Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

UnrepentantLiberal

(11,700 posts)
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 08:53 AM Jul 2012

17 people hurt in Tuscaloosa, Ala., bar shooting

Source: AP

July 17, 2012

TUSCALOOSA, Ala. (AP) — A gunman opened fire at a bar in the hometown of the University of Alabama, wounding multiple people, police said Tuesday.

A total of 17 people were being treated at DCH Regional Medical Center, hospital spokesman Brad Fisher told The Associated Press.

Four of the victims have been admitted to the hospital, and two of them were receiving critical care, Fisher said. It wasn't immediately known whether all had been hit by gunfire, he said.

-snip-

Riley Dunn, a University of Alabama senior who was injured in the shooting, estimated that there were 80 to 90 people in the area at the time. One gunshot rang out, then about 20 seconds later "that's when he really started firing them off" and everyone scattered, Dunn said.

Read more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iAll5Eaoy--Q5xYDqRqZBDx2_dxw?docId=00e371d1655940d0bb3bcf9fe4b80bbc

140 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
17 people hurt in Tuscaloosa, Ala., bar shooting (Original Post) UnrepentantLiberal Jul 2012 OP
Nobody killed? TheMightyFavog Jul 2012 #1
Hope everyone is ok. Is Alabama one of the states that allows guns in bars like Arizona? still_one Jul 2012 #2
What does this have to do with Arizona? michreject Jul 2012 #6
Because there are a few states that have a law allowing concealed weapons in bars. Arizona is one still_one Jul 2012 #16
Business owners can post no guns allowed on their doors. permatex Jul 2012 #40
You can actually look this stuff up. PavePusher Jul 2012 #58
Thanks, I googled it and the search wasn't clear still_one Jul 2012 #89
Guns and alcohol , never a good mix. Marrah_G Jul 2012 #3
The shooter wasn't in the bar drinking permatex Jul 2012 #5
Then nothing could have prevented that, however, concealed weapons in bars is a stupid law, but hey still_one Jul 2012 #18
Actually the myth of the wild west is just that permatex Jul 2012 #21
Because alcohol contributes to more heated exchanges, even if the person with the weapon isn't still_one Jul 2012 #22
But the opposite has been shown to be true permatex Jul 2012 #31
"You can check the stats on the conviction rate of CCP holders..." uh clem Jul 2012 #54
Citation to your information, please? n/t PavePusher Jul 2012 #61
I'll bet it's Brady or VPC stats. permatex Jul 2012 #64
I don't buy the stats, and I have seen enough fights with alcohol involved that to me it is common still_one Jul 2012 #90
Yea, but there are lots of folks who aren't criminals per se, who don't get a permit. Hoyt Jul 2012 #91
So fucking what. permatex Jul 2012 #100
And exactly how is that going to be enforced? SheilaT Jul 2012 #27
If it was such a problem permatex Jul 2012 #34
No the states wouldn't repeal. Too much right wing gun lobbying money from NRA and others. Hoyt Jul 2012 #92
So provide the links to what you are claiming. permatex Jul 2012 #101
my state, NH, driven of course by ALEC and the NRA Warren Stupidity Jul 2012 #32
Only on your property and only to a trespasser and only after he refuse to leave. hack89 Jul 2012 #35
Heres a text of Senate bill 88 permatex Jul 2012 #36
"However, if just one citizen with a CCP had been on scene,..." uh clem Jul 2012 #45
Where did you get that? permatex Jul 2012 #46
Hoyt, are you running a sock puppet? n/t PavePusher Jul 2012 #62
No. You are not in the gungeon now. People don't buy your more guns in public promotion. Hoyt Jul 2012 #93
"You are not in the gungeon now." PavePusher Jul 2012 #95
Nope, you hang out with your gun promoting buddies in the gungeon. Here you see how people really Hoyt Jul 2012 #97
What make and model of gun was used? PavePusher Jul 2012 #99
Do you plan on waiting for all the facts before you'll pull your gun if you think Hoyt Jul 2012 #104
There is a wee bit of difference between making decisions during an emergency situation.... PavePusher Jul 2012 #105
What are the odds of anything happening where most people need a gun? Hoyt Jul 2012 #107
Oh about... sarisataka Jul 2012 #108
Come on, how many times are you actually at risk if you are moderately careful? Hoyt Jul 2012 #109
I will agree with you there sarisataka Jul 2012 #110
Too funny. nt michreject Jul 2012 #114
given donquijoterocket Jul 2012 #50
Not necessarily true permatex Jul 2012 #55
You have evidence of existance of a statistically significant problem.... PavePusher Jul 2012 #65
If their weapons are concealed, how does the bartender know they're not allowed a drink? freshwest Jul 2012 #51
As is true of MOST laws, the proscription against drinking while carrying a weapon is self-enforced slackmaster Jul 2012 #70
If the person is not reliable, like Rodriquez, things will get out of hand. freshwest Jul 2012 #80
one thing donquijoterocket Jul 2012 #53
They are sometimes a possible solution to some things. PavePusher Jul 2012 #66
We've outlawed cigarettes in most public places, but the NRA has paid for laws allowing guns. Hoyt Jul 2012 #94
Bullshit. PavePusher Jul 2012 #96
And I'm doing my best to make your nightmare come true. permatex Jul 2012 #102
Please cite to where it's been a statistically significant problem... PavePusher Jul 2012 #59
Actually, 11 of the shots were fired from outside the bar dixiegrrrrl Jul 2012 #78
Well that's crap reporting. PavePusher Jul 2012 #98
the 17 "injured" seems accurate. dixiegrrrrl Jul 2012 #103
