Snyder officials inoculate state from Flint water suits
Source: The Detroit News
Snyder officials inoculate state from Flint water suits
Chad Livengood, Detroit News Lansing Bureau 12:45 p.m. EDT September 19, 2016
flintwater0126
(Photo: David Guralnick / Detroit News)
Lansing Gov. Rick Snyders administration quietly inoculated itself from being sued by Flint over the citys lead-contaminated water crisis by requiring that litigation be approved by an oversight board stacked with gubernatorial appointees.
The Flint Receivership Transition Advisory Board passed a resolution on March 31 eliminating the city administrators ability to initiate litigation without first getting approval from the board.
Flints Receivership Transition Advisory Board, or RTAB, was put in place to have veto power on budgets after the citys last emergency manager left town in April 2015. The panels members are all appointees of Snyder.
The boards action came seven days after the city of Flint filed a notice in the state Court of Claims preserving its right to sue the state over the citys water becoming contaminated with toxic lead.....................
Read more: http://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/michigan/flint-water-crisis/2016/09/19/lawsuit/90695032/
Can this even be legal?????
sakabatou
(46,335 posts)bucolic_frolic
(55,835 posts)If they only have power over budgets ... who knows
Does the city administrator need permission to sue, or permission
to solicit the funds to sue?
Those seem two separate things to me
George II
(67,782 posts)democrattotheend
(12,011 posts)A state can only be sued if it consents to be sued.
tclambert
(11,194 posts)So what's your recourse if the State poisons your children?
meow2u3
(25,251 posts)tclambert
(11,194 posts)That should raise an outcry.
TheDebbieDee
(11,119 posts)Why wouldn't these negligent, murderous troll republicans running the state of Michigan do the same thing?
So, you can poison a city, lay waste to the minds of an entire generation of residents and avoid any and all lawsuits... RepubliCANTs!
hack89
(39,181 posts)There are six specific instances delineated by law.
ColemanMaskell
(783 posts)For those of you not from around here, the Republicans controlling government in Michigan seem to be willing to do pretty much anything to save money and cut taxes. Any hope for redress will have to come in Federal courts.
The cities in Michigan have largely black populations, while the suburbs and countryside are largely white. Hence racist sentiments can be conveniently disguised in urban vs rural language. The state government has the power to appoint a "city manager" when any city is in financial trouble, and the "city manager" has a great deal of power that the residents of the city have no legal recourse against.
Another example of Michigan at its finest:
An initiative can be placed on the ballot for popular vote, if enough signatures are gathered on a petition. However, such initiatives are barred from influencing appropriations of money. Hence when the Republican legislature passes bills that they know the people would disapprove, they attach some minor monetary appropriation as part of the bill, preventing the people from overturning the law by a ballot initiative.
and so on.
Not all of Michigan's problems are political, of course. But the political landscape is ugly.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.