Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

demmiblue

(39,939 posts)
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 08:45 PM Mar 2017

This message was self-deleted by its author

This message was self-deleted by its author (demmiblue) on Sat Mar 18, 2017, 10:02 AM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

59 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This message was self-deleted by its author (Original Post) demmiblue Mar 2017 OP
Thanks for the memories Donna but, we can do better. jalan48 Mar 2017 #1
A list of topics..but not the questions. What is sad about this is that HRC could assume the topics nikibatts Mar 2017 #47
P.S. Donna and Debbie can just... demmiblue Mar 2017 #2
"can just" what? Why are you doing this? SunSeeker Mar 2017 #32
I still think very highly of her. hrmjustin Mar 2017 #3
Yeah, us too Donna...... vi5 Mar 2017 #4
Hillary had her flaws as a candidate BeyondGeography Mar 2017 #5
Total unforced error. demmiblue Mar 2017 #11
the anti-Clinton climate being nurture for the last 25 years was her undoing mdbl Mar 2017 #50
MISTAKE MY ASS. She KNEW what she was doing. pangaia Mar 2017 #6
Did she apologize for lying about it? FBaggins Mar 2017 #7
She didn't send them all at once, either. TexasMommaWithAHat Mar 2017 #8
Brazile did not send those emails to Hillary; they went to Podesta and Palmieri. SunSeeker Mar 2017 #36
How do you think they presented it and prepped her for the questions? Hassin Bin Sober Mar 2017 #37
Hillary didn't need to be prepped for the two questions mentioned by Brazile. SunSeeker Mar 2017 #40
Donna shouldn't have done it ... NanceGreggs Mar 2017 #9
Bernie folks remember it well too..n/t monmouth4 Mar 2017 #10
So do Hillary folks. So do O'Malley folks. So do other folks. Your point? demmiblue Mar 2017 #14
You have to have it EXPLAINED to you??? nt Plucketeer Mar 2017 #25
My bad, assumed something that wasn't there. n/t demmiblue Mar 2017 #58
Post removed Post removed Mar 2017 #12
Donna Brazile wasn't working for the DNC at the time. lapucelle Mar 2017 #17
Oh, my bad...someone else had their fingers on the scale... Talk Is Cheap Mar 2017 #20
Yes, you're right... lapucelle Mar 2017 #24
Hillary is a policy wonk. Beacool Mar 2017 #13
They were both running as candidates for the Democratic party. demmiblue Mar 2017 #16
Brazile did not send the emails to Hillary. SunSeeker Mar 2017 #31
Exactly. It was extremely obvious that these type of questions were going to be asked. LisaL Mar 2017 #49
Hillary didn't ask for any debate questions. LisaL Mar 2017 #51
The NO was referring to letting an Independent run as a Democrat. demmiblue Mar 2017 #57
There's an accuracy problen with The Hill's clickbait headline lapucelle Mar 2017 #15
Thanks for pointing that out. LisaM Mar 2017 #18
***BREAKING*** lapucelle Mar 2017 #21
Gee. That makes it better. They didn't need to do it but did it anyway. Hassin Bin Sober Mar 2017 #38
And I regret her needing that inside information. n brewens Mar 2017 #19
You're relying on the assumption that she actually had the information. lapucelle Mar 2017 #23
The "tips" were hardly the sort of information Hillary could not have surmised herself. SunSeeker Mar 2017 #28
What else did she do? Lunabell Mar 2017 #22
Enquiring minds want to know! SunSeeker Mar 2017 #29
Hey, I know! Cary Mar 2017 #26
I wouldn't trust anything from the writer who is a Washington Times staple. LiberalFighter Mar 2017 #27
Why cite this conservative's article when you could have cited the Time article he was basing it on? SunSeeker Mar 2017 #30
That's the key here. Out of thousands of emails... joshcryer Mar 2017 #45
As if any question in a debate would be a big surprise Beaverhausen Mar 2017 #33
Then why did she do this? melman Mar 2017 #34
Because she is a former campaign manager (for Gore, and many other Dems) and wanted to help. SunSeeker Mar 2017 #35
Right melman Mar 2017 #39
Because Russians, Trump and BoBs played it up to hurt Dems/Hillary. nt SunSeeker Mar 2017 #41
lol melman Mar 2017 #42
Sending debate questions to your preferred candidate is shady bullshit. Gravitycollapse Mar 2017 #43
Putin thanks you for continuing to push his meme. SunSeeker Mar 2017 #56
Her responses when first accused were denial and making fun of Trump DeeDeeNY Mar 2017 #44
Best post of the thread! 7962 Mar 2017 #46
Thanks. I remember people's reactions when that came out. DeeDeeNY Mar 2017 #54
She didn't send any questions for debates with Trump. LisaL Mar 2017 #48
it didn't even matter at that point which debate DeeDeeNY Mar 2017 #55
Go away Donna! Vinnie From Indy Mar 2017 #52
Here's what I don't understand... Blue Idaho Mar 2017 #53
Self-deleting... more important things to worry about. demmiblue Mar 2017 #59

