Reid: White House options for 2020 resemble 'an old-folks' home'
Source: Politico
By NOLAN D. MCCASKILL 12/27/16 02:02 PM EST
The likely 2020 class of Democratic presidential candidates is starting to resemble an old-folks home, according to retiring Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid.
Reid recently told an aide that he was unsure whether he would support Vice President Joe Biden should he challenge President-elect Donald Trump for the White House in 2020 because the field has yet to take shape.
It depends on whos running, Reid told the staffer, according to a New York Magazine profile of the Nevada Democrat published online Tuesday. Weve got (Elizabeth) Warren; shell be 71. Biden will be 78. Bernie (Sanders) will be 79.
Indeed, as the Democratic Party looks to pick up the pieces from a tough November showing that shattered their hopes to keep the White House, make deep inroads in the House and retake the Senate, a roster of familiar faces has surfaced as top contenders for the next presidential election.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/harry-reid-2020-candidates-old-folks-home-232985
elleng
(130,732 posts)JudyM
(29,192 posts)Reid needs to just. Go.
elleng
(130,732 posts)but THIS opinion is one we can, and SHOULD, live without.
Xipe Totec
(43,888 posts)by sitting on their chairs until they rotted, then, perhaps, we might have a younger generation to pick from.
Crash2Parties
(6,017 posts)Xipe Totec
(43,888 posts)No offense. in case you read past the nt.
Crash2Parties
(6,017 posts)SharonAnn
(13,771 posts)politicat
(9,808 posts)Low-ish count, long history, though.
My county office and the current crop isn't much better. And I'm in a blue-blue-blue place, with a lot of young'uns who want to step up for both party and elected roles.
Institutional memory is a great thing, until it becomes inertia.
Xipe Totec
(43,888 posts)But I do feel that incumbency hurts us more than the Regurglicans.
DRoseDARs
(6,810 posts)Fucking Politico. Fucking New York Magazine. Fucking fuck.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)speculating on who would run and their ages so, should we say "fucking DU" also?
harun
(11,348 posts)DrToast
(6,414 posts)She would crush Trump (even though I don't think he'll run again) while maintaining a smile.
Response to DrToast (Reply #3)
Name removed Message auto-removed
mopinko
(69,990 posts)an all minnesota ticket would be fine w me. shove your coastal elite bullshit where the sun dont shine.
RedWedge
(618 posts)DrToast
(6,414 posts)To begin with I think she's very smart and capable. That's obviously necessary. But there are many potential candidates that have that. What I think she brings to the table beyond her capability is that she seems very likable and relatable. When I watch her in interviews, she's always relaxed and comfortable. She's genuine. She doesn't sound like she's blowing smoke up your ass.
I guess I could be wrong, but I think she would do well as a candidate despite her relatively low national profile.
RedWedge
(618 posts)I know she hasn't been in the senate very long, but her "capability" hasn't resulted in much either.
DrToast
(6,414 posts)Sure would have helped this year. And 9 years isn't exactly a short amount of time in the Senate
J_William_Ryan
(1,748 posts)DrToast
(6,414 posts)I don't think she would be as skilled a politician as Obama, but I see them cut of the same cloth.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)Amy Klobuchar wants more emphasis on adoption. I want more emphasis on family preservation.
She will never get my vote.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)StevieM
(10,500 posts)I meant that I could never vote for her in a primary. I don't want her to be the Democratic nominee.
If she wins the nomination then she will get my vote.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)doc03
(35,295 posts)DonViejo
(60,536 posts)doc03
(35,295 posts)we can drive ourselves nuts trying to figure something out and a 10 year old can fix it in seconds.
I missed a few weeks school in my sophomore year and failed Spanish. That was the only class I ever failed
and it always bothered me. Here a few days ago I bought one of those learning Spanish easy books
I think my ability to learn a new language is gone now. I can remember something that happened 40 years ago
like it was yesterday but can't remember where I put my car keys five minutes ago.
angrychair
(8,678 posts)Finding Democratic Congress members under 55 is rare (the average is 59.6 for Dems) which is almost 5 years older than republicans. All Democratic Congressional leadership is significantly older than 60 and has been in Congress for decades in some cases.
