Poll: Romney preferred over Obama to handle the economy
Last edited Tue Jul 24, 2012, 03:46 AM - Edit history (1)
Source:
WASHINGTON Despite concerted Democratic attacks on his business record, Republican challenger Mitt Romney scores a significant advantage over President Obama when it comes to managing the economy, reducing the federal budget deficit and creating jobs, a national USA TODAY/Gallup Poll finds.
By more than 2-1, 63%-29%, those surveyed say Romney's background in business, including his tenure at the private equity firm Bain Capital, would cause him to make good decisions, not bad ones, in dealing with the nation's economic problems over the next four years.
Read more: http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/story/2012-07-23/poll-romney-obama-economy/56439758/1
Help me. The country I live in is full of nuts!
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)This really makes no sense. I think the worst person to put in charge of the economic direction of this country is a vulture capitalist. Perhaps the 63% are just not paying attention.
olddad56
(5,732 posts)Brigid
(17,621 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)WTF are people thinking?? Or are they thinking. Excuse me, I am going to go bang my head against a walll now.
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)nm
Jessy169
(602 posts)My reaction to these poll numbers: Yeah, right, tell me another one.
I got my BA degree in Public Relations from a university that had (and probably still has) a very respectable PR program. PR is all about molding public opinion, of course, and polls -- fake polls to be more specific -- are one of the "tools of the trade". There are many ways to get the numbers you want, not necessarily the numbers that accurately reflect the situation. An ally or somebody who Romney campaign may have slipped a cool million to could easily come out with a poll like this. Polling companies are in it for the money most often. Be suspicious of all polls that don't have multiple sources that generally support the same numbers. I wonder what the margin of error is on this particular poll? Did they publish that?
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)It was a stacked stand alone question:
"Would Mitt Romney's background in business, including his tenure at the private equity firm Bain Capital, would cause him to make good decisions, not bad ones, in dealing with the nation's economic problems?"
Then USA Today jumps magically to: Romney preferred 2 to 1.
Flatpicker
(894 posts)aggiesal
(10,759 posts)Who did they ask? (Scared people)!
and
How did they ask them? Similar to the following:
"With Obama's dismal record of only creating 3 million jobs over the past 3.5 years,
don't you agree that RMoney would create at least 3 million during the next 4 years?
We're talking Gallup Poll here.
and 'assuming' that because he's incredibly wealthy, he'd magically do the same for OTHERS, like U.S.A!
aggiesal
(10,759 posts)all in the way you "FRAME" the questions.
I believe you can get the result you want just by "FRAMING"
the question to get the answer you want.
In this case, I don't believe Gallup was expecting such a
lopsided result, but I'm sure they were looking for a
53-47 type result.
These results basically throws the poll as unbelievable.
elleng
(141,926 posts)and this one is highly suspect.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)Rmoney is going to make them rich like him. We will all have tax havens around the globe, an elevator in every garage, and a dancing horse.
elleng
(141,926 posts)Just said that, above!
benld74
(10,284 posts)elleng
(141,926 posts)1620rock
(2,218 posts)Brigid
(17,621 posts)Isn't this how we got into this mess in the first place?
dmosh42
(2,217 posts)xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)Vote straight Democratic.
get the red out
(14,031 posts)to get to that poll margin. I just don't see that. Not unless they exclusively polled Kentucky or somewhere.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)...Pretty much on every issue, every poll gets different results.
At the end of the day, polls are simply the opinions of those people interviewed, and cannot by any sense of logic be extended over a population of three hundred and eleven million people.
Lydia Leftcoast
(48,223 posts)I have to wonder how the questions were phrased.
Amonester
(11,541 posts)mostly in red states to make sure the results got in their ways?
demwing
(16,916 posts)Response to demwing (Reply #19)
speedoo This message was self-deleted by its author.
mzmolly
(52,781 posts)Mexico's?
YankeyMCC
(8,401 posts)who had lost everything due to an unexpected illness.
