Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Seedersandleechers

(3,044 posts)
Thu Mar 23, 2017, 11:35 AM Mar 2017

Today, Senators will vote to allow ISPs to sell your internet history and end FCC online privacy ru

Source: Privacy News Online

On March 23rd, 2017, the US Senate votes on S.J.Res 34, which would use the Congressional Review Act to strip away online privacy protections gained under the FCC and also disallow the FCC from enacting privacy rules in the future. The resolution, if passed along with its House counterpart and then signed into law, would pass the responsibility of online privacy regulation from the FCC onto the FTC, with the American public losing out in the meantime.

The FCC online privacy rules currently require ISPs to get your affirmative consent before selling your personal, sensitive information to advertisers. Notably, the FCC didn’t go as far as to ban “pay-for-privacy” schemes that were being offered by some ISPs. Back in 2016, when the FCC passed sweeping net neutrality and online privacy rules for Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and telecoms to follow, the FTC did release a statement titled: Net Neutrality and Privacy: Don’t Fear the Reclassification.

The Senators that proposed this resolution did so for a reason
If you’re wondering whether or not the Senators that proposed S.J.Res 34 received any money from ISPs or telecoms, the answer is a resounding yes. Vocativ has a nice infographic that shows which Senators have received donations from telecoms and ISPs, and even trade groups like the CTIA. In a recent filing with the FCC, the CTIA has been attempting to push the idea that web browsing history and app usage data are not sensitive information.

Read more: https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/blog/2017/03/today-senators-will-vote-allow-isps-sell-internet-history-end-fcc-online-privacy-rules/

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Today, Senators will vote to allow ISPs to sell your internet history and end FCC online privacy ru (Original Post) Seedersandleechers Mar 2017 OP
K&R for visibility. Time to go call Congresspeople diva77 Mar 2017 #1
Enter your phone number and they'll connect you. Seedersandleechers Mar 2017 #3
Or 202-224-3121 and follow a few short prompts to get your senators' office. Everybody call! JudyM Mar 2017 #9
I'd call mine Plucketeer Mar 2017 #10
Oh Goody another item on the buck list of not being able to say yes or no turbinetree Mar 2017 #2
Is this another Russian Idea? padfun Mar 2017 #4
I'm sure that this is intended to give us more choice and freedom Orrex Mar 2017 #5
Republicons hate big gubmt prying but love mega-corps prying. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2017 #6
kick cry baby Mar 2017 #7
All the better to 2naSalit Mar 2017 #8
FWIW - those rules never went into effect onenote Mar 2017 #11
This doesn't even make sense FakeNoose Mar 2017 #12
Good to hear it has an upside. dixiegrrrrl Mar 2017 #14
Party line vote, pretty much.... MADem Mar 2017 #13
GJGE Snowdenistas Blue_Tires Mar 2017 #15

turbinetree

(24,688 posts)
2. Oh Goody another item on the buck list of not being able to say yes or no
Thu Mar 23, 2017, 11:59 AM
Mar 2017

to ones "privacy" because it will not be there, good bye to the 4th and 5th amendment in some ways, and just think all 22 right wing fascists senators think, "I cannot say yes or no if I want my privacy to be sold or not sold, when I click on that box-----------------again, they put greed over privacy, that is what a plutocracy is all about.

plu·toc·ra·cy
plo͞oˈtäkrəsē/Submit
noun
government by the wealthy.
a country or society governed by the wealthy.
plural noun: plutocracies
an elite or ruling class of people whose power derives from their wealth.


The same twits , yes the same twits, that go around and think and say that there should be no government intrusion into a person's life, but they turn right around and sell it to the highest corporations--------------------amazing



Orrex

(63,198 posts)
5. I'm sure that this is intended to give us more choice and freedom
Thu Mar 23, 2017, 12:06 PM
Mar 2017

You know, just like all of the horrible anti-consumer legislation and policy they push.

onenote

(42,684 posts)
11. FWIW - those rules never went into effect
Thu Mar 23, 2017, 12:22 PM
Mar 2017

Action by Congress to block the rules is an outrageous rules, but as a practical matter, those rules, which were adopted last October, have not gone into effect and, because of action taken earlier this month by the FCC, the most significant of the rules wouldn't have gone into effect even if the Senate didn't act.

It sucks.

FakeNoose

(32,620 posts)
12. This doesn't even make sense
Thu Mar 23, 2017, 12:26 PM
Mar 2017

Doesn't the Senate understand that it's their own privacy they're burning when they do this?

I'm not on the internet searching for kiddie porn, but maybe some of them are.
The whole world will know about it when they remove internet privacy.
Not only that, we'll find out what all their family members are doing too.


Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
15. GJGE Snowdenistas
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 08:56 AM
Mar 2017

Hilarious how silent they've been this week... If Obama was still in office they'd be marching on Washington today...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Today, Senators will vote...