Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Frequent Ranter

(55 posts)
Mon Apr 10, 2017, 07:28 PM Apr 2017

Syria war: US missiles 'took out 20% of aircraft'

Source: BBC

3 hours ago

A US air strike in response to a suspected chemical attack damaged or destroyed 20% of Syria's operational aircraft, the US has said.

Defence Secretary James Mattis said Syria would be "ill-advised ever again to use chemical weapons".

Syria has denied a chemical attack on the rebel-held town of Khan Sheikhoun last week that left 89 people dead.

G7 nations are meeting in Italy to discuss policy and how to persuade Russia to abandon its Syrian ally.

Read more: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-39561102



Imagine: American military technology is so precise, we can "damage or destroy 20% of Syria's operational aircraft" without even taking out the runway(s) they were on!

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

The Velveteen Ocelot

(129,722 posts)
1. Supposedly they were in hangars or bunkers, not on the runways.
Mon Apr 10, 2017, 07:32 PM
Apr 2017

Airplanes don't sit parked on runways. But it was Kabuki theatre anyhow.

atreides1

(16,799 posts)
2. Wow
Mon Apr 10, 2017, 07:32 PM
Apr 2017

Considering the Syrians have more then one airbase, that's a pretty big claim by Mattis!!! Maybe, Mattis is doing alternative facts now?

 

Hulk

(6,699 posts)
4. Contrary to all evidence and all previous information...
Mon Apr 10, 2017, 07:40 PM
Apr 2017

Absolute bull shit. I had read that six aircraft under repair were destroyed, and the runways were INtact. I am also puzzled by the fact this administration claims 59 Tomahawk missiles were fired, and something like 35 targets were hit???? This makes zero fucking sense to my mind.

Can't believe ANY shit from this cabal of idiots.

hack89

(39,181 posts)
7. Critical or tough targets may have had multiple missiles aimed at them
Mon Apr 10, 2017, 08:14 PM
Apr 2017

It is not always one target = one missile

Historic NY

(39,794 posts)
12. Exactly there weren't enough aircraft on the ground..
Mon Apr 10, 2017, 10:09 PM
Apr 2017

and there were some still in intact revetments. The initial damage assessments said 6 aging MIGS.

Jim__

(15,133 posts)
5. Remember the question: If Trump claimed that North Korea launched a missile at Hawaii, ...
Mon Apr 10, 2017, 08:12 PM
Apr 2017

... would you believe him?

I wouldn’t.

That goes for his claims about Syria too.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Syria war: US missiles 't...