He's getting back on his feet largely due to Mass Health care, unemployment benefits and the somewhat better than national average state economy (in a state that is essential a single party Democratic state).
You know what he said to me about his downfall: "It's all the Democrats fault."
I said, "The Republicans want to take your health care away." (maybe a stretch since this is the State program not Federal but the theme is the same.)
His response: "Yeah, well except for that one thing."
I didn't go on, I had plenty of facts and I had no idea how to get past his 'certainty' about what he believed.
However, I am suspicious the poll refereed too in the OP isn't very accurate. Still there is a lot of delusion out there.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)What can I say but
daybranch
(1,309 posts)First I say why should we believe a poll saying just the opposite of what other polls found just a few days ago?
Second I say why would you ask such a voluminous question, which would tend to drum up support for the republiicans especially the part about reducing the deficit which I am sure is not a principal thought in the minds of the jobless.
Garbage in garbage out.
SlimJimmy
(3,251 posts)gkhouston
(21,642 posts)"Okay, I'll tell you whether my refrigerator is running if you'll take this poll..."
SlimJimmy
(3,251 posts)gkhouston
(21,642 posts)says to me that they wanted a certain result, and quickly. I wonder how many people they called (and later excluded) to get this result.
SlimJimmy
(3,251 posts)polling that's been done. Using likely voters (or even registered voters) would have tightened it considerably.
demwing
(16,916 posts)there are no demographics attached to this poll, no MOE, and no details of any kind, except this headline encouraging remark:
Note that the article doesn't ask who is better on the economy.The question asked was essentially this: "Would Romney's experience help him run the economy?" 63% said yes, 29% said no. Was there a similar question asked about Obama? If not, it's unfair to compare the two on men on this metric.
BTW - USA Today has their head up their ass on their EC vote counter. The still have New Mexico and Pennsylvania as toss ups, despite wide margins of support for Obama in both states.
As always - Fuck The News!
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)I wonder HOW a Democrat can ever win an election again, between the "supreme" Court decision allowing Koch Bros and worse to donate billions, to the corporate consolidated media who wants NO regulations.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)And should they have to steal the election they will have a reason for you to believe it is legit...the meme will be that it is the economy stupid why people voted for him.
I sure am convinced that the fix is in and that we are now just seeing the explanation for electing a liar.
SlimJimmy
(3,251 posts)there are no demographics attached to this poll, no MOE, and no details of any kind, except this headline encouraging remark:
demwing
(16,916 posts)I completely missed it
SlimJimmy
(3,251 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)I posted that link in Post #19. Now that you pointed it out, I can search for the quote and find it easily, but I swear I read that article three times and couldn't see the damn MOE, lol.
thanks!!
SlimJimmy
(3,251 posts)razorman
(1,644 posts)only seems to make the problems worse. I just wish I had some sort of solution. But, I do not see a way out of our current economic woes during my lifetime.
progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)I'm serious. I've given up wishing that average Americans would wise up and see that the candidate has destroyed so many small towns like Marion, Indiana, so that he and his pals can get even more filthy rich. I've given up believing that average folks would realize that if he did that to make his hundreds of millions, he will make it worse in he's in charge.
I've come to the conclusion with all the dumbfucks in America, that they actually deserve what they vote for. If you're more aware of who the Kardashian's are, and what Miley Cyrus wore to last night's awards, then you get what you deserve.
If you're too stupid to connect the dots that the Red States are basically welfare states, coming in at the lowest of any chart for health, education, employment, infant mortality, and that the Blue States are subsidizing your asses, then you deserve Romney. You deserve to have your job sent to China.. then you can wake the fuck up one day. Or you can go on like you are, blaming families who LOST everything because Bain and those like them have sent your fucking jobs to China after bankrupting your town.