How can they not know the caliber? sarisataka Jul 2012 #106
They like that sort of thing jberryhill Jul 2012 #4
your post MrDiaz Jul 2012 #7
lol jberryhill Jul 2012 #9
Or was he just another fear-freaked gun hugger? BamBamBane Jul 2012 #10
That is just so.............................. permatex Jul 2012 #11
Bigotry against gun owners? Jack Sprat Jul 2012 #12
How about the little snark about over compensating? permatex Jul 2012 #23
It wasn't insulting at all, unless Jack Sprat Jul 2012 #33
You just made my point permatex Jul 2012 #42
Talking to your gun is not a good sign. UnrepentantLiberal Jul 2012 #49
Thanks for sharing the image. Judi Lynn Jul 2012 #25
+1 AnOhioan Jul 2012 #28
Do you know what that gun is or what it was used for or did you just think it was a cute photo? rl6214 Jul 2012 #111
You see it's like this... uh clem Jul 2012 #48
You are misinformed about federal law, specifically 18 USC section 922 (d) slackmaster Jul 2012 #52
I love it when posted facts permatex Jul 2012 #63
Not to mention any number of state laws broken.... n/t PavePusher Jul 2012 #69
Cap on backwards. Shirt untucked. Gang hit. slackmaster Jul 2012 #8
you forgot "Negros" Warren Stupidity Jul 2012 #13
From the surveilance photo, he appears to be white. AtheistCrusader Jul 2012 #15
Look at the pictures I posted downthread, tell me what color that dude is. nt MADem Jul 2012 #20
Yeah, that bottom one is the one I saw on the news article. AtheistCrusader Jul 2012 #56
I imagine the poster was trivializing the shooting. Warren Stupidity Jul 2012 #29
You have a vivid imagination, and apparently some biases as well slackmaster Jul 2012 #39
Funny. You seem to be the only one that hears it. AtheistCrusader Jul 2012 #57
Could be a white guy. I can't tell from the picture. Can you? MADem Jul 2012 #19
Police describe him as a white male, 5’7" to 5’9" slackmaster Jul 2012 #37
"gang"=/="racism" PavePusher Jul 2012 #74
This message was self-deleted by its author PavePusher Jul 2012 #68
Actually, Warren Stupidity played the race card in this thread slackmaster Jul 2012 #71
Arrgh, sorry, replied in wrong place. I'll delete and move. n/t PavePusher Jul 2012 #72
Kinda hurts one's credibility. Remmah2 Jul 2012 #116
Open carry state. Warren Stupidity Jul 2012 #14
So how is that relevent to this? permatex Jul 2012 #24
actually it is a may issue for concealed carry. Warren Stupidity Jul 2012 #30
The idea of may issue is to prevent the "wrong" people from getting permits slackmaster Jul 2012 #41
I stand corrected on shall issue permatex Jul 2012 #43
Yeah....We need more guns zellie Jul 2012 #17
No, we need the states to do a better job of reporting permatex Jul 2012 #26
No - we need less lunatics hack89 Jul 2012 #38
You can trust gun owners. They can police their own actions. No regulation needed. onehandle Jul 2012 #44
You can trust lawful gun owner alot more than banksters. permatex Jul 2012 #47
You can trust bankers alot more than lawful gun owners. onehandle Jul 2012 #60
Platitudes and atitudes seems to be all you have. permatex Jul 2012 #67
Replies in this thread bongbong Jul 2012 #73
It's mostly a bunch of speculation about what happened snooper2 Jul 2012 #75
I'm thinking he got 86'd for bringing a live opossum into the club slackmaster Jul 2012 #76
did the bar have a posted policy against this? DBoon Jul 2012 #79
It was a violation of California state law, something in the Health and Safety Code slackmaster Jul 2012 #81
But placental mammals would be fine right? 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #83
I think a service iguana would be allowed slackmaster Jul 2012 #84
I'll discuss that with my seeing eye turtle. Remmah2 Jul 2012 #117
"I was taking drugs, and things got out of hand at the bar," dixiegrrrrl Jul 2012 #77
That was real "white" of him to turn himself in slackmaster Jul 2012 #82
Clearly the bars fault. And guns 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #85
Or maybe bongbong Jul 2012 #86
Didn't you forget your :rofl: and your "gun religionist" bullshit? rl6214 Jul 2012 #112
Obsessed bongbong Jul 2012 #118
Obsessed? Yes you are. rl6214 Jul 2012 #119
Oh dear bongbong Jul 2012 #120
Tough guy? No, I just go with the flow. If anyone is "a self-professed "tough guy" rl6214 Jul 2012 #121
ROFL bongbong Jul 2012 #122
please show me rl6214 Jul 2012 #123
Sorry, different poster bongbong Jul 2012 #124
"Sorry, different poster" rl6214 Jul 2012 #125
Yowza bongbong Jul 2012 #126
How often do we have gas attacks compared to armed robberies or assaultis in general rl6214 Jul 2012 #127
LOL bongbong Jul 2012 #128
"Logic and facts? Your fear & gun-religion rule them out to be a member. " rl6214 Jul 2012 #129
Worship your PRECIOUS! bongbong Jul 2012 #130
You just keep up with your juvenile shtick rl6214 Jul 2012 #131
OK bongbong Jul 2012 #132
"That's alright, this is a Liberal chatboard, and Liberals think gun-religionists are completely nut rl6214 Jul 2012 #135
PROVE IT bongbong Jul 2012 #136
In the immortal words of YOU...google it, I'm not going to do your work for you rl6214 Jul 2012 #137
LOL bongbong Jul 2012 #140
Suspect held in Alabama bar shooting that wounded 17 struggle4progress Jul 2012 #87
UPDATE Tejas Jul 2012 #88
how many more of these mass shootings before we get gun control? wordpix Jul 2012 #133
Gun control, like in Mexico? Tejas Jul 2012 #134
I love my gun, love my gun! adigal Jul 2012 #113
Guns wound people. ileus Jul 2012 #115
If everyone in that bar had been heavily armed, this wouldn't have happened. Bucky Jul 2012 #138
Just another day in Gunland - n/t primavera Jul 2012 #139
 