We have allowed them to lead the Party despite stunning loses throughout the country, allowing 29 states to fall to republican control, putting up very little resistance in most states.
jaysunb
(11,856 posts)who I think was the best candidate last go round.
femmocrat
(28,394 posts)Also Corey Booker who gives a barn-burner of a speech!
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)elleng
(130,732 posts)JUST the right attitude for Dems to adopt, NOT!
1. Ended death penalty in Maryland
2. Prevented fracking in Maryland and put regulations in the way to prevent next GOP Gov Hogan fom easily allowing fracking.
3. Provided health insurance for 380,000
4. Reduced infant mortality to an all time low.
5. Provided meals to thousands of hungry children and moved toward a goal for eradicating childhood hunger.
6. Enacted a $10.10 living wage and a $11. minimum wage for State workers.
7. Supporter the Dream Act
8. Cut income taxes for 86% of Marylanders (raised taxes on the rich).
9. Reformed Marylands tax code to make it more progressive.
10. Enacted some of the nations most comprehensive reforms to protect homeowners from foreclosure.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12813
kwassa
(23,340 posts)I don't know why, I voted for him, but he pulled nothing in the Maryland primary, much less nationwide.
He doesn't have it.
elleng
(130,732 posts)and little $$$.
pnwmom
(108,955 posts)Response to jaysunb (Reply #7)
Name removed Message auto-removed
PragmaticLiberal
(904 posts)RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)liberal N proud
(60,332 posts)The Castro brothers come to mind among others.
Response to liberal N proud (Reply #14)
Name removed Message auto-removed
TexasBushwhacker
(20,142 posts)Governor or Senator first. Serving in a statewide office is important for building their base. Cornyn is up for re-election in 2020 and he'll be 68. He may run again, or he may take some cushy lobbyist position. I think Dan Patrick will probably primary him, so that could be bloody.
Cruz is up for re-election in 2018, but I'm afraid we're stuck with him until 2020. I'm don't think he would challenge Trump again, although if Pense takes over he might challenge him.
GusFring
(756 posts)Response to GusFring (Reply #15)
Name removed Message auto-removed
tenorly
(2,037 posts)Just compare our population pyramid from 1980:
to that of 2014:
and current projections for 2050:
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)ebbie15644
(1,214 posts)marylandblue
(12,344 posts)He even used to be friendly with Trump, until he found out how nuts Trump is.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,142 posts)ebbie15644
(1,214 posts)get attention. I also think that if all we have is old people, we are in trouble. Not that I'm against old but it's time to show "new blood"
cannabis_flower
(3,764 posts)Hill and Bill used to be friendly with Trump - went to his wedding, in fact.
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)If you're going the celeb route someone like George Clooney would be better, imo.
rtracey
(2,062 posts)Gavin Newson......
DrToast
(6,414 posts)Reminds me of John Edwards.
independentpiney
(1,510 posts)He'd crush trump in campaign trail entertainment value since that's what we've devolved to as an electorate, and then govern effectively for 8 years
Crash2Parties
(6,017 posts)paleotn
(17,881 posts)Joaquin Castro, Julian Castro, Cory Booker and dare I say.... Tim Kaine. That's just off the top of my head. Our bench of well known Dems may seem thin, but our full bench is certainly not. And wouldn't Kaine's integrity and common decency be a welcome relief for the majority of Americans after a few years of Trumpence disasters?
Vinca
(50,236 posts)Remember, in 2000 nobody had heard of Barrack Obama and in 2008 he was POTUS. There must be someone closer to 50 than 80!
JudyM
(29,192 posts)It's appalling that chronological age should be used to limit these folks... if they have stamina and ideas that appeal to all age groups, as long as their minds don't show signs of failing, they should be given the opportunity.
I am stunned by people cavalierly dismissing these folks because they're older. And to not recognize it as ageism... we have fought for employment laws that prevent just such discrimination.
potone
(1,701 posts)with the current rate of technological change, there is something to be said for having some younger people in high office who are comfortable with modern technology. After all, that was one of the things that got Hillary into trouble, and it is clear that the economic basis of our country is changing as a result of the rapid technological developments. A younger person might be more attuned to these changes and comfortable with the new technology than someone in their 70s.
