Lindsey Graham Pushes to Cut U.N. Funding After Vote on Israeli Settlements
Source: Mediaite
by Josh Feldman | 12:04 pm, December 24th, 2016
Senator Lindsey Graham is pushing to cut U.S. funding to the United Nations in response to the U.N. Security Council vote yesterday to condemn Israeli settlements.
Before the actual vote on the resolution yesterday, Graham released a statement warning not just the U.N., but any nation that votes in favor of the resolution, about potential consequences:
Lindsey Graham ✔
@LindseyGrahamSC
If UN moves forward with ill-conceived #Israel resolution, I'll work to form a bipartisan coalition to suspend/reduce US assistance to UN.
1:18 PM - 23 Dec 2016
268 Retweets 506 likes
Lindsey Graham ✔
@LindseyGrahamSC
Any nation which backs this ill-conceived #Israel resolution and receives assistance from the US -- will put that assistance in jeopardy.
1:21 PM - 23 Dec 2016
356 Retweets 596 likes
When the vote took place, the United States abstained and declined to invoke veto power.
In his response, Graham tore into the reckless foreign policy of the Obama administration and said, Regardless of the terrorist attacks they suffer, or the number of rockets fired their way, in the United Nations Israel is always the bad guy.
Read more: http://www.mediaite.com/online/lindsey-graham-pushes-to-cut-u-n-funding-after-vote-on-israeli-settlements/
Historic NY
(37,454 posts)suddenly embrace Israel who is constantly inciting conflict and doesn't want to settle the conflict. Remember when the Congress did an end run around the President having Netanyahu here to address them.
benld74
(9,911 posts)2 state has been the US stance for years.
Where the heck has he been?
Or is he turning too
lastlib
(23,320 posts)Leave it to Loon-dsey.
Response to lastlib (Reply #8)
Post removed
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)DK504
(3,847 posts)of fascism more and more of these morons are skinny dipping.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Reagan and elder Bush being prominent examples. Bill Clinton was much friendlier (and nearly got a peace agreement).
still_one
(92,450 posts)other hard line republicans, if not antisemitic, definitely had antisemitic leanings, and the Nixon tapes with Billy Graham only point to the way he felt toward Jews.
As we have trump, Israel has Netanyahu,
It is out of print now, but there is a book entitled "Double Vision" by Ze'ev Chafets, from 1985, and it explored a lot of these questions
oberliner
(58,724 posts)It will be interesting to see if there is any tension there.
still_one
(92,450 posts)hatrack
(59,593 posts)Your defiant stance was fun for the week it lasted.
Buh-bye.
Scruffy1
(3,257 posts)He's really good at making loud statements to grab a headline then doing whatever his masters tell him. I am sure he is completely owned through blackmail or money.
pansypoo53219
(21,004 posts)the settlements cost them a bundle.
elmac
(4,642 posts)Do tell.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)MyOwnPeace
(16,940 posts)is support for continued expansion of settlements.
This does NOTHING to increase the possibility of peace there.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)in the process.
The longer Israel waits to come to a fair two state solution, the more likely a multi-ethnic one state solution.
The latter would be more in line with our values.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)That is a strange sentence.
With respect to your other comments, multi-ethnic states pretty much all broke up a few decades ago. No one wants to re-unite Yugoslavia.
okasha
(11,573 posts)every nation in the Americas is a multi-ethnic state. Some deal with it better than others. The US isn't dealing well at the moment; there are calls for division right here on DU, as well as from white supremacists.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Into smaller independent countries.
Czech Republic, Slovakia, Eritrea, Montenegro, Serbia, Kosovo, etc.
okasha
(11,573 posts)But far more multi-ethnic states have held together than have broken up.
Those you cite were formed from linking previously independent states. They simply reverted to their previous forms.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)They each have their own separate national identities.
It seems like the two-state solution is the way to go. That is pretty much the world consensus as well. This UN resolution reiterated that point - as did the Obama administration.
okasha
(11,573 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,097 posts)All gone.
lefty2000
(177 posts)He knows as well as we do that we need both Israel and the United Nations.
Blue Idaho
(5,060 posts)Even worse is a sitting Senator threatening our allies and friends 140 characters at a time.
Mc Mike
(9,115 posts)thing".
treestar
(82,383 posts)They expect us to favor that?
Grey Lemercier
(1,429 posts)I would wager less than 5% of Rethugs are not overt, blatant anti-Arab and/or Islamophobic.
treestar
(82,383 posts)and all that, but I draw the line at those settlements. They to me prove it is about taking more land from the Palestinians.
onecaliberal
(32,920 posts)Republicans are sick and pathetic. They really do hate brown skin.
tirebiter
(2,539 posts)without Truman pushing it through the UN.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Truman pushing it through the UN?
Moliere
(285 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Bush and Clinton administrations both vetoed similar resolutions.
Also, the Obama administration has previously vetoed similar resolutions in 2011.
To wit:
US vetoes UN condemnation of Israeli settlements
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/feb/19/us-veto-israel-settlement
Moliere
(285 posts)# of times USA voted yes or abstained on resolutions critical of Israel:
Reagan: 21
Bush 1: 9
Bush 2: 6
Obama: 1
Did you not read the link?
Obama vetoed a similar resolution in 2011, as have Bush and Clinton.
From 2011:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/feb/19/us-veto-israel-settlement
Here's Clinton:
http://www.nytimes.com/1995/05/18/world/us-vetoes-a-condemnation-in-un-of-israeli-land-seizure.html