still_one

(98,883 posts)
16. Because there are a few states that have a law allowing concealed weapons in bars. Arizona is one
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 11:35 AM
Jul 2012

of them. The owners of those establishments have always been against that, claiming that alcohol and guns are not a good combination

I was wondering if Alabama also had such a law that is all

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
40. Business owners can post no guns allowed on their doors.
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 12:32 PM
Jul 2012

When they do, that makes it illegal. Of course, someone with criminal intent will disobey the signs.
And it's more than a few now, hasn't seemed to be a problem.

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
5. The shooter wasn't in the bar drinking
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 10:06 AM
Jul 2012

he came in and started shooting.
The state I live in does allow concealed carry in bars, but you can't be drinking, thats the law in most of the states that allow concealed carry in restaurants and bars.
Hasn't seemed to be a problem yet and some of these laws have been around for years.

Any private business can put up a no guns allowed sign, problem with that is that criminals don't obey those signs.

 

still_one

(98,883 posts)
18. Then nothing could have prevented that, however, concealed weapons in bars is a stupid law, but hey
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 11:39 AM
Jul 2012

they want to go back to the wild west let them. Unfortunately in this situation it appears it would not have prevented anything.

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
21. Actually the myth of the wild west is just that
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 11:52 AM
Jul 2012

a myth, the eastern states at that time were much more violent then the western states. As far as concealed carry in bars, I'd like to hear your reasons why you think it's a bad idea.
When a CCP holder carrys in a bar, they are prohibited from consuming any alcohol whatsoever, and they better not let the weapon print or get flashed, in some states that will get you a misdemeanor charge and loss of your CCP.

I agree with your last statement, in this situation, no law would have prevented this shooting.

However, if just one citizen with a CCP had been on scene, things might have turned out differently, not saying they would, just saying that it might have been stopped after a few shots were fired.

 

still_one

(98,883 posts)
22. Because alcohol contributes to more heated exchanges, even if the person with the weapon isn't
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 11:58 AM
Jul 2012

drinking, someone else who is could say something that he would take as offensive, and it would be all to easy to use that weapon

If the weapon was not on his person, if he had to go out and get it, that process might cool the person off

I won't go to those establishments, where concealed weapons are allowed, especially in certain states where there is a lot of frustration simmering

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
31. But the opposite has been shown to be true
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 12:13 PM
Jul 2012

I just recently applied for my CCP and it was pounded into my head the consequences of doing something stupid like what you suggest.
The huge majority of CCP holders are pretty level headed, honest citizens who made the decision to be able to defend themselves if it ever came to that. I admit that I wrestled with my decision to apply for about a year, weighing the pros and cons, whether I could take another human life if I was, through no fault of my own, put in that situation. It wasn't an easy decision, but now that I've done it, I feel confident that I'm not going to do what you suggest might happen.
You can check the stats on the conviction rate of CCP holders, FL and TX post those stats every year.

Your choice to not want CCP in bars and I respect that.
What are your views on CCP in general?

uh clem

(59 posts)
54. "You can check the stats on the conviction rate of CCP holders..."
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 01:09 PM
Jul 2012

I have and it's doesn't look good for the CCPs.