JudyM
(29,192 posts)expertise! If Hillary had made different choices she wouldn't've had any problems at all. She had a guy on the side handling everything rather than going through proper procedures.
PragmaticLiberal
(904 posts)DrToast
(6,414 posts)I was hoping she would be the next CA Gov.
ellie
(6,928 posts)All the way!
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)not that age should mean much considering trump will be 74.
HoneyBadger
(2,297 posts)Philanthropist, Harvard Doctor, self funding, considered a genius, child of refugees, fluent in Chinese and Spanish
kwassa
(23,340 posts)DAMANgoldberg
(1,278 posts)I would love nothing more than Alan Grayson to run for President. It won't happen, but I love his policies.
A name to watch out for: Anthony Foxx, current US Transportation Secretary from Charlotte, North Carolina (biased).
RayStar
(417 posts)He's young and handsome. Brave enough to challenge Mrs. Pelosi.
NNadir
(33,470 posts)...person comes out of nowhere and sometimes wins.
This was the case after James Buchanan, generally regarded as the worst President ever by historians, who was succeeded by Abraham Lincoln, who in 1860 was a former one term congressman who had lost a Senate race in 1858 to Steven Douglas.
I know that I personally didn't think of Barack Obama as a leading candidate after the Kerry defeat in 2004, and yet he saved our country from a Bush disaster which Trump is likely to exceed.
FDR was well known by 1932, but he had only been elected Governor of New York in 1928 - the year Hoover took office - and before that had been out of politics because of his polio. I don't think that many people in 1928 assumed he would be President.
Trump is likely to be so bad, that a strongly Democratic Congress will be elected in 2018. One never knows whether the situation will be so bad that the constitutional restriction put in place to prevent "another FDR" might be repealed. In this case Obama might be another FDR.
Trump, and Pence who will surely wade into this slime, might both be impeached, a la Nixon Agnew (resigned). I don't think that anyone in 1972 thought Nixon and Agnew would be gone 2 years later, and yet they were.
The country is sure to suffer tremendously in the next four years, and I suspect we have no idea who will restore it, but we must hope that the American genius for self regeneration will find us again as it has in our history.
Our country has surely not faced a worse prospect since the days of Buchanan.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Since so many demos seem to make the mistake of bringing a balloon to a knife fight, what about Tony Bourdain?
EMAN51
(133 posts)Gavin Newsom.
EMAN51
(133 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,074 posts)Perhaps he might run for President down the road, but I don't think it will be in 2020.
EMAN51
(133 posts)But he does have national aspirations, and would kick ass.
GoCubsGo
(32,074 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I think more and more people are noticing his leadership at the national level, too.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,142 posts)ooky
(8,908 posts)after people have had their fill of Republican congressonal over-reach and Trump's broken promises. The "jobs" he's not going to bring back should alone be enough to sink his bid for a a second term.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,142 posts)Renew Deal
(81,846 posts)And Trump is the oldest person ever to win. Americans typically look for fresh blood.
OrwellwasRight
(5,170 posts)are septuagenarians.
The Party leadership does not have a great record of mentoring and raising up the next generation of leaders. Unfortunately, the R Party does--just look how young Paul Ryan is. Now imagine how he comes across on TV (minus what he is saying of course): young, good looking, active, quick on his feet, etc. Appearances matter, perceptions matter, and we know this factually and have known it for years. it is part of the reason Kennedy beat Nixon in 1960.
The Democratic Party needs to get better at raising up younger leaders. There has to be a balance between seniority and respect for elders and lifting up a new generation of leaders before they themselves are all in their 60s. Like Frank Pallone and Ed Markey. They were once touted as the "next generation" of leaders for the Commerce Committee. Markey eventually got tired of waiting, ran for the Senate. He is now 70. Pallone finally got the Ranking Member nod at 63. He is now 65, and age when most people are considering retirement.
Obama is a good example. New, young, fresh face when he was elected? Yes. With extensive elected leadership experience? No. How could the Party have better lifted him up so that he came into the presidency with as much leadership experience as Ryan will have when he hits Obama's age, for example???