jalan48

(14,914 posts)
1. Thanks for the memories Donna but, we can do better.
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 08:49 PM
Mar 2017
 

nikibatts

(2,198 posts)
47. A list of topics..but not the questions. What is sad about this is that HRC could assume the topics
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 08:53 AM
Mar 2017

on her own. She was savvy enough to assume what the TOPICS would be. I could have guessed what the topics would be, especially if I were holding a town hall in Flint.

It was dumb on Donna's part but I don't believe it gave HRC any edged that she didn't already have. It just made the DNC and Donna look bad.

demmiblue

(39,939 posts)
2. P.S. Donna and Debbie can just...
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 08:51 PM
Mar 2017

SunSeeker

(58,372 posts)
32. "can just" what? Why are you doing this?
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 01:14 AM
Mar 2017

Your OP, and your reply to your own OP, only serve to fling more divisive anti-Dem crap in our midst when we should be standing together against Trump.

Why oh WHY would you pick on these two great Democratic women? What purpose does it serve? Could you not find anything about Trump or his adminstration you don't like?

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
3. I still think very highly of her.
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 08:52 PM
Mar 2017
 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
4. Yeah, us too Donna......
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 08:52 PM
Mar 2017

....us too.

BeyondGeography

(41,196 posts)
5. Hillary had her flaws as a candidate
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 08:56 PM
Mar 2017

but Q&A was not even close to being one of them. I never saw her stumped by a question. She knows all the issues in depth, is articulate and very good on her feet. That's what made this extra stupid. And then Trump came along and talked about it as if Hillary had all the questions to all the debates where she beat his ass and his credulous, cretinous followers ate it up.

Extra, extra stupid. You're not the only one with regrets, Donna.

demmiblue

(39,939 posts)
11. Total unforced error.
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 09:09 PM
Mar 2017

I am not really a Hillary fan (obviously, I supported her in the general), but DAMN she owned him in the debates. Even when he was stalking her on the stage like a complete creeper. She kept her cool and nailed it.

mdbl

(8,731 posts)
50. the anti-Clinton climate being nurture for the last 25 years was her undoing
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 09:32 AM
Mar 2017

Dorks in the heartland had this crap pounded into their heads and it showed at the voting booth. Brainwashing does work.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
6. MISTAKE MY ASS. She KNEW what she was doing.
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 08:57 PM
Mar 2017

It's like saying, Oh, I poured sand in one of the INDY cars. It was a mistake. I 'll never do it again.. meanwhile.......

regardless of whether Hillary or Bernie eventually won....




FBaggins

(28,760 posts)
7. Did she apologize for lying about it?
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 09:00 PM
Mar 2017

TexasMommaWithAHat

(3,212 posts)
8. She didn't send them all at once, either.
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 09:04 PM
Mar 2017

Hillary could have told Donna not to send anything, but are we left to assume that she didn't say anything and continued to accept the "tips?"

SunSeeker

(58,372 posts)
36. Brazile did not send those emails to Hillary; they went to Podesta and Palmieri.
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 02:00 AM
Mar 2017

There is no evidence Hillary got the tips (there were only two) or knew about Brazile's emails to Podesta and Palmieri.

