Updated election results in Philly: Clinton nets 17,873 votes
Last edited Thu Dec 1, 2016, 10:21 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: http://www.dailykos.com
Clinton: 563,275, Trump: 105,876. The updated totals (final count):
Clinton: 584,020, Trump: 108,748.
That means Hillary netted 17,873 votes from Philly, after provisional (HC: 7,673, DT: 866) and absentee (HC:13,072, DT: 2,006) ballots were included. Theres a spreadsheet at the Philly Commissioners web site that includes these breakdowns, but I called to make sure they were the most up-to-date results.
Overall, Trumps lead in PA has shrunk to 46,435 votes, down from around 68,000, so these figures from Philadelphia make up the bulk of the 21,500 drop.
Read more: http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/12/1/1606087/-Updated-election-results-in-Philly-Clinton-nets-17-873-votes
In 2004 the same Senate seats were on the ballot, some of the same Senators. Note how the exit polls compare, positive is red shift, and how many of the states red shift. 2016 is double the shift in 2004, trending moreso in red states, more than doubled in the battleground states with robust polling where pre-election polls agree with the exit polls. States without Senate races have a lower red shift in both 2004 and 2016; the 2004 50 state mean was 1.9% red shift and the 2016 29 state mean is 3.52% in 2016, a dramatic difference with the 20 Senate race states at 4.7%.
These recounts might actually reverse the election
Grown2Hate
(2,010 posts)And this is BEFORE any type of recount. I'm STILL not getting my hopes up, but these are some pretty goddamn razor thin margins here...
turbinetree
(24,695 posts)This is just great,
Farmgirl1961
(1,493 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,846 posts)One of the arguments made about the Philly turnout this election cycle, was that it was "way down" from 2012. But based on the updated 2016 figures, it's only about 4,000 less that what Obama got in 2012 -
http://www.electionreturns.pa.gov/ENR_New/General/CountyResults?countyName=Philadelphia&ElectionID=27&ElectionType=G&IsActive=0
What is still significant is the 10,000 vote "margin" that Drumpf got over Romney comparing 2016 to 2012.
As for "potential" however, in 2008 you had this -
http://www.electionreturns.pa.gov/ENR_New/General/CountyResults?countyName=Philadelphia&ElectionID=17&ElectionType=G&IsActive=0
So over these last 3 elections, McCain bested Drumpf and Romney on the R side, and there was about a 7,000 vote drop from 2008 to both 2012 & 2016 on the D side.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Spreadsheet here: https://1drv.ms/x/s!AnpcCOQ6UEI1ilyWVYYvwaK9Hq_i
Pennsylvania Vote - By The Numbers
dKos Nov 23, 2016 - http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/11/23/1603619/-Pennsylvania-Vote-By-The-Numbers
Grey Lemercier
(1,429 posts)it was relatively odd, but somewhat explained, BUT now, knowing that is went 75 percent for Hillary in 2008 Dem primary, but 8 years later went for Trump by 20 plus (AFTER VOTING FOR OBAMA IN 08 12)
the shit is dodgy!!!!!
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)TeddyBear 1
(79 posts)Trump halts Michigan Recount
http://www.nbc26.com/news/trumps-objection-halts-michigan-recount
FailureToCommunicate
(14,012 posts)KewlKat
(5,624 posts)since she was so close to his vote total.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)It is ironic that the candidate who claims millions of illegal votes were cast wants to prevent recounting. Nothing but bullshit for four years isn't going to be easy.
Welcome to DU.
TheWayitIs
(12 posts)Hillary won the popular vote by millions. Here's a petition to sign if you think that should make her president:
This is big because Chelsea Handler is fully behind it
https://twitter.com/chelseahandler/status/804436076588769280
Electoral College: Make Hillary Clinton President on December 19
https://www.change.org/p/electoral-college-electors-electoral-college-make-hillary-clinton-president-on-december-19?recruiter=644470148&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=share_email_responsive
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)metalbot
(1,058 posts)Doing so at this point is changing the rules after the fact. Both candidates ran on an electoral strategy, and one lost. I mean, one would think that trump couldn't have won the popular vote if that were what he were trying to do, but I didn't think he could win a state strategy either.
MadDAsHell
(2,067 posts)That maybe they don't typically count right away if it's not close?
i.e. not yet a recount?
If so, it's very encouraging that it's getting this close even without the recount. In fact, it's kind of amazing that they would call a state race with a spread of only 70,000 votes when there are ~23,000 uncounted votes from one single city, isn't it?
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Albeit, the big stronghold of Dem voters, Philadelphia.