 

still_one

(98,883 posts)
90. I don't buy the stats, and I have seen enough fights with alcohol involved that to me it is common
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 03:38 PM
Jul 2012

sense

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
91. Yea, but there are lots of folks who aren't criminals per se, who don't get a permit.
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 05:56 PM
Jul 2012

We've become much to complacent with guns in this country.

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
100. So fucking what.
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 07:37 PM
Jul 2012

It's there choice not to get one just as it's my choice to get one.
Folks who are not criminals per se have a different word, law abiding citizens. You on the other hand, by your own words, were a criminal at one time.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
27. And exactly how is that going to be enforced?
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 12:09 PM
Jul 2012

It depends on the CCP holder being honest and sensible enough not to drink while carrying.

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
34. If it was such a problem
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 12:17 PM
Jul 2012

the states that allow it would have repealed those laws by now. The huge majority of CCP holders are honest lawful citizens who took the time and spent the money to apply for and get their CCP. Sure, your always going to have a few assholes who fuck up and break the law, but they usually pay a pretty steep price for the fuck up.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
92. No the states wouldn't repeal. Too much right wing gun lobbying money from NRA and others.
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 05:58 PM
Jul 2012
 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
101. So provide the links to what you are claiming.
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 07:41 PM
Jul 2012

Show us the proof that the states wouldn't repeal those laws because of the NRA if those laws caused such problems, which, so far, they haven't. Just once, put your money where your mouth is.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
32. my state, NH, driven of course by ALEC and the NRA
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 12:16 PM
Jul 2012

has removed brandishing as an offense under SYG. You can now pull your gun out and use it to threaten other people, without risking jail time, under our fabulous new stand your ground idiocy. Plus you can keep a loaded gun in your car, just in case you need to shoot while driving.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
35. Only on your property and only to a trespasser and only after he refuse to leave.
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 12:26 PM
Jul 2012
A bill that would make it lawful to brandish a gun at a trespasser who refuses a homeowner's request to leave received mostly support at a public hearing yesterday.

The bill was inspired by Moultonboro farmer Ward Bird, who was jailed on a mandatory minimum three-year sentence for brandishing a gun at a trespasser who refused to leave his remote property.

Republican Rep. Betsey Patten, whose district includes Bird's property, said her bill would also remove the mandatory minimum sentence provision of the criminal threatening law.


http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/242213/bill-would-allow-show-of-guns-to-trespassers

Do you think 3 years was an appropriate sentence?

And the NRA and ALEC had nothing to do with it.

uh clem

(59 posts)
45. "However, if just one citizen with a CCP had been on scene,..."
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 12:50 PM
Jul 2012

Didn't the shooter have a CCP? At any rate, he was probably considered a responsible gun owner until he started shooting.

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
46. Where did you get that?
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 12:54 PM
Jul 2012

They haven't even caught the guy yet. Did you even read the article?

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
93. No. You are not in the gungeon now. People don't buy your more guns in public promotion.
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 06:01 PM
Jul 2012
 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
95. "You are not in the gungeon now."
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 06:18 PM
Jul 2012

Facsinating. You acknowledge (and approve of) a double-standard in behavior on DU. Most interesting.


" People don't buy your more guns in public promotion."

I'm sure you can cite to me "selling" something.... somewhere....


 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
97. Nope, you hang out with your gun promoting buddies in the gungeon. Here you see how people really
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 06:25 PM
Jul 2012

feel about guns and right wing groups like the NRA who are run by people like Grover Norquist, Teddy Nugent, John Bolton, Bob Barr, Ollie North and a host of other right wingers.

Fact is, we should have continued the ban on the type guns this yahoo used to shoot up a bar. But, because of the NRA, similar right wing groups, and a few "liberals" who can't function without a gun on city streets, this crud goes on and the gun manufacturers keep making more and more money.

By the way, the guy who shot up that bar looks like the yahoos that flooded gun stores after President Obama was elected, preparing to "take their country back."

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
99. What make and model of gun was used?
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 06:45 PM
Jul 2012

Was it one that would have fallen under the "ban" requirements?

Can you back up your claim to knowledge that has not been made public yet?

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
104. Do you plan on waiting for all the facts before you'll pull your gun if you think
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 09:14 PM
Jul 2012

you are being threatened? I bet not.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
105. There is a wee bit of difference between making decisions during an emergency situation....
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 11:02 PM
Jul 2012

and arm-chair kibitzing from the safety of where-ever your computer is located.

You would know that if your life was even a tenth as eventful as you have claimed.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
107. What are the odds of anything happening where most people need a gun?
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 11:19 PM
Jul 2012

Especially compared to negative gun outcomes.

sarisataka

(22,618 posts)
108. Oh about...
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 11:23 PM
Jul 2012

eight hundred thousand to two million times a year. The lower anti-gun source says at least one hundred fifty thousand. Even Brady et al. recognize there are many defensive gun uses every year.

sarisataka

(22,618 posts)
110. I will agree with you there
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 11:55 PM
Jul 2012

many things can be avoided by being careful. Sometimes, however, lighting does strike...

donquijoterocket

(488 posts)
50. given
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 12:59 PM
Jul 2012

how bad most people are with handguns it most likely might have ended with even more casualties. Never have been quite sure why gunners think another gunner is going to put their rounds in the 9 or 10 ring especially if the initial gunner starts shooting back.Targets are one thing a target that shoots back is another. Firefights especially in enclosed spaces are a good way to increase collateral damage and friendly fire casualties, to use a couple of the more oxymoronic euphemisms.

