This message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (demmiblue) on Sat Mar 18, 2017, 10:02 AM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
jalan48
(14,914 posts)nikibatts
(2,198 posts)on her own. She was savvy enough to assume what the TOPICS would be. I could have guessed what the topics would be, especially if I were holding a town hall in Flint.
It was dumb on Donna's part but I don't believe it gave HRC any edged that she didn't already have. It just made the DNC and Donna look bad.
demmiblue
(39,939 posts)SunSeeker
(58,372 posts)Your OP, and your reply to your own OP, only serve to fling more divisive anti-Dem crap in our midst when we should be standing together against Trump.
Why oh WHY would you pick on these two great Democratic women? What purpose does it serve? Could you not find anything about Trump or his adminstration you don't like?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)vi5
(13,305 posts)....us too.
BeyondGeography
(41,196 posts)but Q&A was not even close to being one of them. I never saw her stumped by a question. She knows all the issues in depth, is articulate and very good on her feet. That's what made this extra stupid. And then Trump came along and talked about it as if Hillary had all the questions to all the debates where she beat his ass and his credulous, cretinous followers ate it up.
Extra, extra stupid. You're not the only one with regrets, Donna.
demmiblue
(39,939 posts)I am not really a Hillary fan (obviously, I supported her in the general), but DAMN she owned him in the debates. Even when he was stalking her on the stage like a complete creeper. She kept her cool and nailed it.
mdbl
(8,731 posts)Dorks in the heartland had this crap pounded into their heads and it showed at the voting booth. Brainwashing does work.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)It's like saying, Oh, I poured sand in one of the INDY cars. It was a mistake. I 'll never do it again.. meanwhile.......
regardless of whether Hillary or Bernie eventually won....
FBaggins
(28,760 posts)TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)Hillary could have told Donna not to send anything, but are we left to assume that she didn't say anything and continued to accept the "tips?"
SunSeeker
(58,372 posts)There is no evidence Hillary got the tips (there were only two) or knew about Brazile's emails to Podesta and Palmieri.
Hassin Bin Sober
(27,494 posts)Maybe they had a bout of conscience and sat on what they knew.
SunSeeker
(58,372 posts)One was that she'd be asked about water contamination in the Flint debate. Do you thing anyone didn't know that? And Hillary had been championing Flint and had a plan for remediation. Hillary wanted the debate in Flint so she could talk about this stuff!
The other was that Hillary would be asked about her position on the death penalty, a question she had been asked, and answered, repeatedly.
That was it.
NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)... but this whole thing is a non story, in that there is nothing HRC (and Bernie) didn't know would be asked about.
They're both politicians, both smart people, and both well-versed on how these debates go. I cannot imagine that ANY topic raised at any of the debates came as a surprise to either.
monmouth4
(10,777 posts)demmiblue
(39,939 posts)Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)demmiblue
(39,939 posts)Response to demmiblue (Original post)
Post removed
lapucelle
(21,124 posts)Facts matter.
Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)Facts matter...
lapucelle
(21,124 posts)16,000,000 voters had their fingers on the scale.
Beacool
(30,524 posts)She's never needed to cheat in any debate. I don't know why Brazile sent her those emails.
As for the DNC, of course they were going to favor an actual Democrat to an Independent who only joined the party when he decided to run for president.
demmiblue
(39,939 posts)They could have just as easily said 'NO'.
SunSeeker
(58,372 posts)Brazile sent them to just Palmieri and Podesta. There is no evidence Hillary got them. And the "tips" were stuff everyone already knew.
LisaL
(47,502 posts)LisaL
(47,502 posts)I don't know how she could have said NO to something she didn't know was coming.
demmiblue
(39,939 posts)All Democratic candidates should be treated fairly and impartially.
lapucelle
(21,124 posts)Brazile contacted the campaign, not Clinton herself.
However, if people want to conflate the candidate with the campaign, they should do so across the board and include instances of data breach, lest they be perceived as applying a double standard.
LisaM
(29,682 posts)Besides, didn't we all know what the Town Hall topics were?
lapucelle
(21,124 posts)One of the questions was about water contamination. The town hall was in Flint, Michigan.
Hassin Bin Sober
(27,494 posts)brewens
(15,359 posts)lapucelle
(21,124 posts)SunSeeker
(58,372 posts)Hillary was a policy wonk. She did not "need" these tips. Hell, neither did Bernie. Did ANYONE need to be told that water contamination might come up at the Flint debate?
Or that she might be asked about the death penalty, something she was getting repeatedly asked about, as the exchange of emails between Palmieri and Brazile acknowledges?