They don't deserve anything more than what they voted for. I do not want Romney to win because America will become a third world country, where the Koch Bros and the billion-dollar-a-year traders on Wall Street have everything, and the elderly are eating dog food and dying because they can't afford heat in the winter. BUT... I will absolutely ENJOY the stunned faces and stupid facebook posts from the people too ignorant to figure out what the hell Romney is hiding and WHO made sure he won the primaries.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I'm feeling a little vengeful toward all the willing idiots today too.
ieoeja
(9,748 posts)63% say Romney's background in business would cause him to make good decisions in dealing with the nation's economic problems.
29% say it would cause him to make bad decisions
The only thing showing a 2-1 margin in here is comparing Romney (good decisions) to Romney (bad decisions). Even there it does not ask if they believe Romney would actually make good decisions. It appears instead to be asking how his business experience would affect that decisions making ability. I am sure many people answered "good" while believing he would make bad decisions, but do so in despite of his work experience.
And buried at the end of the story : "the race stands at 46% Obama, 45% Romney."
speedoo
(11,229 posts)We really need to see exactly what questions were asked, among other things. USA Today is not a reliable source for this kind of information.
mountain grammy
(29,004 posts)Really?
librechik
(30,957 posts)Obama won't even give me a COLA rise!
heaven05
(18,124 posts)bowens43
(16,064 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)sa2968
(38 posts)I've seen other polls which say that people prefer Obama to Romney on the economy. All these polls are useless.
dogknob
(2,431 posts)...feared arrest for not acting convincingly sad at Kim Jong Il's funeral.
EDIT: I've clicked your link a few times over the past hour and all I get is a blank page on USAToday's site. Even tried it in different browsers (my main browser is Opera, which YouTube HATES)
handmade34
(24,009 posts)we still need to try to get across to people the facts, figures, charts, graphs, etc... that inform us w/o doubt that democrats are much better for the economy than republicans... there is endless information and fact...



http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-22/stocks-return-more-with-dem-in-white-house-bgov-barometer.html
?w=450&h=243
?w=450&h=305
?w=450
Bainbridge Bear
(155 posts)When you can find this kind of support, after all we have endured, for a practitioner of "vulture capitalism" who will do everything he can to ransack what is left of the 99% then it feels like more evidence for the end of our Republic. Mitt Romney will further the devolution of the U.S. into the Corporate States of America. He is a despicable man who will say anything to get into the Oval Office.
penndragon69
(788 posts)That is, if you believe the poll results of a RIGHT wing
media organization!
TBF
(36,556 posts)Gman
(24,780 posts)for himself and his buds.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)...is the full poll?
It seems the MSM is again engaging in creative spin with the head line and the text to aid Romney.
I mean, that shows a response to a specific question, those who believe the experiecne will help and those who do not (still unbelievable), which is not a contrast to Obama.
I like Ben LaBolt's response later in the article.
Bain is not going away.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021007300
liberal N proud
(61,194 posts)SlimJimmy
(3,251 posts)"Never poll adults and not likely voters if you want an accurate result."
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)and the President is gaining in Ohio. Romney's negatives are going up.
DallasNE
(8,002 posts)We are basically still operating under Bush's policies, especially on taxes, because Congress blocks every attempt to create jobs, etc. and Romney would bring back full bore all of the failed Bush policies and the American people are buying the Romney proposals, whatever they are. Give me a break. Within 10 months of taking office Romney would have this country mired in recession and his remedy would be to end Medicare and turn it into a voucher system where the voucher would barely cover half of the cost of private insurance. And that is just for starters. Just look to Spain if you want to see what austerity looks and feels like. That is the Romney model and it ain't pretty. Poverty levels are already at the level they were in the 1960's and heading south rapidly. In other words, we have already lost 50 years of progress with no turnaround in sight.
One of the core issues is the data the American people are getting. Nobody is giving context to what is being said so they don't know what or who to believe so they are believing the worst case scenario.
demwing
(16,916 posts)Team Obama has put out some AMAZING ads
but if you were referring to the media, well as always : Fuck "The News"
DallasNE
(8,002 posts)I was talking about the media. There needs to be a reliable, neutral source. The so-called factcheckers fail on that account as well. They mostly side with Romney using incomplete data to support their "findings".