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
55. Not necessarily true
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 01:10 PM
Jul 2012

most CCP holders practice quite often, I don't have my CCP yet, should be here next week or so, but I regularly practice my shooting skills, I can outshoot the two of my relates that are LEO, and I can probably outshoot most street cops who usually only shoot a gun when they have to do their annual firearms qualification.
Here's a recent video of a CCP holder thwarting an armed robbery at an internet cafe with appox. 30 people there.
http://legiscan.com/gaits/text/347750

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
65. You have evidence of existance of a statistically significant problem....
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 01:27 PM
Jul 2012

of legal gun carriers causing such problems?

Please post a citation to evidence supporting your assertion.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
51. If their weapons are concealed, how does the bartender know they're not allowed a drink?
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 01:01 PM
Jul 2012
 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
70. As is true of MOST laws, the proscription against drinking while carrying a weapon is self-enforced
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 01:50 PM
Jul 2012

HTH

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
80. If the person is not reliable, like Rodriquez, things will get out of hand.
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 03:00 PM
Jul 2012

Too many variables, nothing to be done, except to avoid a crowd. There are good reason not to go to bars, although this was not a drunken patron, or so it would appear. This story is not really about CCW, RKBA, the state of Alabama, the university nearby or bars. Just a violent person who shouldn't have been armed, but laws don't stop criminals. It would only be politically interesting if there was evidence of bias. We may never know. I don't guess any laws will be changed by this.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
66. They are sometimes a possible solution to some things.
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 01:29 PM
Jul 2012

No-one claims they are an applicable solution to everything.

OMG, This just in: Any object can be used in a criminal/negligent/harmful way!! More on this shocking fact at TonightsObviousNewsAt10!!!!

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
94. We've outlawed cigarettes in most public places, but the NRA has paid for laws allowing guns.
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 06:06 PM
Jul 2012


I'm with you, we've glamorized gun far too long. Unfortunately, we'll sit on our asses for the next decade and another 100 million guns will pollute society.
 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
96. Bullshit.
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 06:21 PM
Jul 2012

We've outlawed use, not carry of cigarettes.

As usual, your attempt at analogy is Teh Phale.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
59. Please cite to where it's been a statistically significant problem...
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 01:21 PM
Jul 2012

with otherwise legal carriers getting drunk and shooting places up.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
98. Well that's crap reporting.
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 06:27 PM
Jul 2012

"He used a military-type assault rifle, Anderson said, but police are unsure of the caliber or rate of fire."

In other words, they don't know shit, but the reporter decided to do some creative fear-mongering word play.

Sigh.



dixiegrrrrl

(60,156 posts)
103. the 17 "injured" seems accurate.
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 09:09 PM
Jul 2012

not "wounded" but "injured.
tho is now reported to be in critical condition.
Al.com is keeping up with the latest.
and we have friends who got to the University up there.

sarisataka

(22,618 posts)
106. How can they not know the caliber?
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 11:15 PM
Jul 2012

Recover one bullet and grab a caliper...

ROF? ~60 rpm, same for any semiautomatic rifle.

The picture is to fuzzy for any positive ID on the rifle. I would guess an AK derivative but it could be about anything.

Very happy no one was killed.

 

MrDiaz

(731 posts)
7. your post
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 10:42 AM
Jul 2012

shows everyone how little educated you actually are on the. Was the guy doing the shooting a concealed handgun license holder, or a criminal who acquired a gun illegally.

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
11. That is just so..............................
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 10:53 AM
Jul 2012

original......................not. More bigotry against gun owners on display.
Why am I not surprised.

 

Jack Sprat

(2,500 posts)
12. Bigotry against gun owners?
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 11:26 AM
Jul 2012

I don't think so. I'm a gun owner and I don't take it that way. The main reason I own a gun is to protect myself against violence prone gun owners.

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
23. How about the little snark about over compensating?
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 11:58 AM
Jul 2012

Just how did you take that? 99.9% of gun owners in this country are honest law abiding citizens and that poster's comment was, IMHO, insulting. You may not take it that way and thats your perogative, I choose to take it as an insult.

 

Jack Sprat

(2,500 posts)
33. It wasn't insulting at all, unless
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 12:16 PM
Jul 2012

of course, you're one of those gunowners that's really into his guns. If you adore your guns and sleep with them at night and even talk to them some everyday, then I can understand where you're coming from.....I guess.

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
42. You just made my point
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 12:35 PM
Jul 2012

I tried to have a civil conversation with you and you just had to throw in your little snarky remarks.
Have a good day.

