaged in. Cheryl Mills	still_one	Aug 2016	#6
That statement doesn't absolve Mills. It only says that if something was done wrong	NWCorona	Aug 2016	#7
There was nothing done wrong or improperly. This is good ole Chuck Grassley, you know the one	still_one	Aug 2016	#9
You're always first in line with these stories, aren't you?	randome	Aug 2016	#8
Actually I'm quite reserved these days. The primary is over and am following Bernie's lead	NWCorona	Aug 2016	#11
Thanks For Sharing .....	Grassy Knoll	Aug 2016	#10
Your welcome!	NWCorona	Aug 2016	#12
Well this one took more than 2 clicks	MyNameGoesHere	Aug 2016	#13
What did you find? n/t	Control-Z	Aug 2016	#14
It's all there if you click through it	MyNameGoesHere	Aug 2016	#17
And? Where was the "liberal MSM" when Cheney was giving out no-bid...	Buckeye_Democrat	Aug 2016	#15
That's a very good point. I myself was beyond livid that they got a pass.	NWCorona	Aug 2016	#21
So she did this on her own time and paid expenses out of her own pocket.	Kaleva	Aug 2016	#16
Oy. So what? Really don't give a tinkers damn about the "optics". I'll leave that to the repugs to	Laser102	Aug 2016	#18
Kicked and rec'd	farleftlib	Aug 2016	#19
Troll infestation	MelSC	Aug 2016	#20
there is nothing wrong with this story	Enrique	Aug 2016	#22
What's curious is the paragraph you deliberately chose not to quote. Here, I'll do it for you.	BobbyDrake	Aug 2016	#23
Well considering I only had 4 paragraphs to work with I think I incapsulated well enough	NWCorona	Aug 2016	#24
You're so transparent, I bet you shower in Windex. nt	BobbyDrake	Aug 2016	#25
Is that the best you can do?	NWCorona	Aug 2016	#26
Are you from Corona Ca? I lived off Horsethief canyon 5 years ago	MattP	Aug 2016	#27
No I'm not from there but I might have to check it out lol	NWCorona	Aug 2016	#33
I don't spend my best material on weak stuff like these concern threads.	BobbyDrake	Aug 2016	#37
Ok. I'll try better next time.	NWCorona	Aug 2016	#39
I strongly doubt it. nt	BobbyDrake	Aug 2016	#48
Actually, no. An effective synopsis will allow both premise and contrast to premise.	LanternWaste	Aug 2016	#56
I disagree but that isn't surprising I'm sure	NWCorona	Aug 2016	#57
So was it illegal or not? If not then why is it in LBN?	cstanleytech	Aug 2016	#28
Is legality a prerequisite for LBN	NWCorona	Aug 2016	#34
No but if nothing illegal was done then how is it news of national interest?	cstanleytech	Aug 2016	#49
That's a fair question but if that standard was applied across LBN	NWCorona	Aug 2016	#50
Yes except the question isnt what makes those other posts news of national interest	cstanleytech	Aug 2016	#51
I think the national aspect to your question answers it's self.	NWCorona	Aug 2016	#52
Ya, that's been defused here on DU about 4 times already. nt	fleabiscuit	Aug 2016	#29
I didn't know that this was reported already. Do you have a DU link?	NWCorona	Aug 2016	#31
~	fleabiscuit	Aug 2016	#43
They clearly value Mills opinion	Renew Deal	Aug 2016	#30
I would value her opinion as well. I've said many times before this op that I highly respect Mills.	NWCorona	Aug 2016	#32
Right, you posted this nothingburger ball of inuendo out of concern and respect for Mills.	SunSeeker	Aug 2016	#35
I don't know what's more sad, the thread itself or the flimsy defense of it by the OP. nt	BobbyDrake	Aug 2016	#38
Look in the mirror	NWCorona	Aug 2016	#40
Wow, you sure love discussing the issues.	SunSeeker	Aug 2016	#47
No one is above reproach. I'm sorry if that hurts your feelings.	NWCorona	Aug 2016	#41
It doesn't hurt my feelings. It just says a lot about you. nt	SunSeeker	Aug 2016	#42
~	fleabiscuit	Aug 2016	#45
This would be an example	grubbs	Aug 2016	#36
It's a Charity	videohead5	Aug 2016	#44
~	fleabiscuit	Aug 2016	#46
She did it as a volunteer. You are allowed to volunteer in your	applegrove	Aug 2016	#53
And that very well may be so.	NWCorona	Aug 2016	#54
On her own time, off State time. No conflict, no problem, no story...	LanternWaste	Aug 2016	#55

Response to NWCorona (Original post)

Thu Aug 11, 2016, 05:44 PM

Agschmid (28,728 posts)

Top Clinton State Department aide helped Clinton Foundation

1. ?

2. And this breaking new how?

4. If you could supply a 3 day old link I'll gladly self delete.

3. and so? n/t

5. Did you read the link?

6. There was no conflict of interest. It was volunteer work that Ms. Mills engaged in. Cheryl Mills

7. That statement doesn't absolve Mills. It only says that if something was done wrong

9. There was nothing done wrong or improperly. This is good ole Chuck Grassley, you know the one

8. You're always first in line with these stories, aren't you?

11. Actually I'm quite reserved these days. The primary is over and am following Bernie's lead

10. Thanks For Sharing .....

12. Your welcome!

13. Well this one took more than 2 clicks

14. What did you find? n/t

17. It's all there if you click through it

15. And? Where was the "liberal MSM" when Cheney was giving out no-bid...

21. That's a very good point. I myself was beyond livid that they got a pass.

16. So she did this on her own time and paid expenses out of her own pocket.

18. Oy. So what? Really don't give a tinkers damn about the "optics". I'll leave that to the repugs to

19. Kicked and rec'd

20. Troll infestation

22. there is nothing wrong with this story

23. What's curious is the paragraph you deliberately chose not to quote. Here, I'll do it for you.

24. Well considering I only had 4 paragraphs to work with I think I incapsulated well enough

25. You're so transparent, I bet you shower in Windex. nt

26. Is that the best you can do?

27. Are you from Corona Ca? I lived off Horsethief canyon 5 years ago

33. No I'm not from there but I might have to check it out lol

37. I don't spend my best material on weak stuff like these concern threads.

39. Ok. I'll try better next time.

48. I strongly doubt it. nt

56. Actually, no. An effective synopsis will allow both premise and contrast to premise.

57. I disagree but that isn't surprising I'm sure

28. So was it illegal or not? If not then why is it in LBN?

34. Is legality a prerequisite for LBN

49. No but if nothing illegal was done then how is it news of national interest?

50. That's a fair question but if that standard was applied across LBN

51. Yes except the question isnt what makes those other posts news of national interest

52. I think the national aspect to your question answers it's self.

29. Ya, that's been defused here on DU about 4 times already. nt

31. I didn't know that this was reported already. Do you have a DU link?

43. ~

30. They clearly value Mills opinion

32. I would value her opinion as well. I've said many times before this op that I highly respect Mills.

35. Right, you posted this nothingburger ball of inuendo out of concern and respect for Mills.

38. I don't know what's more sad, the thread itself or the flimsy defense of it by the OP. nt

40. Look in the mirror

47. Wow, you sure love discussing the issues.

41. No one is above reproach. I'm sorry if that hurts your feelings.

42. It doesn't hurt my feelings. It just says a lot about you. nt

45. ~

36. This would be an example

44. It's a Charity

46. ~

53. She did it as a volunteer. You are allowed to volunteer in your

54. And that very well may be so.

55. On her own time, off State time. No conflict, no problem, no story...