I don't live in a battleground State so I don't see that many political ads.
demwing
(16,916 posts)"The News" media fails in every way, unless you judge them as propagandists, in which case they do a smashing job. First class liars, without a doubt.
As always - Fuck "The News"
DCBob
(24,689 posts)RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)Doremus
(7,273 posts)NYC Liberal
(20,453 posts)It says 63% think Romney's business background would "cause him to make good decisions" about the economy.
The poll is NOT a comparison between Romney and Obama.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)they will certainly make life easier for the wealthiest. The effect on the rest of us won't be so pleasant.
SemperEadem
(8,053 posts)The poll of 1,030 adults Thursday through Sunday has a margin of error of plus- or minus-4 percentage points.
It took them 4 days to find 1,000 people. Where were the calls based? They didn't call me.
What these 1030 people don't get is that if mittiot takes over, they can say goodbye to a lot more of their income because he knows who to manage the economy for the 1% and for corporate raiders who shake down companies for their assets and saddles them with liability to the point where they have to lay off people and file for bankruptcy, taking the workers' pensions with them.
Stargleamer
(2,714 posts)and cuts in spending that benefit those who are struggling, are what this country so desperately needs!
cbrer
(1,831 posts)I don't buy this bullshit for $00.02!
This stinks worse than a landfill in Delhi.
high density
(13,397 posts)All I've heard is shitcan Obamacare and more tax cuts. We've already seen over the past decade how this does not produce jobs or help budget deficits.
Turbineguy
(40,029 posts)along with putting pedophiles in charge of elementary schools and rapists in charge of women's shelters.
EmeraldCityGrl
(4,310 posts)A poll with of 1000 people deserves a headline and worst of all an OP?
This paragraph from the article seems more important and relavent, but frankly the entire article stinks
of RW Bullshit.
"While Mitt Romney has claimed for the past year that he knows how to create jobs because he did it as a corporate buyout specialist, Americans are just now learning about his real record that he profited off of bankrupting companies and outsourcing jobs," LaBolt says. "That's not an economic philosophy they want to see in the Oval Office, and the more they are learning about his record, the less supportive they are."
Their contest is close: 57% say Obama has the personality and leadership qualities a president should have; 54% say that of Romney. Forty-seven percent say they agree with Obama on the issues that matter most to them; 45% say that of Romney.
Zoeisright
(8,339 posts)Short memories, no ability to reason, and fucking ignorant.
cigsandcoffee
(2,300 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)Many many people in this country hardly pick up a news paper. They don't read! Too time consuming. Now if it has to do with their buddies texting them, well that's about the extent of their reading habits. We live in a country of idiots .. increasingly. So I would like to know where/ and who are these folks (USA Today) polling? I never got a call. To believe anything that right-wing rag says is stupidity plain and simple. I never read their trash.
eringer
(525 posts)managing the economy: Destroy PBS and Planned Parenthood. Allow the rich to keep their wealth tax-free into perpetuity. Long term Goal -- disestablish the middle class.
reducing the federal budget deficit: Shredding the safety net for grandma.
creating jobs: Hiring folks at below minimum wage to operate water cannons to blow the homeless (our "new" poor class) off the city streets every morning.
Yavin4
(37,182 posts)under a President Romney administration. I have lost all sympathy and patience for the American people. If they buy into all that Tea party/Fox News bullshit, then they're going to be destroyed, just like they were hammered under Bush.
I'm done with them.
Evasporque
(2,133 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)But that is all it's good for...
center rising
(971 posts)and-justice-for-all
(14,765 posts)and I can attest to that. It did not take me long to find a job, two in fact, and one of which I turned done to do the distance I would have had to drive daily.
I thin the poll is bullshit, Robocorp has only one of thinking about the economy and that is how much of a return he can get off the backs of the middle class and the poor. A business mogul is not what we need in the White House, a rich white asshole is not the answer but is however the PROBLEM.