AG Maura Healey: We will win gun lawsuit

[SecularMotion]

Source: MassLive

BOSTON — Attorney General Maura Healey on Friday predicted that she will win a lawsuit filed by a national gun rights group over her interpretation of the state's assault weapons ban.

This summer, Healey angered gun rights supporters when she interpreted a ban on assault weapons to make illegal certain types of guns that are similar to assault weapons. Around 10,000 of those so-called "copycat" assault weapons were sold last year in Massachusetts.

The lawsuit, filed by the National Shooting Sports Foundation and four gun shops, argues that Healey's interpretation of the law violates due process and is "unconstitutionally vague, invalid and unenforceable."

Healey spoke Friday at a rally on Boston Common urging voters to cast ballots Nov. 8 for candidates who support gun control.

Read more: http://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/10/ag_maura_healey_we_will_win_gu.html

[Judi Lynn]

1. Time to head toward civilization. n/t

[yallerdawg]

2. What the NRA and the minions really mean:

The attorney general criticized the National Rifle Association for saying government leaders should enforce existing gun laws rather than pass new ones. "They obviously don't mean it because that's exactly what I did, and they sued me," Healey said. "But we will win."

[beevul]

6. That is some bait and switch right there. WOW.

The attorney general criticized the National Rifle Association for saying government leaders should enforce existing gun laws rather than pass new ones. "They obviously don't mean it because that's exactly what I did, and they sued me," Healey said. "But we will win."

Yes, that. Bait and switch.

It wasn't the national rifle association who sued her, the lawsuit was filed by the National Shooting Sports Foundation and four gun shops. It says so right in the article.


Healy seems to be proceeding from a presumption that people are stupid, and so apparently, do you. That or you swallowed it hook line and sinker and let your bias against the hated gun do the driving rather than your reading eye and your thinking brain. In short: Because gunz.


I'm not sure which is worse.

[patsimp]

3. kick

[ileus]

4. Hopefully the people can win this one.

[machoneman]

5. I agree but...

The article should have, for me at least, better defined how she is interpreting the law. For example, what are these copycat weapons? It interesting that a AR-15 type weapon is described as an assault rifle by the press and most of us. Yet in a Bass Pro Shop flyer some of what looks like hand guns have attached plastic or wooden stocks, long screw-on barrels and other attachments that make then look like an assault-styled weapon. Is this what the AG has banned from sale?

[One_Life_To_Give]

7. As the Tsarnaev brothers had to Murder a cop

in an attempt to obtain a second firearm. I am not sure the Commonwealth is the place that really needs much in the way of additional gun laws.

[Eleanors38]

8. Healey: Arch drug warrior, cooperating with GOPer governor. Phew!

[friendly_iconoclast]

9. UPDATE: Healy has backed down, and now acknowledges the legality of those rifles

Last edited Sat Dec 21, 2019, 07:04 AM - Edit history (1)

https://www.nssf.org/nssf-welcomes-massachusetts-ags-enforcement-notice-clarification

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The National Shooting Sports Foundation® (NSSF®), the firearms industry trade association, accepts Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey’s agreement to clarify the Enforcement Notice that included “’Copies’ or ‘Duplicates’ of the Enumerated Weapons.” The Attorney General’s agreement to clarify this notice effectively ends the legal challenge by NSSF, Pullman Arms of Worcester, Mass., along with three other Massachusetts firearms retailers.

“We are pleased this matter has come to a successful resolution,” said Lawrence G. Keane, Senior Vice President of Government Relations and Public Affairs and General Counsel for NSSF. “We sought clarification to the Enforcement Notice to allow firearms retailers to know exactly what the law stated and ensure they were operating within the confines of that law. For two and a half years, these business owners were left in the dark and today, they finally have the clear answers they sought.”

In 2016 Attorney General Healey charged that firearms retailers were violating the intent of a state law against so-called “assault weapons” by making small tweaks to certain firearms and issued the Enforcement Notice. The Notice warned retailers those so-called “copies” or “duplicates” of the firearms specifically listed in the state law were illegal for sale.

NSSF and the stores had to file the case to challenge the Notice because it was too vague to apply. The complaint identified the difficulties in applying the Notice to listed firearms after the Attorney General’s office ignored multiple requests to clarify the Notice as to those firearms. The Office did not take steps to clarify the notice for two and a half years, and only recently notified the Plaintiffs that the listed firearms are not illegal “assault weapons.” The Office agreed to amend the Notice after NSSF prevailed against multiple motions designed to dismiss or stall the case. Because the Notice has been clarified, the goals for the case have been achieved, and there is nothing else to fight about in this action.