 

rl6214

(8,142 posts)
111. Do you know what that gun is or what it was used for or did you just think it was a cute photo?
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 04:01 AM
Jul 2012

It is actually called a punt gun, a huge shotgun used to kill an entire flock of birds at one time such as ducks. They were outlawed for hunting by most states in the 1860s

uh clem

(59 posts)
48. You see it's like this...
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 12:57 PM
Jul 2012

If a reponsible gun owner commits a crime, he gets reclassified as a criminal so won't tarnish the reputations of the gun lovers. As far as a legally purchased weapon goes, any criminal can purchase a gun from a private seller with cash ans without a background check.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
52. You are misinformed about federal law, specifically 18 USC section 922 (d)
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 01:01 PM
Jul 2012
As far as a legally purchased weapon goes, any criminal can purchase a gun from a private seller with cash ans without a background check.

In the situation you describe here, the buyer has committed a crime. If the buyer knows or has reason to believe the buyer is not legally allowed to have a firearm, the buyer has also committed a crime.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/922

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
15. From the surveilance photo, he appears to be white.
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 11:33 AM
Jul 2012

Do you imagine gang member automatically means 'black'? Maybe you should re-visit and adjust your personal biases.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
56. Yeah, that bottom one is the one I saw on the news article.
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 01:16 PM
Jul 2012

Looks like a white guy to me.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
39. You have a vivid imagination, and apparently some biases as well
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 12:30 PM
Jul 2012

Can a white person be a gang member? How about an Asian? Hispanic?

Or all all gang members black in your mind?

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
57. Funny. You seem to be the only one that hears it.
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 01:18 PM
Jul 2012

Where I come from, the descripton he used immediately conjures a white guy, because that is, statistically, the most numerous gang banger, population wise.

I tend to question whether it was a gang hit though. If it was, this guy was a spectacularly shitty shot.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
19. Could be a white guy. I can't tell from the picture. Can you?
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 11:44 AM
Jul 2012

If he's a brother, he's pink. Very pink. Very bright. He has a very visible tattooed left arm.

I don't know what universe you come from -- that hat and big shirt look is popular amongst the white people too down that way.




http://blog.al.com/tuscaloosa/2012/07/tuscaloosa_shooting_copper_top.html


Copper Top, located at the intersection of Fourth Street and 23rd Avenue in downtown Tuscaloosa about a mile away from the University of Alabama campus, is frequented by UA students.
 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
74. "gang"=/="racism"
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 02:22 PM
Jul 2012

But thanks for playing the race card, it certainly exposes your standards.

Good luck with that.

Response to slackmaster (Reply #8)

 

Remmah2

(3,291 posts)
116. Kinda hurts one's credibility.
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 11:59 AM
Jul 2012

One that constantly submarines to the lowest common denominator.

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
24. So how is that relevent to this?
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 12:01 PM
Jul 2012

It's also a shall issue state, is that relevent to this shooting?

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
30. actually it is a may issue for concealed carry.
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 12:11 PM
Jul 2012

yes gun culture is relevant to the shooting.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
41. The idea of may issue is to prevent the "wrong" people from getting permits
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 12:35 PM
Jul 2012

Who do you think that term refers to, Warren Stupidity?

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
43. I stand corrected on shall issue
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 12:41 PM
Jul 2012

but this isn't a gun culture issue, it's a criminal issue.

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
26. No, we need the states to do a better job of reporting
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 12:04 PM
Jul 2012

judgements of mental health to NICS. We need better mental health care in this country.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
38. No - we need less lunatics
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 12:28 PM
Jul 2012

properly funded mental health care - lets focus on the import issue.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
44. You can trust gun owners. They can police their own actions. No regulation needed.
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 12:47 PM
Jul 2012

I mean, bankers.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
60. You can trust bankers alot more than lawful gun owners.
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 01:22 PM
Jul 2012

See. I can issue platitudes too.

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
73. Replies in this thread
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 02:17 PM
Jul 2012

Gun-relgionist: "Nothing so bad about guns. I don't have any evidence, but they're GREAT!"

Liberal: "Guns are dangerous."
Gun-religionist: "WHERE IS YOUR PROOF? I WANT EVIDENCE! And it can't be from places that I hate like the Brady Campaign! Only NRA-approved sources meet my approval!"

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
75. It's mostly a bunch of speculation about what happened
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 02:31 PM
Jul 2012

Maybe some dude that was in the bar had raped his daughter and he went bonkers?


 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
76. I'm thinking he got 86'd for bringing a live opossum into the club
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 02:41 PM
Jul 2012

I've seen that happen.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
81. It was a violation of California state law, something in the Health and Safety Code
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 03:04 PM
Jul 2012

No children or non-humans allowed in bars except for service animals, but aquariums and maybe caged birds are OK. The guy who brought the opossum into the club thought it would be funny, but the bartender and the bouncer were not amused.

It's really amazing how many people in my neighborhood have service dogs.

