Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,786 posts)
Tue Jan 17, 2017, 01:02 PM Jan 2017

Invesco: Were cutting risk over Trump policy uncertainty

Source: CNBC

The lack of clarity over President-elect Donald Trump's policies has been so great that major fund manager Invesco is reducing its risk exposure, said Kevin Egan, a senior portfolio manager.

"We've really taken a lot of risk off the table because we are concerned about this uncertainty, this disconnect between stated policy, tweeted policy and the things that are coming out of all different directions," Egan told CNBC's "Squawk Box" on Tuesday.

...snip...

As an example, Egan pointed to the outlook for the pharmaceutical sector. He noted that after headlines around the Democratic Party demonizing the sector, the market should have been able to expect the sector to perform better under the Republicans and Trump.

But that expectation was short-circuited as Trump has criticized the sector, Egan noted.

Read more: http://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/16/invesco-were-cutting-risk-over-trump-policy-uncertainty.html



We've considered this issue with respect to our own investments; the problem is, between Brexit and EU instability, there aren't other non-US investments that are any more reliable.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Invesco: Were cutting risk over Trump policy uncertainty (Original Post) brooklynite Jan 2017 OP
Other than more pollution and tax cuts for people who don't need them bucolic_frolic Jan 2017 #1
How many cycles do these people need to figure it out? Jeroen Jan 2017 #2
tweeted policy should not be a term that is ever used with respect to a country xor Jan 2017 #3

bucolic_frolic

(43,356 posts)
1. Other than more pollution and tax cuts for people who don't need them
Tue Jan 17, 2017, 01:21 PM
Jan 2017

there is no coherency between Trump, House, Senate, GOP Platform

No one knows what to think. Stalemate would be a good idea for 4 years.

GOP were Obstructionists, now they are Do-Nothings

Jeroen

(1,061 posts)
2. How many cycles do these people need to figure it out?
Tue Jan 17, 2017, 01:21 PM
Jan 2017

Democrats are good for business and stability. Jeez, it boggles the mind.
Fuckers.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Invesco: Were cutting ris...