Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
Fri Dec 2, 2016, 07:22 PM Dec 2016

Boxer to Introduce Bill Protecting Water of Tribes and Municipalities

Source: Barbara Boxer Press Release


Legislation Would Require Permission of Federally Recognized Tribes and Communities Before Projects Affecting Their Water Supply Are Approved by The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Friday, December 2, 2016

Washington, D.C. - U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) today announced that she will introduce the Protect Our Drinking Water Act of 2016, which would require permission from federally recognized tribes and communities before projects affecting their water supply are approved by the Army Corps of Engineers.

"As we watch the events unfold in North Dakota, it has become clear that the rights of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe to a safe water supply are not being respected and we must protect the drinking water of every American," Senator Boxer said. "I understand the route of the Dakota Access Pipeline was moved because it was considered a potential threat to the municipal water supply of Bismarck. My legislation would ensure that whether a project affects a tribe or a local community, the people whose water supply could be at risk must get equal consideration.

"The legislation is being prepared and will be introduced on Monday. It is critical that we send a message to the Standing Rock Sioux and all of its supporters, including thousands of veterans, that their voices are being heard."

Senator Boxer's legislation would require the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to obtain written consent from federally recognized tribes and municipalities that operate a water system before granting an easement for pipelines that could threaten water supplies.

Read more: https://www.boxer.senate.gov/?p=release&id=3360

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

JudyM

(29,196 posts)
2. Putting rethugs to the test. Drinking water is a primal issue for people, and this is also a state
Fri Dec 2, 2016, 07:27 PM
Dec 2016

sovereignty type of issue, which they claim to be champions for.

turbinetree

(24,683 posts)
3. Yepper.........................and this will again show there true hypocrisy
Fri Dec 2, 2016, 07:36 PM
Dec 2016

of how much of there true colors of racism they really are.

We the Indigenous People are not going away this time, we have had enough


 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
4. Wouldn't the result of that be that we never build another pipeline again?
Fri Dec 2, 2016, 08:05 PM
Dec 2016

Maybe thats what she wants, but lets be honest, we need pipelines. We can't just stop construction forever.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
7. Barely but it looks like they rejected Bismarck
Fri Dec 2, 2016, 08:44 PM
Dec 2016

Because they didn't want to affect their water supply

?itok=-8p7k1Se

turbinetree

(24,683 posts)
10. Excuse me what do you consider "Native" land before 1563 or after 1563
Fri Dec 2, 2016, 10:59 PM
Dec 2016

This is not some hyper question, I consider my land my land prior to the discovery of the "explorers" looking for greed to fill the coffers of some Queen or King

That's what people forget in this country, it was not your land, you took the land, you confiscated the land and swindled for the land, and you threatened to take the land and you created wars to remove us from our land


That is a fact, that should be reminded of everyone, not this glossy make over of someone writing to make it sound or look good

Thieves are still thieves

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
11. If we go back to the 1600's isn't that Cheyenne territory?
Fri Dec 2, 2016, 11:19 PM
Dec 2016

Didn't the Siox live in the great lakes area around that time?

So if we are going to go back that far, doesn't the land rightfully belong to the Cheyenne. Should we give them standing rock reservation and all the surrounding territory.

Of course, it belongs to the Sioux now because they had fought a war and took it by force.

turbinetree

(24,683 posts)
12. All Indigenous People recognize them selves by there language
Fri Dec 2, 2016, 11:35 PM
Dec 2016

The Nakoda (also known as Stoney or Îyârhe Nakoda) are an Indigenous People in Western Canada and, originally, the United States.

They refer to themselves in their own language as "Nakoda", meaning friend, ally. The name "Stoney" was given them by white explorers, because of their technique of using fire-heated rocks to boil broth in rawhide bowls. They are very closely related to the Assiniboine, who are also known as Stone Sioux (from the Ojibwe asinii-bwaan).


May I also suggest :


http://www.beacon.org/An-Indigenous-Peoples-History-of-the-United-States-P1164.aspx


http://www.sacred-texts.com/nam/cher/motc/

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Boxer to Introduce Bill P...