Hassin Bin Sober

(27,494 posts)
37. How do you think they presented it and prepped her for the questions?
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 02:17 AM
Mar 2017

Maybe they had a bout of conscience and sat on what they knew.

SunSeeker

(58,372 posts)
40. Hillary didn't need to be prepped for the two questions mentioned by Brazile.
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 02:51 AM
Mar 2017

One was that she'd be asked about water contamination in the Flint debate. Do you thing anyone didn't know that? And Hillary had been championing Flint and had a plan for remediation. Hillary wanted the debate in Flint so she could talk about this stuff!

The other was that Hillary would be asked about her position on the death penalty, a question she had been asked, and answered, repeatedly.

That was it.

NanceGreggs

(27,835 posts)
9. Donna shouldn't have done it ...
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 09:07 PM
Mar 2017

... but this whole thing is a non story, in that there is nothing HRC (and Bernie) didn't know would be asked about.

They're both politicians, both smart people, and both well-versed on how these debates go. I cannot imagine that ANY topic raised at any of the debates came as a surprise to either.

monmouth4

(10,777 posts)
10. Bernie folks remember it well too..n/t
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 09:08 PM
Mar 2017

demmiblue

(39,939 posts)
14. So do Hillary folks. So do O'Malley folks. So do other folks. Your point?
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 09:16 PM
Mar 2017
 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
25. You have to have it EXPLAINED to you??? nt
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 10:09 PM
Mar 2017

demmiblue

(39,939 posts)
58. My bad, assumed something that wasn't there. n/t
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 09:59 AM
Mar 2017

Response to demmiblue (Original post)

lapucelle

(21,124 posts)
17. Donna Brazile wasn't working for the DNC at the time.
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 09:25 PM
Mar 2017

Facts matter.

 

Talk Is Cheap

(389 posts)
20. Oh, my bad...someone else had their fingers on the scale...
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 09:34 PM
Mar 2017

Facts matter...

lapucelle

(21,124 posts)
24. Yes, you're right...
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 09:43 PM
Mar 2017

16,000,000 voters had their fingers on the scale.

Beacool

(30,524 posts)
13. Hillary is a policy wonk.
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 09:16 PM
Mar 2017

She's never needed to cheat in any debate. I don't know why Brazile sent her those emails.

As for the DNC, of course they were going to favor an actual Democrat to an Independent who only joined the party when he decided to run for president.

demmiblue

(39,939 posts)
16. They were both running as candidates for the Democratic party.
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 09:22 PM
Mar 2017

They could have just as easily said 'NO'.

SunSeeker

(58,372 posts)
31. Brazile did not send the emails to Hillary.
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 01:02 AM
Mar 2017

Brazile sent them to just Palmieri and Podesta. There is no evidence Hillary got them. And the "tips" were stuff everyone already knew.

LisaL

(47,502 posts)
49. Exactly. It was extremely obvious that these type of questions were going to be asked.
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 08:56 AM
Mar 2017

LisaL

(47,502 posts)
51. Hillary didn't ask for any debate questions.
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 09:34 AM
Mar 2017

I don't know how she could have said NO to something she didn't know was coming.

demmiblue

(39,939 posts)
57. The NO was referring to letting an Independent run as a Democrat.
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 09:58 AM
Mar 2017
As for the DNC, of course they were going to favor an actual Democrat to an Independent who only joined the party when he decided to run for president.

All Democratic candidates should be treated fairly and impartially.

lapucelle

(21,124 posts)
15. There's an accuracy problen with The Hill's clickbait headline
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 09:20 PM
Mar 2017

Brazile contacted the campaign, not Clinton herself.

However, if people want to conflate the candidate with the campaign, they should do so across the board and include instances of data breach, lest they be perceived as applying a double standard.

LisaM

(29,682 posts)
18. Thanks for pointing that out.
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 09:28 PM
Mar 2017

Besides, didn't we all know what the Town Hall topics were?

lapucelle

(21,124 posts)
21. ***BREAKING***
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 09:35 PM
Mar 2017

One of the questions was about water contamination. The town hall was in Flint, Michigan.

