Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(81,546 posts)
Mon Sep 19, 2016, 08:53 PM Sep 2016

Snyder officials inoculate state from Flint water suits

Source: The Detroit News



Snyder officials inoculate state from Flint water suits
Chad Livengood, Detroit News Lansing Bureau 12:45 p.m. EDT September 19, 2016
flintwater0126

(Photo: David Guralnick / Detroit News)

Lansing — Gov. Rick Snyder’s administration quietly inoculated itself from being sued by Flint over the city’s lead-contaminated water crisis by requiring that litigation be approved by an oversight board stacked with gubernatorial appointees.

The Flint Receivership Transition Advisory Board passed a resolution on March 31 eliminating the city administrator’s ability to initiate litigation without first getting approval from the board.

Flint’s Receivership Transition Advisory Board, or RTAB, was put in place to have veto power on budgets after the city’s last emergency manager left town in April 2015. The panel’s members are all appointees of Snyder.

The board’s action came seven days after the city of Flint filed a notice in the state Court of Claims preserving its right to sue the state over the city’s water becoming contaminated with toxic lead.....................

Read more: http://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/michigan/flint-water-crisis/2016/09/19/lawsuit/90695032/



Can this even be legal?????
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Snyder officials inoculate state from Flint water suits (Original Post) riversedge Sep 2016 OP
I have no idea sakabatou Sep 2016 #1
Right to Lifers poisoning politics as well as people bucolic_frolic Sep 2016 #2
Probably not legal, and DEFINITELY not going to protect anyone from Federal charges. George II Sep 2016 #3
Yes, under the 11th amendment democrattotheend Sep 2016 #4
Holy crap. I thought you were joking until I looked it up. tclambert Sep 2016 #6
But that only applies to out-of-staters and foreigners meow2u3 Sep 2016 #10
Ask for the suit anyway. Get the board on record denying it. tclambert Sep 2016 #5
Well, the gun manufacturers have inoculated themselves against lawsuits... TheDebbieDee Sep 2016 #7
You can still sue gun manufacturers hack89 Sep 2016 #8
Hopefully Federal lawsuits will be brought ColemanMaskell Sep 2016 #9

bucolic_frolic

(55,835 posts)
2. Right to Lifers poisoning politics as well as people
Mon Sep 19, 2016, 09:09 PM
Sep 2016

If they only have power over budgets ... who knows

Does the city administrator need permission to sue, or permission
to solicit the funds to sue?

Those seem two separate things to me

tclambert

(11,194 posts)
6. Holy crap. I thought you were joking until I looked it up.
Mon Sep 19, 2016, 09:25 PM
Sep 2016

So what's your recourse if the State poisons your children?

 

TheDebbieDee

(11,119 posts)
7. Well, the gun manufacturers have inoculated themselves against lawsuits...
Mon Sep 19, 2016, 09:25 PM
Sep 2016

Why wouldn't these negligent, murderous troll republicans running the state of Michigan do the same thing?

So, you can poison a city, lay waste to the minds of an entire generation of residents and avoid any and all lawsuits... RepubliCANTs!

hack89

(39,181 posts)
8. You can still sue gun manufacturers
Mon Sep 19, 2016, 09:32 PM
Sep 2016

There are six specific instances delineated by law.

ColemanMaskell

(783 posts)
9. Hopefully Federal lawsuits will be brought
Mon Sep 19, 2016, 09:45 PM
Sep 2016

For those of you not from around here, the Republicans controlling government in Michigan seem to be willing to do pretty much anything to save money and cut taxes. Any hope for redress will have to come in Federal courts.

The cities in Michigan have largely black populations, while the suburbs and countryside are largely white. Hence racist sentiments can be conveniently disguised in urban vs rural language. The state government has the power to appoint a "city manager" when any city is in financial trouble, and the "city manager" has a great deal of power that the residents of the city have no legal recourse against.

Another example of Michigan at its finest:
An initiative can be placed on the ballot for popular vote, if enough signatures are gathered on a petition. However, such initiatives are barred from influencing appropriations of money. Hence when the Republican legislature passes bills that they know the people would disapprove, they attach some minor monetary appropriation as part of the bill, preventing the people from overturning the law by a ballot initiative.

and so on.

Not all of Michigan's problems are political, of course. But the political landscape is ugly.



Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Snyder officials inoculat...