How are those two tips "putting the thumb on the scale" for Hillary?
Lunabell
(7,309 posts)And didn't get caught doing? I wonder...
..
SunSeeker
(58,372 posts)Cary
(11,746 posts)Let's sow ever more discord and discontent right through November 2018 so we can snatch another defeat.feom the jaws of victory!
Hey maybe we can keep it up through 2020 to give Orange Hiltler more time to destroy our nation!
LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)SunSeeker
(58,372 posts)Concha completely ignores the whole point of that Time article, which is entitled, "Donna Brazile: Russian DNC Narrative Played Out Exactly As They Hoped."
In that Time article, Brazile accurately states:
http://time.com/4705515/donna-brazile-russia-emails-clinton/
Your OP, and Concha's piece, only serve to reinforce the false narrative that Putin and Trump sought to establish with the Podesta email leaks. To get a flavor for the kind of conservative garbage this douchebag puts out, just Google "Joe Concha The Hill." You'll get stuff like this article bashing Samantha Bee, with such ridiculously wrong statements as:
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/media/323385-samantha-bee-is-late-night-tvs-leading-hypocrite-on-racial-diversity
And THIS is the guy whose article you chose to spotlight in LBN?!
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)...they found a couple, that they used via social media engineering, to sow division and create the BoB movement. And most of those were irrelevant policy suggestions that never made it to the fore in Clinton's campaign. Clinton played with kids gloves compared to the 2008 campaign against Sanders. That's the saddest thing about this whole thing.
Beaverhausen
(24,706 posts)this is ridiculous.
melman
(7,681 posts)SunSeeker
(58,372 posts)As she put it,
"As a longtime political activist with deep ties in our party, I supported all of our candidates for president. I often shared my thoughts with each and every campaign, and any suggestions that indicate otherwise are simply untrue," she wrote in a statement.
https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-10-11/dncs-donna-brazile-denies-giving-hillary-clinton-early-access-to-town-hall-question
Totally innocent.
So then why does she regret it so much?
SunSeeker
(58,372 posts)Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)I don't care how you try to rationalize it.
SunSeeker
(58,372 posts)Him and Trump luuurv the discord.
DeeDeeNY
(3,962 posts)When he first accused her of giving Hillary the answers and she was questioned by an interviewer, her flippant answer was along the lines of "you really think they would give me the questions in advance? I'm just not that important." It was crushing when Wikileaks proved her a liar. It put doubts in people's minds that maybe Trump wasn't so paranoid, and what else were the Democrats were lying about? The worst part was that eve if Hillary had seen her emails it wouldn't have mattered because she needed no help to win the debates anyway.
7962
(11,841 posts)It seems few others are seeing the "big picture" as you did.
I get being supportive, but screw ups like this created a lot of doubt in the minds of many on the fence.
DeeDeeNY
(3,962 posts)Once the first doubt creeps in, it's tough.
LisaL
(47,502 posts)The questions she send were for primary debates with Sanders.
DeeDeeNY
(3,962 posts)Trump's accusations now seemed possible.
Vinnie From Indy
(10,820 posts)Just go away!
Blue Idaho
(5,500 posts)She could not have sent HRC the "answers" because the answers had to be Hillary's. Sending the topics make no sense either - almost anyone with an IQ above 80 could have guessed the areas that were to be discussed. The same things that were being discussed daily in speeches and interviews.
The only thing Brazile did - was to show her lack of trust in Candidate Clinton to handle herself presidentially while showing herself to be a person of poor judgement. Dumb move.
demmiblue
(39,939 posts)Brazile: Sending Clinton town hall topics mistake I will forever regret
Source: The Hill
Donna Brazile says passing along a list of topics for a TV town hall event to Hillary Clintons campaign was a mistake I will forever regret.
Brazile, who was the Democratic National Committees (DNC) interim chairwoman this summer and is a former CNN contributor, opened up about last years election in a Time magazine essay.
My job was to make all our Democratic candidates look good, and I worked closely with both campaigns to make that happen, she wrote. But sending those emails was a mistake I will forever regret.
WikiLeaks in October published emails purportedly stolen from Clinton campaign chief John Podesta, which included messages from Brazile to Clintons campaign containing information on what would be asked during two town hall debates between Clinton and her rival for the Democratic presidential nomination, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)
Read more: http://thehill.com/media/324580-brazile-sending-clinton-town-hall-topics-mistake-i-will-forever-regret
We can and we will do better than this.
Let's go Perez... you've got this!