Judge rejects Green Party's Pennsylvania recount case

[sweetapogee]

Source: WPVI-TV

PHILADELPHIA -- A federal judge on Monday issued a stinging rejection of a Green Party-backed request to recount paper ballots in Pennsylvania's presidential election, won by Republican Donald Trump, and scan some counties' election systems for signs of hacking.


Read more: http://6abc.com/politics/judge-rejects-green-partys-pennsylvania-recount-case/1651954/

---

This just over the transom.

[no_hypocrisy]

1. EMERGENCY APPEAL!

[NWCorona]

2. And why didn't Jill just cough up the $10k to secure the recount instead of going the court route?

[Coyotl]

3. No surprise here.

[Hortensis]

4. Stein got a lot of publicity, but it's now showcasing her

stumbles and deficiencies, and probably deceitfulness. Certainly her attorneys would have discussed with her in the very beginning the question of whether she had "standing" in PN and in other states. This performance is about what I've always normally expected of her.

My donation did get the issue of auditing elections discussed nationally, which is the least I hoped for, actual audits being pretty much the most. Narrower win margins for what smells like an illegitimate presidency, even if he was legally elected, would have been fine also.

[Mr. Evil]

5. The fix is in. n/t