 

rl6214

(8,142 posts)
112. Didn't you forget your :rofl: and your "gun religionist" bullshit?
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 04:08 AM
Jul 2012

You know, the normal shtick you like posting when it comes to guns?

Can't make a post based upon fact so you have to resort to your shtick.

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
118. Obsessed
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 04:51 PM
Jul 2012

> You know, the normal shtick you like posting when it comes to guns?

I didn't know you were so obsessed with my posts! I'll try harder next time just for you, sweetie-pie!

 

rl6214

(8,142 posts)
119. Obsessed? Yes you are.
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 10:29 PM
Jul 2012

See, there ya go, you got your little in there this time. Aren't you cute.

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
120. Oh dear
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 04:35 PM
Jul 2012

> Obsessed? Yes you are.

Back to the old "I know you are but what am I?" stuff from 2nd grade. You must be running out of "witty" stuff to post. You were just getting entertaining. A pity.

One question: Are you a self-professed "tough guy" like permatex?

 

rl6214

(8,142 posts)
121. Tough guy? No, I just go with the flow. If anyone is "a self-professed "tough guy"
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 08:58 PM
Jul 2012

they usually aren't that tough. I like the Teddy Roosevelt quote "speak softly and carry a big stick".

I'd like to see exactly where permatex professed to be a "tough guy" and what the conversation was about and the context it was in.

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
122. ROFL
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 12:11 PM
Jul 2012

> If anyone is "a self-professed "tough guy" they usually aren't that tough.

You said it (that you were a "tough guy&quot , so I guess that means you AREN'T tough. Basically, you sound really confused about yourself.

It looks like Gun Religion messes up people's heads.

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
124. Sorry, different poster
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:50 PM
Jul 2012

Thought I was responding to the self-professed "tough guy" (as he claimed in one of his posts to me) permatex.

Gun-relgionists are easy to mix up, my bad.

But maybe YOU can answer my question. Why is a person a "tough guy" when they need to carry gun(s) to feel safe enough to appear in public, but they're a 'wimpy librul' if they have no such fear gripping their persona?

 

rl6214

(8,142 posts)
125. "Sorry, different poster"
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 04:36 PM
Jul 2012

Yeah, but did you go edit your insulting post, nope.

"my bad"

As usual

"But maybe YOU can answer my question. Why is a person a "tough guy" when they need to carry gun(s) to feel safe enough to appear in public, but they're a 'wimpy librul' if they have no such fear gripping their persona?"

I don't claim to be a "tough guy" because I carry a gun nor do I "need to carry a gun (s) to feel safe enough to appear in public"

There may be some out there that do but I don't carry a gun out of fear, I carry a gun so I am prepared in a situation that I may need one. I came close to drowning once but I don't fear water because of it. It dosen't keep me out of pools, rivers or lakes, I just make sure I am prepared when entering water so I don't get in over my head (pun intended). I don't like heights but that dosen't prevent me from going up on/in tall buildings, roller coasters or even mountain climbing. Your fear arguement dosen't hold water.

So to answer your question, it's not a matter of a "tough guy" vs a "wimpy librul", it's being prepared vs not being prepared, your attempts at insults aside.

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
126. Yowza
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 05:14 PM
Jul 2012

> Your fear arguement dosen't hold water.

Maybe not in your case, but it does in lotsa other gun-religionists' cases.

> So to answer your question, it's not a matter of a "tough guy" vs a "wimpy librul", it's being prepared vs not being prepared,

Prepared? Why aren't you prepared for a gas attack? Why not carry around a gas mask? Why is the "preparation" that gun-relgionists need seem to coincide so closely with just carrying a gun? There are plenty of scenarios where a gun wouldn't make a difference.

No one can prove that they are just "preparing" and aren't "scared".

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As always, the run-relgionist's "arguments" dissolve in a pool of facts & logic.

 

rl6214

(8,142 posts)
127. How often do we have gas attacks compared to armed robberies or assaultis in general
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 06:35 PM
Jul 2012

Fail

"Why is the "preparation" that gun-relgionists need seem to coincide so closely with just carrying a gun?"

Why would you think it coincides just with carrying a gun? I try to be prepared in most aspects in my life. I carry a firstaide kit in my Jeep along with jumper cables, tool, an emergency jumpstart battery, emergency water, rations and blanket, a flashlight, spotlight, winch, shovel, two jacks and a spare tire. Most people would think those preparations are a bit much, I don't. In fact I had my jumpstart battery out of the Jeep yesterday and threw it in at the last minute and sure enough I needed to use it on a friends car. How many gas attacks do you see. I'm sure you can cite a few. I'll wait.

"There are plenty of scenarios where a gun wouldn't make a difference. "

And there are plenty fo scenarios, posted here everyday where they do.

"No one can prove that they are just "preparing" and aren't "scared". "

And you can't prove that they are prepared that they are scared of something. All you have is your whining, accusations and name calling.

"As always, the run-relgionist's "arguments" dissolve in a pool of facts & logic."