Hassin Bin Sober

(27,494 posts)
38. Gee. That makes it better. They didn't need to do it but did it anyway.
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 02:19 AM
Mar 2017
 

brewens

(15,359 posts)
19. And I regret her needing that inside information. n
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 09:30 PM
Mar 2017

lapucelle

(21,124 posts)
23. You're relying on the assumption that she actually had the information.
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 09:38 PM
Mar 2017

SunSeeker

(58,372 posts)
28. The "tips" were hardly the sort of information Hillary could not have surmised herself.
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 12:14 AM
Mar 2017

Hillary was a policy wonk. She did not "need" these tips. Hell, neither did Bernie. Did ANYONE need to be told that water contamination might come up at the Flint debate?

Or that she might be asked about the death penalty, something she was getting repeatedly asked about, as the exchange of emails between Palmieri and Brazile acknowledges?

How are those two tips "putting the thumb on the scale" for Hillary?

 

Lunabell

(7,309 posts)
22. What else did she do?
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 09:36 PM
Mar 2017

And didn't get caught doing? I wonder...
..

SunSeeker

(58,372 posts)
29. Enquiring minds want to know!
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 12:31 AM
Mar 2017

Cary

(11,746 posts)
26. Hey, I know!
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 10:22 PM
Mar 2017

Let's sow ever more discord and discontent right through November 2018 so we can snatch another defeat.feom the jaws of victory!

Hey maybe we can keep it up through 2020 to give Orange Hiltler more time to destroy our nation!

LiberalFighter

(53,544 posts)
27. I wouldn't trust anything from the writer who is a Washington Times staple.
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 11:29 PM
Mar 2017

SunSeeker

(58,372 posts)
30. Why cite this conservative's article when you could have cited the Time article he was basing it on?
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 12:56 AM
Mar 2017

Concha completely ignores the whole point of that Time article, which is entitled, "Donna Brazile: Russian DNC Narrative Played Out Exactly As They Hoped."

In that Time article, Brazile accurately states:

By stealing all the DNC’s emails and then selectively releasing those few, the Russians made it look like I was in the tank for Secretary Clinton. Despite the strong, public support I received from top Sanders campaign aides in the wake of those leaks, the media narrative played out just as the Russians had hoped, leaving Sanders supporters understandably angry and sowing division in our ranks. In reality, not only was I not playing favorites, the more competitive and heated the primary got, the harder D.N.C. staff worked to be scrupulously fair and beyond reproach. In all the months the Russians monitored the D.N.C.’s email, they found just a handful of inappropriate emails, with no sign of anyone taking action to disadvantage the Sanders campaign.


http://time.com/4705515/donna-brazile-russia-emails-clinton/

Your OP, and Concha's piece, only serve to reinforce the false narrative that Putin and Trump sought to establish with the Podesta email leaks. To get a flavor for the kind of conservative garbage this douchebag puts out, just Google "Joe Concha The Hill." You'll get stuff like this article bashing Samantha Bee, with such ridiculously wrong statements as:

But Bee will get a pass here because media routinely fawns over the myopic narrative of her program: Attack Trump, attack conservatives, all without remotely considering making a joke about the other side, and you'll be receiving weekly praise and plenty of awards for the next few decades.


http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/media/323385-samantha-bee-is-late-night-tvs-leading-hypocrite-on-racial-diversity


And THIS is the guy whose article you chose to spotlight in LBN?!

joshcryer

(62,536 posts)
45. That's the key here. Out of thousands of emails...
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 08:02 AM
Mar 2017

...they found a couple, that they used via social media engineering, to sow division and create the BoB movement. And most of those were irrelevant policy suggestions that never made it to the fore in Clinton's campaign. Clinton played with kids gloves compared to the 2008 campaign against Sanders. That's the saddest thing about this whole thing.

Beaverhausen

(24,706 posts)
33. As if any question in a debate would be a big surprise
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 01:22 AM
Mar 2017

this is ridiculous.

















