= new reply since forum marked as read
Don't get your hopes up, idiot. I took the oath you're referring to. It said: "All enemies, foreign and domestic" (Italics mine).
If you take up arms against the people of the United States, you are a domestic enemy. And if an armed insurrection starts, I will go down to my local recruiting office and beg them to take this 48 year-old ex-tanker back for the duration so I can clobber you clowns...
the republicans can try to distance themselves from the orange hair "guy" all they want, they can even sing the tune from the
Kinks "Destroyer" (which I think is appropriate for there dumpster), to describe how paranoid he really is and them also, but they own this "guy" and his team, and he owns them.
They made this bed, and they own it. One has to look no further than what has been happening at the committee level for years and now the U.S. Supreme Court. Hurricane Sandy was prime example in republican malfeasance, and Katrina, tying up or trying to take funds from other programs to pay for something, when human beings were in trouble. Or what has happened at Keystone and now what is transpiring in the plains of North Dakota.
McCain has already come out and said that if Clinton gets the job of being a president he will not allow her the Constitutional right to advise and consent to her the nominees and put people on the U.S. Supreme court.
Mitch McConnell, Chuck Grassley and all of the other republicans are bastardizing the system, when it comes to judicial nominees , some sitting and waiting for over 18 months.
Kelly Ayotte thinks that the orange hair serial predator of woman, is a role model for her daughter, and is now trying to back track that debate answer.
Pat Toomey thinks that a woman's right to choice should be the same as what the orange hair guy said, that there should be some form of punishment.
The list goes on and on
And, other one is Paul (Ayn Rand) Ryan, Kevin McCarthy, Jason Chaffetz, and everyone on that side of the republican aisle.
They have already threatened and said that this coming March in the appropriation side of budget, if they are still in power that they will go after the funding of social security and medicare, EPA, USDA, FDA, NLRB, CFPB, Department of Education, (and will more than likely pass the TPP, just to poke the workers in the proverbial eye) and any and all agencies because they lost some power and will continue to try and sell the idea that the Ronald Ray Gun mantra that government is bad and needs to be privatized.
I am really struck on how the media has played in this election, like, lets say the Washington Post and there editorial board and how they marginalized on one particular candidate from Vermont. When the paper said that his views were simplistic, when he was advocating for better policies.
The Washington Post said the following:
"The system----and by this we mean the constitutional structure of checks and balances-----require policymakers to settle for incremental changes. Mr. Obama has scored several ambitious but incomplete reforms that have made peoples lives better while ideologues on both sides took pot shots."
If this is read like it means then the American system because of its structure doesn't permit a president to achieve anything more than the incremental changes.
Right now the right wing republican party are trying to have it both ways and if the Post is any indication in what there comments were, in this above article when they also commenting on the "checks and balances", should be incremental, is wrong.
The republican party with the help from some in the fourth rail have bastardized the concept of what the constitution means when it comes to "checks and balances" .
Maybe they should look at themselves in the mirror and really ask what the policies are that this country needs to move forward.
Most people in this country do not realize that the elected people in Washington, will have only worked 111 days this year. Everyday the papers should be asking what have you been doing in those 111 days, what have the republican controlled Congress being doing--------------nothing and how does that relate to this election cycle, it relates to everything, a party that has tried to have it both ways and to stall on policies, and to continue to stall, and to support a bigot and racists, and other anti-polices platform for years, of using hate and fear.
When I worked on aircraft to maintain flight safety, we did not use incremental changes, by law we could be charged with murder if we were found to bastardized flight safety and caused the death of anyone on that plane.
The New Deal, the Voting Rights Acts, were not incremental changes, they were direct polices to help the country as a whole and its citizens, this is what this country needs.
The papers can endorse Clinton all they want, my question is do they endorse the down ballot republicans? And Why?
Or are they going to explain, what it means to have a party that knew, they had a flawed person running for office, and there right wing policies are wrong, that has always thought that if you lose you never shake the other person hand, and acknowledge that you lose, to protect the "checks and balances" for the winner. How are these papers going to explain this, when they have been lacking in there job performance of explaining, how a Congress and Senate, thought they can circumvent the Constitution when they were sitting in a restaurant conspiring, to attack the "checks and balances"
Just saying
No they will not, but they will some how come up with a plan to make it look like one if we do not vote, to stop this grid lock.
Right now on Chuckles program Meet the right wing Press, he just had on Jeff Flake from Arizona, the same man that thinks that giving Navajo sacred land to a foreign corporation is just fine and dandy, right along with McCain in tow.
He, Chuckles thought it was more important to bring Flake on to try and help prop up the charade, when he could have linked the that legislation, that he and McCain did and thinks, to how the dumpster does the same thing when being a bigot and racist, just like Flake and McCain were against the Navajo.
My parents live in Arizona and they see first hand what these two and the right wing republican government have been doing, and now the Arizona paper wants to endorse Clinton---great, what have they been doing for the last umpteen years, supporting racism.
And if Clinton gets into office and he (Flake) his still in that republican power structure, will he continue with the grid lock?
I say yes
But Chuckles didn't ask that question on the "check and balance" ----nope, he was trying to help figure out how to talk about a fascist, and not calling him out and his leadership, to protect that grid lock on the Constitution.
What I found appalling is that a morning host (coffee joe, and I do not think he belongs on air in any capacity) on the cable system, let this man ( the orange hair bigot and whatever adjectives that he embodies) call in and spew his "stuff", then (joe) trying to back track with his panel and his republican guest, when the dumpster was getting into trouble and continuing the enabling of taking the "checks and balances" and throwing them out the window, then trying it both ways also.
A fascist is a fascist, and what happened last night, shows what a party (republican) looks like, and what has been perpetuating the scam for a very long long time, because of the MSM put this end product on the stage to attack civility and the "checks and balances", that they were suppose to protect and that they were more concerned, with this is end product.
And whenever they put someone from the Post or Politico, or the New York Times, to speak its the same thing on what I said in my previous post
Another rant.................
Again, Thank you