Facts and logic? To borrow a line from you:



There would have to be first of all SOME FACTS presented by you in order to prove any logic.

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
128. LOL
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 07:07 PM
Jul 2012

> How often do we have gas attacks compared to armed robberies or assaultis in general

There are plenty of other ways to "prepare" than with just guns. I picked one, but I'm sure your fear tells you to carry a gun, so it doesn't matter.

> fe. I carry a firstaide kit in my Jeep along with jumper cables, tool, an emergency jumpstart battery,

Why not lots of other stuff? Why just that? Why not be prepared for more kinds of problems?

I know lots of people (millions, in fact) who live in "dangerous" places like NYC and don't carry guns. No fear from them.

Logic and facts? Your fear & gun-religion rule them out to be a member.

 

rl6214

(8,142 posts)
129. "Logic and facts? Your fear & gun-religion rule them out to be a member. "
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 08:24 PM
Jul 2012

WOW, you really are just dense. Keep coming back to the same old shtick when your (lack of) "logic" has been used against you. Again in your words

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
130. Worship your PRECIOUS!
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 11:58 PM
Jul 2012

Oh boy. You gun-relgionists are sure predictable.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

 

rl6214

(8,142 posts)
131. You just keep up with your juvenile shtick
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 02:30 AM
Jul 2012

just reinforces what everyone here knows of you.

I'm sure all the other 12 year olds walk around talking about your precious.

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
132. OK
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 09:00 PM
Jul 2012

> just reinforces what everyone here knows of you.

That's alright, this is a Liberal chatboard, and Liberals think gun-religionists are completely nuts.

 

rl6214

(8,142 posts)
135. "That's alright, this is a Liberal chatboard, and Liberals think gun-religionists are completely nut
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 11:52 PM
Jul 2012

That's right, and recent surveys have shown that their are more liberal gun owners on this chatboard than those that don't own guns and that's not a gungeon survey so GET USED TO IT.

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
136. PROVE IT
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 05:28 PM
Jul 2012

> d recent surveys have shown that their are more liberal gun owners on this chatboard than those that don't own guns

In the immortal words of gun-relgionists everywhere, PROVE IT.

Oh, and BTW, on-line polls don't count since they're EASILY hacked to produce false vote counts, something that is right up the alley of gun-relgionists.

GET GOING! You're going to have to produce a statistically rigorous poll of DU members. That's a tough one!

 

rl6214

(8,142 posts)
137. In the immortal words of YOU...google it, I'm not going to do your work for you
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 07:31 PM
Jul 2012

"Oh, and BTW, on-line polls don't count since they're EASILY hacked to produce false vote counts"

So you can hack the polls here on DU? Sure you can.

Never fail to amuse yourself with all those do you.

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
140. LOL
Mon Jul 23, 2012, 04:12 PM
Jul 2012

So you have no proof for your claim.

Don't worry, none of you gun-religionists do. You're just typical in that respect. Also typical in your worship of a death-dealin' piece of iron.

struggle4progress

(126,061 posts)
87. Suspect held in Alabama bar shooting that wounded 17
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 03:12 PM
Jul 2012

By Verna Gates
TUSCALOOSA, Alabama | Tue Jul 17, 2012 2:05pm EDT

(Reuters) - ... Police spokesman Brent Blankley said he would not provide additional details. A press conference was scheduled for 1 p.m. local time, he said.

Police Chief Steven Anderson said earlier that the shooter may have been targeting someone ...

"The individuals who were there are very blessed that they were not killed," he said.

The shooting at the Copper Top bar in downtown Tuscaloosa may be connected to an earlier shooting at a residence in the nearby town of Northport, Anderson said. One person was injured in that incident ...

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/17/us-alabama-shooting-idUSBRE86G0IS20120717

 

Tejas

(4,759 posts)
88. UPDATE
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 03:27 PM
Jul 2012
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014168989

Police: Alabama bar shooting suspect in custody

(CNN) -- The suspect in an early morning shooting at a bar in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, is in custody, Police Chief Steve Anderson said Tuesday.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
133. how many more of these mass shootings before we get gun control?
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 09:23 PM
Jul 2012

Christ, you can buy guns every day and order semi auto magazines on the internet up the wazoo. One gun seller in AZ limited his customers to "only" one semi-auto weapon per day. And when a person buys these things in huge quantities, sometimes for days or months on end, no one flags the buyer and informs police.

Great system.

I feel safe now

 

Tejas

(4,759 posts)
134. Gun control, like in Mexico?
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 10:05 PM
Jul 2012

Mexico has tough gun laws, but they do not appear to be working very well for Mexico.

 

adigal

(7,581 posts)
113. I love my gun, love my gun!
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 07:07 AM
Jul 2012

Don't you be taking it away from me, you hear?

God bless 'merica.

Bucky

(55,334 posts)
138. If everyone in that bar had been heavily armed, this wouldn't have happened.
Mon Jul 23, 2012, 08:37 AM
Jul 2012

or at least it would have played out differently.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»17 people hurt in Tuscalo...