 

melman

(7,681 posts)
34. Then why did she do this?
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 01:35 AM
Mar 2017

SunSeeker

(58,372 posts)
35. Because she is a former campaign manager (for Gore, and many other Dems) and wanted to help.
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 01:54 AM
Mar 2017

As she put it,

"As a longtime political activist with deep ties in our party, I supported all of our candidates for president. I often shared my thoughts with each and every campaign, and any suggestions that indicate otherwise are simply untrue," she wrote in a statement. 


https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-10-11/dncs-donna-brazile-denies-giving-hillary-clinton-early-access-to-town-hall-question

 

melman

(7,681 posts)
39. Right
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 02:26 AM
Mar 2017

Totally innocent.

So then why does she regret it so much?

SunSeeker

(58,372 posts)
41. Because Russians, Trump and BoBs played it up to hurt Dems/Hillary. nt
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 03:02 AM
Mar 2017
 

melman

(7,681 posts)
42. lol
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 03:24 AM
Mar 2017

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
43. Sending debate questions to your preferred candidate is shady bullshit.
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 03:53 AM
Mar 2017

I don't care how you try to rationalize it.

SunSeeker

(58,372 posts)
56. Putin thanks you for continuing to push his meme.
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 09:52 AM
Mar 2017

Him and Trump luuurv the discord.

DeeDeeNY

(3,962 posts)
44. Her responses when first accused were denial and making fun of Trump
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 07:41 AM
Mar 2017

When he first accused her of giving Hillary the answers and she was questioned by an interviewer, her flippant answer was along the lines of "you really think they would give me the questions in advance? I'm just not that important." It was crushing when Wikileaks proved her a liar. It put doubts in people's minds that maybe Trump wasn't so paranoid, and what else were the Democrats were lying about? The worst part was that eve if Hillary had seen her emails it wouldn't have mattered because she needed no help to win the debates anyway.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
46. Best post of the thread!
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 08:43 AM
Mar 2017

It seems few others are seeing the "big picture" as you did.
I get being supportive, but screw ups like this created a lot of doubt in the minds of many on the fence.

DeeDeeNY

(3,962 posts)
54. Thanks. I remember people's reactions when that came out.
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 09:48 AM
Mar 2017

Once the first doubt creeps in, it's tough.

LisaL

(47,502 posts)
48. She didn't send any questions for debates with Trump.
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 08:54 AM
Mar 2017

The questions she send were for primary debates with Sanders.

DeeDeeNY

(3,962 posts)
55. it didn't even matter at that point which debate
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 09:50 AM
Mar 2017

Trump's accusations now seemed possible.

Vinnie From Indy

(10,820 posts)
52. Go away Donna!
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 09:38 AM
Mar 2017

Just go away!

Blue Idaho

(5,500 posts)
53. Here's what I don't understand...
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 09:42 AM
Mar 2017

She could not have sent HRC the "answers" because the answers had to be Hillary's. Sending the topics make no sense either - almost anyone with an IQ above 80 could have guessed the areas that were to be discussed. The same things that were being discussed daily in speeches and interviews.

The only thing Brazile did - was to show her lack of trust in Candidate Clinton to handle herself presidentially while showing herself to be a person of poor judgement. Dumb move.

demmiblue

(39,939 posts)
59. Self-deleting... more important things to worry about.
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 10:01 AM
Mar 2017

Brazile: Sending Clinton town hall topics mistake I will forever regret
Source: The Hill



Donna Brazile says passing along a list of topics for a TV town hall event to Hillary Clinton’s campaign was “a mistake I will forever regret.”

Brazile, who was the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) interim chairwoman this summer and is a former CNN contributor, opened up about last year’s election in a Time magazine essay.

“My job was to make all our Democratic candidates look good, and I worked closely with both campaigns to make that happen,” she wrote. “But sending those emails was a mistake I will forever regret.”

WikiLeaks in October published emails purportedly stolen from Clinton campaign chief John Podesta, which included messages from Brazile to Clinton’s campaign containing information on what would be asked during two town hall debates between Clinton and her rival for the Democratic presidential nomination, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)

Read more: http://thehill.com/media/324580-brazile-sending-clinton-town-hall-topics-mistake-i-will-forever-regret


We can and we will do better than this.

Let's go Perez... you've got this!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»This message was self-del...